Social Justice Warriors - Now With Less Feminism Sperging

Just today I was told that my point of view was totally invalid because I’m white, when the point I was making had absolutely zero to do with that.
just yesterday someone told me that because i'm not part of the lgbtttttqqqqqq that i am not allowed to have an opinion on whether males should be allowed into women's sports. the person didn't say if i'm allowed to have an opinion as to what I would like to eat for lunch.
 
Wait, does that mean teachers educating students is now "adult-splaining"? Are they seriously going down this rabbit hole?
This is starting to sound like America's version of China's Cultural Revolution.

just yesterday someone told me that because i'm not part of the lgbtttttqqqqqq that i am not allowed to have an opinion on whether males should be allowed into women's sports. the person didn't say if i'm allowed to have an opinion as to what I would like to eat for lunch.
Hopefully we don't get to that point.
 
"Adult-splained"
Because what does the Secretary of the Treasury know?
We should totally listen to this 17 year old who was so mentally abnormal and dis-functional she wasn't even required to go to her tard school.
I'm really fucking tired of this "From the Mouthes of Babes" shit that infests our culture.
Maybe it's just a sign of how infantalized we've become that so many people treat the, coached, words of children as some source of unconventional wisdom but it really needs to stop.
Children and teenagers are fucking dumb.
Thats why we place so many restrictions on them and invest so much into molding them into adults.
What could be more smoothbrain than worshiping child sages?
 
View attachment 1128445

That bottom point IS accurate, but realistically, trees are large carbon sinks, so planting native trees isn't a problem.
Just remembered that awful PC building video The Verge did. Once the PC building side of Youtube found it, they began mocking it to hell and back. The Verge starts crying about it, the guy in the video starts pulling the race card(even though tons of black people in the tech community were mocking the video), attempts at silencing all criticism are made.

A little bit later, the guy who invented ziptie tweezers asks everyone mocking him to do something positive. The guy behind Gamersnexus, Steve, takes his advice and begins putting ads for stuff like Ecosia and Eden Project in his videos. Think a few other techtubers followed suit.

Might sound nutty, but I think that hit a nerve or five for The Verge.
 
But remember, leftists engaged in rioting and assault are just "speaking", and your brain hemorrhage is the natural outcome of your violent words that disagree with their speech.
The justification (read: excuse) I most-often hear for this kind of behavior is that left-wing violence isn't "as prevalent" as right-wing violence. The fuck? That's like saying that because men commit more rapes, we shouldn't punish women who commit sexual assaults.
 
The justification (read: excuse) I most-often hear for this kind of behavior is that left-wing violence isn't "as prevalent" as right-wing violence. The fuck? That's like saying that because men commit more rapes, we shouldn't punish women who commit sexual assaults.

Unless SJWs are willing to count Islamic terrorism as "right-wing violence", which it is (in the sense that it's fundamentalist, religious, archeo-conservative), and they're not (because they'd have to admit that they're chosen darkies are actually worse than any fundie loons in the US), there's no data produced that has ever shown that.

That also ignores that the only way that feminists can claim "more men commit sex crimes than women" is by using definitions for sex crimes that exclude female perpetration, but that's a separate discussion.
 
The justification (read: excuse) I most-often hear for this kind of behavior is that left-wing violence isn't "as prevalent" as right-wing violence. The fuck? That's like saying that because men commit more rapes, we shouldn't punish women who commit sexual assaults.
Left-wing violence, like women who rape, aren't called that so as to keep the numbers down. The reporting on shootings in the US where the perpetrator is a minority is noticeably less than when they're a white man, for example, and there are numerous places which show how when women have sex with their students, male or female, it's not called 'rape', and sometimes not even 'sexual assault'.

I believe more men commit sexual assault than women, but I also believe it's not nearly so disparate as they would have you believe, partly because women's assault gets downplayed, and partly because men don't call what they've experienced sexual assault or rape. The number of men who have been sexually assaulted, especially by women, skyrockets when you ask them if they've had certain experiences that equate to sexual assault, rather than if you ask them if they've been sexually assaulted.

Current SJW logic is that women won't lie about rape, so #believewomen. There's also many of them who don't believe women should be punished for making false rape claims, because #believewomen, so then if it can be proved a woman did lie about rape there must have been a good reason; that Rolling Stone false rape story for a couple of years back still had SJWs believing something must have happened to the girl at the centre, because they couldn't let go of the narrative of frat guys all being rape machines. They also are often very dismissive of the consequences of a man being falsely accused of rape, and seem to think that men in general deserve to be punished, so if a few get wrongly accused, well, that's just the price you have to pay.

All of that suggests that they're really not that far off suggesting exactly what you said. And like numerous outlandish positions, while they know they could never say it out loud, noting some of their actions and arguments, it seems clear that there are a few of them - not many, but a few - who do honestly believe that female sexual assault should be dismissed. Because they don't think women can assault men, because they think it's payback, and/or because they just ignore women-on-women violence.
 
The justification (read: excuse) I most-often hear for this kind of behavior is that left-wing violence isn't "as prevalent" as right-wing violence. The fuck? That's like saying that because men commit more rapes, we shouldn't punish women who commit sexual assaults.

Privilege is a one-dimensional universal constant. For any two people, one has privilege over the other, such that the first person has it better in every single way, and the second person has it worse in every single way. The circumstances are irrelevant. A white man starving to death on the streets in the middle of winter has privilege over Michelle Obama.

Naturally, when confronted with evidence that this isn't true, the reaction is to delegitimize this evidence. You must explain that the suffering of the privileged doesn't count. Any admission that other people suffer is a threat to the legitimacy of one’s own suffering. SJWs will deny and actively mock the pain of others, or at the very least state that it doesn’t count as the correct sort of pain to matter in the moral calculus and certainly isn’t even in the same ballpark as their own.
 
if you're bi, why would you also call yourself lesbian

Because for ages, but especially in the 90s, bisexuals were the devil incarnate in the gay community.

It was common for those just "experimenting" with homosexuality, especially women, to go out of their way to identify as lesbian then claim bisexuality when they found a Chad they wanted to marry and had to explain why they were riding Chad's cock.

For a lot of bisexual people, not just women but men too, it was a matter of survival to identity as gay instead of bisexual because one's gay friends would turn on you the second they found out you still had feelings for the opposite sex due to a fear that you A. were just "experimenting" for kicks and B. Would use being bisexual to basically get straight privilege and be able to pass as straight/have your homosexual experience excused as "going through a phase" and not held against you in a way that could ruin your life, once you resume a life of heterosexuality.

But for lesbians, especially those of the militant variety, being bisexual meant you were a traitor in waiting. Ironically, this was especially common amongst the lesbian/feminists who would be at the foreground of the TERF movement, as far as their politicization of their gayness meaning that you had to be 100% gay or else be a traitor.
 
Is this the right place to argue against the "peggers arent gay" crowd? All I have to say is, if you take an object, sometimes literally shaped like a raging hard dick, up your ass, then you are gay as fuck. What's the difference between a tran shoving their gorl dick up your ass, and some girl wearing a strap on? Are they both not tits with dicks? I had to ask here so I didnt get permabanned from SA. Though, there's a strong chance that could still happen.
 
View attachment 1128356
Seriously, it's a real fucking article. http://archive.ph/RPNxi
Tbh, my family is enviroment-friendly and I try to care about segregation etc. I think climate change is real, but I don't think it's as serious or apocalyptic as they are presenting it now. I think we are doing good or at least we are trying to be more ecological - banned plastic bags or straws, more segregation, less pollution.
But I just don't get why it become such a serious, mainstream topic in the last year. You know, I think enviroment and state of our planet is more serious and actually important topic, unlike how many black gays are presented in cartoon or how video games makes you sexist, what is the pay gap in Hollywood, or how problematic everything is. But those were mainstream topic in the last decade.
I also don't think girl with autistic disorder is the best candidate to be the face of the movement. They want to appeal to older politians who are from generation with different look at mental disorders yet they choose girl who because of her ilness are going to be awkard or seemingly robotic. I think lightly autistic people can lead a normal life and do great in many professions but public speaker is just not one of them.
 
Tbh, my family is enviroment-friendly and I try to care about segregation etc. I think climate change is real, but I don't think it's as serious or apocalyptic as they are presenting it now. I think we are doing good or at least we are trying to be more ecological - banned plastic bags or straws, more segregation, less pollution.
But I just don't get why it become such a serious, mainstream topic in the last year. You know, I think enviroment and state of our planet is more serious and actually important topic, unlike how many black gays are presented in cartoon or how video games makes you sexist, what is the pay gap in Hollywood, or how problematic everything is. But those were mainstream topic in the last decade.
I also don't think girl with autistic disorder is the best candidate to be the face of the movement. They want to appeal to older politians who are from generation with different look at mental disorders yet they choose girl who because of her ilness are going to be awkard or seemingly robotic. I think lightly autistic people can lead a normal life and do great in many professions but public speaker is just not one of them.

It's Vice. They care more about making people angry and outraged to generate clicks than actually helping to fix the problem.
 
Is this the right place to argue against the "peggers arent gay" crowd? All I have to say is, if you take an object, sometimes literally shaped like a raging hard dick, up your ass, then you are gay as fuck. What's the difference between a tran shoving their gorl dick up your ass, and some girl wearing a strap on? Are they both not tits with dicks? I had to ask here so I didnt get permabanned from SA. Though, there's a strong chance that could still happen.
If a dude who is only attracted to women wants something put up his ass sometimes it doesn't make him gay. Does looking at a man's body make you hard? Do you want to suck a dick? If no, then you're not gay.

Men basically have a clit inside their assholes. Their wives or girlfriends could touch it to get them off and it would feel a million times better than if she gave them a hand job. It also wouldn't be gay, because she's not a dude. This is a psychological hangup that only straight men have and it makes 0 logical sense to me.
 
Back