Shy Hard 2: Shy Harder

But you're part of the society that he hates so much. So you're okay with him screwing you as well over as long as he stays consistent? That doesn't make sense at all.

Culture, not society. I don't engage in popular western culture. Maybe I should ask him if he counts me as part of it, but I doubt it.

strict consistency sounds pretty autistic. where are you on the spectrum?

Autistic consistency is consistency with time, not consistency across a logical model at any one given time. That's just a common trait of, you know, intelligence.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Watch out guys. Mooooo might spam us with Wikipedia links to prove how much smarter he is than us dunces.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BriarHeart
I'm not sure. I think they have a tendency to enjoy domination and the sensation of danger. I think a guy who exudes the threat of violence will draw women, but I'm not sure I'd go so far to say that they enjoy when it is explicitly carried out.

I'll say that when a guy hits a woman, they'll often be surprisingly forgiving partly because there's some element of it that is attractive, but that it's a balancing act subconsciously, a threshold of violence that they'll reject. So if you're a threatening guy who lashes out briefly, say, every 6 months, you'll probably retain the adoration of your girlfriend, but if you routinely beat her to a pulp she'll get the hell out of there quickly.

I'm sure the women here would beg to differ. So, why don't we ask them for their take?
Hey, women of of the Kiwi Farms, do you agree with this?
 
  • Like
Reactions: BriarHeart
wikipedia is pretty autistic @mooooo where are you on the spectrum? are you sure your not super autistic?

my cousin is mildly autistic, and there's big differences between us.

To most people, there's an innate awareness of social protocol always just below the surface of our mind.
In contrast, my cousin once picked his nose in front of a girl because "he was tired".
To him, social protocol is intellectual instead of emotional, like solving an equation. Most people do it intuitively, not having to think about it.

He also struggles a bit with speech, like his sentences are a bit segmented. Most people can fluently stream thoughts out through their mouth, but he's a bit like a youtube video that isn't buffering fast enough. It takes effort for him to turn a thought into speech.

I'm also a lot more flexible. He operates rigidly on pre-established rules. This side of the cupboard is his, this jar of honey is his, etc. I'll be like "hey, I got some cereal, you can go ahead and have some if you want". Then the next day I take a spoonful of honey and he freaks out because it's "his". Sure, I broke "a rule", but most people operate on a kind of social reciprocity. I do nice things, people do nice things back, providing you don't overstep the mark and take too much.

So really there's very large and obvious differences between a neurotypical and someone even mildly autistic, such that you wouldn't be making such assumptions if you really understood what it's like first hand.

I'm sure the women here would beg to differ. So, why don't we ask them for their take?
Hey, women of of the Kiwi Farms, do you agree with this?

Judge people by their actions, not by their words.
 
Judge people by their actions, not by their words.

So, if the female users here said they wouldn't want to be with someone who beats them, even if the assaults are months apart, you wouldn't believe them?
 
This fellow is so very, very smart, he doesn't even have to listen to women to understand all there is to know about them. That's why he's so popular, charming and fun at parties.

It's a common belief on the LS forum to say that a woman's actions are much stronger than what she says.
 
  • Informative
Reactions: Marvin
Straight up, if I laid a fucking finger on my wife in anger, she'd be out the door so fast (and rightfully so). I think she'd want to kick someone's ass just for suggesting they'd know what she wants better than she does. This goes for pretty much all of the women I know. They wouldn't stand for that shit. There's nothing attractive about pathetic, weak, violently insecure manchildren who try to control women by hitting them. While there are people (both men and women) who are susceptible to sticking through abusive situations, the dynamic between the abuser and abused is far more nuanced than "wah, women like bad boys who hit them." That's some mild Marijan Siklic conspiracy shit right there.
 
It's a common belief on the LS forum to say that a woman's actions are much stronger than what she says.
Well if a person's words are claims of what they would do, then what they actually do is clearly the bottom line.

Straight up, if I laid a fucking finger on my wife in anger, she'd be out the door so fast (and rightfully so). I think she'd want to kick someone's ass just for suggesting they'd know what she wants better than she does.
Ah, so she's the violent one in your relationship.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Back