StoneToss (allegedly, formerly Red Panels)

libertarian-government-force-comic.png

I assume he's referring to a citizen's right to bear arms against government tyranny.

Well this is pretty dark. I'm not sure how it is accurately characterizing libertards, though. Wouldn't libertards have guns and not need the government?

StoneToss is a Nazi. He is a statist fuck.
 
Took me a second.

IMG_20200109_012227.png


I showed some stonetoss comics to a friend. He only got about half of them, because he isn't mired in online political discourse/memery.

I think part of the appeal, and you can see that in this thread, is that unless you understand his political perspective, you don't get what he's saying.

You see the same on antifastonetoss. People are angry about the comic while they sometimes simultaneously ask for what is meant by it.
 
Last edited:
Took me a second.

View attachment 1089448

I showed some stonetoss comics to a friend. He only got about half of them, because he isn't mired in online political discourse/memery.

I think part of the appeal, and you can see that in this thread, is that unless you understand his political perspective, you don't get what he's saying.

You see the same on antifastonetoss. People are angry about the comic while they sometimes simultaneously ask for what is meant by it.
The big difference between those two is that even people who are part of the antifa stonetoss clique don't know what they mean.
 
👌Is supposed to have 3 fingers held up to make up a W while the circle goes into the hand to make a P, so that it stands for white power. Maybe StoneToss just didn't know or it's artistic liberty because his cartoons only have 4 fingers.
:thinking:
Vut are you talking about?
 
Last edited:
  • Political Sperging
Reactions: Mike Stoklasa
Judging by their posts they mostly end up understanding them. They end up rejecting them because of a dogmatic adherance to a worldview that is fundamentally at odds with nature.



To be able to maintain that view, they have to take everything opposing as uncharitably as possible and everything from their own side as charitably as possible. Most political groups have some version of that, but I don't know if there is any more blatant or unsophisticated as that off antifa.

Here is an example of that.

View attachment 1089496

Because maybe, just maybe, that banner is symbolic too.

Here is another example, where they end up claiming that you can have anal sex without any fecal matter at all. It's like they haven't even heard of santorum.

Or maybe they have difficulty understanding exaggeration. You'd think one of stonetoss' worst comics would be easier to satirize.

View attachment 1089511

View attachment 1089508
Not funny. Didn't laugh.
 
👌Is supposed to have 3 fingers held up to make up a W while the circle goes into the hand to make a P, so that it stands for white power. Maybe StoneToss just didn't know or it's artistic liberty because his cartoons only have 4 fingers.
:thinking:
It's because his characters only have 4 fingers and he refused to change up his style when everyone can recognize what that's supposed to be anyway. It's not that deep fam.
 
Judging by their posts they mostly end up understanding them. They end up rejecting them because of a dogmatic adherance to a worldview that is fundamentally at odds with nature.



To be able to maintain that view, they have to take everything opposing as uncharitably as possible and everything from their own side as charitably as possible. Most political groups have some version of that, but I don't know if there is any more blatant or unsophisticated as that off antifa.

Here is an example of that.

View attachment 1089496

Because maybe, just maybe, that banner is symbolic too.

Here is another example, where they end up claiming that you can have anal sex without any fecal matter at all. It's like they haven't even heard of santorum.

Or maybe they have difficulty understanding exaggeration. You'd think one of stonetoss' worst comics would be easier to satirize.

View attachment 1089511

View attachment 1089508
I think the key difference between StoneToss and the various Antifa StoneToss edits is pushing an agenda. Yes Stone is obviously right-wing, but his comics are mostly just meme-ing and trying to get a reaction rather than pushing his beliefs (with some exceptions of course). The Antifa edits focus completely on taking out the offensive shit and pushing their political ideologies while completely missing the point: getting a reaction other than asspats from their own community.
 
(Edit: reposting this seperate from the post it was merged with.)

The big difference between those two is that even people who are part of the antifa stonetoss clique don't know what they mean.
Judging by their posts they mostly end up understanding them. They end up rejecting them because of a dogmatic adherance to a worldview that is fundamentally at odds with nature.

To be able to maintain that view, they have to take everything opposing as uncharitably as possible and everything from their own side as charitably as possible. Most political groups have some version of that, but I don't know if there is any more blatant or unsophisticated as that off antifa.

Here is an example of that

IMG_20200109_015129.png

Because maybe, just maybe, that banner is symbolic too.

Here is another example, where they end up claiming that you can have anal sex without any fecal matter at all. It's like they haven't even heard of santorum.

Or maybe they have difficulty understanding exaggeration. You'd think one of stonetoss' worst comics would be easier to satirize.

IMG_20200109_014728.png
IMG_20200109_014745.png
 
Back