US New York Times editorial board endorses Warren, Klobuchar for president - Its time to call a truce and urge all Americans, whether they maga chuds, dsa cucks, radical centrist autists and I dare say niggers and kikes to unite against the neoliberalist and neoconservative elite



The New York Times announced late Sunday that its editorial board was breaking "from convention" and will endorse two candidates for president in 2020: Minnesota Sen. Amy Klobuchar and Massachusetts Sen. Elizabeth Warren.

The paper’s endorsement has traditionally been one of the most coveted for a Democratic politician. The editorial board wrote that in choosing these two candidates, it recognizes that both "radical" and "realist" models should be considered.

The paper said it spent more than 12 hours with the candidates before coming to its conclusion.

"The history of the editorial board would suggest that we would side squarely with the candidate with a more traditional approach to pushing the nation forward, within the realities of a constitutional framework and a multiparty country," the editorial read. "But the events of the past few years have shaken the confidence of even the most committed institutionalists. We are not veering away from the values we espouse, but we are rattled by the weakness of the institutions that we trusted to undergird those values."

The paper called Warren a "gifted storyteller" who has "emerged as a standard-bearer for the Democratic left." The editorial board called her path to the White House "challenging, but not hard to envision."

Warren reposted the article on Twitter, joking, "So I guess @AmyKlobuchar and I are now both undefeated in New York Times endorsements!"

Klobuchar was described as the "standard-bearer," but for the party’s center. The paper gushed that she is the very definition of "Midwestern charisma, grit and sticktoitiveness."

The paper pointed to her goals of slashing childhood poverty, achieve 100 percent net-zero emissions by 2050 and her push for a more robust public option in healthcare. He moderate approach to governing would make for a formidable deal maker in Washington, the editorial wrote.

Reports on how she treats her staff “gave us pause,” but she pledged to do better in the future, the paper wrote.

Perhaps as important as who the paper endorsed is who it did not.

Joe Biden, the former vice president who continues to lead in polls, but his agenda does not go far enough on issues like climate and health care, the board wrote. The editorial board also wrote that Sen. Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., appeared to have missed his moment. The paper pointed out that he would be 79 when he's sworn in and has recently suffered a heart attack. "His health is a serious concern," it wrote.

The paper said it is looking forward to watching South Bend, Ind., Mayor Pete Buttigieg develop as a politician and said it was impressed with his resume, but it also pointed out that he never won more than 11,000 votes. The paper said it hopes Andrew Yang, the entrepreneur, also continues to work in politics and recommended looking to New York to get started.

Michael Bloomberg, the billionaire former mayor who the editorial board endorsed twice, falls short of the editorial board’s aspirations for 2020. The editorial pointed to issues like barring his own media company from investigating him and his refusal to let women who signed nondisclosure settlements speak to the media. The paper said his campaign approach “reveals more about America’s broken system than his likelihood of fixing it.”

-------------------------------------------------------------------------

Here is what the fine folk at stupidpol think about this:


--------------------------------------------------------------------------

Well now its official, the elite are telling us plebians to fuck off. And I now regret wasting my college loan money on buying the New York Times.
 
Chud, cucks, kikes and niggers uniting to stop them? Could happen. But no Irish, you hear me?
 
  • Agree
Reactions: MrJokerRager
Hillary would have definitely beaten low energy Bush, zodiac killer Cruz and muh small hands Rubio. All of them were pretentious cucks back then, only Cruz so far as redeemed himself to some extent.
Rubio's one man shitpost crusade against Maduro has been entertaining. Ineffective, but entertaining.
 
Endorsements went obsolete in 2016 too, rags like the NYT are just in denial about it.

I mean, didn't Hillary have every single paper that had a circulation greater than a High School Newsletter endorsing her, with the papers telling Trumpites "obviously you can't win, you don't even have ONE of us! Stupid rubes! "


And it was all for naught?


Trump didn't get a single endorsement until he'd already won several states. Endorsements didn't matter in 2016 either. And that's just on the Republican side, Bernie shouldn't have given Hillary nearly the run he did if you judged the race by endorsements alone.



That is true for the Republican side (and for the general election), but for Democrats the nominee was the most endorsed candidate which happened to be Hillary. That may not be the case this time around.

 
Joe Biden's elevator moment may be as good as a New York Times endorsement
http://archive.is/9QVeU

The video of Biden taking a selfie with the elevator operator was captured by the crew shooting the Times' TV show "The Weekly" on the way up to his official interview for the endorsement.

Which, as you know by now, he didn't get.

But that's beside the point here. What Biden did get is an African American woman telling him that she "loves him" and that he is her "favorite." And a video of that exchange that has been viewed more than 281,000 times in less than 24 hours, a virality only topped by former candidate New Jersey Sen. Cory Booker's very strong answer to a Times editorial board question of who has broken his heart (more than 800,000 views).

Biden, sensing a moment, tweeted the video of the encounter on Monday afternoon with the caption: "Honored to have won Jacquelyn's endorsement."

"The NYT video of Biden in the elevator now has more than 6x the views on Twitter than the NYT opinion videos for Warren and Klobuchar ... combined," tweeted Snapchat's Peter Hamby.
 
so like

this is the same new york times that reported

"many of these former aides say she was not just demanding but often dehumanizing — not merely a tough boss in a capital full of them but the steward of a work environment colored by volatility, highhandedness and distrust "

"Low-level employees were asked to perform duties they described as demeaning, like washing her dishes or other cleaning "

 
so like

this is the same new york times that reported

"many of these former aides say she was not just demanding but often dehumanizing — not merely a tough boss in a capital full of them but the steward of a work environment colored by volatility, highhandedness and distrust "

"Low-level employees were asked to perform duties they described as demeaning, like washing her dishes or other cleaning "

You see, it only counts as toxicity when men do it (I'm not even joking).
 
so like

this is the same new york times that reported

"many of these former aides say she was not just demanding but often dehumanizing — not merely a tough boss in a capital full of them but the steward of a work environment colored by volatility, highhandedness and distrust "

"Low-level employees were asked to perform duties they described as demeaning, like washing her dishes or other cleaning "

And she eats with a comb.
 
Back