Jenny Nicholson / Jennifer Elizabeth Nicholson / @JennyENicholson / @spider_jewel - Disney shill

They both have characters do universe breaking shit for the purpose of plot convenience. In TLJ it's muh Holdo Maneuver, in ROS it's pretty much everything to do with the force, but especially force heal/resurrection.

They also both waste a lot of time on plot points that amount to very little or nothing. In ROS most of the plot is a goose chase for various Macguffins. TLJ has Canto Bight, Rey's nonsense faux deep cave vision, Luke's naval gazing about whether the Jedi suck, and the constant waffling of whether Kylo Ren will turn good or not. Even the space battles are pointless because both sides can pull reinforcements or super moves out of their ass to turn the tide whenever the plot demands it, whether losses matter or not is completely arbitrary, and no one important dies (and no, Rose Tico's sister and Captain Silver Dildo don't count).

There are definitely differences, but there are enough similarities that there are probably going to be plenty of times TLJ defenders who hate ROS contradict themselves. Especially since so many of these idiots shot themselves in the foot by saying everything is subjective and themes are more important than logic.

TLJ was overly-edgy in an attempt to be original, which caused it to feel nothing like a Star Wars film and the characters were no longer the characters they were supposed to be. TRoS was a routinely-generic, studio-processed theme park ride catering to those who hated TLJ (and pissing off the TLJ defenders in the process).

There are similarities in the little things, but the two are completely different shades of bad as a whole. TLJ defenders hate TRoS because TRoS did away with what they enjoyed in TLJ, including the themes. It's more of a contradiction to praise things like Kylo Ren being set up as the big bad and Rey's parents being nobodies, then say it's fine that TRoS retconned them. TLJ may be horrible, but it's a horrible thing they love and they're not going to stand for shade being thrown at it.

Also, who actually said everything is subjective? It was MauLer who brought "objective" and "subjective" into the conversation.

Leia doesn't die in TLJ. Meanwhile, Luke comes back as a force ghost in ROS, and continues to not do anything but give a pep talk when he totally could wreck shit because force ghosts can touch things and cause lightning strikes now.

So no. They don't really count.

Does that mean no one important died in the original Star Wars because Obi-Wan came back?
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Frog Gremlin
TLJ was overly-edgy in an attempt to be original, which caused it to feel nothing like a Star Wars film and the characters were no longer the characters they were supposed to be. TRoS was a routinely-generic, studio-processed theme park ride catering to those who hated TLJ (and pissing off the TLJ defenders in the process).
This part I agree with. The two movies had a drastically different tone. That and the pacing are the biggest differences. But the logic problems and universe breaking shit are very similar.

There are similarities in the little things, but the two are completely different shades of bad as a whole. TLJ defenders hate TRoS because TRoS did away with what they enjoyed in TLJ, including the themes. It's more of a contradiction to praise things like Kylo Ren being set up as the big bad and Rey's parents being nobodies, then say it's fine that TRoS retconned them. TLJ may be horrible, but it's a horrible thing they love and they're not going to stand for shade being thrown at it.
Just because they have a different tone doesn't mean that there won't be people who attack ROS for its gaping plotholes and lack of logical consistency when they said that stuff didn't matter for TLJ.

Also, why is it more of a contradiction to hate TLJ and defend ROS? What if someone likes ROS because they want Star Wars to be upbeat, hopeful, and quirky instead of an edgy, nihilistic middle finger to Star Wars? Someone could pull a "muh tone" argument to defend ROS in the same way someone could say "muh themes" to defend TLJ. But if you try to say the movies are intelligently plotted and make sense, you're fucked with both.

Also, who actually said everything is subjective? It was MauLer who brought "objective" and "subjective" into the conversation.
Just Write said it repeatedly during his EFAP debate.

Hello Greedo also said it. Probably lots more, but those are the two I can name off the top of my head.

Does that mean no one important died in the original Star Wars because Obi-Wan came back?
Being a force ghost in the original trilogy wasn't the same thing as it is now. There was no reason to assume force ghosts could interact with the physical world beyond speaking to people, and no reason to think they could even do that consistently unless the person is in tune with the force or whatever. "Why doesn't force ghost Obi-Wan help?" was a question that people weren't really concerned with in the OT because the general consensus was that aside from giving advice, he couldn't.

This is what people mean when they say the sequels ruin the originals. Unless you ignore them, they introduce a billion plot holes and problems that weren't there before. That's what breaking the universe means, and for all their problems the prequel movies mostly didn't do that.
 
This is what people mean when they say the sequels ruin the originals. Unless you ignore them, they introduce a billion plot holes and problems that weren't there before. That's what breaking the universe means, and for all their problems the prequel movies mostly didn't do that.

ehhhh, midichlorians are a scourge upon the franchise and most modern star wars media ventures are better for ignoring them.

the franchise went from implying that the force was a spiritual thing to "actually genetics make you better at space magic, sorry."
 
They both have characters do universe breaking shit for the purpose of plot convenience. In TLJ it's muh Holdo Maneuver, in ROS it's pretty much everything to do with the force, but especially force heal/resurrection.

They also both waste a lot of time on plot points that amount to very little or nothing. In ROS most of the plot is a goose chase for various Macguffins. TLJ has Canto Bight, Rey's nonsense faux deep cave vision, Luke's naval gazing about whether the Jedi suck, and the constant waffling of whether Kylo Ren will turn good or not. Even the space battles are pointless because both sides can pull reinforcements or super moves out of their ass to turn the tide whenever the plot demands it, whether losses matter or not is completely arbitrary, and no one important dies (and no, Rose Tico's sister and Captain Silver Dildo don't count).

There are definitely differences, but there are enough similarities that there are probably going to be plenty of times TLJ defenders who hate ROS contradict themselves. Especially since so many of these idiots shot themselves in the foot by saying everything is subjective and themes are more important than logic.


Couple of other common themes

-shit jokes
-Bad character direction
-failure to integrate with previous film in trilogy,
-Keeping leia alive was a horrible mistake in both.
-They have no idea what they're doing with Hux.
-load of new characters which are forgettable.
-lumbered with terrible decision to keep the rebels vs empire dynamic due to soft reset.
-Both have been integrated into retarded net slap fight
-Anyone over invested in either is a loser.

mutual Positives
-Nice effects
-Good soundtrack
-Lots of good actors
-Are star wars movies.
 
This part I agree with. The two movies had a drastically different tone. That and the pacing are the biggest differences. But the logic problems and universe breaking shit are very similar.

The logic problems and universe breaking shit you cited in TLJ was about hyperspace and space battles, the logic problems and universe breaking shit you cited in TRoS was about the Force. It would be one thing if the movies fucked with the exact same aspect, but some people seem to prioritize logic and the universe more in certain areas than others.

Just because they have a different tone doesn't mean that there won't be people who attack ROS for its gaping plotholes and lack of logical consistency when they said that stuff didn't matter for TLJ.

TLJ defenders who hate TRoS are able to look past the gaping plotholes and lack of logical consistency in TLJ because they enjoyed the subversive, edgy tone that TRoS was the antithesis of and find the problems in TRoS to be more blatant. It's part being blinded by what they
liked and part not believing there are gaping plotholes and lack of logical consistency in TLJ. TRoS wasn't able to hide its flaws from them and the gaping plotholes and lack of logical consistency weren't the same.

Also, why is it more of a contradiction to hate TLJ and defend ROS? What if someone likes ROS because they want Star Wars to be upbeat, hopeful, and quirky instead of an edgy, nihilistic middle finger to Star Wars? Someone could pull a "muh tone" argument to defend ROS in the same way someone could say "muh themes" to defend TLJ. But if you try to say the movies are intelligently plotted and make sense, you're fucked with both.

I said it's more of a contradiction to praise both TLJ and TRoS, especially after praising the things in TLJ that TRoS rectonned.

Just Write said it repeatedly during his EFAP debate.

Which is again MauLer bringing it to the conversation. And even then, is he saying literally everything is subjective or just specific things?

Hello Greedo also said it. Probably lots more, but those are the two I can name off the top of my head.

I've never heard HelloGreedo say "subjective". He's talked about people having the right to like or dislike anything they want, but that's not him claiming everything is subjective, that's him trying to prevent slapfights.

Being a force ghost in the original trilogy wasn't the same thing as it is now. There was no reason to assume force ghosts could interact with the physical world beyond speaking to people, and no reason to think they could even do that consistently unless the person is in tune with the force or whatever. "Why doesn't force ghost Obi-Wan help?" was a question that people weren't really concerned with in the OT because the general consensus was that aside from giving advice, he couldn't.

This is what people mean when they say the sequels ruin the originals. Unless you ignore them, they introduce a billion plot holes and problems that weren't there before. That's what breaking the universe means, and for all their problems the prequel movies mostly didn't do that.

So Obi-Wan "died" in the original Star Wars because he couldn't do more than give advice, but Luke didn't "die" in TLJ because he could have done more than give advice, even when he didn't? Both stop physically living, then come back as ghosts to just give advice. If Luke doesn't count as a death in TLJ, then Obi-Wan doesn't count as a death in the original Star Wars.

Couple of other common themes

-shit jokes
-Bad character direction
-failure to integrate with previous film in trilogy,
-Keeping leia alive was a horrible mistake in both.
-They have no idea what they're doing with Hux.
-load of new characters which are forgettable.
-lumbered with terrible decision to keep the rebels vs empire dynamic due to soft reset.
-Both have been integrated into exceptional net slap fight
-Anyone over invested in either is a loser.

mutual Positives
-Nice effects
-Good soundtrack
-Lots of good actors
-Are star wars movies.

Right, they have small, superficial, and common similarities that often apply to most megamillion franchise films. One is still nothing like a Star Wars film, one is still too much like a Star Wars film.
 
I've never heard HelloGreedo say "subjective". He's talked about people having the right to like or dislike anything they want, but that's not him claiming everything is subjective, that's him trying to prevent slapfights.
HelloGreedo said, "I can't think of anything more pointless than criticizing art" in a video that I'm pretty sure he's taken down now because of the backlash, and his point was very much that it's all subjective, even if he didn't use the exact word. Which is fucking rich considering that he built up his channel in the first place by criticizing the prequels. HelloGreedo has said such spectacularly retarded things since becoming a sequel shill and been such a massive hypocrite compared to his earlier content that he could have his own thread here if he was a steadier producer of his bullshit. This is a guy who went from six digit views to four almost overnight. He killed his channel that fast. That's how bad his takes are.

Anyway, this is way too much bullshit nitpicking about the sequels and now we'll probably all get shoah'd for offtopic posting.
 
Trying to go back on track to Jenny I guess this is something a tad bigger.
We have Vidward, we have her persona as the resident quirky-nerd-girl next door mixed with some self-awareness about how thirsty her fans really are. We have that she has way more power than her friends but prefers to hide it, that a whole cult of horny idiots has gathered around her and the city of San Bruno.
Lads, we have here something rather promising but it also seems like it will take a while before anyone can get to it.

While things develop I will let you with something to get the noggin' joggin'.
1515179804835.jpg
 
One interesting thing from the latest EFAP video was that Star Wars Girl (I think it was her? I'm not familiar with everyone there) said that she's mutual friends with Jenny's friends and used to see her a lot at the parks. I guess they both live pretty close to the park or something and SWG is a Disney enthusiast as well. She later said that Jenny didn't care about Star Wars until Disney bought it, and that's probably why her opinions are so weird.
 
The logic problems and universe breaking shit you cited in TLJ was about hyperspace and space battles, the logic problems and universe breaking shit you cited in TRoS was about the Force. It would be one thing if the movies fucked with the exact same aspect, but some people seem to prioritize logic and the universe more in certain areas than others.



TLJ defenders who hate TRoS are able to look past the gaping plotholes and lack of logical consistency in TLJ because they enjoyed the subversive, edgy tone that TRoS was the antithesis of and find the problems in TRoS to be more blatant. It's part being blinded by what they
liked and part not believing there are gaping plotholes and lack of logical consistency in TLJ. TRoS wasn't able to hide its flaws from them and the gaping plotholes and lack of logical consistency weren't the same.



I said it's more of a contradiction to praise both TLJ and TRoS, especially after praising the things in TLJ that TRoS rectonned.



Which is again MauLer bringing it to the conversation. And even then, is he saying literally everything is subjective or just specific things?



I've never heard HelloGreedo say "subjective". He's talked about people having the right to like or dislike anything they want, but that's not him claiming everything is subjective, that's him trying to prevent slapfights.



So Obi-Wan "died" in the original Star Wars because he couldn't do more than give advice, but Luke didn't "die" in TLJ because he could have done more than give advice, even when he didn't? Both stop physically living, then come back as ghosts to just give advice. If Luke doesn't count as a death in TLJ, then Obi-Wan doesn't count as a death in the original Star Wars.



Right, they have small, superficial, and common similarities that often apply to most megamillion franchise films. One is still nothing like a Star Wars film, one is still too much like a Star Wars film.

Jesus Christ, we get it you have an intense desire to skull fuck Mauler.

Just go ape out in Maulers thread instead of trying to defend the stupid people he features on his overly long podcast
 
HelloGreedo said, "I can't think of anything more pointless than criticizing art" in a video that I'm pretty sure he's taken down now because of the backlash, and his point was very much that it's all subjective, even if he didn't use the exact word. Which is fucking rich considering that he built up his channel in the first place by criticizing the prequels. HelloGreedo has said such spectacularly exceptional things since becoming a sequel shill and been such a massive hypocrite compared to his earlier content that he could have his own thread here if he was a steadier producer of his bullshit. This is a guy who went from six digit views to four almost overnight. He killed his channel that fast. That's how bad his takes are.

Anyway, this is way too much bullshit nitpicking about the sequels and now we'll probably all get shoah'd for offtopic posting.

His point was art debates are pointless because nobody is going to change their opinions and the video where he said that is still up (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-ZOXkMc4NnI&t=5m40s). I don't care enough about HelloGreedo to research his channel, but if he's as exceptional as claimed, make a thread. He produces videos pretty regularly.


You consider a trilogy's total failure to integrate three part together a small issue?

We're not talking about the entire trilogy, we're talking about individual movies.

Jesus Christ, we get it you have an intense desire to skull fuck Mauler.

Just go ape out in Maulers thread instead of trying to defend the stupid people he features on his overly long podcast

That was less about MauLer and more about how TLJ defenders and haters have been unable to use TRoS to come together. MauLer, Jenny, Quinton, HelloGreedo, JustWrite, and Patrick Willems should mend their bridges over a good EFAP about hating TRoS.

One interesting thing from the latest EFAP video was that Star Wars Girl (I think it was her? I'm not familiar with everyone there) said that she's mutual friends with Jenny's friends and used to see her a lot at the parks. I guess they both live pretty close to the park or something and SWG is a Disney enthusiast as well. She later said that Jenny didn't care about Star Wars until Disney bought it, and that's probably why her opinions are so weird.

Jenny's third upload (that's still on her channel) is her dubbing a scene from RotS in 2013. It came after the Disney acquisition, but before the Disney films. Whether she became a fan after Disney bought Star Wars is unconfirmed, but it wasn't the Disney films that made her a fan.

 
Last edited:
That was less about MauLer and more about how TLJ defenders and haters have been unable to use TRoS to come together. MauLer, Jenny, Quinton, HelloGreedo, JustWrite, and Patrick Willems should mend their bridges over a good EFAP about hating TRoS.
Unfortunate that The Last Jedi became another front of the culture wars since a get together like this would probably be pretty fun to watch but will never happen because such hard battle lines were drawn over that film.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Frog Gremlin
Unfortunate that The Last Jedi became another front of the culture wars since a get together like this would probably be pretty fun to watch but will never happen because such hard battle lines were drawn over that film.

tbf, I don't think quinton is ever going on EFAP, TLJ culture war aside. would pay money to see him in a cage match with mauler tho.
 
Unfortunate that The Last Jedi became another front of the culture wars since a get together like this would probably be pretty fun to watch but will never happen because such hard battle lines were drawn over that film.

At least the whole thing is great entertainment. TRoS managed to anger both sides and failed to unite them.

tbf, I don't think quinton is ever going on EFAP, TLJ culture war aside. would pay money to see him in a cage match with mauler tho.

Couldn't be worse than Kimbo Slice vs. Dada 5000. First one to pass out loses.
 
Back