Lolcow Andrew Peter Carlson / Anaiah Carlson / Tamarlover / Xtamarlover - Jewish/Christian Wannabe Cult Leader, Stalker, Ugly af, dogfucker, mayor of spitsville

[Rabid Weasels]

Sorry if I missed this somewhere I thought I was caught up. Why $15,000? These are specific damages? For what?

 

[Anaiah Carlson]

Sorry if I missed this somewhere I thought I was caught up. Why $15,000? These are specific damages? For what?

I had said I would like to do restitution. Tell me how much you feel I owe you based on how I treated you. The $15,000 was picked by her and calculated based on her gut feeling what she felt would make things right between me and her. I told her she could pick any amount as long as it was $20,000 or less. In response, she told me she wanted $15,000 (though later changed it to $18,000). I was willing to even send the $18,000, but I was unwilling to sign a legal contract that she wanted me to sign in which I would agree my legal documentation that I would send her the money. I said I'll only keep sending money if there is no contract. Because I wasn't willing to sign it, she said the deal is off, and that she never wants money from me ever again. I barely had any money left over for myself when I was sending her so much money, so even though I was little disappointed, I was ultimately relieved and glad that I didn't have to keep sending my money. It was a huge financial burden and an emotional burden to have to send so much money. Which I would have been happy to do even though it was definitely a huge sacrifice and toll on me mentally to give so much money. But now I can spend money on myself which I am very pleased about. I've been buying thousands of dollars worth of books for my library goals. So I feel like I am making better use of my money now.

 

[Spergetti]

I'm not short ask your mother how tall I am. She'

Pussies will always find find a excuse.

They don't rule me like you smucks.

I am superior dude.

mobb rule

Give the meth pipe a rest, Marshall. You're barely speaking English anymore.

Pussies will always find find a excuse. Andrew I know this is your profile. I'm on a cell phone so insulting my intelligence is lame cause nobody on earth gives a fuck about oxfords spelling rules. Words represent phonetic sound and as long as vowels are placed correctly for the reader to decipher pronunciation there is absolutely no way to misspell a word. Dont give a fuck what some yuppie education center says. They don't rule me like you smucks. Nice try you AINT doing shit. I am superior dude. FACT.

Also, thanks for confirming you are Marshall Castersen. Again. For like, the 17th time since you started acting like a retard in this thread.

 

[Anaiah Carlson]

What kind of video games did you buy for yourself? What do you play

Heres my switch games. also have a few digital ones like smash bros

 

[Diana Moon Glampers]

I had said I would like to do restitution. Tell me how much you feel I owe you based on how I treated you. The $15,000 was picked by her and calculated based on her gut feeling what she felt would make things right between me and her. I told her she could pick any amount as long as it was $20,000 or less. In response, she told me she wanted $15,000 (though later changed it to $18,000). I was willing to even send the $18,000, but I was unwilling to sign a legal contract that she wanted me to sign in which I would agree my legal documentation that I would send her the money. I said I'll only keep sending money if there is no contract. Because I wasn't willing to sign it, she said the deal is off, and that she never wants money from me ever again. I barely had any money left over for myself when I was sending her so much money, so even though I was little disappointed, I was ultimately relieved and glad that I didn't have to keep sending my money. It was a huge financial burden and an emotional burden to have to send so much money. Which I would have been happy to do even though it was definitely a huge sacrifice and toll on me mentally to give so much money. But now I can spend money on myself which I am very pleased about. I've been buying thousands of dollars worth of books for my library goals. So I feel like I am making better use of my money now.

Do your parents know you gave away $15,000 to her? $15,000 is enough for a single person to live on for a year...you wouldn't live well, and you'd probably need food stamps and stuff, but there are plenty of people living life on that difficulty level right now.

Do your parents know that you could be very nearly self-sufficient if you weren't so committed to the idea that people are obligated to be your friend forever (even if the only way they'll agree to that is through five-figure payments)?

 

[Anaiah Carlson]

Do your parents know you gave away $15,000 to her? $15,000 is enough for a single person to live on for a year...you wouldn't live well, and you'd probably need food stamps and stuff, but there are plenty of people living life on that difficulty level right now.

Do your parents know that you could be very nearly self-sufficient if you weren't so committed to the idea that people are obligated to be your friend forever (even if the only way they'll agree to that is through five-figure payments)?

I only gave her $6,500, and then I decided to back out and not give her the rest because she was making unreasonable demands of me to sign legal documents and such stating I'd agree to send her the rest of her money. So her insistence i sign such a thing was the very reason I decided not to send her the rest of the money. Because Melinda had called my sister's phone number and harassed her, I told my sister that I sent her $6,500 and my sister then tattled to my parents and as punishment I have to start paying $200 in rent every month starting this January if I want to keep living with my parents. This they hope will teach me some discipline and to use my money more wisely. My dad was extremely offended that I gave her so much money. Its good i only sent $6,500.

 

[Deadpool]

.Words represent phonetic sound and as long as vowels are placed correctly for the reader to decipher pronunciation there is absolutely no way to misspell a word. Dont give a fuck what some yuppie education center says. They don't rule me like you smucks. Nice try you AINT doing shit. I am superior dude. FACT.

Yuppie education center? You mean elementary school? They have those in the ghetto too, and teach the students the same thing. I'm not a slave to the rules. I just enjoy communicating effectively, while not looking like a 3rd grade drop out. Oh and I post exclusively on a tablet or phone so that's no excuse.

 

[Anaiah Carlson]

null

My picture of video games I have on the switch is gold highlighted. lol that must not be the case in the final version of your algorithm, Null. Just wanted to let you know cause I can't comment in most other threads to give my imput (I'm almost solely confined by the mods to being able to post on my own thread only). I also can't message anyone or post on my profile so I am only able to say such things here in my thread.

 

[Diana Moon Glampers]

I only gave her $6,500, and then I decided to back out and not give her the rest because she was making unreasonable demands of me to sign legal documents and such stating I'd agree to send her the rest of her money. So her insistence i sign such a thing was the very reason I decided not to send her the rest of the money. Because Melinda had called my sister's phone number and harassed her, I told my sister that I sent her $6,500 and my sister then tattled to my parents and as punishment I have to start paying $200 in rent every month starting this January if I want to keep living with my parents. This they hope will teach me some discipline and to use my money more wisely. My dad was extremely offended that I gave her so much money. Its good i only sent $6,500.

LOL, so what you mean to say is, you got ratted out before you could send her more than $6500, your parents had an angry discussion with you, and then you told her you couldn't send her more money "because she was being unreasonable," but really because you have to abide by your parents' rules to keep living with them.

Have you offered your ex-girlfriend money to keep talking to her, as restitution? It's such a great idea, I don't know why it's so rarely done.

 

[Agoraphobic Bullshit]

As a child I was diagnosed with asperger syndrome. After a couple years of therapy as a child, they decided I had made such great progress that it wasn't necessary to need special education services and to just enroll me in school in normal classes like everyone else. Ever since then I lived as a normal kid and never thought of myself any different.

Unrelated question for anyone who knows to answer: Is it just me, or did people's past conversations from years past get deleted? I think at one point I was banned from starting conversations with people (and I still am banned) but I was still able to see people's past messages. But now I can't see any past messages. So is this for everyone that their messages past a certain date got deleted or were my access to past messages I had deleted for some reason? or are they still accessible? all i see is this in my messages thing:

View attachment 1083556

Well, Chris-Chan's parents thought he was normal enough to be mainstreamed, and look how poorly that turned out.

I mean, he's never actually stalked anyone for years on end to the extent you do, and has never attempted to buy useless land for a cult, so he may have a few things going for him that you do not.

Edited: spelling

 

[Baby Yoda]

null

My picture of video games I have on the switch is gold highlighted. lol that must not be the case in the final version of your algorithm, Null. Just wanted to let you know cause I can't comment in most other threads to give my imput (I'm almost solely confined by the mods to being able to post on my own thread only). I also can't message anyone or post on my profile so I am only able to say such things here in my thread.

Are you trying to say you don't think that your video games should be highlighted in gold?

 

[Anaiah Carlson]

LOL, so what you mean to say is, you got ratted out before you could send her more than $6500, your parents had an angry discussion with you, and then you told her you couldn't send her more money "because she was being unreasonable," but really because you have to abide by your parents' rules to keep living with them.

Have you offered your ex-girlfriend money to keep talking to her, as restitution? It's such a great idea, I don't know why it's so rarely done.

No i'm saying that i stopped sending her the rest of the money well before. Melinda had a fight with me when I said i wouldn't send her any more money if she is forcing me to sign the contract, so she started arguing with me, and we got nasty towards each other. She was offended by things I said so she started calling people in my family and yelling at them threatening them. Prior to that I had already stopped sending her money about a month before that.

 

[Null]

wait, the Carlson guy is back fawning over the dipshit hick woman whose failed 5 times in a row to even get a response from the people she's trying to sue?

 

[Jaded Optimist]

wait, the Carlson guy is back fawning over the dipshit hick woman whose failed 5 times in a row to even get a response from the people she's trying to sue?

Once a cow always a cow.

Throughout last year he sent her over $6000.

 

[Anaiah Carlson]

wait, the Carlson guy is back fawning over the dipshit hick woman whose failed 5 times in a row to even get a response from the people she's trying to sue?

No. During the Summer I had a lapse of judgment and tried to make things right with her and I was hoping helping her could help me move on from my ex girlfriend. Anyways, I advise you to read pages 261-274 of this thread so you can be fully updated (and fully entertained).

In light of what Melinda said in the other thread, since I am unable to post in that thread, my clarifications in light of what she said:

My statements about how many men she had married was based from her own testimony. Melinda's husband Marshall made a video in 2017 saying that he had had five wives and that she had had eight husbands. Furthermore, every "concubine" that Melinda had she referred to him as her "husband" at the time she was with him. And only after they broke up did she change how she characterized the relationship. So my mention of her having 8 husbands was based on her own testimony. My specific statement in the past was that she had eight husbands and had sex with 9 people. But the 9th person was speculation on my part based on unclear info. Anyways, that clears up what I said.

Now the other stuff. Yes I contacted Melinda asking her to follow through with restitution in exchange for forgiveness (I don't think I said contrary to that). Ask Melinda how many people have asked her for restitution. She told me that i was the FIRST that asked her for restitution. Apparently not even Marshall asked her for restitution. So anyways, she decided to give me a chance to make restitution with her. Now regarding this 20% interest thing, whether or not it is secular or not doesn't make a difference. The 20% should have been the same regardless and should have already been included in the final amount from the getgo. Thus, if it was judged to be $15,000 plus 20% interest, thats what it should have been all along, regardless of how much of it was regarded as religious or not. When she said that half was legal and half was religious, I misunderstood what she was saying. I thought she was saying that because part of what I did was a legal wrong done to her, and because part of it was a religious wrong done to her, that the restitution total would be $15,000. It was not made clear in any way that the legal part was to be regarded as a legal settlement in the context of her supreme court lawsuit.

Typically, if a change of terms is made, you discuss the implications. Instead of discussing it first, she just threw a fast one on me. She could have said "well if you want to do only torah, i would add an extra 20%." that would have given me the opportunity to say oh well then nevermind lets just stick to secular and religious or to decide if i was ok with the extra 20%. instead she just thrusted it upon me without consent or informing me of the terms. I did agree to the extra 20% after the fact, but I was reluctantly agreeing because I didn't want to sign a notarized agreement. I agreed to it at first, because I thought she was approaching it from a sincere and honest perspective. But when she changed it to $18,000 by tacking on 20% interest without discussing that was going to be done first before having me agree to it, I started to suspect her intentions were no longer sincere.

I increasingly got the sense that she didn't want to communicate with me anymore and that if i signed the notarized document she would then say "ok now don't talk to me anymore" and then if i refused to send her money she would do a lawsuit saying i agreed to send the money because i signed the document. wishing to avoid such a thing, I said why can't i just keep sending you the money. we don't need to sign such a contract. ive been faithful sending the money this entire time i said to her. I offered to pay her back whatever it cost her to go through the trouble of getting it notarized. she refused my offer to pay her back for that amount. The email i sent her was not "i changed my mind i don't want to send you money anymore". rather it was "i changed my mind about signing the document. I want to send you money but without a legal document notarized please." She refused it, showing her intentions were not right with me.

It is Melinda's POV of view that I was getting too personal in my discussions with her but it is my POV that she was getting too personal with me and involving me in her business and drama by telling me all about her problems with Marshall. Telling me how abusive he was to her. Asking me to help her get away from Marshall. Asking me to defend her against him, by arguing against him in a group thread. She told me "be brave" and to post against him to refute him for his false theology about spousal abuse. If she didn't want me to talk personal with her, she shouldn't have been confiding in me highly personal things about her emotions and her relationship problems. Also she said that she found evidence I broke the agreement by telling third parties info about her. But we had a truce which explicitly stated that if she suspected me having broken the agreement that she must first bring the accusation to me and give me a warning and give me a chance to not do it again, in case I misunderstood the terms of the agreement. So instead of keeping the truce of peace, she voluntarily ended the peace truce and refused to give me the benefit of the doubt. We could have still had peace this entire time. But instead, she revoked our peace truce all because she didn't like that I had talked about her privately with my friends. I had told her in advance that I might speak about her to my friends, but that I wouldn't confide in the personal details of our restitution stuff and that it would be very minor info about her and nothing personal. Anyways, this whole thing is just ridiculous. I did my best to try to make peace and restitution and fix my wrongs with Melinda. But she caved out and decided to choose an abuser (Marshall) rather than have peace with me. It was only when she started patching things back up with Marshall that she decided she didn't want to talk as much with me anymore. She was going to be working for me at one point, but she decided against it because she was still unsure about whether she would reconcile with Marshall. And then she did and she started pulling herself back. And ever since she started that Supreme Court appeal, she changed her attitude and behavior towards me. It was like once the supreme court thing was filed by her, she didn't want the truce with me anymore and was being mean towards me and inconsiderate of my feelings.



So 2 months of negotiations by email and all that work I had to go through and then he says he changes his mind. I could have reached across the computer and choked him. Also my POV is that he was getting too personal in many of the legal discussions and that exhausted me to the point of no return. He was trying to overstep the boundaries of the Agreement by giving me unsolicited advice. Also, at that point I found evidence that he broke the Agreement by telling third parties information about me. So I called it off.

Lets see who a better husband would have been for Melinda:

Husband number 1:

1.Physically Hits Wife
2.Physically Demeans and Mocks and Insults Wife Making Her Feel Like Crap
3.Constantly Fights and Argues all the time
4.Addicted to drugs
5.Unable to support himself or his family financially
6.Is anti-feminist
7.Believes men aren't able to be perfect saying excuses for bad actions such as "i'm just a man."

Husband number 2:

1.Never physically hits wife.
2.Never physically demeans or mocks or insults wife. makes her feel wonderful all the time like a queen.
3.Only fights or argues on rare occasion and not major/big arguments/fights.
4.Not addicted to any substances
5.Financially stable and self-sufficient
6.Feminist
7.Believes men are able to be perfect and that any wrong deeds done by men are the full responsibility of the person doing those deeds.

Now which one is husband number 1 and husband number 2? which one is better?

Yet solely because I don't believe In Paul she would rather be with a horribly abusive man. Every time she would consider being with me, she would choose someone else instead who rejected Paul. I as a good former friend, tried everything I could think of to restore friendship with her. I sent her $6,500! No one else has done as much as me to try and fix things with Melinda. But it was never good enough for her. I could never satisfy her overly high requirements she placed on me. Meanwhile, she gives all these excuses for Marshall even though his behavior is far worse and more outrageous than mine. Its entirely unfair. But no matter, most likely if she had been with me it would have ended in disaster anyways. And I can do far better. I just wanted to be with her because she was my best friend and her friendship had meant so much to me. Why would I send her that much money if I didn't care about her? I proved myself to be a true friend even when she turned me away.

But anyways, I need to find a woman who will be by my side no matter what. Who will go with me to the ends of the earth. Who will be my partner in the truth and lead by my side as my queen. Who will believe whatever the evidence points to even if its against her beliefs.

Just final thing to say. Marshall is NOT the excellent husband by Melinda's standard. She settled majorly to be with him. But if that's what she wants, I told her that is her choice and I would support her choice if thats what she wants. And i wished her luck and success in her relationship with Marshall. So its not like I am trying to end their relationship. But when she told me she wanted out of her relationship, I tried to help her because that's what she said she wanted at the time. Its not my fault that that was misconstrued by her as me being "too personal". Anyways, I want the drama to be over. I agreed not to contact her anymore. But here she comes onto this site, referencing what i said. So since she referenced what I said, I wanted to provide further clarity regarding what she said.

And to be clear, I said i would keep doing restitution if she wanted me to. She was the one that refused and denied my offer to continue sending her restitution. I offered to pay off the restitution she said no. So its not my fault that I haven't fulfilled restitution. And I think its unfair to characterize me as a 5.5 year stalker. 2016-2017 i was being stalkerish (though whether "stalker" is debatable, though I was pretty creepy and cringy in much of what I had said and done in those two years, i admit). I deny the association beyond that.

 

[Baby Yoda]

Lets see who a better husband would have been for Melinda:

Husband number 1:

1.Physically Hits Wife
2.Physically Demeans and Mocks and Insults Wife Making Her Feel Like Crap
3.Constantly Fights and Argues all the time
4.Addicted to drugs
5.Unable to support himself or his family financially
6.Is anti-feminist
7.Believes men aren't able to be perfect saying excuses for bad actions such as "i'm just a man."

Husband number 2:

1.Never physically hits wife.
2.Never physically demeans or mocks or insults wife. makes her feel wonderful all the time like a queen.
3.Only fights or argues on rare occasion and not major/big arguments/fights.
4.Not addicted to any substances
5.Financially stable and self-sufficient
6.Feminist
7.Believes men are able to be perfect and that any wrong deeds done by men are the full responsibility of the person doing those deeds.

Now which one is husband number 1 and husband number 2? which one is better?

Yet solely because I don't believe In Paul she would rather be with a horribly abusive man. Every time she would consider being with me, she would choose someone else instead who rejected Paul. I as a good former friend, tried everything I could think of to restore friendship with her. I sent her $6,500! No one else has done as much as me to try and fix things with Melinda. But it was never good enough for her. I could never satisfy her overly high requirements she placed on me. Meanwhile, she gives all these excuses for Marshall even though his behavior is far worse and more outrageous than mine. Its entirely unfair. But no matter, most likely if she had been with me it would have ended in disaster anyways. And I can do far better. I just wanted to be with her because she was my best friend and her friendship had meant so much to me. Why would I send her that much money if I didn't care about her? I proved myself to be a true friend even when she turned me away.

But anyways, I need to find a woman who will be by my side no matter what. Who will go with me to the ends of the earth. Who will be my partner in the truth and lead by my side as my queen. Who will believe whatever the evidence points to even if its against her beliefs.

Just final thing to say. Marshall is NOT the excellent husband by Melinda's standard. She settled majorly to be with him. But if that's what she wants, I told her that is her choice and I would support her choice if thats what she wants. And i wished her luck and success in her relationship with Marshall. So its not like I am trying to end their relationship. But when she told me she wanted out of her relationship, I tried to help her because that's what she said she wanted at the time. Its not my fault that that was misconstrued by her as me being "too personal". Anyways, I want the drama to be over. I agreed not to contact her anymore. But here she comes onto this site, referencing what i said. So since she referenced what I said, I wanted to provide further clarity regarding what she said.

And to be clear, I said i would keep doing restitution if she wanted me to. She was the one that refused and denied my offer to continue sending her restitution. I offered to pay off the restitution she said no. So its not my fault that I haven't fulfilled restitution. And I think its unfair to characterize me as a 5.5 year stalker. 2016-2017 i was being stalkerish (though whether "stalker" is debatable, though I was pretty creepy and cringy in much of what I had said and done in those two years, i admit). I deny the association beyond that.

I only started reading your post, but Melinda is the poster woman for how autistic SJWs are. They always say they want equality and a "nice" guy but end up with some drunken, dirty, racist, misogynist. Makes sense evolutionarily. After 100,000 years of living out in the Savannah and at war with other tribes, if a woman chose a weak "nice guy" over a mean, psychopathic caveman she risks death. Women like Melinda's brains just haven't caught up to how humans have evolved since to select for intelligence over brutality since the caveman days.

 

[Jaded Optimist]

I only started reading your post, but Melinda is the poster woman for how autistic SJWs are. They always say they want equality and a "nice" guy but end up with some drunken, dirty, racist, misogynist. Makes sense evolutionarily. After 100,000 years of living out in the Savannah and at war with other tribes, if a woman chose a weak "nice guy" over a mean, psychopathic caveman she risks death. Women like Melinda's brains just haven't caught up to how humans have evolved since to select for intelligence over brutality since the caveman days.

Have you even read Andrew's thread? He is not a catch or a "nice guy".

He is a nice guy in the internet sense whee he feels he us owed affection from women.

 

[Baby Yoda]

Have you even read Andrew's thread? He is not a catch or a "nice guy".

He is a nice guy in the internet sense whee he feels he us owed affection from women.

I just meant in reference to his last post about Melinda choosing husband 1 over 2, not Andrew in general.

 

[Anaiah Carlson]

Have you even read Andrew's thread? He is not a catch or a "nice guy".

He is a nice guy in the internet sense whee he feels he us owed affection from women.

Im owed affection from women who owe it. Not all women. My exes owe me affection. So do former friends who ended friendship without justification.

 

[Baby Yoda]

Im owed affection from women who owe it. Not all women. My exes owe me affection. So do former friends who ended friendship without justification.

Why dont you just start a religious meetup or something and find some other woman?