Orbiter 🏳️‍🌈🐱 Nick Fuentes / Nicholas Joseph Fuentes / der America First Pürrer / "Nick the Knife" - CatboyKami's ex. Flipped fed asset after January 6th. Groypers are pardoned for January 6th, still a fag. Kept Ali Akbar, brown muslim boy-hungry pedophile, around groypers knowing what he was. Hates white women more than blacks and jews.

Probably cause Vaush was, in fact, trying to rally people together over this. It's not a conspiracy to believe extremely online vendetta holders would do shit like that, it's easier than doxing. If you watched Twitter it was legitimately breadtubers losing their shit over it. I mean there's breadtube types earlier on in this very thread who were giddy about it.

I don't question the legitimacy of the claim that certain far left elements were using it as an excuse to go after Nick however using that fact to discount his own fans criticizing him is very suspect. It goes back to what I mentioned previously about his pride. His ego is completely unchecked and he refuses to accept what he did or accept that the people he hangs out with are total losers.
 
I agree with my man up there, hanging out with weird dudes with cat ears is comparable to nofap nazis who think the only way to move the needle politically is to shoot up a black preschool.
A weird dude who wears cat ears, drinks from a dildo and twirls his dick on camera, is an outspoken fan of a Hitler apologist documentary, and based his personal logo off of pedophile logos for some reason...

Instead of focusing his bad optics in one area, he seems to have taken a buffet style approach.

And the hypocrisy of bashing wignats while insisting that Lolisocks is cool because he likes a Hitler apologist doc is what those commenters were criticizing. Which they have a point about. This is exactly the sort of thing people were criticizing Nick for earlier when they pointed out that for someone who keeps talking about playing the optics game he's not very good at it.
 
I get that it's fun to make fun of Nick for the absolute height of bad optics and trolling him with his alignment with hilarious degeneracy, but if anyone genuinely believes he is gay with this guy they're autistic. It's like trolling Owen Benjamin about being Jewish, it's fun but... he's not actually Jewish, guys.

Owen is literally Jewish see my thread about him. Also Owen is big gay like his poppa bear.
 
Last edited:
I know some people have said that Lolisocks gets a lot of chicks, but is there any proof of this? I just figure if it's true then there's gotta be plenty evidence of it from when he was 24/7 irl streaming

I wouldn't be surprised if he was banging girls and guys alike, but would drop the "Lolisocks" persona so he could get laid, and any girl who would sleep with him for free is probably an ugly legbeard or an insecure semi-dangerhair.

As for the guys, it really depends on what circles he hangs around. I'd wager a lot of the more apolitical or quiet right-leaning gays would hook up with him for a quick lay or maybe even a casual relationship, but wouldn't dare be in a long-term serious relationship with a nutjob like him.

I don't know that much about Lolisocks, but I wouldn't be surprised if he decided to go full degenerate since he already got laid and thinks he has enough financial security to broadcast his wide array of insane and odious behaviors to the world all the time and not worry about it. I dunno, maybe he's got a wealthy relative or a sugar daddy.

Or maybe he's just doing some literal gay ops and Nick Fuentes is getting played but thinks he's somehow in on the joke.
 
Late AF but:
Meh if he had the daring and ability he could turn that trap into a springboard interview that solidifies his clout but that might have required for him to go over his own history with a fine tooth comb and admit to himself where he might have been in error and what response he could possibly give to questions that broach the more embarrassing parts of his career/personal life. At best now all he gets is CBS smugly showing off his rude reply in whatever piece they're going to do anyway. If he were really smart he would have just declined to comment, but because nick has a chip on his shoulder he isn't satisfied with just saying nothing.
 
Watching Nick for the first time in a while to see what's going on with him on DLive. He has dramatically ramped up the fedposting. I dunno if the pressure is getting to him or what but the supposed optics he loved so much have gone right out the window.
The thing is that ever since Nick became "redpilled", his optics have always sucked, anyone who thought attending the C-Ville disaster has no sense of what is optical. The irony is that is what makes him so bitter and adamant about punching right, whether it's Conservative Inc., who banished him from any type of normal existence and/or political career, or the wignats, who initially duped him into ruining his life.
 
Maybe Jared Taylor. Maybe. But given that he doesn't Jewbait and was deplatformed early, he'll likely never gain any level of leadership in the movement.

The problem isn't Fuentes, per se. He's merely a symptom. The problem with white-oriented movements in America is that they can't help but return to the well that isolates them from the mainstream and fulfill every stereotype that the Left has of them. The use of Nazi symbolism, Holocaust denial, playing "name the (((JEW)))," being made up of Wignats and overall degenerates - all of these factors guarantee that the alt-right will be nothing more than a cesspool of spergy /pol/tards. It seems that the "optics" crowd thinks that by putting on a suit and LARPing as a BoomerCon while Jewbaiting is somehow going to make alt-right/dissident right/what have you more appealing to the mainstream. It's about the same as putting lipstick on a pig.

I think a movement advocating for white interests - however that's defined in 21st century America - could, in theory, work, given how insane the current Left has become. However, that's going to be long time before anything like that happens.

You said it yourself with jared taylor though; the real cause is the deplatforming.

The censorship itself is what makes any white-oriented movement very hard to build. The ADL and the like know how important it is to crack down in any way possible on such movements.

Only for a decade or so more, then the demographics will have sufficiently shifted that even a very broad and succesful movement would lack the numbers.

anyone who thought attending the C-Ville disaster has no sense of what is optical

hindsight is 20/20.

I doubt people predicted accurately what that day would look like.
 
Last edited:
hindsight is 20/20.

I doubt people predicted accurately what that day would look like.
I remember the idea getting floated to the CR/YAF/YAL groups at my school at the time, we all thought it would be like Berkeley, since that was still fresh in everyone's mind. Turns out it ended up being way worse than Berkeley, from the optics to the events of the day.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: tantric_depressive
Only for a decade or so more, then the demographics will have sufficiently shifted that even a very broad and succesful movement would lack the numbers.
What the hell are you talking about? The demographics won't have shifted so much in ten years that a broad and successful white race based movement would lack numbers. Even if white people lose their supermajority status in that time, it will still be one of the largest, if not the largest racial group in the country. There are over 180 million non-Hispanic white people in the USA. To put that in perspective, the entire population of Mexico could pour into the country and combined with the totally number of Hispanics currently in the country they would be just about equal in number to the number of whites currently living here. The white people here now don't disappear because another group comes in.

By definition, any movement that's broad and successful with white people is going to be a big deal. It will dwarf any activism group that's mainly broad and successful among blacks, for instance. The trick with an activist group specifically based around the interests of white people is getting that broad and successful support, and the biggest obstacle to that is the Nazi/KKK stigma. Frightening off every white person who has a black friend or brown GF is another, closely related obstacle.
 
Nick's professional ballwashing manservant, Steve Franssen was on the killstream, and he was about as insufferable as I expected. The grandiose way he speaks about Nick is some serious delusion. Apparantly, the lolisocks date was actually a masterful political gambit and everything is going according to the nebulous plan. I wouldn't be surprised if those two have fucked with the slavish devotion he has for Nick. Nick could shove a statue of the Virgin Mary up his ass and piss on a statue of Christ while burning down a church, and Steve Franssen would say it's just brilliant next level 88D Chess to own the wignats and commies.
 
What the hell are you talking about? The demographics won't have shifted so much in ten years that a broad and successful white race based movement would lack numbers. Even if white people lose their supermajority status in that time, it will still be one of the largest, if not the largest racial group in the country. There are over 180 million non-Hispanic white people in the USA. To put that in perspective, the entire population of Mexico could pour into the country and combined with the totally number of Hispanics currently in the country they would be just about equal in number to the number of whites currently living here. The white people here now don't disappear because another group comes in.

By definition, any movement that's broad and successful with white people is going to be a big deal. It will dwarf any activism group that's mainly broad and successful among blacks, for instance. The trick with an activist group specifically based around the interests of white people is getting that broad and successful support, and the biggest obstacle to that is the Nazi/KKK stigma. Frightening off every white person who has a black friend or brown GF is another, closely related obstacle.
I think the thing to consider is the fact that these white advocates like Nick Fuentes* (some terms and conditions may apply) is the loss of that supermajority and what it means to electoral politics. You have to keep in mind that they consider any plurality with other races and ethnicities to mean doomsday from the outset, hence the apocalyptic mindset they have about the whole ordeal. The only reason why Nick is the outflow for these ideals is the fact that unlike other paleocons like Jared Taylor, he happened to be the last man standing that could livestream on youtube for profit.
 
TFW no


But anyway here's the link, guy's on from 16:10 to around 1:35:00 if the timestamp doesn't work:

This guy is an ignoramus. Instead of actually researching the claims he is parroting, he's just parroting them. The claim about Nobel prizes is false on its face. He's so married to the talking point of race that he doesn't understand that culture is the real dividing line between failed societies and successful societies.
 
This guy is an ignoramus. Instead of actually researching the claims he is parroting, he's just parroting them. The claim about Nobel prizes is false on its face. He's so married to the talking point of race that he doesn't understand that culture is the real dividing line between failed societies and successful societies.

Yeah I'm listening through this to get to the Fuentes bit and he's just like yammering on the usual points. Very boring, very generic.
 
Yeah I'm listening through this to get to the Fuentes bit and he's just like yammering on the usual points. Very boring, very generic.
Same. 41 minutes in. He's just talking out of his ass. This guy has not traveled and it's obvious.

EDIT

This guy is a fucking moron. His understanding of "Asian" cultures is worse than my wife's cat.
 
Last edited:
Back