- Joined
- Feb 4, 2013
YOU LEAVE TURNIPS OUT OF THIS.If I make a comic about how everyone here likes to anally insert turnips, will it be true?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
YOU LEAVE TURNIPS OUT OF THIS.If I make a comic about how everyone here likes to anally insert turnips, will it be true?
Do you ever worry for your worldview when it's so fickle that you cannot accept others' perspectives on situations you describe?Do you ever worry about the validity of your worldview if it's only valid when you take people's experiences, tell them they're not true, and re-write them for them?
Then deconstruct my argument why don't you, instead of ignoring it. And Saul Goodman's while you're at it. I think between us we sum up what we all feel.None of the arguments have been valid, so logically my statement applies to all of them.
more like "the egg came before the chicken because the chicken must have been wearing a fedora"Wait, I get it. There's a language barrier here. I guess in loveshy slang, "not valid arguments" actually means "inconvenient shit I don't want to deal with".
the egg came before the chicken because the chicken must have been wearing a fedora
Do you ever worry for your worldview when it's so fickle that you cannot accept others' perspectives on situations you describe?
For the record, I'm always examining my world-view. That's why I don't believe in nonsense like the friendzone. Maybe you should try it sometime because your current worldview is rather ridiculous. I told you that your described experience was nonsense not because it 'pulls my worldview into question' or whatever, but because the situation you described communicated to me what I wrote in my post to you.
Just because someone makes out with you when they're drunk doesn't mean they want to spend their lives with you. Girls don't ditch guys for being too nice. That's a fantasy tale and the fact that you don't seem to grasp that is both really funny and really sad.
Anyway, it's been fun, but I think it's about time to bring our little conversation to a close. I don't think either of us is gonna change the other person's mind, and you gave me some good chuckles, so I think it'd be pointless continuing this.
Well I feel the same way about you, so no one can claim to have objectively "won". It's just an opinion.
However, I'm fully willing to change my view if a good argument is presented, so perhaps there is potential for me to grow here if there's a view that makes more sense than my current one.
None of the arguments have been valid, so logically my statement applies to all of them.
If I make a comic about how everyone here likes to anally insert turnips, will it be true?
more like "the egg came before the chicken because the chicken must have been wearing a fedora"
it's not an argument, it's an assertion. An assertion is a conclusion. Your conclusions haven't been founded on demonstrable evidence and logic yet. You just say "women are this way", the same way I say "women are this way". But I don't pretend for my mere assertions to be arguments.Then deconstruct my argument why don't you, instead of ignoring it. And Saul Goodman's while you're at it. I think between us we sum up what we all feel.
I don't know, bro. I've dropped some pretty good points at you that would be conversation starters and you stopped following up. Maybe I was a bit rough with my delivery (protip: your smugness will continue to bring this out in those you interact with), but my points seemed pretty solid to me and those who hit the "agree" rating. Twice now, you have abandoned a line of questioning when I started holding your feet to the fire.more like "the egg came before the chicken because the chicken must have been wearing a fedora"
Fine lets think about this logically. Nothing you tried so far has worked correct? Then why not try to be a better person instead of a bitter, arrogant, misogynistic cunt?
"The very definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over again and expecting a different result."
~Albert Einstein.
So we are to believe that you went home and completely dispassionately decided that you needed to be "less nice" to women so that you could better round out your Sex Hypothesis.You're inventing emotion into it. The event happened, I learnt from it. It's just data.
http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Not_even_wrongit's not an argument, it's an assertion. An assertion is a conclusion. Your conclusions haven't been founded on demonstrable evidence and logic yet. You just say "women are this way", the same way I say "women are this way". But I don't pretend for my mere assertions to be arguments.
Dear lord. 25 pages already.
I'd thought you'd be the smart one and just leave. But no you came back. People who think they're smart and come back to prove how smart they are are not as smart as they think they are.
Saney asked what YOU think. Between Holden and him I am starting to think that lacking swag means you can't answer questions like an adult.He seems ok about enginehead and I, and seems to agree about the dysfunction inherent in women in western culture, so I'd be interested to hear what he'd say to mesh these two ideas together where western women are to be avoided but it's bad for our race to mix with another apparently.
It is a viable method because I wouldn't get anything out of actually debating you. I get to have a bit of fun at least when insulting your fedora, gut or lack of personality.You like to pretend that insults are a viable method to counter logic.