Fat Acceptance Movement / Fat Girlcows

For people who like to bore on about eating disorders they seem to have forgotten anorexia exists. Or that unexplained weight loss can be an indicator of major disease, including various cancers. Doctors won't waste time letting you know if you are medically underwieght either because of all the risks to health it poses, including osteoporosis, impaired healing ability, infertility and lowered immune function. It's just much rarer these days than obesity of any class so beyond the regular fuss around anorexia that pops up regularly in regard to the alleged influence of skinny models and such, not many people really hear much about the medical risks of being underweight.
 
View attachment 1066602

Excessively thin people get fussed at by their doctors too, what is this obeast's point? Unhealthy ends of the weight spectrum are unhealthy. The fat end of the spectrum is just a lot bigger (pun intended) than the underweight one because a person can only lose so much weight before their body shuts down.

Yeah it's called being underweight. As in...there's literally a term to refer to it.
 
Of course doctors pick up if you’re underweight and act on it. Significant intended weight loss to the point of being underweight will be investigated as it can be psychologically rooted. Significant unintended weight loss will be investigated in other ways because it can be a sign of several very serious health problems including cancer.
Do they think that doctors just ignore the underweight? They really don’t...
 
233D5944-74D0-4CB6-8BD0-346B83A2509B.jpegF47136D5-8FF5-4545-8A09-C7102809ACA7.jpeg
Merry Christmas from Lividlipids everyone!
 
View attachment 1067165View attachment 1067166
Merry Christmas from Lividlipids everyone!
If our financial system would collapse without fatphobia, then maybe fatphobia is a good thing ... And as far as I know, no one has ever passed a law that requires fat people to buy gym memberships. As for clothing, fats pay more for clothing because plus sizes require more fabric. Otherwise, thin people would be the ones being overcharged if all the prices were the same.
 
If our financial system would collapse without fatphobia, then maybe fatphobia is a good thing ... And as far as I know, no one has ever passed a law that requires fat people to buy gym memberships. As for clothing, fats pay more for clothing because plus sizes require more fabric. Otherwise, thin people would be the ones being overcharged if all the prices were the same.

I must have forgotten about McDonald's and Frito lay becoming not for profit organizations.

I don't remember seeing any fatties marching around Venezuela at the moment. It's almost as if the excess wealth from capitalism let's them become disabled from food.
:thinking:
 
Merry Christmas gorls!
1577308965308.png
1577308986435.png
Weight Discrimination Survey (Archive)
1577309183283.png
Looks like FA's are pushing this book
https://www.amazon.com/Fat-Politics-Americas-Obesity-Epidemic/dp/0195313208
1577309438087.png
It seems almost daily we read newspaper articles and watch news reports exposing the growing epidemic of obesity in America. Our government tells us we are experiencing a major health crisis, with sixty percent of Americans classified as overweight, and one in four as obese. But how valid are these claims? In Fat Politics, J. Eric Oliver shows how a handful of doctors, government bureaucrats, and health researchers, with financial backing from the drug and weight-loss industries, have campaigned to create standards that mislead the public. They mislabel more than sixty million Americans as "overweight," inflate the health risks of being fat, and promote the idea that obesity is a killer disease.
In reviewing the scientific evidence, Oliver shows there is little proof that obesity causes so much disease and death or that losing weight is what makes people healthier. Our concern with obesity, he writes, is fueled more by social prejudice, bureaucratic politics, and industry profit than by scientific fact. Misinformation pushes millions of Americans towards dangerous surgeries, crash diets, and harmful diet drugs, while we ignore other, more real health problems. Oliver goes on to examine why it is that Americans despise fatness and explores why, despite this revulsion, we continue to gain weight.
Fat Politics will topple your most basic assumptions about obesity and health. It is essential reading for anyone with a stake in the nation's--or their own--good health.

1577309552857.png
1577311747545.png
1577311853593.png
Weight Stigma Is a Dangerous Threat to Health (Archive)
For the last 20 years, Americans have been embroiled in a full-fledged health and morality panic about the widely reported obesity epidemic. Nightly news, newspapers and daytime talk shows alike bemoan the state of American bodies, while often failing to report the 1998 change in the BMI’s definitions of “overweight” and “obese,” or the racist history of the BMI itself. Health reporting frequently cites the dangers of living in a fat body. Most people don’t give it a second thought, with some of us even coming to believe that a higher BMI necessarily means that all fat people will come to develop diabetes, hypertension, heart disease, and an early grave. But a growing body of research shows that the health issues attributed to being fat may be exacerbated — or even caused — by the bias and discrimination too often leveled against fat people.
Bias among health care providers may be worsening fat patients’ health outcomes by perpetuating weight stigma. A 2014 study published in the journal Obesity found that 67% of medical students exhibit overt bias against fat patients, with over half of respondents characterizing fat people as a whole as being “lazy, unmotivated, noncompliant, and unhealthy.”
Providers’ bias doesn’t end with their own perceptions, either — it measurably impacts fat people’s care. A 2013 study in the journal Obesity found that doctors “build less emotional rapport with obese patients.” And a 2001 study in the International Journal of Obesity found that “although physicians prescribed more tests for heavier patients, [they also spent] less time with them, and viewed them significantly more negatively.” Research published last year found that nurses who belied in weight controllability (that is, the idea that people can control their own weight, and that fat people are simply failing to control our own behaviors) also reported greater weight-based discrimination in medical settings — ultimately negatively impacting the care they provide to fatter people. Some researchers even argue that weight stigma is a primary driver of the so-called “obesity epidemic,” citing a range of studies showing that experiences of discrimination and internalized weight stigma cause weight gain, and that health care providers’ bias leads many fat people to postpone health care or avoid it altogether — another driver of poor health outcomes.
Research released earlier this month further underscores the depth of medical weight stigma in vulnerable populations. A new study published in the journal Women’s Reproductive Health found that people seeking reproductive health care can have negative experiences “shaped by dominant notions of health, the body, motherhood and fatness.” A follow-up commentary in the same journal cautioned that “providers need to examine their own biases” lest they allow those biases to influence the quality of care they provide to expecting parents.
If so many are, as they claim, “just concerned about fat people’s health,” the best way to express that concern is to address the overwhelming stigma facing fat people in doctor’s offices.
Last month, Obesity: A Research Journal published new findings on weight stigma in LGBTQ communities, who already experience high rates of medical discrimination, leading to significant health disparities. Researchers found that LGBTQ people experience similar rates of weight stigma to straight, cisgender people (that is, people who aren’t transgender), but that gay men were most likely to internalize that weight stigma. Internalized weight stigma, according to the study, is also “associated with poorer mental [health-related quality of life], lower eating self-efficacy, and increased eating to cope, controlling for demographics and BMI.” That is, because gay men were more likely to believe the stigma leveled against fat people was true and correct, they experienced an increase in negative health outcomes across the board.
These new studies also include recommendations to address providers’ bias that largely focused on standardizing health care provisions, limiting shaming approaches, and confronting providers’ existing internalized biases. While health care providers undergo immense technical training, little (if any) of that training requires them to confront biases they may hold against the people they’re tasked with treating.
The authors of the Obesity: A Research Journal study write that their findings underscore the need among health care providers to recognize that some people “may be vulnerable to stigma and unfair treatment because of both their body weight and their sexual identity.” This awareness could not only make medical appointments more comfortable and productive, but also, as the researchers write, can help medical professionals understand that stigma puts people “at additional risk for compounding stressors and adverse health outcomes.”
Too often, the stigma fat people face is thinly veiled by a purported “concern for our health,” a kind of well-intended bullying that only ends up compounding the harms we face. If so many are, as they claim, “just concerned about fat people’s health,” the best way to express that concern is to address the overwhelming stigma facing fat people in doctor’s offices. After all, while some of us may be sick, stigma from health care providers often prevents us from accessing the care we need, which only makes us sicker. Until providers’ biases are effectively addressed, the privilege of reliable, respectful health care will, paradoxically, be reserved for those already seen to be healthy.
Elemental
Your life, sourced by science. A new Medium publication about health and wellness.
Follow
https://medium.com/m/signin?operati...b8f524873fa---------------------clap_sidebar-
1.2K

)
 

Attachments

  • 1577309259297.png
    1577309259297.png
    24.2 KB · Views: 378

Screenshot from 2019-12-25 17-33-33.png

Women, Fat and the Sexual Market walk into a bar where they meet Sloth, Capitalism and the Paradox of Freedom.

It's like A Christmas Carol except the Ghost of Christmas future won't shut the fuck up about rising insulin prices and the fact that her knees keep hurting.
 
Please let this be an intentional dig at Anna.
I gotta say that while i appreciate entertainment provided by stupid fat fucks, I would be perfectly happy if none of them ever did these things on tiktok or anywhere else. So I can't imagine anyone actually expecting it from them.
 
Please let this be an intentional dig at Anna.
That is the first person I thought of. She had to be directing it at her. She's just jealous. Even if lipids did those things, nobody would want to watch.

Also, I don't think she is autistic (not in the way she means). I think she meant to say "I'm an asshole".

Why is she appropriating Indian culture with her Christmas meal? She should be making the food of her own ancestors. Not trying to claim someone else's. Typical white person. Colonization is what brought curry to white people. All those Indians who were killed or subjugated just so Lipids could enjoy her curry. How can she sleep at night?
 
Why is she appropriating Indian culture with her Christmas meal? She should be making the food of her own ancestors. Not trying to claim someone else's. Typical white person. Colonization is what brought curry to white people. All those Indians who were killed or subjugated just so Lipids could enjoy her curry. How can she sleep at night?

Not just the food -- the Mary and Jesus appear to be of Indian extraction.
 
Not just the food -- the Mary and Jesus appear to be of Indian extraction.

Ah, you're right--I just glanced at the dark skin and thought it was a WE WUZ KANGZ moment. Looks like it's a portrayal of Madonna and child as dark Indians or similar. Livid is fetishizing these people. Liberal racism in a nutshell.
 
Back