Lolcow Melinda Leigh Scott & Marshall Castersen - Sue-happy couple. Flat earth conspiracists. Pretending to be Jewish. Believe Kiwi Farms is protected by the Masonic Order. 0-6 on lawsuits. Marshall is dead.

Marshall-Law said:
You can mock me all you want but everything I have stated is factual. Science points to a flat earth but your science dogma is a phony believe structure rooted in greek mythology. Facts you cant measure curvation on this earth and there are zero images of earth that are not CGI. You have nothing but phony balony paintings of satelites and planets. It's not the real world.
Click to expand...
You can't even spell baloney. Why should I trust you?
 
  • Like
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Deadpool, Adamska, cowPoly and 3 others
Trombonista said:
You can't even spell baloney. Why should I trust you?
Click to expand...
My favorite is that many images we have of other stars and galaxies came from before CGI was even a thing. Ship captains for centuries documented the curvature of the horizon in their logs. I suppose Galileo was duped by a painting when he discovered the rings of Saturn and several of Jupiter's moons. The stupid is so incredibly thick with this one that he's surely had a major head injury at some point.

Again, Marshall, do us all a favor and prove us wrong by walking to the edge and take one for the team by hurling yourself off of it.
 
  • Like
  • Informative
Reactions: redcent, Deadpool, Adamska and 5 others
Toasty said:
I've looked through a telescope myself and seen planets. Not lights. I've seen the rings around Saturn through a telescope. Never seen Ireland though.
Edit:image of Saturn through the telescope I use taken with a skyris 236m cameraView attachment 1099381 here's the scope I use. And Jupiter.View attachment 1099382
Click to expand...

That’s a fucking dope setup.

Also you guys its
“bologna”
give me the ratings
 
  • DRINK!
  • Feels
  • Agree
Reactions: ConSluttant, Trombonista, Orange Rhymer and 7 others
Marshall-Law said:
View attachment 1099390
Saturn in the daytime. What does this prove? It's a celestrial body of light. How could a reflection appear through that has more luminosity? It's not a planet. Just like the moon is a light and has it's own light source and power. It is position behind the firmament.
Click to expand...
Would you like to explain what a “celestrial body of light” is?
 
redcent said:
Interesting

Considering you can see planets in the night sky with the aid of a telescope tell me how they are paintings
Click to expand...
Marshall-Law said:
You see lights in the sky doesnt mean they are planets. Buy a nice telescope and look at the stars: they look nothing like the portrait paintings like NASA gives you. They are nothing like we see in the text books. They are stars.


It's called a vanishing point. I already addressed this issue. You can zoom in with a telescope and the ship will still be there. It's a trick of the eye because you eyes can only process so much. When I was in the navy standing quarter master of the watch. My look out watches would get visual contacts of light houses 100 miles out which the light house was only 60 to 80 feet tall. Using NASAs curvature calculations 8" squared per mile: you shouldn't be able to see the light from that distance at sea level. Distance and position was confirmed using a telescopic Alidade with distance verified with updated charts ,GPS and radar. Margin of compass error .004 second against the beam of the ship Set and drift of 4 feet per 15 miles. . I have done these experiments on my own and have seen the fallacy of NASA's clams of curvature. Nice try but your arguing with someone who has real world experience and over 100000 miles of sea time.
Click to expand...
A family member of mine has a nice telescope. I can see jupiter with it and some of its moons. And a crescent venus. Mars, saturn and its rings...

Not in best detail, but I have also been to local observatory. They have better detail

As someone already asked these planets have been seen for ages before computers. Before the invention of the plane. How are these paintings and how would they get up in the sky?
 
Clearly all telescopes just have paintings on the lenses to fool us.

Few questions though,
If the moon is a light with its own illumination, how do eclipses work?
Why are scientists and people with basic algebra skills able to accurately predict when those eclipses will happen within the heliocentric model?
Why am I even trying, when you won't accept reality as an answer?
How are pictures of the Earth from the 1960's computer generated, when CGI wasn't even a thing?
How many vials of bath salts do you go through a day to be as stupid and dense as you are?
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: ConSluttant, Kamov Ka-52, redcent and 5 others
Banh Xeo said:
That’s a fucking dope setup.

Also you guys its
“bologna”
give me the ratings
Click to expand...
Yes it is. I don't own it, lol, I'm in a co-op. We just got a new solar filter for doing sun flares.
And you Ninja'd me on bologna.
 
moseph.jartelli said:
Rage Against The Machine was owned and controlled by Sony. Pretty mainstream 'rebellion'
Click to expand...
Marshall likes RATM b/c he got to see their penors during that one concert where they (thankfully) didn't play and were nekked. RATM kept the ticket sales, though.

Each member became a multimillionaire, and thanked the Bush administrations for not taxing their shekels at the Dem-Soc proposed 90%.
Pretty rebellious. What rebels. Much communism.
Also, Zack drove a Cadillac Escalade during that time. I wonder if the Zapista rebels knew that?
www.youtube.com

Rage Against the Machine Sucks - Your Favorite Band Sucks Podcast

Listen to the full episode here:: https://www.yfbspod.com/rage-against-the-machine-sucks Rage Against the Machine can't be real, right? This is like that "Be...
www.youtube.com www.youtube.com
RATM : the fav band of popped-collar 'brahs' everywhere.

Pick up a 1st grade science textbook and get a better/less mainstream taste in music.
 
  • Agree
  • Informative
Reactions: cowPoly and moseph.jartelli
Since I'm back from working a job, let's see how the cargo cultists are doing. Probably just being stupid and proving that they are jobless jokes who need to be starved of government largesse.
Marshall-Law said:
You can mock me all you want but everything I have stated is factual. Science points to a flat earth but your science dogma is a phony believe structure rooted in greek mythology. Facts you cant measure curvation on this earth and there are zero images of earth that are not CGI. You have nothing but phony balony paintings of satelites and planets. It's not the real world.
Click to expand...
Yeah, you definitely only rely on tardbux if you're doing this shit on a Wednesday morning. Also methed out if you needed less than 5 hours of sleep before going down a new route of "trying to win" since pretending to be a man sure as shit didn't work.

Anywho, we've been able to measure curvature since like the 3rd Century BC, and it's real simple. Just get some boys, go a few hundred miles away, and radio in your respective shadow lengths at the same time. Then do some high school level math (actually middle school, since the brunt of your formula work is Pythagorean theorum), pi being your best bud, and you're golden.

And you're literally proving your sheep nature by using the same excuses as the other tards; if the image of the planet is too grainy, you'll reject it. If it looks too good, you'll reject it. You can bleat and cry you won't, but your standard of proof will always conveniently change since you refuse to acknowledge the possibility of being wrong on this. You will always prefer being dishonest over admitting fault, hence why I'm just going to mock you as I do this.

Marshall-Law said:
You see lights in the sky doesnt mean they are planets. Buy a nice telescope and look at the stars: they look nothing like the portrait paintings like NASA gives you. They are nothing like we see in the text books. They are stars.


It's called a vanishing point. I already addressed this issue. You can zoom in with a telescope and the ship will still be there. It's a trick of the eye because you eyes can only process so much. When I was in the navy standing quarter master of the watch. My look out watches would get visual contacts of light houses 100 miles out which the light house was only 60 to 80 feet tall. Using NASAs curvature calculations 8" squared per mile: you shouldn't be able to see the light from that distance at sea level. Distance and position was confirmed using a telescopic Alidade with distance verified with updated charts ,GPS and radar. Margin of compass error .004 second against the beam of the ship Set and drift of 4 feet per 15 miles. . I have done these experiments on my own and have seen the fallacy of NASA's clams of curvature. Nice try but your arguing with someone who has real world experience and over 100000 miles of sea time.
Click to expand...
"REEE DA PIKCHURS DUN LOOK RITE REEEE!!!"

~ Marshall proving he has no case and that he will just house rule bs in his tardbrain until he thinks he wins

Also again you're being dishonest by using the well known refraction phenomenon that takes place near water. Just bleating this over and over again does shit all when it's been known about and documented and accounted for, and still doesn't defeat that you can easily sit on your ass and watch things sink below the horizon.

Got a new argument you low-T faggot? Or are you just going to rehash old debunked shit you google desperately to pretend you aren't a dumb dumb?

I'd mock the hole's posting in this thread too, but apparently she had to make sure her sons and daughters (since you sure as shit didn't make most of them) didn't starve (mainly to prevent CPS from getting in the house) given she was less active than you today. Either that or she was fucking another guy behind your back as you type this, tears in eyes and close to tantruming futilely at life.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
Reactions: Anonymus Fluhre, Spergichu, Whatthefuck and 5 others
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back