Megathread Tranny Sideshows on Social Media - Any small-time spectacle on Reddit, Tumblr, Twitter, Dating Sites, and other social media.

Note how they are often claim that even tho their are numb, multilated and/or suffer from other srs problems they are glad their healthy dick & balls are gone. Cool story bro. They are clearly lying to themselves or say it because regretting srs is a huge no no in looney troonland
Yeah, I'm not buying the "I'll never have an orgasm again but it was totally worth it to cut my genitals off". No sane adult would ever choose that. I can see trans kids who have no idea what they are giving up, but for most people a healthy sex life is a pretty important thing. Sure, you can be happy without it if there were a tragic accident or illness, but to willingly choose to give it up to indulge a fantasy of changing your sex? Nope. This guy will probably end up in the 41%.
 
J.K.ROWLING!
xmhl48qbe4641.jpg

There is no better way to PWN an author whose opinions you disagree with when it comes to trans issues than writing an erotic fanfiction story featuring made up trans characters engaging in degenerate sexual acts.

The post on r/itsafetish censored the name but it was pretty easy to find the story in question.
ölääölöä.png

The author actually isn't a troon, she's just one of those people who doesn't think being LGB is enough so she calls herself queer.
läöläö.png
 
"I'm definitely tighter than most cis girls."


Troon narcissism strikes again. It is not possible for troons to be tighter than women. They do not have actual functioning vaginal walls nor have the ability to perform actual vaginal Kegels. If he feels "tight," which won't last for long, it's because that is how the surgeon sculpted his frankenpuss.
 
"I'm definitely tighter than most cis girls."


Troon narcissism strikes again. It is not possible for troons to be tighter than women. They do not have actual functioning vaginal walls nor have the ability to perform actual vaginal Kegels. If he feels "tight," which won't last for long, it's because that is how the surgeon sculpted his frankenpuss.

Can only get so tight before it closes up!

Edit: Why. Why do these people exist. How does having hair IN YOUR VAGINA not matter. How are you not repulsed by yourself. What the fuck.

20191223_111023.jpg
 
Last edited:
The reason his rot pocket is "tighter than a cis girls" is because the amount of scar tissue with little to no dexterity, as well as the fact his taint muscles do not and can not expand like a vagina. Some vaginas are naturally tight, but they relax and expand when aroused.
That's nothing to brag about. He's literally just saying it doesn't even work like a real vagina. Gg
 
Can only get so tight before it closes up!

Edit: Why. Why do these people exist. How does having hair IN YOUR VAGINA not matter. How are you not repulsed by yourself. What the fuck.

View attachment 1064692
Lmao, did he not get his nuts lasered before getting the surgery? Now he's doomed to be one of those trannies who have vaginas that occasionally cough up gooey hairballs.

I like to imagine he's one of those troons who won't tell their partners about being trans and one day some poor guy will get a surprise hairball on his dick as he pulls out.
 
Their expectations vs reality is telling. Either their surgeons aren’t giving them correct info or they are and it’s just not registering. When you cut into the body you sever nerve fibres. How many depends on what you’re doing. With skill, it is possible to avoid an amount of damage and damage depends on where you are and what you’re doing , but almost any surgery is going to result in scar tissue, severed or crushed nerve fibres etc.
The absolute state of every SRS I’ve seen on here leads me to believe that this is not delicate skilled work to start with. The actual procedures themselves are so brutal and result in so much tissue damage that I just can’t see how much sensation would remain at all. Again it’s this weird plug and play view of anatomy where you just pull one bit off and bolt another bit on and it all works once you’ve done the software upgrade.
I would be very interested to see what kind of information people are given beforehand. What’s the US situation with elective surgery and proper informed consent? Here you have to give a run down of what they can reasonably expect, risks, blah blah. Are they being given an overly optimistic view or are they just ignoring the list of side effects?
 
Their expectations vs reality is telling. Either their surgeons aren’t giving them correct info or they are and it’s just not registering. When you cut into the body you sever nerve fibres. How many depends on what you’re doing. With skill, it is possible to avoid an amount of damage and damage depends on where you are and what you’re doing , but almost any surgery is going to result in scar tissue, severed or crushed nerve fibres etc.
The absolute state of every SRS I’ve seen on here leads me to believe that this is not delicate skilled work to start with. The actual procedures themselves are so brutal and result in so much tissue damage that I just can’t see how much sensation would remain at all. Again it’s this weird plug and play view of anatomy where you just pull one bit off and bolt another bit on and it all works once you’ve done the software upgrade.
I would be very interested to see what kind of information people are given beforehand. What’s the US situation with elective surgery and proper informed consent? Here you have to give a run down of what they can reasonably expect, risks, blah blah. Are they being given an overly optimistic view or are they just ignoring the list of side effects?
I'm sure that the doctors tell them about the associated risks, especially in first worlds. Troons are just dumb enough to believe the hype. You would have to be OPL levels stupid to actually believe doctors can magically turn your dick into a vagina with no complications.
 
Lmao, did he not get his nuts lasered before getting the surgery? Now he's doomed to be one of those trannies who have vaginas that occasionally cough up gooey hairballs.

I like to imagine he's one of those troons who won't tell their partners about being trans and one day some poor guy will get a surprise hairball on his dick as he pulls out.
In the bad old gatekeeping days tranners were told "hey you have to have pubic electrolysis done so this exact thing doesn't happen"

mr thai doctor, however says "ohhh rich american I remove penis is tight vagina not freakshow no just shave I kill hair follicles during surgery"

Their expectations vs reality is telling. Either their surgeons aren’t giving them correct info or they are and it’s just not registering. When you cut into the body you sever nerve fibres. How many depends on what you’re doing. With skill, it is possible to avoid an amount of damage and damage depends on where you are and what you’re doing , but almost any surgery is going to result in scar tissue, severed or crushed nerve fibres etc.
The absolute state of every SRS I’ve seen on here leads me to believe that this is not delicate skilled work to start with. The actual procedures themselves are so brutal and result in so much tissue damage that I just can’t see how much sensation would remain at all. Again it’s this weird plug and play view of anatomy where you just pull one bit off and bolt another bit on and it all works once you’ve done the software upgrade.
I would be very interested to see what kind of information people are given beforehand. What’s the US situation with elective surgery and proper informed consent? Here you have to give a run down of what they can reasonably expect, risks, blah blah. Are they being given an overly optimistic view or are they just ignoring the list of side effects?
Apparently SRS surgeries got very advanced after WW2 when surgeons had to learn how to sew up sensitive bits while trying to keep sensitivity. I've only seen evidence that this actually did anything re f2m procedures, and I literally do not know if they were doing skintubes then or not; I presume the surgeries had to do with mastectomies and possibly cliterodectomies.
 
So I was bored out of my mind and looking up random shit, and I eventually stumbled across this historical pseudo-scientific theory called Lysenkoism.
Lysenkoism (Russian: Лысе́нковщина, tr. Lysenkovshchina) was a political campaign conducted by Trofim Lysenko, his followers and Soviet authorities against genetics and science-based agriculture. Lysenko served as the director of the Soviet Union's Lenin All-Union Academy of Agricultural Sciences. Lysenkoism began in the late 1920s and formally ended in 1964.

The pseudo-scientific ideas of Lysenkoism assumed the heritability of acquired characteristics (Lamarckism).[1] Lysenko's theory rejected Mendelian inheritance and the concept of the "gene"; it departed from Darwinian evolutionary theory by rejecting natural selection.[2] Proponents falsely claimed to have discovered, among many other things, that rye could transform into wheat and wheat into barley, that weeds could spontaneously transmute into food grains, and that "natural cooperation" was observed in nature as opposed to "natural selection".[2] Lysenkoism promised extraordinary advances in breeding and in agriculture that never came about.

Joseph Stalin supported the campaign. More than 3,000 mainstream biologists were fired or even sent to prison,[3] and numerous scientists were executed as part of a campaign instigated by Lysenko to suppress his scientific opponents.[4][5][6][7] The president of the Agriculture Academy, Nikolai Vavilov, was sent to prison and died there, while Soviet genetics research was effectively destroyed until the death of Stalin in 1953.[2] Research and teaching in the fields of neurophysiology, cell biology, and many other biological disciplines was also negatively affected or banned.[8]

Mendelian genetics, the science of heredity, developed into an experimentally-based field of biology at the start of the 20th century through the work of August Weismann, Thomas Hunt Morgan, and others, building on the rediscovered work of Gregor Mendel. They showed that the characteristics of an organism were carried by inherited genes, which were located on chromosomes in each cell's nucleus. These could be affected by random changes, mutations, and could be shuffled and recombined during sexual reproduction, but were otherwise passed on unchanged from parent to offspring. Beneficial changes could spread through a population by natural selection or, in agriculture, by plant breeding.[10] In contrast, Lamarckism proposes that an organism can somehow pass on characteristics that it has acquired during its lifetime to its offspring, implying that change in the body can affect the genetic material in the germ line.[10][11]

Soviet agriculture around 1930 was in a massive crisis due to the forced collectivisation of farms, and the extermination of the kulak peasant farmers. The resulting famine in 1932-33 provoked the people and the government alike to search for any possible solution to the critical lack of food.[12]

In 1928, Trofim Lysenko, a previously unknown agronomist, claimed to have developed agricultural techniques, unrelated to conventional plant breeding, which could radically increase crop yields.[10] He made a series of unsubstantiated claims for techniques supposedly created in the Soviet Union that allegedly caused major increases in crop yields. These included vernalization, species transformation, intergeneric hybridization, inheritance of acquired characteristics, vegetative hybridization, and the use of "mentor" grafts. In his view, these proved that the Western genetics was wrong. Instead, most importantly, came the Lamarckian implication that acquired characteristics of an organism could be inherited by that organism's descendants.[10]

1. Lysenko claimed that vernalization could triple or quadruple crop yield by exposing wheat seed to high humidity and low temperature. While cold and moisture exposure are a normal part of the life cycle of autumn-seeded winter cereals, the vernalization technique claimed to increase yields by increasing the intensity of exposure, in some cases planting soaked seeds directly into the snow cover of frozen fields. In reality, the technique was neither new nor Soviet (it was discovered at Michigan State College in 1854, and had been extensively studied in the early 20th century), nor did it produce anything like the yields he promised. He asserted that it showed that the environment could "shatter" a plant's heredity.[10]

2. He claimed that he could transform one species, Triticum durum (pasta wheat, a spring wheat) into another, Triticum vulgare (bread wheat, an autumn wheat), by 2-4 years of autumn planting. Since T. durum is tetraploid with 28 chromosomes (4 sets of 7), and T. vulgare is hexaploid with 42 chromosomes (6 sets), Western geneticists at that time already knew this was impossible.[10]




Lysenkoist vegetative hybridisation. The mechanism would imply a Lamarckian effect of scion on stock when a fruit tree is grafted. No such effect has ever been reliably observed.[10]

3. Another Lysenkoist, V. N. Yakolev, claimed that the Soviet Union had at the Michurin Nurseries pioneered intergeneric fruit tree hybrids, including apple-pear, plum-peach, cherry-plum, and redcurrant-blackcurrant. However, noted Charles Leone in 1952, some such hybrids had been in use for many years; the plum-peach hybrid had been described by the geneticist W. Laxton in 1906. Others of the hybrids had been attempted repeatedly in the West without success, Leone observed, so horticulturalists would have expected full details of which varieties had been crossed, and what the hybrid flowers and fruits were like.[10]

4. Lysenko claimed that fully-Lamarckian inheritance of acquired characteristics occurred in plants, stating in the 1948 book Soviet Biology that "altered sections of the body of parent organisms always possess an altered heredity", whether these were twigs, buds, or the "eyes" of potato tubers. Leone noted that these were in fact somatic mutations, citing the Russian geneticist T. Asseyeva's 1927 work on bud mutations in the potato.[10][13]

5. Lysenko claimed that when a tree is grafted, the scion permanently changes the heritable characteristics of the stock. This would constitute vegetative hybridization. Leone noted that this phenomenon had never been observed despite detailed study (he cites Karl Sax 1949 and M. B. Crane 1949) of many interspecific grafts (such as peach on cherry) in the Western world.[10]

6. Lysenko asserted that I. V. Michurin's "mentor" grafts showed that "external" (environmental) factors could improve varieties of fruit trees. Michurin's idea was to graft a twig of an old variety on to a young tree which had grown and branched for six or seven years but had not started fruiting. Michurin wrote that such trees would not be expected to fruit "until their twentieth year", but his grafted trees fruited "within two years".[10][14] Leone commented on this that Michurin's statements "are curious", noting that the slowest commonly-grown trees to fruit are pears, where half the trees are in fruit at age nine; some cherries start to fruit at age four and all of them are in fruit by age eight. He suggested that Michurin's observations of very slow fruiting reflected "the primitive state" of agriculture left over from Tsarist (pre-Soviet) Russia.[10]

Isaak Izrailevich Prezent brought Lysenko to public attention, using Soviet propaganda to portray him as a genius who had developed a new, revolutionary agricultural technique. Lysenko's resulting popularity gave him a platform to denounce theoretical genetics and to promote his own agricultural practices. He was, in turn, supported by the Soviet propaganda machine, which overstated his successes, cited faked experimental results, and omitted mention of his failures.[15]

Lysenko's political success was mostly due to his appeal to the Communist Party and Soviet ideology. Following the disastrous collectivization efforts of the late 1920s, Lysenko's "new" methods were seen by Soviet officials as paving the way to an "agricultural revolution." Lysenko himself was from a peasant family, and was an enthusiastic advocate of Leninism. During a period which saw a series of man-made agricultural disasters, he was also very quick to respond to problems, although not with real solutions. Whenever the Party announced plans to plant a new crop or cultivate a new area, Lysenko had immediate practical-sounding suggestions on how to proceed.




Lysenko in the field with his wheat, which he claimed would yield more if exposed to cold[10]

So quickly did he develop his prescriptions—from the cold treatment of wheat grains, to the plucking of leaves from cotton plants, to the cluster planting of trees, to unusual fertilizer mixes—that academic biologists did not have time to demonstrate that one technique was valueless or harmful before a new one was adopted. The Party-controlled newspapers applauded Lysenko's "practical" efforts and questioned the motives of his critics. Lysenko's "revolution in agriculture" had a powerful propaganda advantage over the academics, who urged the patience and observation required for science.

Lysenko was admitted into the hierarchy of the Communist Party, and was put in charge of agricultural affairs. He used his position to denounce biologists as "fly-lovers and people haters",[16] and to decry the "wreckers" in biology, who he claimed were trying to disable the Soviet economy and cause it to fail. Furthermore, he denied the distinction between theoretical and applied biology. Lysenko presented himself as a follower of Ivan Vladimirovich Michurin, a well-known and well-liked Soviet horticulturist, but unlike Michurin, he advocated a form of Lamarckism, insisting on using only hybridization and grafting, as non-genetic techniques.[10]

Support from Joseph Stalin gave Lysenko even more momentum and popularity. In 1935, Lysenko compared his opponents in biology to the peasants who still resisted the Soviet government's collectivization strategy, saying that by opposing his theories the traditional geneticists were setting themselves against Marxism. Stalin was in the audience when this speech was made, and he was the first one to stand and applaud, calling out "Bravo, Comrade Lysenko. Bravo."[17] This event emboldened Lysenko and gave him and his ally Prezent free rein to slander the geneticists who still spoke out against him. Many of Lysenkoism's opponents, such as his former mentor Nikolai Ivanovich Vavilov, were imprisoned or even executed because of Lysenko's and Prezent's denunciations.

On August 7, 1948, the V.I. Lenin Academy of Agricultural Sciences announced that from that point on Lysenkoism would be taught as "the only correct theory". Soviet scientists were forced to denounce any work that contradicted Lysenko.[18] Criticism of Lysenko was denounced as "bourgeois" or "fascist", and analogous "non-bourgeois" theories also flourished in other fields such as linguistics and art in the Soviet academy at this time. Perhaps the only opponents of Lysenkoism during Stalin's lifetime to escape liquidation were from the small community of Soviet nuclear physicists: as Tony Judt has observed, "It is significant that Stalin left his nuclear physicists alone and never presumed to second guess their calculations. Stalin may well have been mad but he was not stupid."[19]

Effects
From 1934 to 1940, under Lysenko's admonitions and with Stalin's approval, many geneticists were executed (including Isaak Agol, Solomon Levit, Grigorii Levitskii, Georgii Karpechenko and Georgii Nadson) or sent to labor camps. The famous Soviet geneticist and president of the Agriculture Academy, Nikolai Vavilov, was arrested in 1940 and died in prison in 1943.[20]

In 1936, the American geneticist Hermann Joseph Muller, who had moved to the Leningrad Institute of Genetics with his Drosophila fruit flies, was criticized as a bourgeois, capitalist, imperialist, and promoter of fascism, so he left the USSR, returning to America via Republican Spain.[21] In 1948, genetics was officially declared "a bourgeois pseudoscience";[22] the remaining geneticists were fired from their jobs (some were also arrested), and genetics research was discontinued.

Over 3,000 biologists were imprisoned, fired, or executed for attempting to oppose Lysenkoism and genetics research was effectively destroyed until the death of Stalin in 1953.[2] Due to Lysenkoism, crop yields in the USSR actually declined.[2][8]

Fall
At the end of 1952, the situation started changing, possibly due to Stalin taking offense at Lysenko's growing influence. Articles criticizing Lysenkoism were published in newspapers. However, the process of return to regular genetics slowed down in Nikita Khrushchev's times, due to Lysenko showing him the supposed successes of an experimental agricultural complex. It once again became forbidden to criticize Lysenkoism, though it was now possible to express different views, and all geneticists were released or rehabilitated posthumously. The ban was finally waived in the mid-1960s.[23]
TL;DR: Some soviet dipshit claims that natural selection and mendelian genetics are just bourgeoisie, capitalist myths and that organisms actually cooperate with each other and never compete genetically or for resources. Stalin likes this and ends up purging/killing off any scientists that don't support or try to disprove his BS.

The reason why I'm bringing this up is that it reminded of how trannies are claiming that a genetic disorder is actually a third sex and proof that it's a social construct, and attacking any heretics who say that there are only two sexes or that you can't change your sex by pumping yourself full of the opposite hormone and chopping your dick/tits off.

"Those who don't learn from history are doomed to repeat it" is truer now more than ever.
 
Mallory "Daniel" Ortberg (FTM) and Joseph "Grace" Lavery (MTF) got married over the weekend.

More background info in my post upthread. tl;dr: She is the advice columnist "Dear Prudence" at Slate. He's an English professor at Berkeley. They met. He trooned out. A year later, she trooned out. True love.

Oops! I accidentally screencapped two profiles from the Berkeley English Department's Faculty Page. Sorry about that! You'll just have to figure out for yourself which one is the troon.
faculty.PNG

The blushing bride, in his own words, "bein all AGP and shit."
agp.PNG
And Ortberg shares a peek into her life, which mainly consists of sitting around watching this dude sprain his lips taking kissy-face selfies.
agp0.PNG

"Butt-hurt TSA troon" is becoming its own selfie genre. Traveling to the wedding, the bride intentionally dressed "boyishly" in a fur coat, eyeliner, and a purse, but TSA were still big meanies! Literal violence! [Side note: Lavery, a tenured professor at Berkeley, has moved to NYC so Ortberg doesn't have to be near her (Ortberg's) family in the Bay Area. Lavery is planning to commute weekly to Berkeley, meaning TSA will have ample opportunities to fondle his girldick in 2020.]
jfk.PNGtsa1.PNGtsa2.PNG

The bride and groom at the altar:
trw1.PNG

Lavery wrote his own vows and shared them in a blog entry. Key quote:
By honoring your relation to embodiment, and seeking out other places to process my resentments at masculinity and maleness, I hope we can avoid dwindling into mere heterosexuality.
They're not "mere" heterosexuals, they're cool heterosexuals!

And later on, in bed:
trw3.PNG

The groom shares an intimate moment from the marital bed. "Battling transmisogyny" = Lavery was daydreaming about posting selfies while getting his dick sucked.
trw2.PNG


Could the pitter-patter of little feet be far behind?! Side note, which one of you women is gonna step up and let this dude harvest your uterus? Don't you dare say no or he'll become even more "rueful"! :(
womb.PNG


I'll spoiler this for length, but all you fashionistas should definitely check out Lavery's retrospective of his favorite outfits of 2019.
I have no idea what this male means by his "adult human female" caption:
elliott.PNGelliott2.PNG

Classic troon tongue with "gothy bangs."
gothybangs.PNGgothybangs0.PNG

The t-shirt and blazer combo is what makes it "blokey," you see.
blokey0.PNGblokey.PNG

Nothing says "deeply serious" like lipstick so crooked it looks like a child applied it.
deeplyserious.PNG

A gorgeous smoky eye. Anybody got a tutorial for this look so I can recreate it at home?!?!!?
smokyeye0.PNGsmokyeye.PNG
 
Last edited:
A reddit user who goes by the alias mermaid_coochie shared pics of his progress through surgery and recovery from his “peritoneal vaginoplasty” with Dr. John Pang. This shit made me feel really sick... Fair warning, one of these pics is very disturbing.

694EFE31-9E6A-448A-904B-A28E6210F96E.jpeg
5824CED9-A7EC-4BCF-A6A7-95CEE956F99D.jpeg
A0B9E05B-7061-48A2-90F4-273EBE4F1E01.jpeg
89017740-3B33-4DA3-92F3-627D4693240C.jpeg
The blood... :cryblood:
AA9550DE-1BF6-46CF-8797-2A6FD56764BC.jpeg

I have no words...
44100C40-1CFD-4627-B7B5-F03416FCC3DD.jpeg
She looks forward to receiving “cunnilingus”... oh dear. My heart goes out to the first guy who does it and tastes the rot. Might even get a hairball or a loose flap of necrotic tissue in his mouth, yum!
3A1446DA-FBFA-465F-95CB-E476F0679B46.jpeg
This person is way too hopeful about their future sex life...
 
A reddit user who goes by the alias mermaid_coochie shared pics of his progress through surgery and recovery from his “peritoneal vaginoplasty” with Dr. John Pang. This shit made me feel really sick... Fair warning, one of these pics is very disturbing.


I have no words...
View attachment 1064968
She looks forward to receiving “cunnilingus”... oh dear. My heart goes out to the first guy who does it and tastes the rot. Might even get a hairball or a loose flap of necrotic tissue in his mouth, yum!
View attachment 1064969
This person is way too hopeful about their future sex life...
Any dude that expect someone to go down on that is a monster. They should legally be required to have a warning tattoo above their "vagina" to warn partners that touching, especially orally, the neo-vag may result in contamination and/or projectile vomiting.
 
A reddit user who goes by the alias mermaid_coochie shared pics of his progress through surgery and recovery from his “peritoneal vaginoplasty” with Dr. John Pang. This shit made me feel really sick... Fair warning, one of these pics is very disturbing.


I have no words...
View attachment 1064968
She looks forward to receiving “cunnilingus”... oh dear. My heart goes out to the first guy who does it and tastes the rot. Might even get a hairball or a loose flap of necrotic tissue in his mouth, yum!
View attachment 1064969
This person is way too hopeful about their future sex life...

Screenshot_20191223-161601_Samsung Internet.jpg

Oy vey...his AGP remained strong through the chop and carve.
 
Mallory "Daniel" Ortberg (FTM) and Joseph "Grace" Lavery (MTF) got married over the weekend.

More background info in my post upthread. tl;dr: She is the advice columnist "Dear Prudence" at Slate. He's an English professor at Berkeley. They met. He trooned out. A year later, she trooned out. True love.

Oops! I accidentally screencapped two profiles from the Berkeley English Department's Faculty Page. Sorry about that! You'll have to use your clocking skills to figure out which one is the troon.
View attachment 1064937

The blushing bride, in his own words, "bein all AGP and shit."
View attachment 1064931
And Ortberg shares a peek into her life, which mainly consists of sitting around watching this dude sprain his lips taking kissy-face selfies.
View attachment 1064930

"Butt-hurt TSA troon" is becoming its own selfie genre. Traveling to the wedding, the bride intentionally dressed "boyishly" in a fur coat, eyeliner, and a purse, but TSA were still big meanies! Literal violence! [Side note: Lavery, a tenured professor at Berkeley, has moved to NYC so Ortberg doesn't have to be near her (Ortberg's) family in the Bay Area. Lavery is planning to commute weekly to Berkeley, meaning TSA will have ample opportunities to fondle his girldick in 2020.]
View attachment 1064939

The bride and groom at the altar:
View attachment 1064928

Lavery wrote his own vows and shared them in a blog entry. Key quote:

They're not "mere" heterosexuals, they're cool heterosexuals!

And later on, in bed:
View attachment 1064925

The groom shares an intimate moment from the marital bed. "Battling transmisogyny" = Lavery was thinking about tweeting out selfies while getting his dick sucked.
View attachment 1064926

Could the pitter-patter of little feet be far behind?! Side note, looking for female volunteers to donate uteruses to "rueful" males.
View attachment 1064914

I'll spoiler this for length, but all you fashionistas should check out Lavery's retrospective of his favorite looks from the past year.
I have no idea what this male means by his "adult human female" caption:
View attachment 1064924View attachment 1064923

Classic troon tongue with "gothy bangs."
View attachment 1064917View attachment 1064915

The t-shirt and blazer combo is what makes it "blokey," you see.
View attachment 1064919View attachment 1064920

Nothing says "deeply serious" like lipstick so crooked it looks like a child applied it.
View attachment 1064918

A gorgeous smokey eye. Anybody got a tutorial for this look so I can recreate it at home?!‽‽
View attachment 1064921View attachment 1064922

Anyone who claims a useable womb transplant in males is possible has no place in medicine or science. I hate this claim so much. It makes me mad on the internet. Pregnancy isn't just egg, sperm, and womb, it's a goddamn full body process that can and does go horribly wrong in female bodies biologically designed for that purpose.

Womb transplants are incredibly dangerous for actual women. To the point removal is advised as soon as possible/use is completed- probably the only organ transplant of that nature.

Let them try though, then let them die as their body rejects it and it turns rotten with infection. So nature can do a big fuck you to their cries about how they're real women.
 
Back