Trainwreck Pamela Swain / DocHoliday1977 / MsPhoenix1969 / Observer1977 / danishlace2003 / Writer_thriller - Victim of grand #MeToo conspiracy, litigious wannabe starfucker, off her meds and online

  • Thread starter Thread starter AJ 447
  • Start date Start date

Which member of the Pamspiracy does Pam secretly want to fuck the most?


  • Total voters
    519
Aren't you a behavioral genius! Seriously, learn to make your point in less words.


Pudgy Pammy, just because you can't comprehend text longer than the Twitter character limit doesn't mean other people can't, or that other people's thoughts are so limited by their lack of intelligence as yours are.
 
Only continuing to respond to you and your classic circular debate style that you use to attempt to take over the momentum.

But whatevs.

If you believe my reasoning to be circular, by all means, point out where I'm employing it. An intellectual giant such as yourself should have no issue doing so.

I've also noticed a pattern in her responses to people on here. It seems she's incapable of responding to any post that contains more than a tweet's worth of text. Whenever she's faced with a longer, more thoughtful response instead of shitposting, she calls it "verbose" and subsequently ignores the logical and factual content, responding instead with a "Lol" or "Whatever" or some other dismissive verbal equivalent of an ignorant fart. Attempting to refute or respond to the rational points made by others seems completely beyond her intellectual reach.

My theory on this is her brain is so rotten and confused by this point in the progression of her mental illness that she literally can't keep track of the information being expressed in text beyond a sentence or two. It makes sense; she can't keep track of her own lies and delusions from sentence to sentence, so it would probably be too much to expect her to be capable of keeping track of the expressed thoughts of others--especially with her demonstrated total lack of theory of mind.

It's hilarious to me that someone who asserts they can communicate effectively in a complex way (news flash: she can't) and that somehow conclusively proves they can't be schizophrenic (news flash: it doesn't prove that at all) always falls apart when faced with having to read more than a sentence or two of text. She literally can't handle it, so she immediately gives up--usually bringing up some sexual topic or throwing out a childish insult immediately thereafter in an attempt at diversion. It's a constant pattern if you look back through her posts.

She does it because she's losing control of the conversation, and that induces a panic, so she throws out a churlish or childish response to drag the topic to a level she's comfortable with. For all her protestations, simply shitposts are essentially what she desires.

Pudgy Pammy, just because you can't comprehend text longer than the Twitter character limit doesn't mean other people can't, or that other people's thoughts are so limited by their lack of intelligence as yours are.

She knows this, but admitting it would mean admitting fault, so she has to reframe the scenario so everyone but her is at fault.

And to pre-empt things, Still not Richard Grannon, Tony, Harvey, anyone named Alan, or any person you would know by name, Pam.
 
If you believe my reasoning to be circular, by all means, point out where I'm employing it. An intellectual giant such as yourself should have no issue doing so.



She does it because she's losing control of the conversation, and that induces a panic, so she throws out a churlish or childish response to drag the topic to a level she's comfortable with. For all her protestations, simply shitposts are essentially what she desires.



She knows this, but admitting it would mean admitting fault, so she has to reframe the scenario so everyone but her is at fault.

And to pre-empt things, Still not Richard Grannon, Tony, Harvey, anyone named Alan, or any person you would know by name, Pam.



I dont care who you are. You bore me.

Pudgy Pammy, just because you can't comprehend text longer than the Twitter character limit doesn't mean other people can't, or that other people's thoughts are so limited by their lack of intelligence as yours are.


Good God you're boring too.
 
Your "everyone is verbose" defense doesnt hold much water when Yuku react the same way to short replies, Pam.

Still waiting for an example of my use of circular reasoning.

You're stumped when asked for proof
You change the subject when your stumped.
You fall back on insults.
And you just blather nonsense as filler conversation to make you sound smart.
Then you start all over.
 
I'm stumped when asked for proof
I've change the subject when I'm stumped.
I fall back on insults.
And I just blather nonsense as filler conversation to make myself sound smart.
Then I start all over.
You left out the part where you stuff your pudgy face with buttery snacks.

But otherwise spot on.
 
Back