Lolcow Melinda Leigh Scott & Marshall Castersen - Sue-happy couple. Flat earth conspiracists. Pretending to be Jewish. Believe Kiwi Farms is protected by the Masonic Order. 0-6 on lawsuits. Marshall is dead.

When I came to Kiwi Farms to show the entire world just how uneducated the loyal user base on Kiwi Farms is
First of all you've failed trying to prove anything, as people more intelligent than you, with actual legal degrees and real world experience have shredded your legal arguments. You just refuse to admit when you're wrong because egotism is one of your MANY obvious character flaws. Second your husband, children and the rest of the 10 (generous estimate) members of your pagan cult aren't the "entire world."
 
First of all you've failed trying to prove anything, as people more intelligent than you, with actual legal degrees and real world experience have shredded your legal arguments. You just refuse to admit when you're wrong because egotism is one of your MANY obvious character flaws. Second your husband, children and the rest of the 10 (generous estimate) members of your pagan cult aren't the "entire world."

And who are these "people with actual legal degrees" that you are referring to? Funny, I never saw them. Who are they?
 
"Constructive" in your context would be depriving us of content, not doubling down every other day and continuing to spew the very shit we're mocking you for making your issues with this site so much worse for you.

That's your definition of "constructive". I don't agree. My goals in being here are being accomplished. 4 down, 1 to go.
 
And who are these "people with actual legal degrees" that you are referring to? Funny, I never saw them. Who are they?
Nick Rekieta is an obvious example. @talk talk talk would be another. Both ass raped your "legal arguments" but you still flail around screaming victory.

That's your definition of "constructive". I don't agree. My goals in being here are being accomplished. 4 down, 1 to go.
It's easy to achieve goals when you move the goal posts as often as you do.
 
Also, as aside note, you lack the educational and spiritual credentials...
dunning.png
 
Then came the brave soul Talk Talk Talk who failed miserably to rebuttal my claim of legal corruption.

Hon, I never made a run at that. But at a first pass:

1. You never stated the elements of "judicial fraud" (as you called it in the past);
2. Judicial immunity is well-nigh absolute;
3. The thought that an irritating trickster like Dear Leader is going to be the favorite of a federal judge is laughable. No way he gets cut a break.

Your losses are on you. Crying about Rule 8 won't get you anywhere.
 
Nick Rekieta is an obvious example. @talk talk talk would be another. Both ass raped your "legal arguments" but you still flail around screaming victory.


It's easy to achieve goals when you move the goal posts as often as you do.

Rekeita didn't prove anything. He couldn't even define "privilege" correctly. He also misquoted the federal legal standard for suing a company by name. Thirdly, my Appeals shut down everything he said in his videos. His magic show might work on an uneducated person like you.
Hon, I never made a run at that. But at a first pass:

1. You never stated the elements of "judicial fraud" (as you called it in the past);
2. Judicial immunity is well-nigh absolute;
3. The thought that an irritating trickster like Dear Leader is going to be the favorite of a federal judge is laughable. No way he gets cut a break.

Your losses are on you. Crying about Rule 8 won't get you anywhere.

I already showed how you failed to even quote Nemet properly. YOU couldn't even quote federal legal standard correctly


I'm one of them. And as someone with a degree in criminology, I can confidently say that you're legally exceptional

Degree in criminology? Are you studied in case law? Do you have a JD?

Go ahead, I'm all game. Read my Appeal and let's talk. Let's see what you got 😁
 
Lol, she's invented religious justifications as to why it's OK, no, downright sacred, to be amoral welfare trash with a bunch of kids with different lowlife fathers. I mean, she was going to be amoral welfare trash having a bunch of kids with lowlife fathers anyway, but this way she can pretend that anyone who calls her out is just evil.
 
What gets me is that she swears to be even more amoral than she is, on paper, signs her name to it and all, to be of even lower standards than she is. 5 kids and counting with absolutely no idea who the fathers are. This is what she tells people about herself, just to get them dollars.
 
Still waiting for an educated and factual series of statements showing that something other than legal corruption influenced the outcome of Scott V Carlson and Scott V Moon 🤓
See, the Fourth Circuit performed the Master Shake ritual and looked at the future of this thread and saw the posts by the exceptional Marshall and decided, "Fuck him!" just to mess with you.

Makes as much sense as your theory.
 
I'd say its perfect. Her confidence is through the roof despite literally always being wrong.
Oh I agree the confidence level is right, however she's too far on the knowledge portion. She has negative intelligence. If we look at her husband and children we can determine that she drains the intelligence of those in proximity. A black hole of stupidity if you will.


Rekeita didn't prove anything. He couldn't even define "privilege" correctly. He also misquoted the federal legal standard for suing a company by name. Thirdly, my Appeals shut down everything he said in his videos
He passed the bar exam and can legally practice law with his degree.

You are specialized in "parks and rec" and can legally pick out new slides for a park with your degree.

If I'm interested in hearing about law, I'll listen to Rekeita
If I need to build a jungle gym in a park I'll listen to...well not you because you're probably as incompetent at that as you are everything else.
 
Last edited:
Back