Disaster Biden wants to revoke Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act - Nice internet you got there


Democratic presidential candidate Joe Biden wants to get rid of the legal protection that has shielded social media companies including Facebook from liability for users’ posts.

The former vice president’s stance, presented in an interview with The New York Times editorial board, is more extreme than that of other lawmakers who have confronted tech executives about the legal protection from Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act.

“Section 230 should be revoked, immediately should be revoked, number one. For Zuckerberg and other platforms,” Biden said in the interview published Friday.

The bill became law in the mid-1990s to help still-nascent tech firms avoid being bogged down in legal battles. But as tech companies have amassed more power and billions of dollars, many lawmakers across the political spectrum along with Attorney General William Barr, agree that some reforms of the law and its enforcement are likely warranted.

But revoking the clause in its entirety would have major implications for tech platforms and may still fail to produce some of the desired outcomes. Section 230 allows for tech companies to take “good faith” measures to moderate content on their platforms, meaning they can take down content they consider violent, obscene or harassing without fear of legal retribution.

“Section 230 obviously benefits not just Facebook,” Facebook spokesperson Andy Stone told CNBC. “It’s not just foundational to the internet, it’s what allows The New York Times to host reader comments on their websites.”

Stone also pointed to a Facebook executive’s comments on the subject at a hearing on digital deception last week. Monika Bickert, Facebook’s vice president of global policy management told Congress, “Section 230 is an important part of my team being able to do what we do so — yes, it gives us the ability to proactively look for abuse and remove it.”

Biden’s stance on Section 230 will likely be met with similar criticism in Silicon Valley to that lodged at Sen. Josh Hawley, R-Mo., after he introduced legislation in June that would tie the protections of Section 230 to voluntary audits of the tech companies that prove their practices are “politically neutral.” Trade groups representing tech firms including Facebook, Twitter and Google said at the time that Hawley’s bill would make it much more difficult for tech companies to remove reprehensible content.

Biden’s comments on Section 230 are more pronounced than those of his Democratic rivals. Asked by Vox last year how platforms should be held responsible for hate speech or misinformation, Sen. Bernie Sanders, D-Vt., for example, said he would “work with experts and advocates to ensure that these large, profitable corporations are held responsible when dangerous activity occurs on their watch, while protecting the fundamental right of free speech in this country and making sure right-wing groups don’t abuse regulation to advance their agenda.”
 
Do these dipshit realize this stuff will hurt them as well. Also might as well lose the moral high ground over China. It's sopa all over again from the Obama era. Only this time, Obama killed off leftist free speech guys like the other guy who founded reddit and infected the movement with paid off neoliberal wreckers. So it's up to GOP and I don't have much faith in them and Trump is always unpredictable.
 
Do these dipshit realize this stuff will hurt them as well. Also might as well lose the moral high ground over China. It's sopa all over again from the Obama era. Only this time, Obama killed off leftist free speech guys like the other guy who founded reddit and infected the movement with paid off neoliberal wreckers. So it's up to GOP and I don't have much faith in them and Trump is always unpredictable.

"making sure right-wing groups don’t abuse regulation to advance their agenda.” -- Rulesforthee Butnotformee Sanders
 
Do these dipshit realize this stuff will hurt them as well. Also might as well lose the moral high ground over China. It's sopa all over again from the Obama era. Only this time, Obama killed off leftist free speech guys like the other guy who founded reddit and infected the movement with paid off neoliberal wreckers. So it's up to GOP and I don't have much faith in them and Trump is always unpredictable.

All Democrats are shortsighted and liars. They legislate like they will hold power forever. Look at what they started with a one vote majority in Virginia.
 
I wonder how Silicon valley feels about all the people they are cucking for literally targeting them for break up and legislative dicking.

Are they just that commited to the Democratic Party? Willing togo down in flames if it means victory? It's very curious.
 
I wonder how Silicon valley feels about all the people they are cucking for literally targeting them for break up and legislative dicking.

Are they just that commited to the Democratic Party? Willing togo down in flames if it means victory? It's very curious.
It's too late for those fucks if this happens or gains momentum. However Biden like Obama is also a two faced snake and will likely not act on it compared to sanders or even Bloomberg Allah forbid. Plus they forced out the libertarian left and brought in leftist morality obsessed authoritarian cunts so they asking for this if it happens.
 
I wonder how Silicon valley feels about all the people they are cucking for literally targeting them for break up and legislative dicking.

Are they just that commited to the Democratic Party? Willing togo down in flames if it means victory? It's very curious.
Technocrats have no lasting allegiance to anyone save themselves. Typically thier move is to play the parties against themselves but with the current administration taking a standoffish position against Siliconies they're forced to find allies wherever they can, even the Democrats. Biden for his part will probably not be getting nominated so this is just more pointless posturing from an old man who wont accept his time is over. I wouldn't expect this to affect much change.
 
Technocrats have no lasting allegiance to anyone save themselves. Typically thier move is to play the parties against themselves but with the current administration taking a standoffish position against Siliconies they're forced to find allies wherever they can, even the Democrats. Biden for his part will probably not be getting nominated so this is just more pointless posturing from an old man who wont accept his time is over. I wouldn't expect this to affect much change.
So the official position of the farms is now Bernie is the democratic nominee. Please do happen, it's time we had our Bojo vs Corbyn showdown version.
 
Ehh he isn't entirely wrong. The protections under the CDA are a bit too broad considering what they allow some companies to get away with. I wouldn't revoke it outright but it does need some changes to be made for practical reasons and so companies like facebook and google can't do shady shit and hide behind it as easily
 
So the official position of the farms is now Bernie is the democratic nominee. Please do happen, it's time we had our Bojo vs Corbyn showdown version.
Wait, so are the neoliberals so bitter over "Bernie would've won" they're actually going to get Bernie nominated just to show, no, he wouldn't have won? That's some serious spite for the poor guy.
 
Back