Trainwreck Pamela Swain / DocHoliday1977 / MsPhoenix1969 / Observer1977 / danishlace2003 / Writer_thriller - Victim of grand #MeToo conspiracy, litigious wannabe starfucker, off her meds and online

  • Thread starter Thread starter AJ 447
  • Start date Start date

Which member of the Pamspiracy does Pam secretly want to fuck the most?


  • Total voters
    519
Really? Well whether or not your lawyers or celebrities yourselves, you do realize the longer this thread exists, the more reasonable doubt can not be assumed in your favor or testimony?

Yes. Basically this is a troll thread but its entire existence and you all's insistence to make threats and mention celebrities and even make sexual offers makes you guilty since July 2018. That's 2 years of obsession and removal of reasonable doubt.

You all gambled that you could scare me into sexual compliance and that blew up in your faces. Now, you won my case for me.

So keep posting or delete this thread.
The outcomes of either do not affect me. It only bolsters my credibility.

Have a great day.
Bolsters your credibility with who? Your imaginary friends?
 
Changed your mind from word salad to erotomania. Wow. You couldn't google or find word salad so you switch to something you could find.

Word Salad isn't a theory I have about you. It is a judgement on your ability to write coherently. I don't need articles or links to note that you're rather bad at writing to communicate.

I have never met up with celebrities. Sahry.

I never suggested you had. In fact, that you never have is part of why you show all the symptoms of Erotomania. Also can I say it's funny you always default to proclaiming you've never met a celebrity when such a fact is actually completely irrelevant to whether or not one has erotomania? Because it is.

Your life is better than mine? Of course. Men like Harvey and Tony pay men like you very well to lie and distort the law in their favor.

Neither Weinstein nor Robbins pay me. I do not lie or distort the law as my profession.

I don't want to know you. I have no interest in meeting or knowing a game show host.

I do not want to meet you, Pam. I am also not a game show host.

Really? Well whether or not your lawyers or celebrities yourselves, you do realize the longer this thread exists, the more reasonable doubt can not be assumed in your favor or testimony?

What testimony would this be, Pam? We are not part of your vexacious litigations.

Yes. Basically this is a troll thread but its entire existence and you all's insistence to make threats and mention celebrities and even make sexual offers makes you guilty since July 2018. That's 2 years of obsession and removal of reasonable doubt.

Guilty of what, exactly?

You all gambled that you could scare me into sexual compliance and that blew up in your faces. Now, you won my case for me.

So keep posting or delete this thread.
The outcomes of either do not affect me. It only bolsters my credibility.

Pam, if you think this thread existing bolsters your credibility, you are even more delusional than initially suspected.

Have a great day.

I will, don't you worry.
 
Word Salad isn't a theory I have about you. It is a judgement on your ability to write coherently. I don't need articles or links to note that you're rather bad at writing to communicate.



I never suggested you had. In fact, that you never have is part of why you show all the symptoms of Erotomania. Also can I say it's funny you always default to proclaiming you've never met a celebrity when such a fact is actually completely irrelevant to whether or not one has erotomania? Because it is.



Neither Weinstein nor Robbins pay me. I do not lie or distort the law as my profession.



I do not want to meet you, Pam. I am also not a game show host.



What testimony would this be, Pam? We are not part of your vexacious litigations.



Guilty of what, exactly?



Pam, if you think this thread existing bolsters your credibility, you are even more delusional than initially suspected.



I will, don't you worry.

Whatever.
I'll let you continue to blather on here since you love to hear yourself speak.
 
Whatever.
I'll let you continue to blather on here since you love to hear yourself speak.

There's no 'Let' Pam. You have no control. Legal, emotional, anything. You are just tilting at windmills in your rage.

On a related note, thanks for getting your panties in such a twist about the phrase 'word salad' Helped connect a few dots on my end.
 
There's no 'Let' Pam. You have no control. Legal, emotional, anything. You are just tilting at windmills in your rage.

On a related note, thanks for getting your panties in such a twist about the phrase 'word salad' Helped connect a few dots on my end.


Geez.
My panties aren't your concern. Not now, not ever.

*eyeroll*
 
Really? Well whether or not your lawyers or celebrities yourselves, you do realize the longer this thread exists, the more reasonable doubt can not be assumed in your favor or testimony?

Yes. Basically this is a troll thread but its entire existence and you all's insistence to make threats and mention celebrities and even make sexual offers makes you guilty since July 2018. That's 2 years of obsession and removal of reasonable doubt.

You all gambled that you could scare me into sexual compliance and that blew up in your faces. Now, you won my case for me.

So keep posting or delete this thread.
The outcomes of either do not affect me. It only bolsters my credibility.

Have a great day.
What the hell is 'sexual compliance', is this what you secretly desire?
 
And there comes the deflection by deliberate misunderstanding. You do that a lot when you're realizing you've lost control of the conversation and/or are being made to look the fool.


I've also noticed a pattern in her responses to people on here. It seems she's incapable of responding to any post that contains more than a tweet's worth of text. Whenever she's faced with a longer, more thoughtful response instead of shitposting, she calls it "verbose" and subsequently ignores the logical and factual content, responding instead with a "Lol" or "Whatever" or some other dismissive verbal equivalent of an ignorant fart. Attempting to refute or respond to the rational points made by others seems completely beyond her intellectual reach.

My theory on this is her brain is so rotten and confused by this point in the progression of her mental illness that she literally can't keep track of the information being expressed in text beyond a sentence or two. It makes sense; she can't keep track of her own lies and delusions from sentence to sentence, so it would probably be too much to expect her to be capable of keeping track of the expressed thoughts of others--especially with her demonstrated total lack of theory of mind.

It's hilarious to me that someone who asserts they can communicate effectively in a complex way (news flash: she can't) and that somehow conclusively proves they can't be schizophrenic (news flash: it doesn't prove that at all) always falls apart when faced with having to read more than a sentence or two of text. She literally can't handle it, so she immediately gives up--usually bringing up some sexual topic or throwing out a childish insult immediately thereafter in an attempt at diversion. It's a constant pattern if you look back through her posts.
 
What the hell is 'sexual compliance', is this what you secretly desire?

No.

I've also noticed a pattern in her responses to people on here. It seems she's incapable of responding to any post that contains more than a tweet's worth of text. Whenever she's faced with a longer, more thoughtful response instead of shitposting, she calls it "verbose" and subsequently ignores the logical and factual content, responding instead with a "Lol" or "Whatever" or some other dismissive verbal equivalent of an ignorant fart. Attempting to refute or respond to the rational points made by others seems completely beyond her intellectual reach.

My theory on this is her brain is so rotten and confused by this point in the progression of her mental illness that she literally can't keep track of the information being expressed in text beyond a sentence or two. It makes sense; she can't keep track of her own lies and delusions from sentence to sentence, so it would probably be too much to expect her to be capable of keeping track of the expressed thoughts of others--especially with her demonstrated total lack of theory of mind.

It's hilarious to me that someone who asserts they can communicate effectively in a complex way (news flash: she can't) and that somehow conclusively proves they can't be schizophrenic (news flash: it doesn't prove that at all) always falls apart when faced with having to read more than a sentence or two of text. She literally can't handle it, so she immediately gives up--usually bringing up some sexual topic or throwing out a childish insult immediately thereafter in an attempt at diversion. It's a constant pattern if you look back through her posts.


Verbose. And you couldn't keep up, could you?
 
  • Dumb
Reactions: Deadpool
Back