Crime Twitter mistakenly suspends and later reinstates Nation of Islam leader Louis Farrakhan - 'mistakenly'

Twitter mistakenly suspended and later reinstated the account of Louis Farrakhan, the leader of the Nation of Islam, on Saturday.

On Saturday morning, Farrakhan's Twitter timeline disappeared and was replaced with a message saying his account had been suspended for violating the Twitter rules.


However, Twitter later reinstated Farrakhan's account in the afternoon. A Twitter representative confirmed to the Washington Examiner the initial suspension was an error, saying that "the account was caught by our spam filter in error and has been reinstated." After being reinstated, Farrakhan's account did not immediately display his correct follower account. The representative said an account's followers take time to replenish after being reinstated.

In May 2019, Facebook banned Farrakhan for anti-Semitic and homophobic rhetoric. "We've always banned individuals or organizations that promote or engage in violence and hate, regardless of ideology," a Facebook representative then told CNN Business. "The process for evaluating potential violators is extensive."

On several occasions, Farrakhan has faced widespread criticism for using racist and homophobic rhetoric. In 1990, Farrakhan said, "The Jews, a small handful, control the movement of this great nation, like a radar controls the movement of a great ship in the waters … The Jews got a stranglehold on the Congress,” during a speech. In 2018, he tweeted, "I'm not an anti-Semite. I'm anti-Termite."

Farrakhan was once praised by former co-chairwoman of the Women's March Tamika Mallory, a black gun-control and feminist activist. She, along with Linda Sarsour, a Palestinian American activist, stepped down from the organization after Mallory was accused herself of anti-Semitism.

Article (archive)

Now..
1579652983323.png

call me crazy, but I'm just a little skeptical that a 9 year old Twitter account with 330,00 followers, which hasn't posted in six months, was just automatically caught in a spam filter. But of course no reporter is going to ask the tough questions about that.
 
I'm beginning to think there was an ulterior motive behind reinstating that account after its initial removal. The question I have is "what was it?"
Farrakhan and the NOI would have raised hell if the initial decision (probably made by some gender studies grad working as a high-level moderator for Twitter) wasn't reversed.
 
Farrakhan is one of the few blacks the Jews fear and get angry about. Years ago, the NOI published a book about how integral the Jews were to the slave trade, complete with historical documentation (there was a lot of bullshit in there too because niggers lol). Got a lot of blacks pissed off at the time (early 90s), fresh from the Crown Heights riots. Farrakhan is a reminder of when (((their))) pets (literally at one point) wander off the plantation.
 
Last edited:
Oops, the Algos got a protected class I wonder what racist shit he said to get put in jail.
 
Remember when Laura "They slashed my tires" Loomer got suspended for tweeting race-swapped tweets?
1579657289614.png

1579657323384.png


:thinking:
 
Farrakhan and the NOI would have raised hell if the initial decision (probably made by some gender studies grad working as a high-level moderator for Twitter) wasn't reversed.
So Twitter would cave to a known antisemitic man with an ideology and doctrine so fundamentally absurd it makes unironic flat earth beliefs look acutely rational, because he and his followers, who collectively make up less than 0.03% of the population, will "raise hell"?

That sounds like bullshit. I smell either the greasing of hands or the twisting of wrists involved in this. There is some kind of bullshit either Farrakhan or an "in" Farrakhan has to Twitter is pulling to get him unbanned.
 
Yeah no way the ban wasn't intentional. I mean, he's not just a hate group supporter, he's the leader of one and if Twitter wants to enforce its rules about hate speech he should've been booted a long time ago. I'm way more interested n how it got reversed, though I suspect his race plays a major role (no way it would've been reversed if he was white and the leader of a white supremacist org).

The left will make a big stink about how they supposedly don't tolerate hate groups but when it comes to black supremacists they're more than happy to look the other way or even defend them.
 
So Twitter would cave to a known antisemitic man with an ideology and doctrine so fundamentally absurd it makes unironic flat earth beliefs look acutely rational, because he and his followers, who collectively make up less than 0.03% of the population, will "raise hell"?

With that statement, you could either be describing a troon or the leader of the NOI.
 
Yeah no way the ban wasn't intentional. I mean, he's not just a hate group supporter, he's the leader of one and if Twitter wants to enforce its rules about hate speech he should've been booted a long time ago. I'm way more interested n how it got reversed, though I suspect his race plays a major role (no way it would've been reversed if he was white and the leader of a white supremacist org).

The left will make a big stink about how they supposedly don't tolerate hate groups but when it comes to black supremacists they're more than happy to look the other way or even defend them.
That and he's a terrorist, he could have threatened Twitter if they didn't reinstate his account. And Twitter's trying to cover their asses to hide what could have happened behind the scenes.

Of course, this is all just :thinking:on my part.
 
Back