Jenny Nicholson / Jennifer Elizabeth Nicholson / @JennyENicholson / @spider_jewel - Disney shill

[AnOminous]

To me, she just feels like a fucking normie that somehow happens to have a platform and a degree of professionality, she'd have to lose a lot of self control to ever become a true lolcow.

No horsefucker is a normie.

 

[Cemila Mandes]

You've gone on quite the vendetta against MauLer on this thread and the Quinton thread at least, possibly others I don't read, along with some defenses of the subjects of both threads in relation to him. I'm sensing an a-log at the very least. Possibly a white knight as well.

If you want to rant about MauLer, grow a pair and start a MauLer thread instead of trollsheilding Nicholson and Quinton on theirs. Just be damn sure you justify its existence as something more than your personal vendetta so it doesn't get baleeted.

I did start a MauLer thread. It was moved to his multimedia thread because the staff felt there didn't need to be two threads on him.

About half of this thread is people questioning why it exists. The other half is a-logs/MauLer white knights repeating the same boring reasons for why Jenny belongs here and insisting she'll become a true cow someday, just not today, tomorrow, or even the day after that. So forgive me if I wanted to make this thread more entertaining. It's what happens when a thread is created from a personal vendetta.

 

[Doctor Placebo]

I did start a MauLer thread. It was moved to his multimedia thread because the staff felt there didn't need to be two threads on him.

About half of this thread is people questioning why it exists. The other half is a-logs/MauLer white knights repeating the same boring reasons for why Jenny belongs here and insisting she'll become a true cow someday, just not today, tomorrow, or even the day after that. So forgive me if I wanted to make this thread more entertaining. It's what happens when a thread is created from a personal vendetta.

So rant about MauLer in that thread, regardless of where it is. And that doesn't explain why you're doing the same thing in the Quinton thread.

 

[Cantercoin]

Keeping a thread, that probably would've died out naturally due to a personal vendetta, alive is way more spergy than the person you're a-logging, tbh

 

[Cemila Mandes]

So rant about MauLer in that thread, regardless of where it is. And that doesn't explain why you're doing the same thing in the Quinton thread.

But this thread is infinitely more interesting when blessed by his presence. And you think calling Quinton a pussy with no self awareness translates to defending and white knighting him. Not very objective of you.

Keeping a thread, that probably would've died out naturally due to a personal vendetta, alive is way more spergy than the person you're a-logging, tbh

This thread was never going to die out because MauLer a-logs hold very special vendettas.

 

[Gypsymagic]

But this thread is infinitely more interesting when blessed by his presence. And you think calling Quinton a pussy with no self awareness translates to defending and white knighting him. Not very objective of you.



This thread was never going to die out because MauLer a-logs hold very special vendettas.

So did Mauler make fun of one of your videos or something? EFAP can definitely be cringy at times, but Mauler is probably the tamest out of them. Wolf and Rags are 100x more autistic than Mauler.

 

[Cemila Mandes]

So did Mauler make fun of one of your videos or something? EFAP can definitely be cringy at times, but Mauler is probably the tamest out of them. Wolf and Rags are 100x more autistic than Mauler.

Not yet, but I know he'll be triggered once he gets the slightest trace of anything making fun of him. You don't get more autistic than hosting podcasts that go on for several hours, making videos about a single subject that go on for hours, and scouring the web for internet nobodies criticizing you so you can put them on blast. Wolf was at least smart enough to leave YouTube before it broke him and Rags is too apathetic to have the intense fixations MauLer has.

 

[Clark Kent]

Since this thread sucks, let me remind everyone that Jenny Nicholson's Mirror Universe counterpart Lena Paul recently made a video with former Boy Meets World star Maitland Ward.

 

[Zero Day Defense]

He's a literal neckbeard who has the same traits his NPCs make fun of Jenny and Quinton for.

Calling someone an ogre is usually a jab at their appearance.

The gimmick of his video was all of the characters were being referred to by joke names, unless he really didn't know Luke Skywalker's name either.

He started guarding his image after he started instigating feuds with other content creators.

He denied hiding his face on a video he unlisted and then privatized.

Spoiler

View attachment 1067879

Shrek is great.

There's a difference between calling someone an ogre and calling them Shrek.

I think she was the only one with a joke name.

I'm unclear about what feuds he's been instigating beyond criticizing Hbomberguy and Nicholson.

About half of this thread is people questioning why it exists. The other half is a-logs/MauLer white knights repeating the same boring reasons for why Jenny belongs here and insisting she'll become a true cow someday, just not today, tomorrow, or even the day after that.

MauLer's hardly a topic on this thread outside of your vendetta. Most just have a bad feeling about her.

So did Mauler make fun of one of your videos or something?

MauLer had sex with his wife, presumably.

You don't get more autistic than hosting podcasts that go on for several hours

TIL every single streamer is an autist

and scouring the web for internet nobodies criticizing you so you can put them on blast.

Nicholson was never really a nobody at the time MauLer criticized her. The only other kind of callout that I can recall him doing was for similarly popular Hbomberguy, and even that involved him having some level of admiration of him in general but being disappointed with his Dark Souls 2 critique.

 

[Cemila Mandes]

There's a difference between calling someone an ogre and calling them Shrek.

I think she was the only one with a joke name.

I'm unclear about what feuds he's been instigating beyond criticizing Hbomberguy and Nicholson.

What's the difference, pray tell, between calling someone a fictional species and calling someone a member of said fictional species?

You thought wrong because he was calling Luke "Grumpy" throughout the video.

I Hate Everything, MovieBob, Joseph Anderson, Patrick Willems, HelloGreedo, the Cosmonaut Variety Hour's Marcus, JustWrite, Jonathan McIntosh, anyone with a viewpoint different from his own.

MauLer's hardly a topic on this thread outside of your vendetta. Most just have a bad feeling about her.

MauLer is the reason why this thread exists. If his name being in the OP didn't make that clear, his white knights keep justifying this thread because she supposedly had her fans attack him (which he has his fans do to other content creators and nobodies all the time). Most having a bad feeling about someone instead of legitimate cow material isn't helping this thread either.

MauLer had sex with his wife, presumably.

A guy whose Facebook profile picture contains the girl who friendzoned him isn't having sex with anyone.

TIL every single streamer is an autist

TIL taking quotes out of context is still as effective as when MauLer does it.

Nicholson was never really a nobody at the time MauLer criticized her. The only other kind of callout that I can recall him doing was for similarly popular Hbomberguy, and even that involved him having some level of admiration of him in general but being disappointed with his Dark Souls 2 critique.

But who's he sending his 20.8K followers to attack on Twitter?

A nobody with 27 followers.

A nobody with 80 followers.

A nobody with 16 followers.

A nobody with 70 followers.

A nobody with 6 followers.

 

[Fanatical Pragmatist]

PSA:

Jenny Nicholson will not have sexy times with you if you defend her on KiwiFarms.

 

[Flamenco]

Not yet, but I know he'll be triggered once he gets the slightest trace of anything making fun of him.

I mean Saint and Taxxon did a 45 minute video trying to misrepresent his work, to which he did a podcast on and had the two live tweet it for hours and hold their own stream at equal length that they still have privated. Generally Mauler's critics tend to be more exceptional than him to be completely honest.

 

[Bunny Tracks]

The way I see it, the only lolcows here are the a-logs, and orbiters Jenny somehow manages to create.

Look, I'm not defending any of Jenny's shadier actions, or denying that she has the potential to become a lolcow, but as of now she doesn't seem to really be one. It's everyone else around her as this spergfest that's been going on for the last few pages has shown.

 

[Trig.Point]

The way I see it, the only lolcows here are the a-logs, and orbiters Jenny somehow manages to create.

Look, I'm not defending any of Jenny's shadier actions, or denying that she has the potential to become a lolcow, but as of now she doesn't seem to really be one. It's everyone else around her as this spergfest that's been going on for the last few pages has shown.

I agree that Jenny isn't a lolcow in the traditional sense of the word. However the strong suspicion that she's got shady sponsorship deals, her dabbling with brony culture and the way she caters for her mostly male audience by acting like the stereotypical teenage girl vlogging in her bedroom, do make her someone worth watching.

The fact that she's got good Opsec, and avoids acting impulsively, doesn't negate the justification for her this thread. It just makes it far harder for us to find content for it.

 

[Fanatical Pragmatist]

I agree that Jenny isn't a lolcow in the traditional sense of the word. However the strong suspicion that she's got shady sponsorship deals, her dabbling with brony culture and the way she caters for her mostly male audience by acting like the stereotypical teenage girl vlogging in her bedroom, do make her someone worth watching.

The fact that she's got good Opsec, and avoids acting impulsively, doesn't negate the justification for her this thread. It just makes it far harder for us to find content for it.

Dont forget her friends... I would imagine hanging out with Nyk and Ellis is like having a winter home in Chernobyl and a beach house in Fukushima. Its only a matter of time before that shit rubs off...

Of course it could be Jenny's gameplan. On her own, she's a 5/10 woman-child; standing next to Nyk and Ellis she comes off as the hot and rational/sane one.

 

[Zero Day Defense]

What's the difference, pray tell, between calling someone a fictional species and calling someone a member of said fictional species?

In the former case, you're referring to a general concept; in the latter case, you're referring to a specific character. He could be referring to someone specifically as an ogre to highlight an alleged brutality, oafishness, or ugliness. It's less likely that he's doing that if he's referring to a specific kind of ogre in fiction that has a character arc.

You thought wrong because he was calling Luke "Grumpy" throughout the video.

You said that everyone had a joke name, and that this was a gimmick of the video.

I Hate Everything, MovieBob, Joseph Anderson, Patrick Willems, HelloGreedo, the Cosmonaut Variety Hour's Marcus, JustWrite, Jonathan McIntosh, anyone with a viewpoint different from his own.

Are these instigating feuds or critiquing their viewpoints? I already brought up instances of him doing the latter-- are the instances you bring up any different?

MauLer is the reason why this thread exists. If his name being in the OP didn't make that clear, his white knights keep justifying this thread because she supposedly had her fans attack him (which he has his fans do to other content creators and nobodies all the time). Most having a bad feeling about someone instead of legitimate cow material isn't helping this thread either.

Mention of MauLer and EFAP are literally at the bottom of a long OP, after several evidences not even coming close to intersecting with either.. The operation of his white knights, or whomever you want to label as his white knights are not evidence of MauLer being the reason this thread exists, unless you want to suggest that OP is in fact a MauLer fanboy/white knight.

A guy whose Facebook profile picture contains the girl who friendzoned him isn't having sex with anyone.

Except your wife, given your vitriol.

TIL taking quotes out of context is still as effective as when MauLer does it.

There's no context that would render that thought more complete than it already was. If you're going to complain about muh context, so do with purpose.

But who's he sending his 20.8K followers to attack on Twitter?

Where's the "raid these people" imperative in any of these? It's stupid to claim that interacting with other people in the kind of way you showcased is somehow incitement when there's no actual imperative to bug said people. And if they did in fact go to bug said people, could you demonstrate that they were specifically doing it on his behalf and not because they were individually offended by the showcased comment?

PSA:

Jenny Nicholson will not have sexy times with you if you defend her on KiwiFarms.

...will she if I criticize her on Kiwi Farms?

 

[Cemila Mandes]

I mean Saint and Taxxon did a 45 minute video trying to misrepresent his work, to which he did a podcast on and had the two live tweet it for hours and hold their own stream at equal length that they still have privated. Generally Mauler's critics tend to be more exceptional than him to be completely honest.

Saint and Taxxon are nobodies whose combined subscriber count is about half of MauLer's. It's exceptional of him to give irrelevant people like that attention. And MauLer did himself no favors by refusing a 1-1 discussion with Saint on the grounds that it was pointless to speak to someone so dishonest, yet still invited Saint on EFAP, which means the discussion is only pointless for him when he's not being protected by his friends.

In the former case, you're referring to a general concept; in the latter case, you're referring to a specific character. He could be referring to someone specifically as an ogre to highlight an alleged brutality, oafishness, or ugliness. It's less likely that he's doing that if he's referring to a specific kind of ogre in fiction that has a character arc.

In both cases, you're referring an fictional species known for physical unattractiveness. If you're calling someone an ogre, you're usually making fun of their physical appearance. If you're calling someone a specific kind of ogre in fiction who has a character arc, you're still usually making fun of their appearance. Sure, he could have meant a number of other things by it. But when you call someone "Shrek", any normal person will immediately assume that's a jab at their physical appearance.

You said that everyone had a joke name, and that this was a gimmick of the video.

You said no one else did, so we both thought wrong. That doesn't take away from the irony of him making fun of how she looks while being fatter than her.

Are these instigating feuds or critiquing their viewpoints? I already brought up instances of him doing the latter-- are the instances you bring up any different?

It's a feud for MauLer when he goes after these people at any chance he gets and sends his NPCs to also attack them. You know, the same thing Jenny is vilified for doing, despite never directly referencing MauLer and his video.

Mention of MauLer and EFAP are literally at the bottom of a long OP, after several evidences not even coming close to intersecting with either.. The operation of his white knights, or whomever you want to label as his white knights are not evidence of MauLer being the reason this thread exists, unless you want to suggest that OP is in fact a MauLer fanboy/white knight.

MauLer and EFAP are still in the OP and this section held special meaning to the OP since he needed to preface it with "Oh boi". There's also focus on her being Disney Star Wars fan (despite hating Rogue One, Solo, and TRoS), which MauLer became known for hating on and conditioned his NPCs to hate anyone who liked any of the films. The operation of his white knights further emphasize that this thread only exists because of him as they harp on what a horrible thing she did to him (which again, he does all the time) and accuse her of being a shill for what he doesn't like (which again, is at odds with her negative videos on Disney products). And the ultimate kicker is this thread wasn't created until a few weeks after the whole Joker debacle that MauLer instigated. It's not a suggestion, it's a fact that the OP is a MauLer NPC/white knight.

Except your wife, given your vitriol.

That was twice as clever as the first time you said it.

There's no context that would render that thought more complete than it already was. If you're going to complain about muh context, so do with purpose.

Like MauLer also complains about muh context? The point was he does more than host insanely-long livestreams and even if that's all he did, I'm pretty certain the average streamer doesn't go on for as long as he does, let alone whine about a single subject for much of it.

Where's the "raid these people" imperative in any of these? It's stupid to claim that interacting with other people in the kind of way you showcased is somehow incitement when there's no actual imperative to bug said people. And if they did in fact go to bug said people, could you demonstrate that they were specifically doing it on his behalf and not because they were individually offended by the showcased comment?

It's not a simple interaction. Instead of just replying to these people, he retweets them so all of his 20.8K followers can see these people, laugh at them, and go right after them. MauLer puts the nobodies on his Twitter so his followers will be offended by comments they wouldn't have seen otherwise and raid them. It's stupid to not realize openly instigating conflict when you have a fanbase is going to incite your fanbase to attack the people you're at odds with.

...will she if I criticize her on Kiwi Farms?

Assuming she even knows.

PSA:

Jenny Nicholson will not have sexy times with you if you defend her on KiwiFarms.

MauLer will.

 

[Zero Day Defense]

In both cases, you're referring an fictional species known for physical unattractiveness. If you're calling someone an ogre, you're usually making fun of their physical appearance. If you're calling someone a specific kind of ogre in fiction who has a character arc, you're still usually making fun of their appearance.

The issue with that argument is that the fact that you're using a specific character means that there's more characteristics to talk from. If he wanted to call her ugly, it'd be far more likely that he'd just call her ugly, or that he'd vary the epithets such that the characters referenced/descriptors used would have this common string of "ugly". It'd be more likely that he'd call her an ogre instead of a specific ogre that's actually a sympathetic character with a developed character arc in a much better movie.

There's nothing that you actually have from him that well-suggests anything outside of what he claimed, especially since (IIRC) he doesn't even discuss her appearance along with calling her Shrek.

You said no one else did, so we both thought wrong.

And yet I was still far less wrong than you. You didn't just claim that everyone got a nickname-- you claimed that everyone getting a nickname was a gimmick of the video. Only two people had a nickname, and it wasn't at all a gimmick of the video.

It's a feud for MauLer when he goes after these people at any chance he gets and sends his NPCs to also attack them.

"Going after" is a very dramatic way to say "criticize", and the only place his sycophants are being sent out by him to attack others is-- as far as you can demonstrate-- in your head and on your convoluted investigation board.

MauLer and EFAP are still in the OP and this section held special meaning to the OP since he needed to preface it with "Oh boi".

...because it's a charlie foxtrot of a situation. It's a section because it's a thing that happened and it's relevant to the subject of the thread. But it's one of many sections.

There's also focus on her being Disney Star Wars fan (despite hating Rogue One, Solo, and TRoS), which MauLer became known for hating on and conditioned his NPCs to hate anyone who liked any of the films.

...do you call everyone at least two days younger than you a "baby"? Because you seem to insist on robbing people of their agency as you claim that the only reason that there was an emphasis on her being a Disney Star Wars fan had to be because OP was also a MauLer sycophant. Literally nothing else. Can't even be that he agrees with MauLer independent of MauLer. It's not that OP is independently invested in Star Wars and hates the films. And what does it matter that she hates the side films-- do you have to be a fan of every segment of a franchise in order to be a fan of the franchise?

The operation of his white knights further emphasize that this thread only exists because of him as they harp on what a horrible thing she did to him (which again, he does all the time) and accuse her of being a shill for what he doesn't like (which again, is at odds with her negative videos on Disney products).

Again, you insist on his white knights being extensions of him instead of people that operate independently of him for their own interests (the defense of something/someone they like/appreciate as a means to snuff out cognitive dissonance brought about by observed contradicting opinion).

And the ultimate kicker is this thread wasn't created until a few weeks after the whole Joker debacle that MauLer instigated.

I doubt if it would have mattered to you if this thread was created two months after said incident-- you would have still claimed it was evidence of OP being a MauLer fanboy, even though the shape of your argument suggests that it was also the (preceding) Star Wars stuff that led to the creation of this thread.

That was twice as clever as the first time you said it.

I wasn't trying to be clever. 95% confident, the source of your vendetta is that you somehow managed to get cucked by him.

Like MauLer also complains about muh context?

Deflect less.

The point was he does more than host insanely-long livestreams and even if that's all he did, I'm pretty certain the average streamer doesn't go on for as long as he does, let alone whine about a single subject for much of it.

And responding to specifically that at a point does not break the context of that complete thought. Secondly, if he's not the average streamer... he's not the average streamer.

Instead of just replying to these people, he retweets them so all of his 20.8K followers can see these people, laugh at them, and go right after them. MauLer puts the nobodies on his Twitter so his followers will be offended by comments they wouldn't have seen otherwise and raid them.

How do you know if he wants them going after these people? Because he wants to respond and showcase said response because he wants to make a general point? Are you going to suggest that he rein in his fanbase as if they're not cognizant enough to rein themselves in, as if they were actual children? You can't demonstrate that he's signaling to go after these people because there's nothing that demonstrates that he wants anybody going after these people except for the fact that he acknowledges them. Somehow, them being nobodies means that he wants them raided when he showcases his responses to them? But if they're not nobodies, it still means that?

You just think he wants them raided because of course you do. I'm not beyond thinking that MauLer may not be morally upright-- I mean, he certainly isn't if he helped your wife sabotage your marriage-- but don't waste people's time with vendetta covers and just get down to business.

It's stupid to not realize openly instigating conflict when you have a fanbase is going to incite your fanbase to attack the people you're at odds with.

The failure of your insistence that open criticism == incitement to raid aside, it's stupid to attempt to rein in control of thousands of autonomous agents with their own interests who likely were never operating according to what they thought your interests were, if they ever thought of that in the first place. It's even more asinine to think that someone should have such a responsibility when they're not actually inciting anything.

 

[Rob_Mercury]

I think it's this video the guy talks about to Jenny. I cringed the first 10 seconds and bailed. God speed young cosmonauts.

 

[Zero Day Defense]

View attachment 1071489

"She was useless and I don't want to see her anymore because she was useless. The only value she had was comedic. Like, when she told Finn that they're not going to win by fighting what they hate but saving who they love after she T-boned him at high velocity, before the giant laser blasted through the wall and the First Order was about to murder everyone they loved-- I busted a gut."