Trump Derangement Syndrome - Orange man bad. Read the OP! (ᴛʜɪs ᴛʜʀᴇᴀᴅ ɪs ʟɪᴋᴇ ᴋɪᴡɪ ғᴀʀᴍs ʀᴇᴠɪᴇᴡs ɴᴏᴡ) 🗿🗿🗿🗿

Hey guys, new poster here, though I've been lurking for quite some time now. I figured I might as well try to contribute since you guys have provided me with such ample entertainment over the years, so I browsed Twitter's #impeachmentrally hashtag and found this... thing:
deport.png

"Deport Trump to Hell"? Sounds like a veiled threat to me. But then again, these people never seem to learn that making threats against federal agents is a bad thing.
 
It's been a few months since I asked; but has anything come out of the seemingly pointless continued "investigations" over Russia, and this more recent impeachment shit? It just feels like the same stuff is repeating itself.

I think they did pretty much confirm that Trump likely wanted Ukraine to help out with investigating corruption in the country that may have involved the Bidens. Even Giuliani's actions are virtually confirmation that's true, though there's also no crime to any of that and Biden plus the Democrats are just as guilty of pressuring Ukraine to do their bidding for political reasons.

So for Democrats, who don't really pay attention to the allegations against their side, it looks horrific and like all their worst fears of Trump have been realized while it also acts as vindication for the Republicans that nothing out of the ordinary happened or at least no crime can be indicated by anyone.

All the while Giuliani is coming out with stories of how even that Ambassador Yovonovitch had been impeding investigations of Biden. It's difficult to tell how accurate much of the story is since left wing media will denounce as a conspiracy theory while most of right wing media doesn't do investigations of anything as it's easier to be about think pieces of of left wing media is talking about.

 
First half of this podcast is Ramesh and Jonah agreeing on how Trump is guilty, it's just a question of what his punishment should be.

I cannot figure out how even the conservatives today find it an abuse of power for Trump to investigate one of his political opponents when they are suspected of doing something wrong - but it wasn't an abuse of power when the same was done to Trump in the previous election.

They really do act like battered housewives.
 
EMDf4ymUwAEdL8z.jpg


You know, when Lisa Page didn't talk, there was at least an air of mystery and a benefit of the doubt. Now that she's stepped out in front of the cameras, the illusion is sort of ruined. She's every bit as fucking weird as Strzok turned out to be, she sounds like an irate 15 year-old who's just barely keeping the anger under the mask, and she makes this face at least once every 60 seconds as if she has this compulsive need to impersonate Elvis.

I can see now why Trump liked to refer to her as the "lovely" Lisa Page.
 
Man they're really just pretending Clinton didn't get articles of impeachment passed in the House but rejected by the Senate, huh? They've spent all the years since saying "It doesn't count, stooooopid Rethuglinazis!", but now that sort of thing apparently Super Duper Counts and needs to go in every history book ever. (How lucky that leftists own the textbook companies, hm?)

Also I guess that means Bill Clinton was a dictator. Huh, not looking too good for Hillary, staying married to and supporting a rapist dictator isn't great optics.
 
Still waiting to be executed by anti-gay death squads like the Queer club told me back then.

Election Night 2016: Any moment now!
Now: After he steals the next election!
Election Night 2020: Any moment now!
2024: Trump's presidency will embolden someone who will!
2028: Any moment now!
2032: *hopefully some monkey virus killed us all and they finally shut the fuck up*


I think I see what the purpose of this is now. They're giving themselves an excuse for losing in 2020. The only way the Dems running dick first into a fan makes any sense.
 
Razor makes a interesting point here.


Given the UK elections, I'm actually starting to imagine had Bernie been the nominee in 2016, he would've been BTFO by Trump in the same manner Corbyn had.
 
Razor makes a interesting point here.


Given the UK elections, I'm actually starting to imagine had Bernie been the nominee in 2016, he would've been BTFO by Trump in the same manner Corbyn had.
Bernie at least would have bothered to campaign in the Rust Belt states.
 
So if/when the democratically-elected Senate holds its fair trial and finds the president not guilty of the crimes he has been accused of*, then we will be living in a dictatorship?

Also, this post implies that he will suddenly go mega-dictator, like this is when the purges and disappearing of political enemies are going to start, ONLY after the Senate refuses to remove from office!

*The crime of not giving a Soros/Kraut proxy state billion-dollar gibs packages without stipulations, and the crime of not obliging Schiff's powerless, joke subpoenas
 
I sadly agree. If civil war and authoritarianism are inevitable, it is much better that it be under the right's terms than the left's. Because the worst the right can manage is a banana republic, while the left is never satisfied by the number of sacrifices made on the road to utopia. Even socialists like George Orwell realized this horrible fatal flaw in the ideology. They'll force you to smile as you wait for your turn in the gas chamber, because isn't it an honor to be the grease for the wheel of progress!
The left doesn't believe in guns, so I have a hard time understanding why they want a civil war so badly.

It would not end well for them.

View attachment 1056756

You know, when Lisa Page didn't talk, there was at least an air of mystery and a benefit of the doubt. Now that she's stepped out in front of the cameras, the illusion is sort of ruined. She's every bit as fucking weird as Strzok turned out to be, she sounds like an irate 15 year-old who's just barely keeping the anger under the mask, and she makes this face at least once every 60 seconds as if she has this compulsive need to impersonate Elvis.

I can see now why Trump liked to refer to her as the "lovely" Lisa Page.
I didn't watch it. Was it really that bad? Worse than Comey's interview? Or worse than Hunter Biden's interview? Or worse than Prince Andrew's interview? Or maybe worse than Harvey Weinstein's interview?

His rally a couple weeks ago when he went off on her and Strzok was epic. Funniest President ever.
 
I didn't watch it. Was it really that bad? Worse than Comey's interview? Or worse than Hunter Biden's interview? Or worse than Prince Andrew's interview? Or maybe worse than Harvey Weinstein's interview?
It's only a few minutes long and it's particularly boring compared to the likes of Strzok's interview, but like with Strzok, I always just assumed that there was some air of intelligence and normalcy about them, but every time that one of these people finally steps out in front of a camera they're invariably proven to be a self-important weirdo who's only vaguely capable of expressing normal, human emotion.

She's not nearly on the level of sociopathy that Strzok expressed in his hearing, but she very clearly has the mind of a petty, fifteen year-old idiot and she has the same strange, facial 'tics' that Strzok had.
 
Back