Lolcow Melinda Leigh Scott & Marshall Castersen - Sue-happy couple. Flat earth conspiracists. Pretending to be Jewish. Believe Kiwi Farms is protected by the Masonic Order. 0-6 on lawsuits. Marshall is dead.

On one hand, "I'll sue and sue until you stop talking about me!"

On the other hand assuming not gay ops (which I doubt), "I'll show up in the thread about me and get everyone to talk about me!"

Crazy is as crazy does, I guess. Also, have you read CDA 230 yet?
 
  • Agree
Reactions: xtamarlover
The Torah allows for divorce. You're trying to Christianize His words. Try again.
He specifically said what the Rabbis were teaching, which was that divorce was okay, and corrected their wrong teachings by reminding the Jews that divorce was not okay unless the woman was a whore (i.e. having sex with men besides her spouse). Further, he also said that marrying a divorced woman was adultery.

Do you believe the Messiah's words as recounted in Matthew? If you believe them when he discusses the law being upheld, why do you not believe him equally when he discusses this part of the law?
 
For someone trying to correct a woman as knowledgeable as me about Hebraic Scripture, you sure didn't do your homework before you opened your mouth!

Now I was determined not to validate this site by even engaging on here but you have now desacrated my Father's Torah with lies! Now that the lawsuits are over I have more freedom to speak

Your scripture twisting is lies! Don't you know where it is written:

"Fury seizes me when I think of The Wicked, because they abandon Your Torah" (Psalm 119:53)

"I hate the company of evildoers, I will not sit with The Wicked" (Psalm 26:5)

"I hate those who serve worthless idols" (Psalm 31:5)

"May He put death on them" (Psalm 55:16(15))

"Don't let them enter Your righteousness" (Psalm 69:28-29)

"I feel such digust with those who defy you! I hate them with unlimited hatred!" (Psalm 139:21-22)

"May my enemy meet the doom of the Wicked"---Spoken by the righteous Job (Job 27:7)

So there is the TRUTH. Check your facts before you go twisting Scripture into lies!

Then go learn to read Prob 16:7 in Hebrew because your christianized version is a lie.

Then go read about Samson who set his enemies fields on fire so you can learn what righteous hate is. Stop twisting Scripture into lies by cherry picking verses!

Then go learn what slander is! May YHWH curse all the wicked and evil who have told lies about me and slandered me on this site.

Then go learn what the persecution of the righteous is! You are ignorant of the truth.

And I praise and thank you Elohim, maker of Heaven and Earth, for allowing this persecution upon me to prove I am worthy of Your Kingdom. As Yahushua said: my reward in Heaven is great!
God your sperg out with biblical scripture makes the Sunday schools I had as a kid look More intelligible than this shit.
 
What's the matter Mr. Sexist? You have no facts to stand on so all you can do is call names to try and reinforce your pathetic failing world of Patriarchy?
I'm sure you appreciate Marshall coming online to brag about owning you and fucking you all the time. Gee, it almost sounds like you just talk a big game about feminism, and then just ignore whatever your husband does to cling onto number nine like your life depends on it.
 
On one hand, "I'll sue and sue until you stop talking about me!"

On the other hand assuming not gay ops (which I doubt), "I'll show up in the thread about me and get everyone to talk about me!"

Crazy is as crazy does, I guess. Also, have you read CDA 230 yet?


They were already talking before I showed up. Where you been for that delusional version of events you came up with?

Read my Appeal. I already addressed CDA 230. They don't qualify for immunity under the laws. As I said on page #40ish when Josh posted my email, the lower courts judges don't even follow their own laws. Read before you speak.
 
You'd tolerate a cheater (a form of emotional/mental abuse)? Why would you tolerate that kind of abuse?

Never said I'd tolerate it. Someone in such a case should work it out with their partner (or court in marriage cases) or just leave them. It's not as bad as getting your spleen ruptured or getting a concussion, in any case.


Anyways I'll answer your question with a question of my own:

Why tolerate someone who hits you? Why would you tolerate that form of abuse?
 
I'm sure you appreciate Marshall coming online to brag about owning you and fucking you all the time. Gee, it almost sounds like you just talk a big game about feminism, and then just ignore whatever your husband does to cling onto number nine like your life depends on it.

You must have missed the comment up there where I set the record straight that I've only been married twice. Read before you speak.

My husband had his break ups and divorce before meeting me. I respect him so much for treating me like an equal in that way and not dehumanizing me as a woman. And accepting my prior children through spiritual adoption instead of looking down on me for not aborting my children.
 
What's the matter Mr. Sexist? You have no facts to stand on so all you can do is call names to try and reinforce your pathetic failing world of Patriarchy?
No Ms. Whore, there is no point in trying to seriously engage you because all will do is shriek some variation of "read something, BUT THE TORAH, pagan, sexist, or study my inbred religion while I insult yours" It's like talking to a particularly stupid, autistic parrot. Tamar want a cracker...I mean cock?
 
You must have missed the comment up there where I set the record straight that I've only been married twice. Read before you speak.

My husband had his break ups and divorce before meeting me. I respect him so much for treating me like an equal in that way and not dehumanizing me as a woman. And accepting my prior children through spiritual adoption instead of looking down on me for not aborting my children.
Great response, thanks for not addressing anything I said about your husband bragging about FILLING YOUR HOLES constantly on the internet to impress people. Nice mental gymnastics there, Tamar. Maybe you should put half the effort you spend ignore the problems in your marriage into writing a lawsuit.
 
You must have missed the comment up there where I set the record straight that I've only been married twice. Read before you speak.

My husband had his break ups and divorce before meeting me. I respect him so much for treating me like an equal in that way and not dehumanizing me as a woman. And accepting my prior children through spiritual adoption instead of looking down on me for not aborting my children.
Is the newest kid also Marshall's?

I'd send him to the Lake of Fire for not following The Torah
Wow you seem like a real mean person. I'm glad Christ came about around 2000 years ago tho and set the steps to replace the Old Testament with a more forgiving New Testament.
 
Never said I'd tolerate it. Someone in such a case should work it out with their partner (or court in marriage cases) or just leave them. It's not as bad as getting your spleen ruptured or getting a concussion, in any case.


Anyways I'll answer your question with a question of my own:

Why tolerate someone who hits you? Why would you tolerate that form of abuse?

Because I don't consider striking someone in the middle of a fight physical "abuse". The lesson of Exodus 21:18-19 is to avoid confrontation (pick your battles carefully).

Now if a guy just hits a woman out of nowhere, that's different. The Torah says that person will be cursed (Deut. 27:24). I'd send that kind of man packing!

Wow you seem like a real mean person. I'm glad Christ came about around 2000 years ago tho and set the steps to replace the Old Testament with a more forgiving New Testament.

Except that The Messiah didn't replace the OT. You believe in moral relativism, not truth

Is the newest kid also Marshall's?

All the children in our house call Marshall "dad" <3
And yes, the child I'm pregnant with now was conceived with Marshall

He specifically said what the Rabbis were teaching, which was that divorce was okay, and corrected their wrong teachings by reminding the Jews that divorce was not okay unless the woman was a whore (i.e. having sex with men besides her spouse). Further, he also said that marrying a divorced woman was adultery.

Do you believe the Messiah's words as recounted in Matthew? If you believe them when he discusses the law being upheld, why do you not believe him equally when he discusses this part of the law?


You're misquoting what the Rabbis said. They said FOR ANY AND EVERY REASON. He clarified for PORNEA (idolatry) only. Read Matthew 19 again
 
You're misquoting what the Rabbis said. They said FOR ANY AND EVERY REASON. He clarified for PORNEA (idolatry) only. Read Matthew 19 again
"It was also said, ‘Whoever divorces his wife, let him give her a certificate of divorce.’ But I say to you that everyone who divorces his wife, except on the ground of sexual immorality, makes her commit adultery, and whoever marries a divorced woman commits adultery."

Sorry, it's pretty clear.
 
No Ms. Whore, there is no point in trying to seriously engage you because all will do is shriek some variation of "read something, BUT THE TORAH, pagan, sexist, or study my inbred religion while I insult yours" It's like talking to a particularly stupid, autistic parrot. Tamar want a cracker...I mean cock?

You claim to be a Christian yet your trying to shame a woman who chose not to abort her children? Explain that hypocritical paradox to me, go ahead. I see it in Christians all the time.

"It was also said, ‘Whoever divorces his wife, let him give her a certificate of divorce.’ But I say to you that everyone who divorces his wife, except on the ground of sexual immorality, makes her commit adultery, and whoever marries a divorced woman commits adultery."

Sorry, it's pretty clear.

The word is PORNEA (idolatry) not "sexual immorality"
 
They were already talking before I showed up. Where you been for that delusional version of events you came up with?

Read my Appeal. I already addressed CDA 230. They don't qualify for immunity under the laws. As I said on page #40ish when Josh posted my email, the lower courts judges don't even follow their own laws. Read before you speak.
At the current pace we'll soon see more "talk" here in the next day or so than in the past two and a half years, and all because of either a gay op or an all-consuming desire to rage against an online community that collectively decided to vote an ex "Most Likely to go to Prison for Stalking" at that moment in time.

So if I write out in crayon that you are singularly bringing down the collective intelligence of humanity by several points, thus you should be forever banned from consuming valuable air that the rest of us can breathe instead and then start spamming the court system with it, you're now obligated to neck yourself even if all of the laws on the books at state and federal levels don't support it? Bold strategy Cotton, let's see if it pays off.
 
Great response, thanks for not addressing anything I said about your husband bragging about FILLING YOUR HOLES constantly on the internet to impress people. Nice mental gymnastics there, Tamar. Maybe you should put half the effort you spend ignore the problems in your marriage into writing a lawsuit.

He thinks the sex with me is great, what's wrong with that?
 
Because I don't consider striking someone in the middle of a fight physical "abuse". The lesson of Exodus 21:18-19 is to avoid confrontation (pick your battles carefully).

Now if a guy just hits a woman out of nowhere, that's different. The Torah says that person will be cursed (Deut. 27:24). I'd send that kind of man packing!
So if he commits emotional abuse do you strike him in the middle of what would then be a "fight" ? According to your logic he'd deserve it.

In either case this is a terrible environment to bring kids up in, others irl go through emotional abuse and don't resort to hitting others, why can't your husband?

You also still didn't answer my question regarding Jesus' teachings of those who live by the sword dying by the sword though. Is this something you'd follow or at least see some degree of logic in it?
 
You claim to be a Christian yet your trying to shame a woman who chose not to abort her children? Explain that hypocritical paradox to me, go ahead. I see it in Christians all the time.
Please, please, quote any post where I have mentioned abortion in this thread. Calling you a whore =/= telling you to have an abortion.
 
Please, please, quote any post where I have mentioned abortion in this thread. Calling you a whore =/= telling you to have an abortion.


You lack self awareness of your own evil. Trying to shame a woman for giving birth by trying to make fun of her labia/vagina and by making comments about her blended family is NOT "pro-life" you hypocrite. Get a clue! No wait, go read a book, you're uneducated
 
Back