FATTESTCUNT
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Oct 18, 2019
Kinda interesting that the article claims that false assertions were made about Kotaku being unethical in its coverage of Depression Quest, when they changed their ethics policy in response to the criticism they were getting: -
We agree on the need to ensure that, on the occasion where there is a personal connection between a writer and a developer, it's mentioned. We've also agreed that funding any developers through services such as Patreon introduce needless potential conflicts of interest and are therefore nixing any such contributions by our writers. Some may disagree that Patreons are a conflict. That's a debate for journalism critics. (Update: After some discussion, as noted here, we will make a minor exception and permit a writer paying into a Patreon or any other crowd-funding service in the extremely unlikely scenario when it is the only way to access a game we're interested in for coverage. Since most developers usually provide press at least some access to their games for free, this is largely a hypothetical situation but one that ensures we don't miss covering a game because of an overly restrictive policy.)
