- Joined
- Dec 6, 2015
Somebody needs to reset the "# Days Without Gamergate mention" sign back to zero.
Does the counter have any other digits?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Somebody needs to reset the "# Days Without Gamergate mention" sign back to zero.
Does the counter have any other digits?
Somebody needs to reset the "# Days Without Gamergate mention" sign back to zero.
Oh, we also have a new "advisor," Danielle Citron. They did a speaking gig at MIT together, and some podcast.
Citron's plan is actually really smart when you think about it. I started a thread just now over in i&T. Quoting myself from that post, they indtend to: repeal and replace §230 with something that will require "reasonable moderation", left undefined. Allow hate speech to qualify. Go after sites that don't police hate speech with charges that would've been unthinkable under §230, so jail Watkins and Hotwheels after the mosque attack. Have no need to make a first amendment issue. This is diabolically brilliant and no doubt the end game of the current discussion as it, like all the other current year nonsense, is political.If John's supporters in tech weren't ignorant cucks, this would disturb them a lot. Of course, if they weren't ignorant cucks, why would they support John at all?
Aren't they troons and troon enablers who would love to find a nice juicy endround around the 1st Amendment as regards the hateful practice of misgendering (and saying other meanie things to protected classes?)I'm not claiming she's not smart. I'm wondering why John's supporters don't see her endgame and despise it.
Some of them identify as members of the tech community, rather than as troon enablers. A lot of them support the EFF, which has made its opinion of Citron's ideas very clear.Aren't they troons and troon enablers who would love to find a nice juicy endround around the 1st Amendment as regards the hateful practice of misgendering (and saying other meanie things to protected classes?)
OK. I'm no Wu expert so I'm going to defer. (But is voting for a troon troon-enabling?) Actually it's might not be that surprising. But still, making GamerGate, gay as that was, a political issue you'd think would turn off a lot of tech types, even people who might be inclined to vote for a liberal democrat, and I imagined it did. But my real experience in tech was 20 or so years ago. Feels like the EFF is the kind of organization that could have an old guard and a new guard, though, although they remain very strong on this issue and many other important ones. I'd hope that they don't go full on exceptional though.Some of them identify as members of the tech community, rather than as troon enablers. A lot of them support the EFF, which has made its opinion of Citron's ideas very clear.
To my astonishment, some of them do not seem to know John's a troon.OK. I'm no Wu expert so I'm going to defer. (But is voting for a troon troon-enabling?)
Face blindness, from autism? OTOH not everyone is playing cherchez-le-troon as Kiwis do.To my astonishment, some of them do not seem to know John's a troon.
To my astonishment, some of them do not seem to know John's a troon.
Some of these people are not obviously retards, though. It's very strange.Re,tards not knowing/acknowledging that John is a troon is frankly the least astonishing part about his asspatters. It is incredibly easy using non-Kiwi sources to find out that John has accomplished jack fucking shit in his pathetic life.
I think they ought to kick up a fuss, but I can no longer claim to understand them. It's completely astonishing to me how many of her supporters probably identify with the EFF's ostensible goals.your opinion @AprilRains how will the EFF crowd react to this, or rather, it's implications? are these people just mongs politically and meme up any candidate hypes up a tech background? do they not think of the implications?
I'm no Trump fan, but if you put up a kid as the face of a political movement and have her speak to the UN and world leaders, she is fair game for criticism. Otherwise, that would be the go to for any political movement: stick someone you can't criticize at the forefront to shut down debate. Some of it may be mean spirited, but this is real life, not an after school special. Her parents maybe should have considered that before they let her do this."jealous of her success" yes that must be it John, a billionaire celebrity and President of the United States has accomplished nothing in his life and is driven by pure malice and bitterness, unlike unemployed college dropout John W. Flynt.
View attachment 1047703
What in the absolute fuck.
View attachment 1047705