Social Justice Warriors - Now With Less Feminism Sperging

[TerribleIdeas™]

Spoiler: Not entirely wrong

Cynicism on the left is a running theme since Kennedy got shot, along with the one-two gutcheck of Robert Kennedy and Martin Luther King Jr dying back to back and the overall gut check that was the utopianism of the late sixties hippie movement turning out to be a shrill shrieking fraud that went bad really fast.

Adding to this is how the Democrats failed miserably in 1972 when they caved to the hippies and ran McGovern and how nice guy Carter crashed and burnt as President. And how in the 1980s, the Democrats disintegrated into a quagmire of fiefdoms where they ran repeated losers for President that were SJW-like so as to keep that part of the base quiet, while all of the real talent/money being spent, was funneled directly into keeping the House and Senate firmly under Democrat control and the Democrats effectively cutting a deal with Reagan, where they would give Reagan his way in exchange for Reagan keeping the likes of Newt Gingrich in line, as Gingrich was one of the few GOPers in Congress who didn't like how the Democrats had the Congress under control for decades in terms of holding the majority and had started making noise with what would become his clique when Republicans retook Congress in 1994.

By the time the Clintons came along, the Democrat base was willing to sell it's soul to get power and this cynicism grew like a weed due to how the GOP responded by going crazy as well. To the point that you can argue that a lot of the motivation for the coup against Trump being the direct result of Clinton era types who have never EVER forgiven the GOP for how they treated Clinton. Also, by this point you have Gen X and Gen Y/Millennials who grew up with their parents and the media promoting the sixties/hippie movement as an idealistic utopia that we were "denied" and the glorification of the Civil Rights Movement and so much attention focused upon WW2/Holocaust in school to create the idea that WW2 and the Civil Rights Movement were supposed to be the "final battles" between good and evil and then that faggot Lyndon Johnson fucked everything up and cost us paradise by escalating the Vietnam War.

By the time Clinton gets impeached for lying about a blow job, the left started embracing dystopian "the ends justify the means" type view of power. Mainly that the goal of political power is to keep it from the GOP and to make excuses for the Democrats never actually following through on their utopia promises (see Clinton promising to let gays service openly in the military and to basically draft all of the top scientists in the US and funnel millions to them to cure AIDS ala the Manhattan Project; two things Clinton never did do). And as such, it was OK for the Democrats to be corrupt as fuck, because "the other guy was far worse". This was helped by the GOP being in full Clinton Derangement Syndrome mode, to the point that no one wanted to be on the record of saying that Clinton had impeachment coming, because they didn't want to give the GOP the satisfaction of being told they were right.

Then Bush happened and 911 basically making him and the GOP in general, untouchable. The left survived the nightmare of the 2000 election believing Bush was an exceptional individual and them being able to spend four years brainwashing people into thinking of him as a exceptional usurper king but 9-11 made him an untouchable golden god who used the sympathy and 100+ stat boost to start a war in Iraq. And the media sucked his dick non-stop and the left couldn't even get a show on freaking MSNBC, who famously cancelled all of their liberal themed shows after the second Iraq war started.

The Bush Wars ultimately broke the brains of a TON of liberals/lefties due to the utter impotence they felt under Bush. The rank and file establishment however were still holding out hope of "Hillary is coming", as during the darkest days of the Bill Clinton impeachment, the establishment and their money men and elites on the left made a corrupt bargain with Hillary: she would stay with Bill and publicly stand by her husband and in return, get both a career in the Senate but also the Presidency and lead to a Clinton restoration. To the extent that Hillary further broke the idealism of the left by explicitly voting for the war in Iraq because she thought it was in the best interest of her Presidential ambitions since a vote against it would be used as a hatchet against her by the GOP (which backfired big time as Obama instead used the pro-war vote against her).

Then Obama happened with hope and change, capturing the Millennial vote and winning against Hillary's "Member Berry" campaign and against McCain and Palin.

But the economy took a shit and died right before the election and it led to Obama siding with wall street over main street. Furthermore, Obama turned out to be a fraud on the hope and change department and Obamacare turned out to be a monkey's paw of half-measures that made no one happy. And the right wing full tilt cray-cray, even more so than they did under Clinton in the 90s and combined with the left being drunk on power, when full tilt evil cynical in terms of making establishing the 1000 Year SJW Reich the only thing that mattered and Hillary in particular, the vehicle to do so since unlike Obama, Hillary had no qualms about abusing power to crush her enemies real and imaginary since unlike Obama, there was no stigma where the first woman president had to be June Cleaver whereas the first black President had to be super safe and non-threatening to everyone. And since Hillary lost and the left STILL can't own up to the failures of Obama or how they got on their knees to suck him off, all they got left is their cynicism and hate to keep them going.

I thought the first time the left tried to go with the BAMN/"End justify the means" method was during the Weather Underground and the New Left, in the 70's.

 

[LetterlandMafia]

After winning a BAFTA Joaquin Phoenix used his acceptance speech to call out racism and generally self-flagellate about being a white male. Naturally basketball twitter is loving it.



If it turned out twitter was a recruiting tool created by white nationalists I honestly wouldn’t be surprised.

 

[0 0]

View attachment 1127059

Also, raff out roud at Chinks being laycist against chinks -
View attachment 1127060

View attachment 1127102
View attachment 1127105
View attachment 1127107

"I wear trendy fashions, buy the latest tech brands, enjoy modern western amenities like indoor plumbing and central heating. and I've refused to finish high school, but you should listen to me about how much better anarcho-privitism is, because my parents are from Somalia, and it's really fucking primitive there."

 

[IdaRita]

After winning a BAFTA Joaquin Phoenix used his acceptance speech to call out racism and generally self-flagellate about being a white male. Naturally basketball twitter is loving it.

View attachment 1127940View attachment 1127941View attachment 1127942

If it turned out twitter was a recruiting tool created by white nationalists I honestly wouldn’t be surprised.

I understand noble intentions, trying to make workplces more friendly for people of different cultures... But this is just not healthy. They are trying so much for white people to "identify micro racism" or something like that, they are really forcing white people to feel bad and guilty about their existence... i live in Easter Europe, so this is not really present here (different history and demographic), but I feel like this "YOU MUST RECOGNIZE YOURSELF AS PART OF THE PROBLEM" can really be bad for people mental health or result in an exact opposite - it's forced so much that people will rebel.
I feel like they are trying really hard to force changes in society (like more nominations for black actors) that would happen anyway and without all that making people feel guilty, if you just...give it more time? Without 74856947 articles or Twitter hashtags or culture wars.

 

[Private Pyle]

After winning a BAFTA Joaquin Phoenix used his acceptance speech to call out racism and generally self-flagellate about being a white male. Naturally basketball twitter is loving it.

View attachment 1127940View attachment 1127941View attachment 1127942

If it turned out twitter was a recruiting tool created by white nationalists I honestly wouldn’t be surprised.

From a cynical/pessimistic perspective, you could say he’s only bringing this up because Joker was accused of pandering to “angry white men” and he’s essential pulling a nice guy maneuver.
And are they really going to make BAFTA so white a thing? How many average joes would even know what that is?

 

[TerribleIdeas™]

I understand noble intentions, trying to make workplces more friendly for people of different cultures... But this is just not healthy. They are trying so much for white people to "identify micro racism" or something like that, they are really forcing white people to feel bad and guilty about their existence... i live in Easter Europe, so this is not really present here (different history and demographic), but I feel like this "YOU MUST RECOGNIZE YOURSELF AS PART OF THE PROBLEM" can really be bad for people mental health or result in an exact opposite - it's forced so much that people will rebel.
I feel like they are trying really hard to force changes in society (like more nominations for black actors) that would happen anyway and without all that making people feel guilty, if you just...give it more time? Without 74856947 articles or Twitter hashtags or culture wars.

I've been warning these assholes about "kicked dog syndrome", and their brilliant fucking response is to assume that that warning is proof that their kafka trap is a legitimate test, because "only people with underlying white supremacist sympathies will behave like white supremacists!" Apparently, the notion that you can only abuse, malign, and discriminate people for so long until you push them into the welcoming arms of people with the opposite messaging just doesn't seem real to them, despite the majority of them having just enough self-awareness to realize they owe their current political fervor to the existence of, and the backlash to, the their behavioural mirrors on the religious right.

 

[Otterly]

I've been warning these assholes about "kicked dog syndrome"

I consider myself a fairly chilled and tolerant person. But the past few years and the descent into being told that I must pay for sins I did not commit, and that no redemption is possible, has reduced my tolerance and sympathy greatly. Just today I was told that my point of view was totally invalid because I’m white, when the point I was making had absolutely zero to do with that. Another person in the conversation then hinted that anyone who held an opposing opinion on brexit should be reported to their employer for racism.
This is totalitarian state level stuff. I have to be so aware of what I say, and I do not like it. I’m a mild mannered professional, not someone with any extreme opinions, I’m polite and reasonable and yet I’m still living in fear of someone dobbing me in for thoughtcrime.
I’m quite sure that if I feel like that, one hell of a lot of other people with less restraint and less compunction about hitting back do as well, and quite frankly, part of me thinks bring it on. You can only kick people so much. the sooner the anti SJW backlash happens the better.

 

[TerribleIdeas™]

Seriously, it's a real fucking article. http://archive.ph/RPNxi

 

[ZehnBoat]

View attachment 1128353

if you're bi, why would you also call yourself lesbian
that's like saying "oh, it's not a square, it's a quadrilateral square."

i know the stereotype of "the left can't meme" usually has a lefty meme full of paragraphs of words, but this bitch is starting to do it in regular speech.

 

[TerribleIdeas™]

That bottom point IS accurate, but realistically, trees are large carbon sinks, so planting native trees isn't a problem.

 

[Tour of Italy]

View attachment 1128356

Seriously, it's a real fucking article. http://archive.ph/RPNxi

The whole “-splaining” deal only ever had traction as a way to describe someone being condescending. And typically people only ever bitched about when by random chance they actually did know what the person was talking about.

It wasn’t long before it just devolved into a tool for narcissists to hate randos for no reason. That, and an agitprop technique to discredit experts with minimal effort, based on people’s moronic biases.

 

[Vault Boy]

Wait, does that mean teachers educating students is now "adult-splaining"? Are they seriously going down this rabbit hole?

 

[Private Pyle]

View attachment 1128353

View attachment 1128356

Seriously, it's a real fucking article. http://archive.ph/RPNxi

Is TERF just a way of saying “I don’t like this woman” or to punish wrong speak?
It seems anything can qualify you to be a TERF.

 

[Lord Xenu]

Wait, does that mean teachers educating students is now "adult-splaining"? Are they seriously going down this rabbit hole?

Yeah, it's not like she's an expert in the field, just some rich kid with Tourrette's Syndrome and a tic about recycling and shit.

 

[Book Thief]

Is TERF just a way of saying “I don’t like this woman” or to punish wrong speak?
It seems anything can qualify you to be a TERF.

It's a punishment for wrong-speak. Basically, any time you say anything that might suggest that transgenders shouldn't be able to do something, or disagree with them on some issue, no matter how insane it is, it qualifies as "transphobia." Troons equate disagreements to violence, therefore disagreements must be silenced at all costs.

 

[Symphony of the NEET]

Is TERF just a way of saying “I don’t like this woman” or to punish wrong speak?
It seems anything can qualify you to be a TERF.

leftists expect someone to publicly humiliate themselves in shame if they are called transphobic, so calling someone a TERF is the best way to shut someone down unless they perform martyrdom for trans people.

The Left using fetishistic, mentally unstable trannies as the benchmark for ideological purity has been the most regressive move a political movement has made in a long time. The uberwealthy getting support from fundamentalist New Earthers at least made some sense, I guess, but in 100 years going from gaining worker’s rights progress (40 hour work week, eight hour day) to giving a spotlight men who wanna touch their medically induced moobs while jerking off is a Greek comedy.

 

[Otterly]

A TERF is just a woman who says no to a troon

 

[Wallace]

TERF is just a socially acceptable way to call someone you don't like a bitch.

 

[Jarolleon]

leftists expect someone to publicly humiliate themselves in shame if they are called transphobic, so calling someone a TERF is the best way to shut someone down unless they perform martyrdom for trans people.

The Left using fetishistic, mentally unstable trannies as the benchmark for ideological purity has been the most regressive move a political movement has made in a long time. The uberwealthy getting support from fundamentalist New Earthers at least made some sense, I guess, but in 100 years going from gaining worker’s rights progress (40 hour work week, eight hour day) to giving a spotlight men who wanna touch their medically induced moobs while jerking off is a Greek comedy.

"One leads to the other, for the idle brain is the Devil's playground"-An old-school industrialist fatcat, probably.

 

[TerribleIdeas™]

It's a punishment for wrong-speak. Basically, any time you say anything that might suggest that transgenders shouldn't be able to do something, or disagree with them on some issue, no matter how insane it is, it qualifies as "transphobia." Troons equate disagreements to violence, therefore disagreements must be silenced at all costs.

But remember, leftists engaged in rioting and assault are just "speaking", and your brain hemorrhage is the natural outcome of your violent words that disagree with their speech.