Amy Ramadan / Amy Lee Bell / Amy David / Amy's Life Journey!!! / Amy's DesignZ / amysdesignz - Convicted thief, grifter, fat YouTuber in a spandex hijab; confirmed child abuser

She's already made the rules for the challenge, declared the prizes, changed her mind, reneged on the rules, decided to give the prizes to herself instead, and it hasn't even begun yet. Today's video was meant to be a true "what I eat in a day video". That's what Jen did (allegedly). Fat Amy instead starts the video saying, "Well, this isn't what I would typically eat in a day. This is just what I chose to eat today." So she failed on the premise for this video too. The entire point of this video was supposed to be an accurate representation of her eating before the "lifestyle change". Nope. She lied instead.

At least she admitted her husband hoses her down because she's too fat to wash herself. Let's be honest - it's probably poor Jeremiah that has to do it.
 
Fat Amy didn't eat any candy cookies or Christmas goodies or what the kids didn't eat? Already she's starting on the wrong foot by being dishonest. She doesn't want to say how much she expects to lose in 3 months because its her secret. This is a disaster already and she hasn't even started
I don't know why she wouldn't just claim the standard 2 lbs / week goal that is supposed to be the maximum for healthy weight loss. That would have been a 24 lb goal. Obese people can often lose a lot more than that in the beginning of a diet -- so she would have blown that goal away easily. The fact that she doesn't even think she can manage a 2 lb / week loss means that there is no way this is a real effort. Seems like a New Year's Resolution click bait situation.

She's already made the rules for the challenge, declared the prizes, changed her mind, reneged on the rules, decided to give the prizes to herself instead, and it hasn't even begun yet. Today's video was meant to be a true "what I eat in a day video". That's what Jen did (allegedly). Fat Amy instead starts the video saying, "Well, this isn't what I would typically eat in a day. This is just what I chose to eat today." So she failed on the premise for this video too. The entire point of this video was supposed to be an accurate representation of her eating before the "lifestyle change". Nope. She lied instead.

At least she admitted her husband hoses her down because she's too fat to wash herself. Let's be honest - it's probably poor Jeremiah that has to do it.
So, this is her massively restricting her food because she didn't want everyone to know exactly how many calories she eats a day. So now she'll have to restrict even more in order to look like she is actually eating less every day. (Or, more likely, she'll just lie about eating a lot less.)

Just simply eating less than what you do currently isn't enough, though. You have to eat 500 calories a day less than you BURN every day in order to lose 1 lb. per week. Eating fewer calories but still more calories than you burn every day won't result in weight loss. It will simply slow down your weight gain. I think that is why a lot of obese people can't lose weight. They get the calorie restriction but they have no concept of how many calories it is normal to consume in order to maintain their weight.
 
edit 2: idk why she says medicaid when poor people in oregon are on OHP (oregon health plan), which covers more shit than just medicaid. In fact, it will cover bariatric surgery for some patients!

Yup, pretty much anyone with a BMI > 35 can get bariatric surgery on OHP regardless of comorbidities of which she has a shitton. She could have had WLS years ago but chose not to. Honestly I don't think she would be able to complete the mandatory pre-op weight loss of 10-15% body weight.
 
Are we sure that Amy didn’t ride the short bus to school?
fullsizeoutput_d76.jpeg
 
After reading the whole thread im amazed by one thing: there are few lolcows where 'LARPing as a pseudo-muslim' is the least remarkable or weird thing about it.

Is it in the US also the case that CPS basically can only do a thing if the kid is beaten senseless everyday until it shows on the skin, i.e. when it's far too late?
 
After reading the whole thread im amazed by one thing: there are few lolcows where 'LARPing as a pseudo-muslim' is the least remarkable or weird thing about it.

Is it in the US also the case that CPS basically can only do a thing if the kid is beaten senseless everyday until it shows on the skin, i.e. when it's far too late?
it varies state by state; some places will remove kids for educational neglect, but others will wait until the kids shows up to the ER before doing anything. I have zero idea what OR is like, but I’ll look into it and update y’all.
 
it varies state by state; some places will remove kids for educational neglect, but others will wait until the kids shows up to the ER before doing anything. I have zero idea what OR is like, but I’ll look into it and update y’all.
Thing is, everywhere you hear a story like 'kids drowned in the tub, CPS and social workers did nothing for years' at least ten times per year as a headline. I guess people from YouTube or farmers here tried it already and they've probably gone like 'not enuff eViDeNcE'.
It would be sad if Lil Mowgli dies of silly nonsense like tetanus or staph.
 
Thing is, everywhere you hear a story like 'kids drowned in the tub, CPS and social workers did nothing for years' at least ten times per year as a headline. I guess people from YouTube or farmers here tried it already and they've probably gone like 'not enuff eViDeNcE'.
It would be sad if Lil Mowgli dies of silly nonsense like tetanus or staph.
I'm not in Oregon, but it takes a lot to get a kid removed from the home where I live. Knew friends who were the godparents of a kid. The parents turned into druggies, house was filthy, she went to school dirty, and CPS did take the kid away for a while and let them live with the godparents. Eventually, though, they met the bare minimum they needed to do and got the kid back. They didn't change, they just learned what they needed to do to get CPS off their back.

The goal is to keep families together if at all possible. And while that's noble and all, in most cases it simply means that you have to do some pretty horrific stuff before you lose custody of your kids. And most people don't really clean up their act. They just learn to hide their dysfunction better.
 
The commonality between Amy and Jen, besides the fat, is their inability to be truthful. Not only with others, but themselves. The food they eat is all highly processed, boxed, pre-made, and fast food. Nutritionally empty, calorific, and high sodium. The other commonality between all deathfats is their lack of desire to actually buy, cook, and eat "real food". Without this change they are doomed to fail. Both women didn't show many snacks. They are grazers no doubt about it. A handful of chips here, some pretzels there, a slice of cheese, a couple cookies- it adds up. It's reasonable to add at least another 1000 calories to both women's calorie count to get a more accurate daily total. I don't give this a week. Amy has already moved the goal posts and set the foundation for failure and excuses. However, I think they'll keep up the charade of weight loss/life change for much longer. As Dr. Nowzaradan says, " People lie. The scale doesn't". ( and ," You could've easily lost turdy pound dis munt")
 
Unfuckingbelievable. Since when is being a gluttonous fatass a disability? Fucking outrageous. The doctor who signed off on that should be fined.

Because that's what Amy needs- to walk less.
She clearly can't walk far, even athletic people would struggle to carry that much weight if it were strapped to em. and it is a good thing that doctors do not care how someone got to be disabled when they tell the dmv to give out placards. I have seen plenty of people become legitimately disabled from poor life choices, like DUIs where people lost legs, or smoking so much their lungs or heart failed, etc.

Wasn't Oregon the state in which those lesbian's with the adopted kids who drove off a cliff were based?
If I am remembering correctly, then that doesn't suggest it's great for kids who are being mis-treated.
That was in washington state. However, the governor of oregon did face a bunch of flack for multiple failings in DCFS. The federal government got involved and said that oregon DCFS is seriously fucking up in most measurable ways. The department is being sued constantly by former or current foster children for negligence, and it seems like they usually win.
 
Is it in the US also the case that CPS basically can only do a thing if the kid is beaten senseless everyday until it shows on the skin, i.e. when it's far too late?
I'm not in Oregon, but it takes a lot to get a kid removed from the home where I live. Knew friends who were the godparents of a kid. The parents turned into druggies, house was filthy, she went to school dirty, and CPS did take the kid away for a while and let them live with the godparents. Eventually, though, they met the bare minimum they needed to do and got the kid back. They didn't change, they just learned what they needed to do to get CPS off their back.

The goal is to keep families together if at all possible. And while that's noble and all, in most cases it simply means that you have to do some pretty horrific stuff before you lose custody of your kids. And most people don't really clean up their act. They just learn to hide their dysfunction better.

A cop told me once that all that's necessary to keep your kids is basically to have food in the house (could be a box of crackers in a maggot-infested fridge) and a place to sleep (could be an old, stained, smelly mattress with no sheets). I'm usually a libertarifag, but this stuff grinds my gears. Doesn't the child's right to grow up in a stable enough environment to avoid major personality disorders override their parents' rights to disappear for days and beat them?

I'll provide my own tophat: 🎩
 
Doesn't the child's right to grow up in a stable enough environment to avoid major personality disorders override their parents' rights to disappear for days and beat them?

I'll provide my own tophat: 🎩
There are so many vigilante groups beating up pedos, illegals, Nazis, communists, people of another race etc. etc., but sadly there doesn't seem to be a 'child protective enforcement' group taking people like Amy aside for a moment 🎩
 
She clearly can't walk far, even athletic people would struggle to carry that much weight if it were strapped to em. and it is a good thing that doctors do not care how someone got to be disabled when they tell the dmv to give out placards. I have seen plenty of people become legitimately disabled from poor life choices, like DUIs where people lost legs, or smoking so much their lungs or heart failed, etc.

What pisses people off with superobese fucks being given disability privileges is not just that they got themselves into that state, but unlike most disabilities, the fact they can get themselves out of it quite easily, and simply refuse to.

You cannot grow back legs that got cut off, or grow yourself a new pair of unfucked, unimpaired lungs from smoking, but you can lose weight at home, alone, without any medical help if you so wish. It's called 'eating less'. What is aggravating with the Amys of this world getting disability is that they see it as an end point, a fixed state that proves in some way they cannot help themselves and should not be expected to ever again. They're 'disabled' by definition, so they are a victim and cannot be expected to change and more so, they have RIGHTS and PRIVILEGES now. Which they don't want to give up. They don't want to give up the disability cheeque, the not having the work, the parking placards, or the pleasure of shoving their entire state payments down their throats in the form of takeaways and fast foods.

I would totally support giving disability to people who've eaten themselves disabled if it was time limited to a couple of years max and came with an expectation that they do the work to lose weight and thus undisable themselves. Give them free community gym access, a program about how to cook basic meals if they don't know how, or info about how to understand your calorie needs and calculate how many calories foods have if we have to. But giving them a lifetime support to keep indulging their worst instincts and feeding themselves to death - fuck no.
 
What pisses people off with superobese fucks being given disability privileges is not just that they got themselves into that state, but unlike most disabilities, the fact they can get themselves out of it quite easily, and simply refuse to.

You cannot grow back legs that got cut off, or grow yourself a new pair of unfucked, unimpaired lungs from smoking, but you can lose weight at home, alone, without any medical help if you so wish. It's called 'eating less'. What is aggravating with the Amys of this world getting disability is that they see it as an end point, a fixed state that proves in some way they cannot help themselves and should not be expected to ever again. They're 'disabled' by definition, so they are a victim and cannot be expected to change and more so, they have RIGHTS and PRIVILEGES now. Which they don't want to give up. They don't want to give up the disability cheeque, the not having the work, the parking placards, or the pleasure of shoving their entire state payments down their throats in the form of takeaways and fast foods.

I would totally support giving disability to people who've eaten themselves disabled if it was time limited to a couple of years max and came with an expectation that they do the work to lose weight and thus undisable themselves. Give them free community gym access, a program about how to cook basic meals if they don't know how, or info about how to understand your calorie needs and calculate how many calories foods have if we have to. But giving them a lifetime support to keep indulging their worst instincts and feeding themselves to death - fuck no.
emphysema is what happens when you could have quit smoking to unfuck your lungs, and didn't. people lose a toe to diabetes and don't fix it so they lose their foot and then their leg below the knee. I could go on and on. People get told so god damn often by doctors "if you just stopped doing x, your issue would likely improve", and then patients don't do it. If you take it personally or judge you can't work in medicine for long, it is really hard to care how the problem started when you are dealing with individuals who need professional help. There are points of no return for lots of disabilities, but that's true for fatties too. Lymphedema is a permanent issue, for instance. Whatever made these people this fat to begin with might be something that they can't fix on their own, maybe not, no one really knows for sure. When I learn about mentally ill populations that can theoretically recover (eating disorders, hoarders, addicts, whatever) it seems like half of them are not bad people, they are struggling with a mental issue, and the other half are just horrible people who are too dumb to make better decisions. Amy seems like a horrible person. However, she isn't that unusual of a disabled person for having made choices that led directly to a disability.
 
Back