Lolcow Melinda Leigh Scott & Marshall Castersen - Sue-happy couple. Flat earth conspiracists. Pretending to be Jewish. Believe Kiwi Farms is protected by the Masonic Order. 0-6 on lawsuits. Marshall is dead.

To respect the reasonable requests of a spouse is one thing, and something anyone in a relationship does every day. I don't see not interacting with a particular stranger online as all that unreasonable.
That saidT, To brag about this to strangers online, and include how you've made it part of sexy time is a bit well, why some people are here, and not likely to be gone any time soon.

Again, you are unable to pinpoint POINT A. You do something The Stalker and many Kiwi Farmers do: when I do B in response to someone doing A, you call B "point A".

Translation: none of our BDSM and sex life would even have been mentioned if someone didn't make attacking comments about my husband's dick size and our sex life.

Learn to find POINT A better.
 
Again, you are unable to pinpoint POINT A. You do something The Stalker and many Kiwi Farmers do: when I do B in response to someone doing A, you call B "point A".

Translation: none of our BDSM and sex life would even have been mentioned if someone didn't make attacking comments about my husband's dick size and our sex life.

Learn to find POINT A better.
I've got a Point A in my pants.
 
Again, you are unable to pinpoint POINT A. You do something The Stalker and many Kiwi Farmers do: when I do B in response to someone doing A, you call B "point A".

Translation: none of our BDSM and sex life would even have been mentioned if someone didn't make attacking comments about my husband's dick size and our sex life.

Learn to find POINT A better.
"Somebody else did obnoxious thing A, therefore I did obnoxious thing B," also known as the "two wrongs DO make a right" argument, doesn't really get anyone anywhere. I get it, we're assholes here. It's not necessary for you to reveal your personal details as some sort of defense. I'm going to get a bunch puzzles and rainbows, but I think you can do better. Showing dignity and poise would throw people off a lot more than digging yourself deeper. Unless you enjoy negative attention, in which case, carry on. @Marshall-Law is a lost cause, he obviously adores negative attention, even though he pretends it's actually shit stirring.
 
"Somebody else did obnoxious thing A, therefore I did obnoxious thing B," also known as the "two wrongs DO make a right" argument, doesn't really get anyone anywhere. I get it, we're assholes here. It's not necessary for you to reveal your personal details as some sort of defense. I'm going to get a bunch puzzles and rainbows, but I think you can do better. Showing dignity and poise would throw people off a lot more than digging yourself deeper. Unless you enjoy negative attention, in which case, carry on. @Marshall-Law is a lost cause, he obviously adores negative attention, even though he pretends it's actually shit stirring.

Again, you're trying to back me into being a pacifist and a doormat. QUIT TRYING TO IMPOSE YOUR VALUES ON ME.

You can try all day to say me arguing back is "wrong" and "undignified" but first of all lady, you're a DAMN HYPOCRITE. Are you sitting their with your mouth closed when you don't agree with me? So don't go around telling me to sit in silence when you sit their mouth opened yourself.

Secondly, get your policy straight. If I don't answer you manipulate and try to say it's because I can't defend myself but then when I do answer you say stop talking. You're absolutely manipulative.

Your real problem is that you can't out wit me every time you try to attack me. Take your pacifism and shove it up your ass!

@Null -- I see you changed the header to "lost 5" lawsuits. Yet you haven't said anything about the case law in those Appeals😆

Please, put the MASONIC part of that header in BOLD
 
Again, you are unable to pinpoint POINT A. You do something The Stalker and many Kiwi Farmers do: when I do B in response to someone doing A, you call B "point A".

Translation: none of our BDSM and sex life would even have been mentioned if someone didn't make attacking comments about my husband's dick size and our sex life.

Learn to find POINT A better.


Again, you're trying to back me into being a pacifist and a doormat. QUIT TRYING TO IMPOSE YOUR VALUES ON ME.

You can try all day to say me arguing back is "wrong" and "undignified" but first of all lady, you're a DAMN HYPOCRITE. Are you sitting their with your mouth closed when you don't agree with me? So don't go around telling me to sit in silence when you sit their mouth opened yourself.

Secondly, get your policy straight. If I don't answer you manipulate and try to say it's because I can't defend myself but then when I do answer you say stop talking. You're absolutely manipulative.

Your real problem is that you can't out wit me every time you try to attack me. Take your pacifism and shove it up your ass!

Melinda Melinda please calm down. Please. Think rationally.
 
@Null -- I see you changed the header to "lost 5" lawsuits. Yet you haven't said anything about the case law in those Appeals😆

Please, put the MASONIC part of that header in BOLD
Keep on being desperate to rationalize your legal ineptitude, doesn't change the fact that you've taken many L's in the court.
 
your persistence in saying that I "lost" indicates you do. Yet you have still not been able to refute the case law or adequately demonstrate that judicial corruption is not the reason you are off the hook. 😂

What level Free Mason are you?


He's at least reached OT V, he's seen through the wall of fire and what's on the other side is just a Turtle.
 
Melinda Melinda please calm down. Please. Think rationally.

"Calm down" is another attempt at pacifism: the attempt to control another by telling them how they should feel when attacked. The Stalker thinks like that when he attacks others. It's a way of trying to further the attack (invalidate your victim). You both are disgusting.

Sorry, not buying what you're selling!

Why even comment at all btw? You're just spewing out labels to try to control the conversation
 
Again, you're trying to back me into being a pacifist and a doormat. QUIT TRYING TO IMPOSE YOUR VALUES ON ME.

You can try all day to say me arguing back is "wrong" and "undignified" but first of all lady, you're a DAMN HYPOCRITE. Are you sitting their with your mouth closed when you don't agree with me? So don't go around telling me to sit in silence when you sit their mouth opened yourself.

Secondly, get your policy straight. If I don't answer you manipulate and try to say it's because I can't defend myself but then when I do answer you say stop talking. You're absolutely manipulative.

Your real problem is that you can't out wit me every time you try to attack me. Take your pacifism and shove it up your ass!
You seem annoyed. I never said anything about not arguing back, nor ever identified myself as a pacifist. I just said there's no need to spread your own personal information to do it. But hey, you do you, just don't get mad when people continue to discuss or speculate about it.
 
Keep on being desperate to rationalize your legal ineptitude, doesn't change the fact that you've taken many L's in the court.

Yet you have NO FACTS to back up that claim. You were given the Appeals here by another KF user and you STILL couldn't answer the case law. You prove yourself uneducated once again!
 
You seem annoyed. I never said anything about not arguing back, nor ever identified myself as a pacifist. I just said there's no need to spread your own personal information to do it. But hey, you do you, just don't get mad when people continue to discuss or speculate about it.

Lady, you're a loyal Kiwi farms user and you want to speculate about not spreading personal information? That's absolute 💩
 
Lady, you're a loyal Kiwi farms user and you want to speculate about not spreading personal information? That's absolute 💩
Literally all I have ever done here is observe and discuss. It's kind of the point. On the rare occasion that ii have spoken personally with someone, it has remained private on my end.
 
your persistence in saying that I "lost" indicates you do. Yet you have still not been able to refute the case law or adequately demonstrate that judicial corruption is not the reason you are off the hook. 😂

What level Free Mason are you?
It's funny to say you lost because making fun of losers is funny, especially ones in denial posting they didn't lose on the website they sued to take down.
 
"Calm down" is another attempt at pacifism: the attempt to control another by telling them how they should feel when attacked. The Stalker thinks like that when he attacks others. It's a way of trying to further the attack (invalidate your victim). You both are disgusting.

I think you need to relax and have a bowl of gravy.
 
It's funny to say you lost because making fun of losers is funny, especially ones in denial posting they didn't lose on the website they sued to take down.

So basically you admit to having the moral development of a Simpson's cartoon character. Got it, understand.

But I've asked you 3 times now what level Free Mason you are and you won't answer 🙄
 
He told me directly "yes", because I asked earlier in the thread (when discussing patriarchy)
[/QU
Because porn stars don't pretend to be righteous, and superior while opening their legs to anyone who wants them to (like you do!)



I found a picture of Tamar's pussy for you:
View attachment 1084497
Bear false witness much? This is the only mention of porn I've made in this entire thread. Don't believe me? Use the handy dandy search feature. I especially never told you that porn was my lifestyle you insane whore.


You say you would leave but it's not that simple. Especially when children are involved.

And you say you would do this or that but until you have been in that situation you can't say for sure what you would do


Did it ever occur to you that people stay in less than ideal situations to protect their child?



WRONG. More than one advocate of gender equality, myself included, believes in the right of self defense, for men too.

Your continued attempt at portraying women as weaklings and untouchable angels is another form of sexism AGAINST women. It's called "benevelant sexism".
How do you know that I or someone else in this thread haven't been in an abusive relationship, and handled it like an adult, without violence? Being violent isn't this great thing you make it out to be. It's been called the "last refuge of the ignorant" for a reason. Also the Messiah you pretend to believe in doesn't go for retaliatory violence either.
Mathew 5
38 “You have heard that it was said, ‘An eye for an eye, and a tooth for a tooth.’ 39 But I say to you, do not resist an evil person; but whoever slaps you on your right cheek, turn the other to him also.
QUIT TRYING TO IMPOSE YOUR VALUES ON ME.
You mean like you've done since you got here screaming about the Torah like a particularly stupid autistic parrot?

You are a giant lying goddamn hypocrite and should kill yourself.
 
Last edited:
Back