- Joined
- Feb 3, 2013
@Cowlick is this true?At one point he directly stated that he was not TJ Church and that he just knew him.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
@Cowlick is this true?At one point he directly stated that he was not TJ Church and that he just knew him.
Well, let's see...
1] TM, I am not proving you correct, as you rarely are. Whether what you write is correct or not, it is obvious (to most people) when they read it. Also, the people are indeed agreeing with you, but mainly hoping that doing so will cause you to never write what they claimed to be agreeing with again. lastly, I don't care how much my grammar or spelling worsens, as it will never be as bad as most of yours, & most members here write responses that make it obvious they fail to understand the things I write anyway, even on the occasions I write a post without a single mistake.
2] cosmos, I would never have left this thread on Page 1, as that is already enough that it was easy to find (which seems to go against the claims of some that making it longer would make it come earlier/easier in search results). Also, I'm aware publishing companies have blacklists, but like many companies that have such lists/practices, sometimes the quality or other traits (for instance, relevance to current events, such as in the case of Valerie Plame or Chris Kyle & related stories) cause them to change/ignore these practices. Keep the ID of this company a secret (if in fact the story/claim is even true), but tell your "friend" that while his employer's ID may be none of my business, in the future, I will quite-likely become part of theirs.
Is there a rating for 'delusional', or should I make one?
You've managed to achieve a level of cognitive dissonance that was previously thought impossible. Also my grammar and spelling is way above yours, and I'm still correct. I would say you haven't answered my question about you being retarded but this post is just giving me a resounding yes.1] TM, I am not proving you correct, as you rarely are. Whether what you write is correct or not, it is obvious (to most people) when they read it. Also, the people are indeed agreeing with you, but mainly hoping that doing so will cause you to never write what they claimed to be agreeing with again. lastly, I don't care how much my grammar or spelling worsens, as it will never be as bad as most of yours, & most members here write responses that make it obvious they fail to understand the things I write anyway, even on the occasions I write a post without a single mistake.
So you admit that most of your posts have mistakes, got it.even on the occasions I write a post without a single mistake
Any tips on writing erotica? Any suggestions or critiques on the story I so lovingly crafted for you and your crush?Well, let's see...
1] . lastly, I don't care how much my grammar or spelling worsens, as it will never be as bad as most of yours, & most members here write responses that make it obvious they fail to understand the things I write anyway, even on the occasions I write a post without a single mistake.
Mr. @Cowlick, you're probably one of their list's few white people.Also, I'm aware publishing companies have blacklists, but like many companies that have such lists/practices, sometimes the quality or other traits (for instance, relevance to current events, such as in the case of Valerie Plame or Chris Kyle & related stories) cause them to change/ignore these practices. Keep the ID of this company a secret (if in fact the story/claim is even true), but tell your "friend" that while his employer's ID may be none of my business, in the future, I will quite-likely become part of theirs.
Keep the ID of this company a secret (if in fact the story/claim is even true), but tell your "friend" that while his employer's ID may be none of my business, in the future, I will quite-likely become part of theirs.
Is there a rating for 'delusional', or should I make one?
Quality or other traits of what? I'm sure you're talking about written material but you didn't clarify it as anything. You said it was a trait and when you refer to a trait you typically refer to what has the trait but there is no reference to this.sometimes the quality or other traits (for instance, relevance to current events, such as in the case of Valerie Plame or Chris Kyle & related stories) cause them to change/ignore these practices.
Yeah, because publishing companies totally want to publish the bland wish fulfillment novels of a delusional 30 year old who's most recent accomplishment is winning a 3rd grade spelling bee, has never had a job, has never gotten a college degree and spent the last few years writing low quality porn. Also your average rating on one of those writing sites was 1.8/5. I think peoples opinions on it judges the quality of it, and from this it's easy to see why I call it low quality. You'll never be a professional writer.I will quite-likely become part of theirs.
You know a disagree and dumb rating exists on this site right? Also people then will independently say this stuff as well. You can say nobody agrees with me all you want but, like your writing in general, it makes you look retarded. Also to clarify this, I'm not the one with over 2000 dumb ratings and a negative rating made with their mouth.Also, the people are indeed agreeing with you, but mainly hoping that doing so will cause you to never write what they claimed to be agreeing with again.
3] IceCreamMan: You may have it, but you have it incorrect. I admit some of my posts, but not most (let alone all) contain mistakes. Even so, that is yet another thing which makes me superior to many members here, who include (at least) one mistake in the majority of their posts and refuse to admit them ever, while simultaneously posting corrections to what they claim are mistakes in my posts, not all of which are even incorrect.
Everyone experiences cognitive dissonance.2] Ambrose: I have not achieved a "a level of cognitive dissonance that was previously thought impossible", as the level of 0 is always possible in anything (such as the intelligence of you and many other members)
It is.Also, your spelling and grammar are not equal to mine, let alone superior.
Ahh, let me clear that up. I am correct about being able to predict your responses.Add to that the fact I don't know what you might be referring to that you are "still correc
I can only respond to so much stupidity at once. I normally break your post up into several sections so I have laughing breaks. I'm laughing at you by the way.] Also, let's add that you seem to post multiple times things aimed toward me and also in response to my posts.
See above. Also last time I checked you stalked me over to Marjan's thread, not the other way around.This makes me wish to repeat that I believe you might be some level of obsessed with me,
He actually claims it on your banner, not the post itself.(who claims on each of my posts I am his personal hero &/or best friend)
1] Satan: I would, had Null (who claims on each of my posts I am his personal hero &/or best friend) disabled my ability to post in any other threads or on anyone's profile.
In case there were any questions or doubts,...
1] Satan:...
2] Ambrose:...
2]...
3] IceCreamMan:...
4] Hipstrs:...
assume "more = better"