Star Wars Griefing Thread (SPOILERS) - Safety off

And the third would be basically calling Boyega a nigger, and this time she has no hype surrounding Plan 9 to cover this one up.

Considering that Boyega has done nothing but racebait for the last four years, she's not wrong. John boy has a huge chip on his shoulder about being born black and I'm sure that carries over to everything he does. Imagine working with a guy for five years who resents you because he hates himself. You'd be tired of his shit, too.
 
(I also really find Mass Effect's depiction of Sagittarius A* (the black hole at the galactic centre) to be utterly wrong. Firstly, black holes, let alone supermassive black holes, have huge gravitational lensing, and the energy emitted as Hawking radiation as matter falls into them certainly isn't in the visible spectrum but as gamma rays and X-rays. There's also the fact that in the galactic core, there's tons of stars all in very close proximity to each other, often less than a light year apart. It would therefore be pretty much a solid wall of off-white space speckled with dust clouds and a negative space wedgie bending light in all manner of directions. Also just by stepping out the Normandy onto the Collector base Shepard and crew have probably absorbed enough radiation to make them permanently infertile and probably cancer-riddled within five to ten years.)
If you're talking about the ending of ME2, that's one of the more accurate depictions of what a black hole would look like in pop fiction until Interstellar. For one thing, the black hole depicted isn't Sag A*, it's just a black hole on the edge of the galactic core -- that's stated in the codex, but an easy mistake to make due to dodgy wording. The light you see is radiation from the accretion disk, not Hawking radiation, and indeed that close it would be in the visible spectrum; accretion disks are just that damn energetic. The "halo" is the effect of gravitational lensing.

The thing is, the amount, size, and density of debris informs the player they're close to, but still beyond, the black hole's Roche limit. Effects of gravitational lensing (and time dilation) would out be minimal; the black hole may as well just be another star that far out. The laws of physics don't change (outside the event horizon) just because a celestial object happens to be a black hole.
 
Ten years ago to this day, while I moved on from the franchise after it should have ended in 2005, a fellow classmate wished Disney would take over the franchise.

This is why we can't have nice things.
Pretty much everyone wanted Disney to take over when it happened. Are people forgetting this already? While nowadays the sentiment seems to have shifted to "George, please come back", at the time it was perceived as taking the franchise away from its useless, incompetent creator and giving it to the benevolent megacorp that would make sure we wouldn't get anything like the prequels ever again.
 
Creative Bankruptcy
>your brain on lense flairs
Having the trilogy end at tatooine on the ranch is a cycle something, and star wars fans will eat it up. This is almost as good as my spiderman comic.

>your normal not damaged brain
Luke hated tatooine and had no connection to the place once his family died and friends left, leaving his shit there is closer to insult then honor.
 
But.... why?
Nostalgia faggotry.
"Member Tatooine?!"

As the leaks said before, the ending is Rey and friends going to what's left of the Lars homestead (which apparently is nothing but a fucking crater now unless they plan to add the dome later via CGI) where Rey buries Luke, Leia and Han's items (sabers and those flipping dice) and then she's approached by some old man who asks her who she is, she then responds that she's "Rey... Rey Skywalker". Then the film ends... She feels justified in saying this bullshit because she literally has a thousand generations living inside her now like some crappy Force Avatar because she absorbed the souls of all jedis, including Luke's, effectively becoming the jedi afterlife and the Force itself... She does this in the movie after Palpatine absorbs Kylo Ren's soul to turn himself younger and more powerful. So if absorbing just one guy makes younger, does that mean the bitch is freaking immortal?

Also while I wouldn't be surprised if they do add the Lars homestead in later as CGI, I have to wonder that if they do keep it removed, could it be an example of recreating something from the old film that's not an exact duplicate? Much like how a lot of things are a donut steal of pre-existing things or is slightly altered so as not to completely resemble something from before?

Regardless, the whole idea of burying Luke in a place he so deeply hated is nothing short of an insult. He desperately wanted to escape that planet all his life so now they have him back at square one, but dead. Then again, they've butchered Luke in every other way. Might as well do this.

Pretty much everyone wanted Disney to take over when it happened. Are people forgetting this already? While nowadays the sentiment seems to have shifted to "George, please come back", at the time it was perceived as taking the franchise away from its useless, incompetent creator and giving it to the benevolent megacorp that would make sure we wouldn't get anything like the prequels ever again.
Really? I certainly don't recall anyone (at least on my end) clamoring for Disney. Most were just hoping for an SW movie by a different director or another show like Genndy's rather than a different studio as far as I recall or simply talking about how horrible and inappropriate it was that Vader killed all those kids. Only time I recall anyone mentioning Disney was around the time of the pre-release of Treasure Planet, but that was only by a few peeps in real life, plus that shit bombed. And even back then, people made fun of Disney as being an evil two-faced megacorp.
 
Nostalgia faggotry.
"Member Tatooine?!"

As the leaks said before, the ending is Rey and friends going to what's left of the Lars homestead (which apparently is nothing but a fucking crater now unless they plan to add the dome later via CGI) where Rey buries Luke, Leia and Han's items (sabers and those flipping dice) and then she's approached by some old man who asks her who she is, she then responds that she's "Rey... Rey Skywalker". Then the film ends... She feels justified in saying this bullshit because she literally has a thousand generations living inside her now like some crappy Force Avatar because she absorbed the souls of all jedis, including Luke's, effectively becoming the jedi afterlife and the Force itself... She does this in the movie after Palpatine absorbs Kylo Ren's soul to turn himself younger and more powerful. So if absorbing just one guy makes younger, does that mean the bitch is freaking immortal?

Also while I wouldn't be surprised if they do add the Lars homestead in later as CGI, I have to wonder that if they do keep it removed, could it be an example of recreating something from the old film that's not an exact duplicate? Much like how a lot of things are a donut steal of pre-existing things or is slightly altered so as not to completely resemble something from before?

Regardless, the whole idea of burying Luke in a place he so deeply hated is nothing short of an insult. He desperately wanted to escape that planet all his life so now they have him back at square one, but dead. Then again, they've butchered Luke in every other way. Might as well do this.


Really? I certainly don't recall anyone (at least on my end) clamoring for Disney. Most were just hoping for an SW movie by a different director or another show like Genndy's rather than a different studio as far as I recall or simply talking about how horrible and inappropriate it was that Vader killed all those kids. Only time I recall anyone mentioning Disney was around the time of the pre-release of Treasure Planet, but that was only by a few peeps in real life, plus that shit bombed.
It would make more sense to bury them at the burned out jedi temple, or endor, or almost any other location in the franchise. Fuck it, hang them up above the mose eisley cantina, just for a cheap laugh.
 
>your brain on lense flairs
Wait hol' up a minute fam.

Lens flares, flashing and strobing lights, wildass disorienting camera angles and movements, rounded and elliptical set designs...that JJ/TLJ defenders are almost all members of the soy brigade...

What if all these JJ movies we've been watching have cunningly disguised sissy hypno vids the whole time?
 
Pretty much everyone wanted Disney to take over when it happened. Are people forgetting this already? While nowadays the sentiment seems to have shifted to "George, please come back", at the time it was perceived as taking the franchise away from its useless, incompetent creator and giving it to the benevolent megacorp that would make sure we wouldn't get anything like the prequels ever again.

It seemed like a decent roll of the dice at the time. Lucas had lost all his talent and the prequels were awful, so why not let someone else try if you just had to make more?

I wish they hadn't bothered. But I like The Mandalorian, so...
 
It would make more sense to bury them at the burned out jedi temple, or endor, or almost any other location in the franchise. Fuck it, hang them up above the mose eisley cantina, just for a cheap laugh.
Personally Luke's Jedi Temple would be my first choice, but he no longer has one in Disney canon... So Endor would honestly be the only other fitting choice. It was the site of their greatest victory, and under Disney canon it was the last and maybe only place these people ever knew any true fucking peace or happiness. Also its a pretty world full of all kinds of crazy, dangerous and wonderful shit.
 
Really? I certainly don't recall anyone (at least on my end) clamoring for Disney. Most were just hoping for an SW movie by a different director or another show like Genndy's rather than a different studio as far as I recall or simply talking about how horrible and inappropriate it was that Vader killed all those kids. Only time I recall anyone mentioning Disney was around the time of the pre-release of Treasure Planet, but that was only by a few peeps in real life, plus that shit bombed. And even back then, people made fun of Disney as being an evil two-faced megacorp.
People fucking hated Lucas at that time and Disney was seen as predictable but effective, what was exactly what most fans thought they wanted. Seriously, is the prequel hate getting memory holed? Hell, RLM even said JJ Abrahms would be a great choice for the next Star Wars movie.
 
Endor would honestly be more fitting. It was the site of their greatest victory, and under Disney canon it was the last and maybe only place these people ever knew any true fucking peace or happiness. Also its a pretty world full of all kinds of crazy, dangerous and wonderful shit.
No! Lukes remains remian in a shithole and you'll like it. It so we can go there in the next trilogy to collect a secret jedi medallion to open a secret jedi temple with a special scimitar lightsaber and the ghost of a temple guard that will teach rei's nephew how to make people poopoo themeselves with the force.

Hire me disney!
 
Seriously, is the prequel hate getting memory holed? Hell, RLM even said JJ Abrahms would be a great choice for the next Star Wars movie.
I didn't say anyone wanted Lucas or dismissed prequel hate. I'm saying I didn't see anyone clamoring for Disney back around the 2000s almost 20 years ago. Everywhere I looked, people just said they wanted anyone but Lucas to make an SW film, but nothing to suggest Disney specifically. They wanted films by Spielberg, Cameron or any other big name that wasn't Lucas. Personally I just thought more movies were a bad idea, and prequel hate back then mostly came from media outlets, like MAD TV and whatnot who would mostly talk about how racist George was. Disney wouldn't even be considered an option for SW until 2012 when the bidding started.
 
Last edited:
People fucking hated Lucas at that time and Disney was seen as predictable but effective, what was exactly what most fans thought they wanted. Seriously, is the prequel hate getting memory holed? Hell, RLM even said JJ Abrahms would be a great choice for the next Star Wars movie.
I remember back in 2012 about hearing no rumors about Lucas selling the company to Disney. All I remember is Kennedy joining in June and I assumed that he'd retire while Kennedy has the company become more of a licensing company for merchandise and games.

They wanted films by Spielberg, Cameron or any other big name that wasn't Lucas. Disney wouldn't even be considered an option for SW until 2012 when the bidding started.
I heard Spielberg and Ron Howard were asked by Lucas to direct Episode I back in '97.
 
Amusing; Ridley's getting shanked for trying to throw the black son of immigrants down the stairs. Even though Boyega sounds like a massive pain in the ass because of how hard he milks his ethnicity, it's always fun to watch cannibalism in action.
I hate to break it to everyone here, but I buy Black Series fairly often.
So that's why this thread had people instantly come in and say it's shit a couple pages ago. The Alkies in denial are angry that they're being called out on their gay plastic addiction.
Anyone getting mad and writing essays at some nerd coming into this thread and lukewarm praising one of the few Disney Star Wars products that rises to simple mediocrity instead of being an embarrassing disaster needs to get a grip. Doubly so if they jump headlong into characterizing that person as some soylent-chugging bugman stereotype that makes up this thread's mental image of the average Disney Star Wars fan. A lot of you take this shit ridiculously seriously and seem to think turboautists on edge spaces of the internet constitute some massive super-serious consumer movement as opposed to the normal reaction to a studio making disappointing movies.

If Episode IX fails and Lucasfilm has to restructure, it'll have more to do with Kennedy alienating the entire fanbase TFA attracted by letting her pet folk singer massively overreact to some rote criticism her boring self-insert received than anything posted ITT. It's just a series of movies, the last truly great one being made 40 years ago. If you're typing up a screed about how individuals buying whatever Star Wars products are "the person still giving money to the Rat, you are why Star Wars sucks now", get a fucking grip and act like a fucking adult. I'm sorry your favorite franchise is shitty now, enjoy the parts you liked, laugh at its future failures, and move the fuck on like an emotionally well-adjusted human.
Yeah... no. It's also a series of books, tabletop games, video games, cartoons and so on, and most of those were pretty good until the buyout... so less than a decade ago.
Kudos to whichever one of you did this.
There we go... now all can feel exogol as an actual word; right up there with schmeckledorf.
I guess to make it look more evil? I mean, JJ is really obsessed with making everything related to the Emperor red. Red clothes, red road, red troopers, death star destroyers with red stripes... Also its full of debris. This honestly doesn't feel like a hyperspace route at all, but it is. Its accessed after nu-3PO deciphers the sith dagger mcguffin.
It's probably because he either really liked the Imperial guard, or just seems to think red is evil... even though the Rebels' tracer color for their blasters were red and the Empire's green. But then JarJar only understands like half of how to make a good movie or film.
 
I've got the Good Trilogy on DVD, and I saw Rogue One because word of mouth was good, but I didn't like it. I might get Mandalorian on DVD if the buzz remains positive and it's released. I never signed up for some autistic boycott.
 
People fucking hated Lucas at that time and Disney was seen as predictable but effective, what was exactly what most fans thought they wanted. Seriously, is the prequel hate getting memory holed? Hell, RLM even said JJ Abrahms would be a great choice for the next Star Wars movie.

Look Disney PROTECTS IP like a Hawk. JJ is good at doing modern aesthetics in his direction. The pieces were all there
 
I didn't say anyone wanted Lucas or dismissed prequel hate. I'm saying I didn't see anyone clamoring for Disney back around the 2000s almost 20 years ago. Everywhere I looked, people just said they wanted anyone but Lucas to make an SW film, but nothing to suggest Disney specifically. They wanted films by Spielberg, Cameron or any other big name that wasn't Lucas. Personally I just thought more movies were a bad idea. Disney wouldn't even be considered an option for SW until 2012 when the bidding started.
Yeah it's something I misread into your post. It's just that it lately seems to me that the same people who were shitting on Lucas pre-Disney are now the same people who say that everything was so much better under him and I guess it just randomly boiled up just now.
 
...like some crappy Force Avatar because she absorbed the souls of all jedis, including Luke's, effectively becoming the jedi afterlife and the Force itself...
Honestly, if they'd taken a sideways glance at TCW they might have been able to work something not terrible out. Palpatine becomes a Sith Spectre and possesses a clone body of himself. He discovered the location of Mortis, and worked out some scheme to achieve apotheosis and become an avatar of the Dark Side, itself.

Rey, Kylo, and Luke's Force ghost confront him, and manage to stop him but at the cost of Rey's and Kylo's lives. Those three go on to become the next manifestation of the Father, Son, and Daughter, and therefore restore balance to the Force. The slate wiped completely clean -- Jedi, Sith, all of them -- the next generation of Force-sensitives are free to learn and grow, and form new Force-sensitive orders.
Really? I certainly don't recall anyone (at least on my end) clamoring for Disney.
There was quite a bit. By the time the rat ate Lucasfilm, enough PT BTS information had come out and the Plinkett reviews made it common knowledge among fans, the PT's big failing was no one had any sort of moderating influence on Lucas. ANH and ESB were so good because Lucas collaborated with a team of extremely talented filmmakers, and RotJ was the first sign of trouble when Lucas was given more creative control over his own film. The hopes were Disney would exercise some level of executive control and force him to collaborate.
 
Back