Shy Hard 2: Shy Harder

[CatParty]

It was a joke. This is a fun thread.

as fun as eating all the doritos in the world?

 

[Saney]

are you trying to talk down to me because i am a womyn?

No, he's nitpicking to avoid what you were saying.

 

[mooooo]

No, he's nitpicking to avoid what you were saying.

If the point was that somehow I condone violence against women, then I see nothing that suggests that. If I supported violence, I probably wouldn't be calling the violent men psychopaths and narcissists. The point makes no sense.

 

[24isthehighestnumber]

It was a joke. This is a fun thread.

Anyway, the rest of the quote was irrelevant opinion, so there's nothing to respond to worthwhile.

You know, you really remind me of somebody. Have you ever beaten up your mom or asked her to sit on your peepee?

I was ready to rate that post "feels" until you edited to be condescending.

 

[CatParty]

If the point was that somehow I condone violence against women, then I see nothing that suggests that. If I supported violence, I probably wouldn't be calling the violent men psychopaths and narcissists. The point makes no sense.

I'm not sure. I think they have a tendency to enjoy domination and the sensation of danger.
I'd go so far to say that they enjoy when it is explicitly carried out.

I'll say that when a guy hits a woman, they'll often be surprisingly forgiving partly because there's some element of it that is attractive, but that it's a balancing act subconsciously, a threshold of violence that they'll reject. So if you're a threatening guy who lashes out briefly, say, every 6 months, you'll probably retain the adoration of your girlfriend, but if you routinely beat her to a pulp she'll get the hell out of there quickly.

 

[SU 390]

Well if a person's words are claims of what they would do, then what they actually do is clearly the bottom line.

I'm well aware

 

[4Macie]

Watch out guys. Mooooo might spam us with Wikipedia links to prove how much smarter he is than us dunces.

better than Marian who posts whole blog exerpts....

I'm sure the women here would beg to differ. So, why don't we ask them for their take?
Hey, women of of the Kiwi Farms, do you agree with this?

No. I do not agree with it.

Judge people by their actions, not by their words.

my actions will speak volumes of how much your views are wrong. Women do not like violence (in the majority). I will not lie and deny that there are a handful of women that like violence (in a controlled environment). But the reason women stay with abusers isn't because they like violence. It's because they love their partner or have stockholms syndrome.

@Saney has requested that I watch over the Marijan Jrs we got here. Don't worry folks, I'm a professional Incel and loveshy lolcow handler.

 

[mooooo]

if a crack addict enjoys crack, am I endorsing giving them crack?

logical fallacies abound...

 

[CatParty]

if a crack addict enjoys crack, am I endorsing giving them crack?

logical fallacies abound...

so you are advocating beatin us women because you think we all like and deserve it

 

[24isthehighestnumber]

My turn:

I'm not sure. I think they have a tendency to enjoy domination and the sensation of danger. I think a guy who exudes the threat of violence will draw women, but I'm not sure I'd go so far to say that they enjoy when it is explicitly carried out.

I'll say that when a guy hits a woman, they'll often be surprisingly forgiving partly because there's some element of it that is attractive, but that it's a balancing act subconsciously, a threshold of violence that they'll reject. So if you're a threatening guy who lashes out briefly, say, every 6 months, you'll probably retain the adoration of your girlfriend, but if you routinely beat her to a pulp she'll get the hell out of there quickly.

Anyway, the rest of the quote was irrelevant opinion, so there's nothing to respond to worthwhile.

 

[mooooo]

better than Marian who posts whole blog exerpts....


No. I do not agree with it.
my actions will speak volumes of how much your views are wrong. Women do not like violence (in the majority). I will not lie and deny that there are a handful of women that like violence (in a controlled environment). But the reason women stay with abusers isn't because they like violence. It's because they love their partner or have stockholms syndrome.

@Saney has requested that I watch over the Marijan Jrs we got here. Don't worry folks, I'm a professional Incel and loveshy lolcow handler.

1. You state your position as though it was true with no further justification. This is hypocrisy, since you criticize others who do the same.

2. You just said women can stay with abusers because they love them, agreeing with what I said about women loving men who are physically threatening.

3. What I specifically said was that they will only tolerate a small degree of actual abuse, so again, you're just agreeing with me in some ways.

 

[Saney]

better than Marian who posts whole blog exerpts....


No. I do not agree with it.
my actions will speak volumes of how much your views are wrong. Women do not like violence (in the majority). I will not lie and deny that there are a handful of women that like violence (in a controlled environment). But the reason women stay with abusers isn't because they like violence. It's because they love their partner or have stockholms syndrome.

@Saney has requested that I watch over the Marijan Jrs we got here. Don't worry folks, I'm a professional Incel and loveshy lolcow handler.

Well, I'm annoyed that I'm going to miss stuff because I have to sleep, but at least I know this thread is in good hands.
Night.

 

[mooooo]

so you are advocating beatin us women because you think we all like and deserve it

I don't care either way. That suggests I want to intervene and "fix" them. The woman version of rehab. They can do what they want.

 

[autism420]

1. You state your position as though it was true with no further justification. This is hypocrisy, since you criticize others who do the same.

2. You just said women can stay with abusers because they love them, agreeing with what I said about women loving men who are physically threatening.

3. What I specifically said was that they will only tolerate a small degree of actual abuse, so again, you're just agreeing with me in some ways.

Are you actually mentally handicapped? Honestly asking.

 

[CatParty]

I don't care either way. That suggests I want to intervene and "fix" them. The woman version of rehab. They can do what they want.

what about this woman?



the one on the left with the smaller tits.

 

[mooooo]

My turn:

He asked for my opinion, I gave it. It would only be hypocritical if my stance was that my opinion is objective fact, and you're all obliged to agree with me. I acknowledge it's an opinion.

 

[SU 390]

1. You state your position as though it was true with no further justification. This is hypocrisy, since you criticize others who do the same.

2. You just said women can stay with abusers because they love them, agreeing with what I said about women loving men who are physically threatening.

3. What I specifically said was that they will only tolerate a small degree of actual abuse, so again, you're just agreeing with me in some ways.

"2. You just said women can stay with abusers because they love them, agreeing with what I said about women loving men who are physically threatening."

I think what she meant was the woman in question will still love her man regardless of the abuse.

 

[24isthehighestnumber]

He asked for my opinion, I gave it. It would only be hypocritical if my stance was that my opinion is objective fact, and you're all obliged to agree with me. I acknowledge it's an opinion.

But you're stating and defending it as objective fact. I offered anecdotal evidence (which can be corroborated endlessly by who knows how many women) to the contrary. It's not an irrelevant opinion when it intrinsically disproves your opinion about an entire gender.

 

[mooooo]

"2. You just said women can stay with abusers because they love them, agreeing with what I said about women loving men who are physically threatening."

I think what she meant was the woman in question will still love her man regardless of the abuse.

Then there needs to be additional information and justification to separate cause from consequence. What I find telling is that there are such women who will love them "in spite" of the abuse, but could never love a guy who would never have hit them in the first place. Hmm... a violent psychopath is more loveable than a nice guy, exactly what we've been saying. Weird, huh?

Why don't you stop replying and go plough your lady? You may both lose some calories while you're at it.

I'm at work

 

[CatParty]

I'm at work

prove it