Trump Derangement Syndrome - Orange man bad. Read the OP! (ᴛʜɪs ᴛʜʀᴇᴀᴅ ɪs ʟɪᴋᴇ ᴋɪᴡɪ ғᴀʀᴍs ʀᴇᴠɪᴇᴡs ɴᴏᴡ) 🗿🗿🗿🗿

[It's HK-47]

Just before the FISA report drops, and after she’s seen her portion of the IG Report, Lisa Page herself surfaces to start trying to wage a PR battle. She's spent all of this time quietly crouching behind the curtains and just now pops up to start screaming about how innocent she is, huh?

Time's almost up.

 

[Jigglyjogglers]

Just before the FISA report drops, and after she’s seen her portion of the IG Report, Lisa Page herself surfaces to start trying to wage a PR battle. She's spent all of this time quietly crouching behind the curtains and just now pops up to start screaming about how innocent she is, huh?

Time's almost up.

This is such obvious "Get out in front of it" tactics that it's painful. To anyone even vaguely aware of how politics works this is a giant flashing neon sign that she's both guilty and fucked... they're just counting on it influencing everyone who isn't even vaguely aware of how politics works.

 

[Ghostse]

And she went to the most friendly territory she could for her interview.
The Daily Beast interviewing reeeesistance icon Lisa Page is the Daily Stormer interviewing Hitler.

 

[Thank Fuck For Evil Otto]

On a certain level, I believe Trump naturally appeals to minorities for a variety of reasons.

I still think a big part of it is simply because he's cool. Every single other candidate is uncool, most not even likable. Trump is a boss who doesn't fear or stumble, says what he thinks, and does it with a calm, playful demeanor. Compare to every other candidate, who are all like cookie cutter automatons. When anyone not under the yoke of social justice look at the candidates, how many do you think want to choose the dorky, nagging, stick-in-the-mud phonies that is all non-Trump politicians?

There is no other candidate who has the balls to even try to be a Trump, they are all cowed cowards dancing to the tune of their donors, and it shows in everything they do, as they move in lockstep mouthing identical talking points. Not that Trump isn't also beholden! They have tamed and caged him over the last 3 years, showing that you really cannot fight city hall even from the position of president, but still,

Whatever voodoo lies they had to dissuade voting for Trump in 2016 won't work this time around, not for many, as almost all of their talking points have been proven mendacious. I think this he's going to moonwalk into a landslide (barring the immense amount of the inevitable vote and election fraud). Can you imagine the debates? I look forward to the debates!

 

[Nigger Man]

Third poll in a week showing increased "non-white" support for Trump.

Once is an outlier. Twice is a coincidence. Three times is a trend. If this trend holds up, there's no way a Democrat can win in 2020. This is why they have no choice but to beat the drums of impeachment in order to get their base out, moderates and independents be damned.

Edit: I'm not sure what people are horrified about: Trump's growth among minorities or that we'll be subject to be tortured for months on end concerning "Muh Russia," "Muh Ukraine," "Muh Molvania," etc.?

The article's title is somewhat misleading. It says "Third National Poll Outlining 33/34 Percent Black and Minority Voter Support for President Trump…," but the NPR/PBS poll puts them all under a blanket "Non-White" support. Assuming we take these polls at face value - which we should not - it's not the bombshell the Republicans wants. It's still good news given that it's a higher percentage of minorities that are becoming an increasingly important demographic to attract voters, but hardly the kill switch to the DNC. For all we know, Hispanics and/or Asians might have reached around 40% while the black votes went in the single digits. That same poll also has 48% white disapprovals and 46% white approvals, which would be horrible for Trump if we assume these results are taken at face value.

As for the Rasmussen and Emerson polls, I assume these are the most direct sources possible. I could not find the primary source of the former so I assume the poll data is locked under a paywall. The latter I downloaded the full Excel file of but could not find any percentage of black approval rating, only overall approvals and disapproval Trump got. If I am looking in the wrong places, let me know.

Coming from someone who is cautiously optimistic about Trump's election and is becoming more receptive to the idea of him getting double digit increases of black votes, I wouldn't pop those champagne bottles until we see those increased turnouts in 2020. Even if lots of polls imply increased black and minority support, don't do anything more than take it with a grain of salt. We know what happened in 2016 when the Dems took Clinton's "inevitable" victory as hard science.

 

[MirrorNoir]

That's a really good point, when Biden first joined the race, I thought he was gonna dominate the primaries easily. Mainly due to the fact he's heavily tied to Barack Obama, who is highly received among the democratic party, as well as the fact he could easily garner the older and more moderate voters (read: the ones who vote) by standing to the right of the other lefty dumbfucks that had been holding rallies. In addition, with all the connections he undoubtedly has from being VP, I expected a strong campaign (in comparison to the others) that would end with Biden easily clinching the nomination, alongside another Sander's faction meltdown at the DNC.

With exception to the Sanders meltdown, all of those expectations have been vaporized. Biden's health is clearly declining to worrisome levels, yet, even with this Ukraine shit, his poll numbers are indicating he's still ahead in a good number of states. I can't imagine anything more demoralizing to the democratic party than their nominee stumbling and slurring through his DNC speech. The debates would only go worse for him, Trump has reached the position where he doesn't have to play by the rules and will no doubt capitalize on Biden's gaffes on live television. After which, the democratic party would be nothing but dead men walking towards election day.

I also just want to add one thought. This may be the head cold making me think crazy shit, but I've been pondering whether Bloomberg is joining the race deliberately to sabotage Biden's campaign to ensure the democratic nominee at least isn't dying on screen, or if he just simply thinks he can win. Probably the latter.

Problem with Biden (and ALL of the Democrats running) is that Biden refuses even tacit acknowledgement of where the Democrats went off the rails, ESPECIALLY with relations to the SJW death kult and promise to hang the SJW death kultists from a tree to signal the DNC is course correcting in a manner that they produce a body count to ensure people realize they mean business in fixing the shit that led to Trump. All Biden can say, is super fucking vageries about how he wants to Void Century the last couple of years under Trump like it was One Piece and pretend like it was 11-09-2016 the second he gets sworn in.

The other half are screeching that the DNC didn't do anything wrong save for not going 100% commie when they had a chance. Which is iron in a lot of ways, that a lot of jaded Democrat voters MIGHT have been OK with super high taxes on the rich, further health care reform that will fuck over more people than it helps, UBI, and other commie shit but due to the SJW anti-life death kult antics and the fact that most of this shit is aimed at buying the votes of illegals and minorities and other anti-life beings who want to destroy anyone white male working class/middle class? Will NEVER EVER EVER support it due to the fact that they would be the ones who suffer the most for these gimmies to be given to people not them.

 

[Dante Alighieri]

Assuming we take these polls at face value - which we should not - it's not the bombshell the Republicans wants. It's still good news given that it's a higher percentage of minorities that are becoming an increasingly important demographic to attract voters, but hardly the kill switch to the DNC.

They don't have to vote for Trump, they just have to not vote for a Democrat. Even single digit % less voting will see Trump winning.

 

[Nigger Man]

They don't have to vote for Trump, they just have to not vote for a Democrat. Even single digit % less voting will see Trump winning.

I think so too. I wouldn’t be shocked that after 2020, the Democrats stop specifically targeting blacks (reparations and a likely Abrams VP candidacy will likely be their last attempting at mobilizing the black votes) and throw them under the “diversity” label with other minorities that DNC candidates don’t really mention like Asians and Native Americans.

Though I should mention that single digit dropping in Democratic votes, while it would help Trump win in 2020, won’t be a killswitch for the DNC in future national elections. I have no doubt that after the ultimate disappointment that was Obama that the DNC are planning for blacks dropping out of political relevance by abstaining from voting. To prepare for this, they will prop up other minorities in their place to turn into iron clad voters - Hispanics being the best demographics.

What the DNC don’t want, and might not be preparing for, is to lose the black votes to the Republicans. Blacks have been iron clad Democratic supporters ever since 1968 and as early as 1936, leaned Democratic. Having a reliable, if declining, voting block is important because it allows the DNC to believe that Demographics Is Destiny will ensure a one-party supermajority future where they can do whatever they want.

If Trump gets even 20% of the black votes, it will shock the DNC so much that they may have to try to be the jobs party that he is now trying to carve out for the Republicans. There would be an immediate danger of losing an iron clad support group that would make safe Democratic states like Delaware and Virginia up for grabs and turn swing states like Ohio and North Carolina red. They will drop their socialist push if it means winning elections and not doing so would be the kill switch on a national level.

Super optimistic and yeah, we’re most likely seeing the blacks drop out of politics all together, but it’s a possibility worth considering. Especially when the Democrats might be losing their hold on black men, who unlike black women, voted in double digit amounts for Trump and only 80% for Clinton.

 

[Honest Coyote]

I think it depends also on who the Democrats nominate. Biden and Sanders will probably be able to motivate support (or at least not lose it anymore than they will everyone else by being corrupt, demented, sick geriatrics).

I don't see Warren rallying them. She's an unpleasant schoolmarm scold. She's that one elemtary school teacher all the kids hate. I don't think black people will want to deal with lifetime-channel white woman magic as a job's program.

Buttigeg is in an even worse position. He's a relative unknown, and being attacked for his record in South Bend on race. He stands a real risk of his reputation as an out of touch closet racist becoming his established image. Plus, he's got some pretty major gaffes: the South Carolina fumble with the Kenyan stock photo is gonna be a reoccurring problem for him. Then there's the rainbow elephant in the room: he's gay, and that plays extremely poorly among blacks. During the 2008 Proposition 8, black voters opposed gay marriage by a 40% margin, while almost everyone else was evenly divided. Everyone dances around this, because intersectionality demands it, but I doubt it's changed very much.

 

[Freddy Freaker]

I think it depends also on who the Democrats nominate. Biden and Sanders will probably be able to motivate support (or at least not lose it anymore than they will everyone else by being corrupt, demented, sick geriatrics).

I don't see Warren rallying them. She's an unpleasant schoolmarm scold. She's that one elemtary school teacher all the kids hate. I don't think black people will want to deal with lifetime-channel white woman magic as a job's program.

Buttigeg is in an even worse position. He's a relative unknown, and being attacked for his record in South Bend on race. He stands a real risk of his reputation as an out of touch closet racist becoming his established image. Plus, he's got some pretty major gaffes: the South Carolina fumble with the Kenyan stock photo is gonna be a reoccurring problem for him. Then there's the rainbow elephant in the room: he's gay, and that plays extremely poorly among blacks. During the 2008 Proposition 8, black voters opposed gay marriage by a 40% margin, while almost everyone else was evenly divided. Everyone dances around this, because intersectionality demands it, but I doubt it's changed very much.

>Buttigeg
>Closet racist
>Closet
Lol

 

[Overly Serious]

Even before impeachment took over the cycle, there were several stories that dissected the demographics and concluded that the Republican base was small, but motivated, while the Dem base was larger, but indifferent/demoralized,

This makes sense. The less motivated who receive their world view passively rather than pro-actively, will naturally incline towards whatever the mainstream media tells them. And the MSM is heavily controlled by the Dems as are the heads of various online giants like Twitter and Google.

I still think a big part of it is simply because he's cool. Every single other candidate is uncool, most not even likable. Trump is a boss who doesn't fear or stumble, says what he thinks, and does it with a calm, playful demeanor. Compare to every other candidate, who are all like cookie cutter automatons. When anyone not under the yoke of social justice look at the candidates, how many do you think want to choose the dorky, nagging, stick-in-the-mud phonies that is all non-Trump politicians?

I think there's one of those periodic resurgences of African American leaders. Which happens once every couple of generations before they're all locked up and their communities flooded with drugs again. This is a little long but a good watch. Very interesting to see the interactions between the two sides and even more so to see what sort of person is on both sides:

 

[It's HK-47]

Apparently the Director for Twitter's Trust & Safety department is massively afflicted with TDS.

 

[The Pink Panther]

View attachment 1033615

Apparently the Director for Twitter's Trust & Safety department is massively afflicted with TDS.

And coincidentally Jewish.


Not that it means anything......

 

[heyitsmike]

That's a really good point, when Biden first joined the race, I thought he was gonna dominate the primaries easily. Mainly due to the fact he's heavily tied to Barack Obama, who is highly received among the democratic party, as well as the fact he could easily garner the older and more moderate voters (read: the ones who vote) by standing to the right of the other lefty dumbfucks that had been holding rallies. In addition, with all the connections he undoubtedly has from being VP, I expected a strong campaign (in comparison to the others) that would end with Biden easily clinching the nomination, alongside another Sander's faction meltdown at the DNC.

With exception to the Sanders meltdown, all of those expectations have been vaporized. Biden's health is clearly declining to worrisome levels, yet, even with this Ukraine shit, his poll numbers are indicating he's still ahead in a good number of states. I can't imagine anything more demoralizing to the democratic party than their nominee stumbling and slurring through his DNC speech. The debates would only go worse for him, Trump has reached the position where he doesn't have to play by the rules and will no doubt capitalize on Biden's gaffes on live television. After which, the democratic party would be nothing but dead men walking towards election day.

I also just want to add one thought. This may be the head cold making me think crazy shit, but I've been pondering whether Bloomberg is joining the race deliberately to sabotage Biden's campaign to ensure the democratic nominee at least isn't dying on screen, or if he just simply thinks he can win. Probably the latter.

I think Biden's strength being mostly due to his association with Obama is somewhat overblown. Black folks generally vote Democrat due to habit, not ideology. Black Dems are not nearly as far to the left as white Dems. Transgenderism, homosexuality and carbon taxes on gasoline will not win support from black people.

His strength is mainly due to everyone else being too high on the extremism and too low on the electability. The conventional wisdom is that the only people supporting Biden are low information voters. I don't think they're considering that Biden's steady support is because people are paying attention. They see everyone else and are just so turned off by the rest of the field.

When you combine the fact that Biden is generally dominating in the national polls yet lagging just as badly in enthusiasm and fundraising, that screams to me that his support is as a compromise candidate, not wingman to Obama. They don't care that Biden has early onset dementia. They just need someone to sit in the chair so that the Dems can run the presidency by committee. They don't actually want him to do anything. "Here Joe, nominate this person to SCOTUS." "Look Joe, we're gonna pass this bill, sign it into law." I think that's all they want from Joe Bitin'.

This phenomenon has happened before in the Catholic Church too. Pope Saint John XXIII was basically elected to be a caretaker Pope. A non offensive, safe choice who would probably be dead in few years to preserve the status quo until they can figure out what to do next. Which he promptly blew up by calling Vatican II. Oops.

 

[Godzilla@1989]

View attachment 1033615

Apparently the Director for Twitter's Trust & Safety department is massively afflicted with TDS.

She looks like the type of girl that is begging to suck the cocks of her high school basketball team.

When you combine the fact that Biden is generally dominating in the national polls yet lagging just as badly in enthusiasm and fundraising, that screams to me that his support is as a compromise candidate, not wingman to Obama.

This supports my theory that the DNC are actively colluding with his campaign and making sure he gets the nomination.

 

[blax]

This is such obvious "Get out in front of it" tactics that it's painful. To anyone even vaguely aware of how politics works this is a giant flashing neon sign that she's both guilty and fucked... they're just counting on it influencing everyone who isn't even vaguely aware of how politics works.

Hey, cool it, guys. She's a survivor and we need to thank her.

 

[FierceBrosnan]

And coincidentally Jewish.


Not that it means anything......

Tangentally related, and this may have been brought up before, but where were all these Jewish leaders/bloggers/kvetchers/6Gorillianers back when the detainment centers on the border were actually opened? Or when the centers were full 100% of the time during the Obama administration? Like none of them said shit for a decade and then Orangeman™ gets elected and suddenly every facility is Auschwitz 2: The Legend of Hitler's Gold.

View attachment 1033615

Apparently the Director for Twitter's Trust & Safety department is massively afflicted with TDS.

Tweeting an open position like that feels unprofessional as fuck. Also that part about "excited for the opportunity for impact!" might as well just be an announcement that they do in fact work to control the general discourse of the site.

 

[The golden neckbeard]

I think trump wins easily because the democrat field is a joke.

2 socialists, a faggot whos last name has Butt in it and a dribbling old fool is favored.

Officially its to late for anyone else to get in. Ballots are starting to be printed

 

[Jigglyjogglers]

Apparently the Director for Twitter's Trust & Safety department is massively afflicted with TDS.

How strange, I was reliably informed that Twitter is a haven for the evil ol' alt-right. And yet prominent and central members of their staff are not only far left anti-Trumpers, but extremely outspoken about this? How odd.

 

[heyitsmike]

This supports my theory that the DNC are actively colluding with his campaign and making sure he gets the nomination.

I disagree. I think the support is genuine. The reason Trump's support is so steady is the reason Biden's is the same way: People look them. Then they look at everyone else. And then they say 'Umm yeah... I'll think I'll stick with him.'

There's this theory going around that Pelosi greenlit impeachment so it would force all the more extreme Senate candidates off the campaign trail. I think this is a super dumb take. Because that would have required Pelosi to know what McConnell would do.

If you remember, the talk went from 'Is McConnell even going to hold a trial?' to 'McConnell will hold a trial but immediately move to dismiss.' to 'Is McConnell going to drag this out for weeks?' So for Pelosi and the DNC to have planned this out, they would have had to know what Cocaine Mitch would do. And we still don't really know for sure.

So I'm gonna go with Occam's Razor: Pelosi was forced to act in order to placate the extremist wing of her party.