Apple Thread - The most overrated technology brand?

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

What killed Steve Jobs?

  • Pancreatic Cancer

    Votes: 60 12.2%
  • AIDS from having gay sex with Tim Cook

    Votes: 431 87.8%

  • Total voters
    491
Only apple product I actively use is an old 4th Gen iPod Nano Red 16GB. Many years ago when I used to own Windows I also used iTunes cause it was the only way (at the time I thought) I could get full version of my favorite Dance Dance Revolution songs (the licensed ones that came from the Dancemania series). Once I switched to Linux and found out about JunoDownload, 7Digital, and even KH Insider (to an extent), I got rid of my iTunes and use gtkpod to manage my iPod Nano. Otherwise I'm completely Anti-Apple
 
So I know I’m late on this one, but I want you all to name some good reasons on why I should buy this?
I didn’t know if I should put this in General Discussion forum.

6285E508-514D-44C2-B6A5-7F47AAAD1381.jpeg
 
You can trade it to a Chinese girl for sex after you are done with it.

 
You can trade it to a Chinese girl for sex after you are done with it.

lol, the chiniese girl said she would give her "first" time for an iphone 4. Hoe, who will believe you?
By the way, the rate with chiniese girls is around 30-40 dollars a night. At 300 dollars for the iphone, you should just pay directly to the lady. Trading Iphone for 5 nights of sex equaling around 150-200 dollars makes no sense economically.
 
You should buy it to take nudes and post them here 👍
No one wants to see fat guy micro penis

lol, the chiniese girl said she would give her "first" time for an iphone 4. Hoe, who will believe you?
By the way, the rate with chiniese girls is around 30-40 dollars a night. At 300 dollars for the iphone, you should just pay directly to the lady. Trading Iphone for 5 nights of sex equaling around 150-200 dollars makes no sense economically.
Who says he won't get rid of it when it's 30-40 dollars.
 
So I know I’m late on this one, but I want you all to name some good reasons on why I should buy this?
I didn’t know if I should put this in General Discussion forum.

View attachment 1087734
The three little cameras make it look like an alien creature?
I don't pay attention to tech news stuff so I didn't see these anywhere until they started popping up on billboards and was like wtf is that? Kind of startling to be honest. The billboards had no explanation, just wordless, ominous closeups of the cameras like I'm already supposed to be familiar with this thing.
 
The three little cameras make it look like an alien creature?

They remind me of pustules, like the phone is diseased or something.

Though to be fair, my phone has three cameras and is an LG V40. But those cameras are all in a line across the back. That phone also has a surprisingly powerful and high quality internal speaker and reportedly very good quality DACs but I've not done a frequency response graph or anything so couldn't verify that.

Okay, so it doesn't get the same benchmark scores as an Apple hipster toy. But who gives a shit. Explain to me why I should care so long as it's good enough. I mean, in the world of PCs you don't get a 64 core Threadripper unless you're doing hardcore number crunching or professional grade video editing or similar. And I've never understood why you might want it for "gaming" because 99% of mobile games are faeculent. But then that's not the point. CONSOOME PRODUCT, THEN GET EXCITED FOR NEXT PRODUCT. That's the Apple way, right?
 
The three cameras are supposed to be for different modes, wide lens, HDR, uh, something else. They're pretty worthless to the average user and were added because Apple needed to show something at WWDC after the guy with all the ideas wallowed in cancer for a couple years and died.

Ostensibly it's to take a slice of the professional camera market, although I can't see it taking off even with all the "Shot on iPhone" billboards up. More realistically it's to appeal to Instagram thots that take selfies like it's their job.
 
I love this video.

No, is the short answer to that. They steal others' ideas, jack the price up, and spend loads on clever marketing. They then rewrite history to make themselves sound like the pioneers:

- When Steve Jobs accused Microsoft of stealing their interface design for Windows, Bill Gates rightly pointed out that in all fairness, they both independently plagiarised from Xerox. Steve Jobs's response was to screech, lose his shit, and throw lolsuits everywhere. In fact, the first GUI was from Digital Research's (a branch of Xerox) GEM, released 1982.
- The iPhone has been historically behind the times with both form factor and screen resolution. They still are only on 1080p when most Android phones have had 1440p since the middle of last decade - my last phone before my current one was a Galaxy Note Edge and that was on 1600p and that came out in 2014. Similarly, they and their fanboys scoffed at the first big Android phones in 2012 when the Galaxy Note and the LG G3 came out, but now small phones are the exception rather than the rule. Android has historically been ahead in functionality as well - you could do split screen and multiple cameras long before Apple came along with it, but now they've done so it's a HuGe InNOvAtIOn.
- The iPhone is also behind the times in construction as well. Oh, but they were doing glass sandwiches first, cry the NPCs. Maybe so, but they use shitty glass even to this day. I've not seen half as many Androids with a busted screen as I have iPhones. Also, the sealed glass sandwich is arguably a backwards step IMO because it means you can't have removable batteries, which means if the battery fails, and it will, phone over. The Galaxy Note 7 debacle would have been soluble if they'd persisted with the Note 4's construction. Exploding batteries sir? No problem sir, just send your battery in and we'll send out a fresh one that doesn't in a wee bit, rather than having to rebuild everyone's phone. Okay, LG tried with the G5 and persisted with removable batteries up until the V20 but they were the last holdouts, and the G5's removable battery was all a bit of a kludge anyhow.
- The iPad was not the first tablet. Tablets, including Apple's own Newton, were about in the 1990s only they were called something else back then, like palmtops or similar.
- The Apple II was the first properly successful home computer, I'll give them that. Okay, the TRS-80 and Commodore PET might have been slightly first but the Apple II was successful. However, the II was mostly Wozniak's doing; Jobs was just the weirdo marketing bloke. They don't like to talk about Woz because he is inconvenient to Jobs's ego.

Basically, Apple's innovation is not in technology, but in selling overpriced shit to consoomers, and deliberately gimping their functionality and spinning it as "user friendly."
 
The three cameras are supposed to be for different modes, wide lens, HDR, uh, something else. They're pretty worthless to the average user and were added because Apple needed to show something at WWDC after the guy with all the ideas wallowed in cancer for a couple years and died.

Ostensibly it's to take a slice of the professional camera market, although I can't see it taking off even with all the "Shot on iPhone" billboards up. More realistically it's to appeal to Instagram thots that take selfies like it's their job.

Jony Ive left apple, supposedly in part because of his designer autism being unable to handle the 3 cameras.

Also their HDR mode is somewhat deceptive; https://ww.9to5mac.com/2020/01/03/lying-by-omission/#
 
  • Like
Reactions: Coffee Shits
I know I said it before, but holy crap superfluous side buttons are a terrible idea. I have to put my hand in a really unnatural cramp-inducing position to hold the "Mighty Mouse" without accidentally squeezing the things and cancelling a drag or selection. And there's also the times where I accidentally click or drag stuff without meaning to. wow such a terrible design.

Also the scrollbars in later macOS (at least Lion and up) suck. They're really narrow, leaving such a wide margin to accidentally move the window when you're just trying to scroll. They also look flat and obscure.
 
Last edited:
Bill Burr railed on Apple really hard on the 1/6/20 episode of his podcast:


He's 100% on the money. If you're tech illiterate but you need tech to do your job, and you got wrapped up in Apple's ecosystem, it's very hard to leave, or even just mix their crap in with the rest of your crap, and you need some kind of dongle or adapter for just about everything now.

edit: Oh wait he uploaded it into a proper one-off video on his channel. Edited that in.
 
Last edited:
Back