Lolcow Timothy "TJ" Church / Cowlick - Failed Literotica Writer &/or Null's Best Friend

Well, let's see...

1] TM, I am not proving you correct, as you rarely are. Whether what you write is correct or not, it is obvious (to most people) when they read it. Also, the people are indeed agreeing with you, but mainly hoping that doing so will cause you to never write what they claimed to be agreeing with again. lastly, I don't care how much my grammar or spelling worsens, as it will never be as bad as most of yours, & most members here write responses that make it obvious they fail to understand the things I write anyway, even on the occasions I write a post without a single mistake.

2] cosmos, I would never have left this thread on Page 1, as that is already enough that it was easy to find (which seems to go against the claims of some that making it longer would make it come earlier/easier in search results). Also, I'm aware publishing companies have blacklists, but like many companies that have such lists/practices, sometimes the quality or other traits (for instance, relevance to current events, such as in the case of Valerie Plame or Chris Kyle & related stories) cause them to change/ignore these practices. Keep the ID of this company a secret (if in fact the story/claim is even true), but tell your "friend" that while his employer's ID may be none of my business, in the future, I will quite-likely become part of theirs.
 
Well, let's see...

1] TM, I am not proving you correct, as you rarely are. Whether what you write is correct or not, it is obvious (to most people) when they read it. Also, the people are indeed agreeing with you, but mainly hoping that doing so will cause you to never write what they claimed to be agreeing with again. lastly, I don't care how much my grammar or spelling worsens, as it will never be as bad as most of yours, & most members here write responses that make it obvious they fail to understand the things I write anyway, even on the occasions I write a post without a single mistake.

2] cosmos, I would never have left this thread on Page 1, as that is already enough that it was easy to find (which seems to go against the claims of some that making it longer would make it come earlier/easier in search results). Also, I'm aware publishing companies have blacklists, but like many companies that have such lists/practices, sometimes the quality or other traits (for instance, relevance to current events, such as in the case of Valerie Plame or Chris Kyle & related stories) cause them to change/ignore these practices. Keep the ID of this company a secret (if in fact the story/claim is even true), but tell your "friend" that while his employer's ID may be none of my business, in the future, I will quite-likely become part of theirs.

Is there a rating for 'delusional', or should I make one?
 
1] TM, I am not proving you correct, as you rarely are. Whether what you write is correct or not, it is obvious (to most people) when they read it. Also, the people are indeed agreeing with you, but mainly hoping that doing so will cause you to never write what they claimed to be agreeing with again. lastly, I don't care how much my grammar or spelling worsens, as it will never be as bad as most of yours, & most members here write responses that make it obvious they fail to understand the things I write anyway, even on the occasions I write a post without a single mistake.
You've managed to achieve a level of cognitive dissonance that was previously thought impossible. Also my grammar and spelling is way above yours, and I'm still correct. I would say you haven't answered my question about you being retarded but this post is just giving me a resounding yes.
 
Well, let's see...

1] . lastly, I don't care how much my grammar or spelling worsens, as it will never be as bad as most of yours, & most members here write responses that make it obvious they fail to understand the things I write anyway, even on the occasions I write a post without a single mistake.
Any tips on writing erotica? Any suggestions or critiques on the story I so lovingly crafted for you and your crush?
 
Also, I'm aware publishing companies have blacklists, but like many companies that have such lists/practices, sometimes the quality or other traits (for instance, relevance to current events, such as in the case of Valerie Plame or Chris Kyle & related stories) cause them to change/ignore these practices. Keep the ID of this company a secret (if in fact the story/claim is even true), but tell your "friend" that while his employer's ID may be none of my business, in the future, I will quite-likely become part of theirs.
Mr. @Cowlick, you're probably one of their list's few white people.

As for blacklisting him, you might want to hold off on that. If some schizoid crackers in Massachusetts, America can score television air time for acting like schizoid bigots, TJ's at least got some of the irony factor working for him as well. Plus, everybody seems to have forgotten about the Twilight franchise.
 
sometimes the quality or other traits (for instance, relevance to current events, such as in the case of Valerie Plame or Chris Kyle & related stories) cause them to change/ignore these practices.
Quality or other traits of what? I'm sure you're talking about written material but you didn't clarify it as anything. You said it was a trait and when you refer to a trait you typically refer to what has the trait but there is no reference to this.
I will quite-likely become part of theirs.
Yeah, because publishing companies totally want to publish the bland wish fulfillment novels of a delusional 30 year old who's most recent accomplishment is winning a 3rd grade spelling bee, has never had a job, has never gotten a college degree and spent the last few years writing low quality porn. Also your average rating on one of those writing sites was 1.8/5. I think peoples opinions on it judges the quality of it, and from this it's easy to see why I call it low quality. You'll never be a professional writer.

Do you realize how delusional you are or are you just that dense?\

Also, the people are indeed agreeing with you, but mainly hoping that doing so will cause you to never write what they claimed to be agreeing with again.
You know a disagree and dumb rating exists on this site right? Also people then will independently say this stuff as well. You can say nobody agrees with me all you want but, like your writing in general, it makes you look retarded. Also to clarify this, I'm not the one with over 2000 dumb ratings and a negative rating made with their mouth.
 
Last edited:
In case there were any questions or doubts,...

1] Satan: I would, had Null (who claims on each of my posts I am his personal hero &/or best friend) disabled my ability to post in any other threads or on anyone's profile.

2] Ambrose
: I have not achieved a "a level of cognitive dissonance that was previously thought impossible", as the level of 0 is always possible in anything (such as the intelligence of you and many other members). Also, your spelling and grammar are not equal to mine, let alone superior. Add to that the fact I don't know what you might be referring to that you are "still correct" on, but we'll assume it's true since the grammar and spelling rules have not changed for anything you were correct on previously, not to mention the fact there are so few of those occasions (contrary to what you & many other members seem to believe).

2] Also, let's add that you seem to post multiple times things aimed toward me and also in response to my posts. This makes me wish to repeat that I believe you might be some level of obsessed with me, hoping people see more posts by you & assume "more = better", or that you are simply thinking more posts (&/or more things written total) gives you a better chance at having at least one thing stated correct(ly).

3] IceCreamMan: You may have it, but you have it incorrect. I admit some of my posts, but not most (let alone all) contain mistakes. Even so, that is yet another thing which makes me superior to many members here, who include (at least) one mistake in the majority of their posts and refuse to admit them ever, while simultaneously posting corrections to what they claim are mistakes in my posts, not all of which are even incorrect.

4] Hipstrs: I will not send any bomb threats anywhere. However, without knowing the company's name, I cannot help it if they become a company who receive a copy of some of my non-erotic writings (whether fiction or nonfiction), which will quite possibly lead to the company (but not cosmos' friend specifically, who probably works in the custodial realm or the mail-room) publishing it, then sending me money and a request for more of my works.
 
3] IceCreamMan: You may have it, but you have it incorrect. I admit some of my posts, but not most (let alone all) contain mistakes. Even so, that is yet another thing which makes me superior to many members here, who include (at least) one mistake in the majority of their posts and refuse to admit them ever, while simultaneously posting corrections to what they claim are mistakes in my posts, not all of which are even incorrect.
5L9FXjK.png
 
2] Ambrose: I have not achieved a "a level of cognitive dissonance that was previously thought impossible", as the level of 0 is always possible in anything (such as the intelligence of you and many other members)
Everyone experiences cognitive dissonance.
Also, your spelling and grammar are not equal to mine, let alone superior.
It is.
Add to that the fact I don't know what you might be referring to that you are "still correc
Ahh, let me clear that up. I am correct about being able to predict your responses.

Also small note. If you know anything about the how language changes over time (something I have to know due to being a performer who is known for dialect usage) you'd know that grammar does in fact change over time. I'd suggest you'd read a book by Steven Pinker, a Harvard professor, but as with most things it'd just fly way over your head. If care to read the book, provided your hubris lets you, the title is The Language Instinct. It's a pretty good read. Grammar typically depends on the vernacular of the group. So for example, when you corrected Null the other day. Null was actually fine in how he wrote it because of the setting. Because the atmosphere is relaxed the vernacular here is relatively different in that it allows shortening of words. Since we've established that you don't understand colloquial language this will fly right over your head.
] Also, let's add that you seem to post multiple times things aimed toward me and also in response to my posts.
I can only respond to so much stupidity at once. I normally break your post up into several sections so I have laughing breaks. I'm laughing at you by the way.
This makes me wish to repeat that I believe you might be some level of obsessed with me,
See above. Also last time I checked you stalked me over to Marjan's thread, not the other way around.

(who claims on each of my posts I am his personal hero &/or best friend)
He actually claims it on your banner, not the post itself.

Fun fact you used the word superior twice in this post. I have a rule that seems to reign true in most situations. If a person has to remind people how superior they are then the person is usually inferior.
You're inferior.

Also TJ I've directly pointed out your mistakes and your immediately started bitching. You don't recognize your mistakes. So you're inferior. While I make the occasional grammatical error (which you have failed to point out) I really don't care about it. We make fun of you for it because your responses make us laugh. Also you're wrong about commas, something you don't know how to use. Many people have told you this, a few of whom are actually published writers who have been paid for their writings. (I don't include myself in this because, while I was a lab tech and did contribute to the published paper I wasn't responsible for editing, writing, or many other things besides analysis of results.) You double numbered this post as well.
 
Last edited:
Let me reiterate. Your superior intellect means nothing here. This is our domain, not yours.

If we want this thread to keep going, we will keep it going.

No amount of telling us to remove the thread will make it so.

And even if you or someone else manages to get this thread deleted people will still talk about you on another part of the internet. What will you do then?
 
Back