Iowa caucus vote totals delayed amid 'inconsistencies'; Trump team suggests contest 'rigged' - Beyond Parody

From Fox News (archive)
--------
The Iowa Democratic Party (IDP) still has not reported official vote totals in the critical Iowa caucuses as of early Tuesday morning, in a largely unexplained and unprecedented delay that has raised questions about the legitimacy of the contest -- and campaign officials are livid, Fox News has learned.

The Trump campaign, meanwhile, openly suggested that the delay meant that the caucuses were being "rigged," and that the embarrassing night proved that the Democratic Party can't be trusted to run Americans' health care and implement sweeping new government programs. Even if a winner is ultimately announced, the chaos and confusion has seemingly erased any hope for the major momentum boost that would normally result.

"We found inconsistencies in the reporting of three sets of results," the IDP said in a statement at 11:30 p.m. ET. "In addition to the tech systems being used to tabulate results, we are also using photos of results and a paper trail to validate that all results match and ensure that we have confidence and accuracy in the numbers we report. This is simply a reporting issue. The app did not go down and this is not a hack or an intrusion. The underlying data and paper trail is sound and will simply take time to further report the results."

Fox News is told that during a call with the campaigns, an IDP representative said the party would be "getting photos of the paper results sent over," but didn't answer any questions and then hung up on all the campaigns, even as frustrated staffers pushed for answers. A campaign staffer told Fox News the brief call was "crazy." A second campaign official told Fox News, “Yes, they did hang up.”

The Biden campaign then wrote to the IDP, complaining about the "considerable flaws" in the caucus reporting process.

"The app that was intended to relay Caucus results to the Party failed; the Party’s back-up telephonic reporting system likewise has failed," the campaign wrote in a letter. "Now, we understand that Caucus Chairs are attempting to — and, in many cases, failing to — report results telephonically to the Party. These acute failures are occurring statewide. We appreciate that you plan to brief the campaigns momentarily on these issues, and we plan to participate. However, we believe that the campaigns deserve full explanations and relevant information regarding the methods of quality control you are employing, and an opportunity to respond, before any official results are released."

About an hour earlier, IDP spokesperson Mandy McClure said in a statement, "The integrity of the results is paramount. We have experienced a delay in the results due to quality checks and the fact that the IDP is reporting out three data sets for the first time. What we know right now is that around 25% of precincts have reported, and early data indicates turnout is on pace for 2016."

Turnout in the 2016 Democratic caucuses in Iowa was 171,109. That was far below the nearly 240,000 that took part in the 2008 Democratic caucuses, when then-Sen. Barack Obama won the contest.

"With every passing minute that there is a delay, we worry that the process will lose credibility," a top Elizabeth Warren aide told CNN.

In a surreal moment shortly before Minnesota Sen. Amy Klobuchar took the stage to thank her supporters -- even as no voting results were available -- a precinct chief was being interviewed on CNN while he was on hold for more than an hour with the IDP to report results. The IDP then hung up on the precinct chief live on-air after he was too slow to respond once they took him off hold.

At least four precincts had to resolve ties in their vote results by flipping a coin during the evening, Fox News has learned.

Speaking at 11:30 p.m. ET, former Vice President Joe Biden said he felt good about the caucus, then remarked, "It's on to New Hampshire! ... We're in this for the long haul."

Taking the microphone ten minutes later, Sanders said that when the results were in, he had a "good feeling we're going to be doing very very well here in Iowa."

For the first time ever, the IDP has previously said it will report three sets of results at the end of the state’s first-in-the-nation caucuses: a tally of caucus-goers’ initial candidate preference; vote totals from the “final alignment” after supporters of lower-ranking candidates were able to make a second choice, and the total number of State Delegate Equivalents each candidate receives. There is no guarantee that all three will show the same winner.

Earlier in the evening, an IDP official told Fox News the party was doing “quality control checks, making sure the numbers are accurate,” adding that “people are still caucusing; we are working to report results soon.”
----

tl;dr: Results from the Democratic Iowa Caucus are late coming in, DNC is blaming an app and claiming they are currently doing "quality control."
 
View attachment 1130170

That is possibly the fakest coin toss that I've ever seen in my life. He spent a solid few seconds just fussing with the coin in his fingers, clearly looking at what side the coin was facing, and then flipped it back over. He could have just tossed the coin again, since he fucked it up, but why do that when you already got the result you wanted?

I don't know what's funnier, the clumsiness fumbling with the coin, or the fact that noone calls him out on that
 
Did...did the DNC not expect the Sanders campaign to NOT be on high-alert for precisely this kind of Whoopsie Daisy bullshit?

Given the levels of incompetence the DNC has displayed in the Iowa Caucus alone, I'd wager they really did think Bernie would let his guard down. As much as I dislike Bernie and his fans, I'll give them credit for being on watch for the shady tricks the DNC will inevitably pull.

Even then, the neoliberal bigwigs have a lot of money and a lot of power, and I don't think Bernie will get the nomination. At best, you're going to have a repeat of the 1968 Democratic run, which was an unmitigated disaster for them, directly leading to the rise of Nixon and his subsequent landslide victory in 1972.

In light of these recent events, I wanna ask people here something: if the Democratic party does collapse after this nonsense, what do you think will rise in its place? Will it go more moderate, or will it swing full left?

I don't think the Democratic Party will fully collapse, but I do think it will undergo a massive party shift and realignment, one even larger than their realignment in 1992 and more akin to the Republican realignment in 1980.

As for whether or not it will go moderate or full left, I'd give it a 50/50 shot depending on how 2020 will ultimately play out and the effect it will have on the 2022 midterms. Overall, I think the Democrats will try to go more moderate, with the far left elements either forming their own third party or aligning with the Greens or even more likely, they'll end up becoming a sidelined regional faction like the Religious Right is becoming for the GOP post-2012.

The last time we had a major party collapse was when the Whigs collapsed in 1860, which was then followed by the Civil War. As polarized as we are in Current Year America, I don't think we've quite reached the levels of division that led up the Civil War, and the world powers won't sit out a second civil war like they did during the first.
 
It won't. The fact of the matter is the black and brown people that make up most of the actual voting base of the Democratic party don't care about your progressive politics ,or your college socialist idealism. The fact of the matter is they already have access to all kinds of welfare and benefits, so they will keep voting for establishment dems. Why fuck up a good thing so crackers can get free college? Most minorities get scholarships easily, so its almost a non issue for most aspirant minorities.

That is what Bernie really represents, welfare for middle class white people. Almost all his core issues amount to give me dats for whites. But guess what whitey, black and brown people already know how to game the system, be it being a welfare deadbeat or a successful business person. And you're going to keep coming back. Go ahead, try joining the DSA, an incompetent LARP organization of spergs who can barely hold a successful convention. Good lucking campaigning for the DSA and getting anyone but college kids and white urbanite liberals to even consider voting for you. All those people of color you want to protect and fight for, thinking you are giving them the world and fighting for their justice? They don't care about you. They got theirs, why fuck up a good thing.

Bernie, like his supporters, at their core are cucks. No matter how often they get cheated on, they come crawling back saying its really all their fault, saying they will go to couples therapy. Its more pathetic than the proverbial cuckold who gets off to black men railing his wife and uploading clips of it to Pornhub. Berniebros are like the guy who's girl pressures him into Polyamory, and thinks he is going to be a good prog and get side pussy, only to be left at home weekends while his GF is getting railed by her BF, posting on /r/polyamory and venting at how fustrated he is with how its going. But he isn't going to leave or make a change, because at his core he is a coward too afraid to lose what he has for a sense of self respect.

You will crawl back with establishment dems, falling for all the same stupid rhetoric and sloganeering about RAYCISM! and SOYSHAL JUSTICE! and KOCH BROS! and forget all about Iowa. The black and browns will stick with the political machines run by millionaires and billionaires that get them benefits and protections, and you will be there to go door to door to get signatures.
Also, implying niggos will ever vote for a Jew. See: South Carolina, etc.
 
Yes, because their masters told them to go anti-Brexit.

If by masters you mean the same people that voted for Corbyn. The far left socialists did not want Brexit.

And at any rate, there were more problems with Labour than Brexit.
 
Last edited:
Whoever takes the Iowa caucuses, with the exception of Bernie Sanders, we all know the true winner of such a conflict:

xwZDe7zt_400x400.jpg
 
There is not evidence suggesting this was rigged. Iowa’s voting population are 90% boomers who are tech illiterate. So it makes sense theres a lot of delays.

Caucuses are a fucking relic, and should be abolished. Iowa just made themselves a national laughingstock, and by doing so, they lost all relevancy in this election.

Its funny that Trump got his results with zero issues.
 
There is not evidence suggesting this was rigged. Iowa’s voting population are 90% boomers who are tech illiterate. So it makes sense theres a lot of delays.

Caucuses are a fucking relic, and should be abolished. Iowa just made themselves a national laughingstock, and by doing so, they lost all relevancy in this election.

Its funny that Trump got his results with zero issues.
A lot of volunteers that operate these things are the same boomers as well. Thank goodness Iowa has paper ballots.
 
Given the levels of incompetence the DNC has displayed in the Iowa Caucus alone, I'd wager they really did think Bernie would let his guard down. As much as I dislike Bernie and his fans, I'll give them credit for being on watch for the shady tricks the DNC will inevitably pull.

Sanders is a cuck who repeatedly ate shit in 2016. They just figured he’d eat shit again and let the DNC wreck his chances in 2020. For the sake of his base and for just general entertainment, I hope he tells them to get fucked.
 
Back