Something happened, apparently; I wrote & posted this almost a day ago, but it seems to have disappeared, so allow me to respond to those posts again...
This sentence is an example of dramatic irony. The comma is used in a completely wrong manner here. Instead of separating the clauses, being denied and him being better than the person who denied him, he uses one at the beginning of the sentence, a spot that makes little grammatical sense. This is dramatic irony because we are way more aware of TJ's mistakes and what is actually going on at the site than TJ is. TJ uses bad grammar and has a horrible writing style. This gets him denied, which in turn causes him to respond with more bad writing. Eventually he begins projecting the flaw everybody claims he has onto everyone else. This results in poorly written sentences that have their meanings obstructed by poor writing about how sentences are poorly written. If I were to suggest a book for TJ to read I would say Eats, Shoots, and Leaves.
1] TMA, we all admit your expertise in poor writing, which most of your posts prove if the proof is needed for anyone.
2] No need to even attempt writing over my head (which NGH did unsuccessfully). We all know that mine is lower than those of most members here due to actually having a brain & other things in it.
3] TMA, just because you are obsessed with me does not mean I am with you, so I have no desire to read your ex's Fifty Shades-like description of your relationship. (Lack of underlining or anything of the sort in your recommendation proves the first statement I made in this post.)
On to the actually-new (since my last post was written) things...
1] Ambrose, I don't know about you not because you have hidden the information, but because I don't want it. On the contrary, I would never have come here at all if people had not made & continued a thread on me. Secondly, I never said you could have negative friends; I believed what I meant when I wrote it was obvious, but that's because I assumed I was dealing with people who had reasonable levels of intelligence. (This also explains to you & all others why you think my grammar & the like are garbage, but you each find each other's posts "understandable".) Also, I have no problem dealing with the majority of people on Literotica & similar sites, just a few on each (which explains why they found themselves unable to discuss me negatively there anymore, & joined the low quantity of people with a low IQ who do so here). Also, I never "admitted to eating shit" through anything.
2] One more thing, TMA: No need for that many parentheses in a row (in what is obviously a run-on sentence, or perhaps several of them). It appears the [proper use of brackets is another thing you lack intelligence in.
3] Yog, I am not denying the size of my head. However, while we both agree my head is larger than some, it also has the brain & other things in it, a fact which is undeniable & needn't be discussed for any reason. If we wished to discuss the contents of other members' heads, we would in many cases find ourselves with literally nothing to talk about.
4] Rager, I never said in any way, shape, or form that my head was up my backside... Yet again, someone fails to understand my post, which will no doubt be followed by someone claiming that the mistake was made due to some trait/fault with me, & not the majority of members here (you all have the same thing, which is actually a lack of something else, so you needn't be ashamed to admit it).
5] Chug, my head looks the same way (much like the pic) a lot. What I denied was the hyphenated term you used to describe it.
6] Mr. X, that would make sense if it were the case. However, I've believed myself a high-quality writer for quite some time, & it is only more obvious when I read many of the writings posted here.
7] Again for Ambrose, I use commas correctly not always, but more often, than you correctly use most punctuation, most letters, & a high number of words. Also, I have never had a problem misunderstanding irony, such as the irony of you saying I proved you correct, which is itself an incorrect statement, therefore proving that doing what you claimed I did is a nigh-near-impossible thing.
. I just want you to know
