- Joined
- Oct 13, 2018
Last edited by a moderator:
Razörfist / The Rageoholic / xRazorfistx / Daniel Paul Harris - Hipster Metalfag. Game Journo-Doesn't Play Games He Reviews. Thief Fanfic Author. COOMER AND GROOMER.
- Thread starter Buttz McSmellington
- Start date
InsolentGaylord
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Sep 13, 2019
It wouldn't shock me if it's him projecting his own low T onto others with the beards are for soyboys thing.
Besides I thought those bugmen with beards had them because they were lazy and didn't care about appearances all that much.
Besides I thought those bugmen with beards had them because they were lazy and didn't care about appearances all that much.
The Fresh Maker
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Sep 15, 2019
The Socialism of National Socialism - A Rant
What the hell, let's piss absolutely everyone off. History professors have worked overtime for nearly 80 years, reframing a political movement with SOCIALISM...
www.youtube.com
Razorfist is a re-tard if he actually believes this. Nazis were not socialists. They threw socialists in death camps.
- Joined
- Nov 6, 2018
There principals were birthed from socialism and they shared many socialist policies similar to that of the soviet union. the difference between them and other socialists was that they were nationalists as well.The Socialism of National Socialism - A Rant
What the hell, let's piss absolutely everyone off. History professors have worked overtime for nearly 80 years, reframing a political movement with SOCIALISM...
Razorfist is a re-tard if he actually believes this. Nazis were not socialists. They threw socialists in death camps.
wtfNeedSignUp
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Dec 17, 2019
The communists also executed/imprisoned socialists once they outlived their usefulness.The Socialism of National Socialism - A Rant
What the hell, let's piss absolutely everyone off. History professors have worked overtime for nearly 80 years, reframing a political movement with SOCIALISM...
Razorfist is a re-tard if he actually believes this. Nazis were not socialists. They threw socialists in death camps.
I'd never get the people who try to argue that a party self described as "National Socialist" wasn't really socialist. It's a variant of a government based planned economy with lots of promised gibs to citizens.
- Joined
- Dec 25, 2017
Not sure what’s worse. That this was the first thread I ever posted in, that I have had an account for 2 years now, Or that something compelled me to comment on this thread on Christmas of all days.
Either way, it’s been a wild ride so far everyone!
Either way, it’s been a wild ride so far everyone!
Emperor Julian
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Dec 20, 2015
Razorfist made quite a few errors in this to the point it's actually difficult to unravel because he revels in the gish gallop but I'll hit a few key notes.
1)Razorfists entire section on Italiam fascism can be dismissed out of hand since it's distinct from his arguement as Italian facism and National Socialism are very distinct. Something he tacitly acknowlages.
2) 3:46-is irrelivant because it's never inacted. Something he never acknowlages .
3) He seems to be relying on the idea that any economic control or govermental regulation is instrisically socialist. He also struggles with Volk concepts vs authoritarianism vs socialism. He also seems oblivious of the disctinction between Communism vs Socialism.
4)Their's a lot of tangents here which really drag out the show including shade thrown at FDR as a fucking nazi sympethizer (!). I have no idea why he does this, unless he's a disingenious little turd
5)He never really acknowlages the realpolitik or pro-business policies of the reich. He doesnt even really acknowlague that Nazi economic planning following their assumption of power bordered on non-existant.
6)Hitler liked dogs ergo dogs are bad.
I'm begining to wonder if he's going to go on a tirade about how bullshit democracy is because all those 3rd world junta's had it in their names somewhere. But at the very least he needs to exert some self-control in terms of these rants because it bordered on gibberish.
1)Razorfists entire section on Italiam fascism can be dismissed out of hand since it's distinct from his arguement as Italian facism and National Socialism are very distinct. Something he tacitly acknowlages.
2) 3:46-is irrelivant because it's never inacted. Something he never acknowlages .
3) He seems to be relying on the idea that any economic control or govermental regulation is instrisically socialist. He also struggles with Volk concepts vs authoritarianism vs socialism. He also seems oblivious of the disctinction between Communism vs Socialism.
4)Their's a lot of tangents here which really drag out the show including shade thrown at FDR as a fucking nazi sympethizer (!). I have no idea why he does this, unless he's a disingenious little turd
5)He never really acknowlages the realpolitik or pro-business policies of the reich. He doesnt even really acknowlague that Nazi economic planning following their assumption of power bordered on non-existant.
6)Hitler liked dogs ergo dogs are bad.
I'm begining to wonder if he's going to go on a tirade about how bullshit democracy is because all those 3rd world junta's had it in their names somewhere. But at the very least he needs to exert some self-control in terms of these rants because it bordered on gibberish.
Last edited:
Toast Sandwich
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Dec 9, 2019
It does no good to get the correction just as wrong as the thing you're correcting. Don't play into Danny's braindead Reaganite framing of the issue. The main political rivals of the Nazis at that time were marxist socialists, not just socialists in general. Their name wasn't just some kind of trick to fool people. Socialism doesn't necessitate Marxism. If that wasn't the case then you wouldn't be able to talk intelligently about things like American progressivism of the late 1800s and early 1900s.The Socialism of National Socialism - A Rant
What the hell, let's piss absolutely everyone off. History professors have worked overtime for nearly 80 years, reframing a political movement with SOCIALISM...
Razorfist is a re-tard if he actually believes this. Nazis were not socialists. They threw socialists in death camps.
Look up a list of all the policies under Teddy Roosevelt's "Square Deal". The industrialists of the time would smear them as socialistic. The difference is that while those policies actually were socialist for the most part, they were socialist in a way that wasn't revolutionary and destructive the way Communism was. Ironically, one of Roosevelt's best quotes is "Much of the discussion about socialism and individualism is entirely pointless, because of failure to agree on terminology."
The difference is that now the modern day Republicans are on the same side as the modern day equivalent to the industrialists, and that's why they have reason to push socialism as the boogeyman it's made out to be. For people like Danny it pays to feed back into that narrative. That's why he tries to be so chummy with Steven Crowder, who does what Danny does but even more blatantly. It's opportunism all the way down.
Last edited:
verissimus
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Nov 3, 2018
The Socialism of National Socialism - A Rant
What the hell, let's piss absolutely everyone off. History professors have worked overtime for nearly 80 years, reframing a political movement with SOCIALISM...
Razorfist is a re-tard if he actually believes this. Nazis were not socialists. They threw socialists in death camps.
So did the Bolsheviks (along with practically anyone else including other communists).
Stab You in the Back
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Sep 3, 2018
Props to razor for the timely release of his Rene Auberjonois video. His DS9 videos are the only worthwhile content on his channel and despite saying "we'll be back next week" at the end of every video, its usually a month between uploads. To see the Rene video drop mere days after the last episode was a nice surprise.
- Joined
- Nov 6, 2018
I think he says "next time"
But yeah his DS9, sahdow, and movie stuff is better because its actually stuff he likes doing, though I think his DS9 documentary review is dogshit. He also says on his streams how he has a bunch of stuff done or is going to to do a bunch of stuff, but seems to fumble when it comes to actually uploading it.
God knows when his Witcher vid is coming since apparently the Netflix show has others crying plagiarism. I guess he missed his chance to be the uber contrarian and is waiting for a more fitting time when he can piss off the maximum amount of people.
Razorfist is motivated out of sheer personal opportunity.
ive began to notice that many of his takes are aligned with another out of timing like how he 180d on being anti monopoly when he finally realized his youtube career relied on Google remaining a monopoly.
Or how he has been arguing with people on twitter about copyright and the public domain, (((basically hes a you tuber in 2020 who is not only pro copyright but thinks the public domain shouldn't exist, but hey it technically doesn't at this point))) around the same time he says hes going to publish a pulp and will benefit from copyright.
- Joined
- Jan 4, 2020
Not gonna happen. He's been alluding to this mysterious video ever since the reaction to his first vid about Witcher. This has probably been mentioned before, but apparently some other Youtube rando was going to do a video response, never had the balls to do so, and Danny shelved it indefinitely.
He's been asked about it multiple times on streams, but always has a convenient excuse for not being able to release an over half-decade-old video about how Witcher is actually just plagiarized schlock or some bullshit. My theory is that he knows that there are a bunch of sweaty fanboy Witcher nerds that subscribe to him, and if he were to release it now he'd get a bunch of OMG!Video!Dislikes! and responses calling out his ill-informed hipster crap for what it is.
It's like a lot of his political takes. He's so addicted to Twitter that most of his opinions come from other right-wing lolcows like Molymeme and Jack-off Posobiec. His tweets and videos mostly involve parroting similar pander-y 2016 MAGA talking points to "own the libs", as if any left-wingers actually bother to watch his videos.
InsolentGaylord
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Sep 13, 2019
So he's a reverse of SpoonyOne?
Oh god what if he ends up like Spoony...oh lol.
- Joined
- Mar 21, 2019
People who wear sunglasses indoors should be shot
verissimus
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Nov 3, 2018
Spoony just became and is an out and out asshole. If anything he acts more like a "right-wing" version of MovieBob. Ridiculously full of himself, spouts off intellectually vapid crap from time to time, gets basic facts wrong but proceeds headlong into his special take, etc.
- Joined
- Nov 6, 2018
Never say never. He said he was making the video on Nazis being socialists two years before he actually uploaded it, and he just so happened to upload it during the groyper craze in which it pissed off his intended target, the "Blackpillers".
Also any die hard Witcher fan would have unsubbed by now after 6 years of him bashing the games, books, and CD PR.
As for response vids, I don't see what he has to worry. The only people who've shat on him on YT was a dude with 45 subs and another guy who responded to his 2049 rant and was down-voted by Razors fans.
It would take someone with a larger audience to make an impact on his vid. The only thing is
The only person who gives a fuck on planet Earth about the Witchers originality and originality in general outside of court is Daniel "Razorfist" Harris
wtfNeedSignUp
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Dec 17, 2019
Speaking of which, Razor's arguments of Witch being a ripoff of Elric are really fucking autistic. It boils down to both being murder-hobos (common in fiction), both having white hair, having some weird parallel world storylines (not that uncommon in fantasy) and both having the extremely original nickname of the White Wolf.
- Joined
- Dec 30, 2018
Yeah he says the same dumb shit about Batman being a ripoff of the Shadow.
Markorian
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Apr 25, 2019
It's simple. If something he doesn't like has any similarity to literally anything that ever came before, no matter how minor, it's a blatant ripoff. If he likes it however, then no matter how obviously lifted something is, it's an homage.
wtfNeedSignUp
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Dec 17, 2019
I think the Batman/Shadow one at least had more setting equivalencies. But it falls flat since the modern Batman is a very different beast from it's origin.