Some are ranting about who is or isn't ISWV.
But I don't think there is a clear definition of what being ISWV means to begin with.
Is ISWV the people who use the tag on twitter? Is ISWV the people who donated to the GFM?
Does wanting Vic to get justice makes you ISWV? Does simply thinking Vis is innocent makes you ISWV?
Before arguing who is or isn't ISWV, you need to first check that you have the same definition of the group.
The same goes for KV by the way, for some it's only the funiclique, for others it's the whole following.
If I go by the mere definition of the acronym, i.e. "standing with Vic", then the farms are currently very ISWV.
Granted that's because he seems to be the victim so far, but who ever said ISWV implies anything else?
I see ISWV as the twitter group. I would say that kiwifarms(at least the weebwar sector) is very pro vic, with some light anti vic once in awhile and most not giving a shit. There is a few groups I look at here.
Funiclique( sabat, monica, jamie, apple boy, etc)
Lawtwitter( Tgreg, dunford, etc)
Istandwithvic (Grug, TUG, SenPai, yellowflash, etc)
Kickvic(manjaw, dom, shane, etc)
Farms(obvious)
Party Lawyers(Ty, Lemonfuck, etc)
Then of course you have people who might fall into 2 or more categories or who may be aligning themselves simply for not liking someone else. If I am not mistaken, John Michael Kelly is more or less anti Nick than he is anti Vic, and nick could in theory be lawtwitter and ISWV(though i will always consider him an honorary farmer personally). You might also have the chaos seekers or crisis actors(I dont actually believe blue orca is kickvic, even if she would claim otherwise).
The whole thing is complicating to explain, imma probably get autistic ratings now as this is very fucking autistic, but hopefully this explains it well enough. You can support vic without being ISWV since that has become more of a group over the year this has been going on rather than a concept. Not to mention there are plenty of ISWV that hate the farms.