DESMOND IS AMAZING / desmondisamazing / Wendylou, Andrew, & Desmond Napoles - Child being abused/sexualized by parents for financial gain and fame.

  • Thread starter Thread starter RI 360
  • Start date Start date
Tasty Tatty said:
The first one, the featured video in that cameo website.

www.cameo.com

Cameo - Desmond is Amazing

Desmond is Amazing on Cameo! Cameo lets you book personalized videos from your favorite people.
www.cameo.com www.cameo.com
Click to expand...
Wonder how many creepy as hell requests he gets.
Otterly said:
Poor little kid. Just looking at the photos of him, he is emaciated. Not ‘skinny active whippet like kid’ thin, he’s emaciated. You can see from the lack of fat coverage on the face. I’d also say, looking at his facial features and the obvious hypermobility of the elbows in that pic that’s been posted several times, that he has ‘a diagnosis’ of some type.

I want to take him home, scrub the makeup off, dress him in a comfy set of clothes and feed him. His parents need prosecuting.
Click to expand...
EDS or Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome would be my guess
 
Last edited:
  • Informative
  • Thunk-Provoking
  • Like
Reactions: Video Games, Spastic Colon, Piss Bear and 5 others
Gehenna said:
.......

View attachment 1104379

The circled area is mostly solid, with no glittering, and a darker color than the rest.

That's a bruise, there is no way its makeup as it doesn't match the actual glitter at all.

It also creates a solid line going up....
Click to expand...

Not sure about that. Also if it were a bruise why not just cover it up with a foundation type of makeup rather than something you can see under like glitter..
 
  • Agree
  • Like
Reactions: s0mbra, Cervix taster, Piss Bear and 4 others
RavenCrow said:
Not sure about that. Also if it were a bruise why not just cover it up with a foundation type of makeup rather than something you can see under like glitter..
Click to expand...
Depends where it occured. If this was away from home, or the foundation was wearing off, the glitter might have been all that was at hand. Generally, from my admittedly limited knowledge, glitter and makeups with it tend to fall off and wear off so you need some on hand to do easy touchups. Foundation, as its name implies is a bit harder to do so and you generally need more kit for it.
 
  • Like
  • Thunk-Provoking
  • Optimistic
Reactions: Piss Bear, ⠠⠠⠅⠑⠋⠋⠁⠇⠎ ⠠⠠⠊⠎ ⠠⠠⠁ ⠠⠠⠋⠁⠛, Dork Of Ages and 4 others
Gehenna said:
Depends where it occured. If this was away from home, or the foundation was wearing off, the glitter might have been all that was at hand. Generally, from my admittedly limited knowledge, glitter and makeups with it tend to fall off and wear off so you need some on hand to do easy touchups. Foundation, as its name implies is a bit harder to do so and you generally need more kit for it.
Click to expand...

It depends on the type of glitter. If you get some cheapy glitter or "make up" glitter, then yes, it will fall off super easily. But there's higher end theatrical based glitter that is added to gels and the like that stay on the face way better. But it also depends on what you use to seal that shit. But given Piggy, she probably doesn't seal a goddamned thing so that makeup and glitter comes off within an hour, at best.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
Reactions: Bob's Vagene, Cpl. Long Dong Silver, UnsufficentBoobage and 3 others
This article showcases several other drag kids, including one dressed up as Divine. I'm a fan of Divine and John Waters films, and I'll admit I watched those movies as a high school kid--- and I still would've found it weird had any of my friends decided to dress up that way. I don't understand how people don't see the difference between a kid who wants to wear dresses and then this particular strain of drag. It would be completely different if it was like "Well, my son loves Sailor Moon, so I let him cosplay as her. Now he usually cosplays female characters like Usagi, but also Elsa, The Princess Bride, and other costumes girls like." A kid as young as 12 shouldn't even know who Divine is, or at least not beyond seeing a funny poster in a (regular, non-porn) dvd store.

I can't stand how things always have to be one extreme or the other. Either you accept all this type of shit or you're a complete Nazi? That doesn't make any sense. It's not unreasonable to say "Well, it became clear that my son was gay from an early age, and we're okay with that. He wanted to play dress up and take some funny pictures, but we decided not to put those online because they could be used for nefarious purposes no matter how innocent they are." How is it not obvious to some people that there's clearly other motivations at play here? This doesn't show me "accepting, loving parents of a gay/queer child", if anything, it shows that people are more comfortable with exploiting kids that were already at a higher risk for exploitation in the first place.

Desmond doesn't express himself the way a gay child actually would. I'm sure as kids we all occasionally met another child who was obviously "different", or perhaps some of us were that kid themselves. There's a world of difference between a conversation like "Mum, what's a lesbian?" "It's when two girls get married." "Why do they do that?" "Because they like each other" "Oh ok" rather than letting said child watch adult-oriented shows like The L Word or Orange is the New Black. Or this. She's exposed him to the most adult side of gay culture without (hopefully) just straight up showing him gay porn. None of these kids act like normal children who just happen to be gay. If anything, this is just as bad as the kids who get thrown out of the house by judgmental parents, if maybe not even worse.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: s0mbra, Fugax, Behavioral Sink and 19 others
biledriver said:
This article showcases several other drag kids, including one dressed up as Divine. I'm a fan of Divine and John Waters films, and I'll admit I watched those movies as a high school kid--- and I still would've found it weird had any of my friends decided to dress up that way. I don't understand how people don't see the difference between a kid who wants to wear dresses and then this particular strain of drag. It would be completely different if it was like "Well, my son loves Sailor Moon, so I let him cosplay as her. Now he usually cosplays female characters like Usagi, but also Elsa, The Princess Bride, and other costumes girls like." A kid as young as 12 shouldn't even know who Divine is, or at least not beyond seeing a funny poster in a (regular, non-porn) dvd store.

I can't stand how things always have to be one extreme or the other. Either you accept all this type of shit or you're a complete Nazi? That doesn't make any sense. It's not unreasonable to say "Well, it became clear that my son was gay from an early age, and we're okay with that. He wanted to play dress up and take some funny pictures, but we decided not to put those online because they could be used for nefarious purposes no matter how innocent they are." How is it not obvious to some people that there's clearly other motivations at play here? This doesn't show me "accepting, loving parents of a gay/queer child", if anything, it shows that people are more comfortable with exploiting kids that were already at a higher risk for exploitation in the first place.

Desmond doesn't express himself the way a gay child actually would. I'm sure as kids we all occasionally met another child who was obviously "different", or perhaps some of us were that kid themselves. There's a world of difference between a conversation like "Mum, what's a lesbian?" "It's when two girls get married." "Why do they do that?" "Because they like each other" "Oh ok" rather than letting said child watch adult-oriented shows like The L Word or Orange is the New Black. Or this. She's exposed him to the most adult side of gay culture without (hopefully) just straight up showing him gay porn. None of these kids act like normal children who just happen to be gay. If anything, this is just as bad as the kids who get thrown out of the house by judgmental parents, if maybe not even worse.
Click to expand...

I don't think Desmond is really gay. Shamu is just saying he's gay for the LGBT activist shielding. This is the main problem with the LGBT community. Their activists will shield anybody that claims to be one of them. Pedophiles, Opportunistic scum like Johnathon Yaniv.,etc. There is no line that must never be crossed with them and the regular LGBT folks suffer because of the activists and their lack of limits.
 
Last edited:
  • Agree
  • Like
  • Feels
Reactions: s0mbra, Robert Sanvagene, A Friendly Hoovy and 17 others
JohnMc said:
I don't think Desmond is really gay. Shamu is just saying he's gay for the LGBT activist shielding. This is the main problem with the LGBT community. Their activists will shield anybody that claims to be one of them. Pedophiles, Opportunistic scum like Johnathon Yaniv.,etc. There is no line that must never be crossed with them and the regular LGBT folks suffer because of the activists and their act of limits.
Click to expand...
I 100% agree with all that you said. If anything, I get the impression Desmond just had unusual mannerisms (or maybe he was a bit effete) and his mother just blew it way out of proportion.
At first I thought maybe she had really wanted a daughter, so she "made" one. But further reading, and seeing how she behaves in clips/interviews, leads me to think that the gay angle has to do with her fetish more than her son expressing himself, or that she didn't want a boy.

She claims in that article that "10% of the followers only follow because they hate him". We don't hate Desmond, we hate YOU, Wendy, for making your kid a freak show. And for that permanently sad look in his eyes that would be obvious to any sane person, gay or straight.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
  • Feels
Reactions: s0mbra, behavioral swamp thang, Spastic Colon and 14 others
biledriver said:
I 100% agree with all that you said. If anything, I get the impression Desmond just had unusual mannerisms (or maybe he was a bit effete) and his mother just blew it way out of proportion.
At first I thought maybe she had really wanted a daughter, so she "made" one. But further reading, and seeing how she behaves in clips/interviews, leads me to think that the gay angle has to do with her fetish more than her son expressing himself, or that she didn't want a boy.

She claims in that article that "10% of the followers only follow because they hate him". We don't hate Desmond, we hate YOU, Wendy, for making your kid a freak show. And for that permanently sad look in his eyes that would be obvious to any sane person, gay or straight.
Click to expand...
Piggylou actually DID have a daughter, but she got taken away by child protective services, and from what was described earlier in the thread, she barely even fed her correctly, let alone raise her. Obviouly, Piggy is not the type to give up on her fetishes or living vicariously though her children, so she is trying again with Desmond.
 
  • Like
  • Horrifying
  • Feels
Reactions: Bowser’s Henchman, s0mbra, behavioral swamp thang and 11 others
JohnMc said:
I don't think Desmond is really gay. Shamu is just saying he's gay for the LGBT activist shielding.
Click to expand...

You don't even need to be homo/bi sexual to be part of the LGBT protected class anymore. The identity cult has invented a whole new groups of personalities such as "Questioning" or "Queer" that is just an euphemism for "I'm not like other people". Desmond is "not like other children", so he fits quite well.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
  • Lunacy
Reactions: s0mbra, Fugax, SassyAndMorbidlyObese and 12 others
biledriver said:
I 100% agree with all that you said. If anything, I get the impression Desmond just had unusual mannerisms (or maybe he was a bit effete) and his mother just blew it way out of proportion.
At first I thought maybe she had really wanted a daughter, so she "made" one. But further reading, and seeing how she behaves in clips/interviews, leads me to think that the gay angle has to do with her fetish more than her son expressing himself, or that she didn't want a boy.

She claims in that article that "10% of the followers only follow because they hate him". We don't hate Desmond, we hate YOU, Wendy, for making your kid a freak show. And for that permanently sad look in his eyes that would be obvious to any sane person, gay or straight.
Click to expand...

Boys who tend to spend alot of time around girls will exhibit feminine characteristics, but as they grow older and start to spend more time with boys they'll start exhibiting more masculine characteristics.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
Reactions: Candlelight Desolation, behavioral swamp thang, Spastic Colon and 8 others
Very unlikely that Desmond is actually gay since he was conditioned from an early age to act a certain way and say certain things, and if he does end up being gay, that'll definitely say something for the whole "nature vs. nurture" debate. I'm kinda hoping we get a "Desmond breaks down and comes out as straight" saga. It sounds awful but the collective breakdown that both the media and the woke crowd would have would be hilarious.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
Reactions: s0mbra, behavioral swamp thang, Spastic Colon and 13 others
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back