Lolcow Melinda Leigh Scott & Marshall Castersen - Sue-happy couple. Flat earth conspiracists. Pretending to be Jewish. Believe Kiwi Farms is protected by the Masonic Order. 0-6 on lawsuits. Marshall is dead.

[TamarYaelBatYah]

Oh I agree the confidence level is right, however she's too far on the knowledge portion. She has negative intelligence. If we look at her husband and children we can determine that she drains the intelligence of those in proximity. A black hole of stupidity if you will.



He passed the bar exam and can legally practice law with his degree.

You are specialized in "parks and rec" and can legally pick out new slides for a park with your degree.

If I need to interested in hearing about law, I'll listen to Rekeita
If I need to build a jungle gym in a park I'll listen to...well not you because you're probably as incompetent at that as you are everything else.

Obviously you have no idea what a degree in recreation management does. Don't care if you do though.

Having a JD doesn't make you anymore qualified than someone with a bachelor's degree in order to understand how the law works and to understand case law. That's why Europeans use Bachelor's degrees to become lawyers and why things like law reader programs exist.

The only propose of a JD is to represent other people

However, you DO need an MD/PhD/Masters in clinical psychology to diagnose people of mental illness.

 

[Toasty]

Obviously you have no idea what a degree in recreation management does. Don't care if you do though

In your case, absolutely nothing apparently.

 

[Burmese Rice Farmer]

How's that (very clearly) unused degree treatin' you, Melinda?

 

[TamarYaelBatYah]

In your case, absolutely nothing apparently.

Facts to support that argument?

How's that (very clearly) unused degree treatin' you, Melinda?

Facts to support that argument?

 

[Toasty]

Facts to support that argument?



Facts to support that argument?

Your statements of income. Or were those fraudulent too?

 

[Burmese Rice Farmer]

Facts to support that argument?

The fact you're somehow still on here babbling incoherencies trying to defend yourself after being constantly and consistently proven retarded by people objectively more intelligent and qualified than you.

And yes, that is a fact.

 

[talk talk talk]

The only propose of a JD is to represent other people

Hon, that's like the opposite of how it works. The bar exam, including a character & fitness review, is what qualifies one to represent other people. Plenty of JDs don't actually practice law and don't represent people. It's just another degree.

Don't need no license to diagnose you as a lolcow, though.

 

[AnOminous]

Obviously you have no idea what a degree in recreation management does. Don't care if you do though.

Having a JD doesn't make you anymore qualified than someone with a bachelor's degree in order to understand how the law works and to understand case law. That's why Europeans use Bachelor's degrees to become lawyers and why things like law reader programs exist.

The only propose of a JD is to represent other people

However, you DO need an MD/PhD/Masters in clinical psychology to diagnose people of mental illness.

Shut the fuck up you dumb cum dumpster.

 

[TamarYaelBatYah]

Your statements of income. Or were those fraudulent too?

Nothing fraudulent about my statements of income.

Since when is money the only use of a degree?

Hon, that's like the opposite of how it works. The bar exam, including a character & fitness review, is what qualifies one to represent other people. Plenty of JDs don't actually practice law and don't represent people. It's just another degree.

Don't need no license to diagnose you as a lolcow, though.

But it still stands that the advantage of having a JD is to represent others (you cannot legally do that without a JD). A JD does not in and of itself give you an advantage at understanding the law/case law. Legal experience, mentors, skills learned from obtaining a Bachelor's and experience with case law review can give someone that (these can be obtained outside of a law school setting).

 

[AmbiTron]

What do ya'll wanna bet this is the most attention she's had in years?

 

[Toasty]

Nothing fraudulent about my statements of income.

Since when is money the only use of a degree?

Hey @Deadpool, what was it you were saying about goalposts?
Note she didn't mention the fraudulent status of her applications for child welfare benefits.

 

[Cat_Piss_and_Vinegar]

What do ya'll wanna bet this is the most attention she's had in years?

She's flicking the bean so hard it's going to fly off and splat on the nearest wall/child's eye because of it.

 

[talk talk talk]

But it still stands that the advantage of having a JD is to represent others (you cannot legally do that without a JD). A JD does not in and of itself give you an advantage at understanding the law/case law. Legal experience, mentors, skills learned from obtaining a Bachelor's and experience with case law review can give someone that (these can be obtained outside of a law school setting).

No. Passing the exam and swearing the oath gives one the privilege of representing others. Most US States require a law degree as a prerequisite to taking the exam, but it does not substitute for it except in Wisconsin, which may be the most retarded state because it allows anyone graduating from a Wisconsin law school to skip the exam. California is in the running to be most retarded because it allows people to sit for the bar exam without attending law school.

 

[redcent]

She wants to prove her legal knowledge so bad.

I'd say she is a narcissist, but the vunerable sort (I think thats what it's called?) . She wants approval from others, for her legal knowledge (or deny a lack thereof) , for banging several men, to sitting at home as a dole bludger, to getting married to a failure of a man, to being a baby factory

And no, I don't need a degree in psychology to see that the person ranting and raving in a public place is cray-cray. It's obvious to five year olds.

 

[wenttobermuda]

Behold my throbbing Power Level: I, like some other Kiwis, have a JD and a bar number. I have looked at your appeals out of curiousity, and not bothered commenting for the following reasons:

1) I can't take it seriously. One duty I had as a clerk was to sift through mounds of pro se papers looking for ones that merited real consideration. I'll not bore you with what we looked for, but we had a heap for DOAs. Yours was almost certainly placed in such a heap.

2. You do not understand appellate procedure, case law, persuasive vs. controlling authority, a judge's discretion, or strong legal writing.

3. You are psychologically unstable and evince a disordered personality.

I comment now only because this isn't amusing anymore, and I'm going to go back to marveling at autists.

No one owes it to you to produce a line by line evisceration of the horse shit you brought to court. You don't meet the standard of being argued against. You lack even the minimum coherency to deserve being told "you're wrong." No professional in their right mind would deign respond to you with the attention and respect you feel you merit.

Anaylsis is for opponents; the trash pile is for nutters.

You nutter.

 

[Deadpool]

Hey @Deadpool, what was it you were saying about goalposts?
Note she didn't mention the fraudulent status of her applications for child welfare benefits.

That's the only thing she's good at. Well that and getting knocked up by a string of gutter trash man.

 

[Karl der Grosse]

Out of idle curiosity, do her many and varied babydaddies actually provide any material support for their children, or has Tamar been picking winners like Marshall from the very beginning?

 

[Deadpool]

Out of idle curiosity, do her many and varied babydaddies actually provide any material support for their children, or has Tamar been picking winners like Marshall from the very beginning?

Considering she has likened Marshall's ex making him pay child support to theft, any answer other than none would make her a hypocrite. So probably all of them.

 

[Anonymus Fluhre]

This bint still trying to say there was "legal corruption" because she lost her appeals because they were poorly written and poorly thought out? Does she know how stupid she sounds? She's an adult woman crying on the internet because she failed to remove her name from a website. She could have spent the last three years actually getting a law degree instead of wasting her time. All she has left is chimp out on the very site she failed to take down four our amusement. Dance puppet dance.

 

[Toasty]

No, she doesn't ask them for it, and refuses to divulge their identity to the state so the state can compel them to take some responsibility for sticking their unprotected dick in crazy. And as @Deadpool mentioned, she doesn't feel that Marshall should be responsible for children he fathered with other women.

Edit to add: my information was incorrect. Please see my further posts for more info. My apologies.