So since you disagree with the number 9, can you tell us how many husbands you have had and what is your definition of a husband?
also, why would you except money and communicate with Andrew if you felt threatened by him?
Well now, let's set the record straight here. Although Mr. Carlson gave me an apology letter retracting his statements, which I could just paste here publicly, it does not contain some details which would be needed to set the record straight.
For one, Mr. Carlson, or "The Stalker" as we call him in my home, misrepresent my beliefs. He wrongly said that I believe sex=marriage. I do NOT believe sex=marriage. I said sex=Covenant. He missed a footnote in my Thesis which clearly said the 2 people must also LIVE TOGETHER with the intent to cleave to be specifically a *Marriage Covenant*. So, sex which is rape or slavery is not marriage, because although the person may be kidnapped and then housed, they didn't consent. I said that in my Thesis.
So by my beliefs, I have been married two (2) times. (Once to a pagan and then I learned The Torah.) I had some male concubines (Covenant partners) in between which did not work out (the Covenants were broken). The number is not important. What's important is that I have never had a sexual relationship forbidden by the Torah (never adultery, never prostitution, never Polyandry nor Polygyny) and that I only left people under the rules of Torah. Serial Monogamy, based on the rules of Torah, is not evil.
Also, Mr. Carlson misrepresented some information about us talking. I just finished reading the other thread. Mr. Carlson contacted ME to offer me restitution in exchange for forgiveness. It's a Torah thing. Since I believe it is my moral obligation to offer a chance for restitution, I said yes. However, I told him clearly in June 2019 I would accept half as legal restitution under secular law and half as restitution under Torah law. I have an email proving he agreed to that. Reason I said it is because until someone proves their intent to pay off the restitution (under Torah) is earnest they do not qualify as an Israelite eligible to pay restitution under Torah.
He then retracted his acceptance of those terms and said "Torah only". I said that was fine and so I changed the Agreement to be a religious agreement. That meant I had to tack on 20% interest. He felt slighted by that because it was changed in the final draft to reflect the 20%. Despite the turmoil in his soul about it, he reluctantly agreed, but after all, it's what the Torah says. He acted in the emails like I pulled a fast one on him, but I did not. Torah is Torah.
He agreed to a notarized version of it. I asked for notarized because the Torah says "by two witnesses shall a matter be established". We don't have a Court of Judges overseeing us (neither of us are under a Rabbinical Court) so a secular third party had to do. I go the go ahead by Mr. Carlson to go to the bank, notarize my part and mail it off. I went pregnant with my other children to the bank (no small feat!) and stood there waiting for almost 30 minutes with a wiggly toddler while some incompetent teller tried to figure out how to notarize, grabbed my paper off her desk, went across the street to a law office, and then to the post office and paid to send it signature delivery. I came back home to my desk, opened an email and after all that The Stalker says "I changed my mind".
So 2 months of negotiations by email and all that work I had to go through and then he says he changes his mind. I could have reached across the computer and choked him. Also my POV is that he was getting too personal in many of the legal discussions and that exhausted me to the point of no return. He was trying to overstep the boundaries of the Agreement by giving me unsolicited advice. Also, at that point I found evidence that he broke the Agreement by telling third parties information about me. So I called it off.
hahahaha.
