Lolcow Melinda Leigh Scott & Marshall Castersen - Sue-happy couple. Flat earth conspiracists. Pretending to be Jewish. Believe Kiwi Farms is protected by the Masonic Order. 0-6 on lawsuits. Marshall is dead.

Im not sure if im exceptional or not as i haven't been following this thread too closely

around an hour ago this thread was bumped and when i opened it had a video posted with no other comment,i had to go out and do something when i came back and when i re-opened the the thread the post was gone?

heres the vid that was linked

I cant seem to find it referenced in the last 10 or so pages and it was posted on the 19th,not sure if i caught an aborted gay OP or if im just a fucktard

🤨

Edit:Seems a Kiwi was just having Tech issues when trying to post the video originally
Egads, his teeth & bloat. Her twang. Shudder.

Also, yes, because JOSH is really big into censorship ?
Also, yes, because KF has NEVER encountered sock accounts ?
 
Beating them at their own game how exactly, Marshall?

I swear, that moron is a full blown Cartman. Ego driven madness, shouting for people to respect him and his "authoritah." Seems to twist it to make it all part of this narrative where he flew in and shot laser beams of righteousness and fury to own us and send us all away crying.

At least when you were posting on here you were keeping us amused. Now you're sinking back into obscurity til the next frivolous law filing. Good job, dingus.
 
I guess im gonna have to read through the last months activity of this thread to have any clue whats going on lol

I did it find it weird how this thread had dissapeared off the top of the threadlist considering it had video sperging posted.I assume Null or staff should be able to see who initially posted then deleted the post
The TLDR is: Marshall hit up the farms with an account named Marshall Law and sperged that Marshall is a cool guy who can squish anyones head with his left hand. He swore to yahowai that he is not Marshall, that he is only a distant friend of Melinda and him and also a badass veteran who can squish anyones head with his left hand.
His sperging was funny for the first 8 pages, with all the "I am so much better than... errrrrh Marshall is so much better than you guys", but got boring and repetetive afterwards.
 
The TLDR is: Marshall hit up the farms with an account named Marshall Law and sperged that Marshall is a cool guy who can squish anyones head with his left hand. He swore to yahowai that he is not Marshall, that he is only a distant friend of Melinda and him and also a badass veteran who can squish anyones head with his left hand.
His sperging was funny for the first 8 pages, with all the "I am so much better than... errrrrh Marshall is so much better than you guys", but got boring and repetetive afterwards.

It was mainly informative in that it showed the dude is clinically tarded. He has a far subnormal IQ.
 
Why didn't YAHGAY grant Bradley perfect health? Is it because Marshall conceived him with a pagan whore and YAHGAY was punishing him for wasting his perfect blessed-by-YAHGAY-seed inside an impure and unworthy woman? When will YAHGAY punish Marshall's other half-pagan mutt children who aren't pure and of Jewish ancestry?

Why did YAHGAY punish Bradley Crastersen? Did he die from a preventable disease that he refused to get treated, or from physical abuse from Martial-Law, wife beater and wife rapist? Was this justice from YAHGAY?

@Shugo What is your experience in Torah or with Torah observant communities? I have seen you use the name of YHWH when you write but you also pair it with Christian theology. You also make a lot of commentary on The Torah but the things you say are Christian theology. Are you a Hebrew Roots Christian?
 
@Shugo What is your experience in Torah or with Torah observant communities? I have seen you use the name of YHWH when you write but you also pair it with Christian theology. You also make a lot of commentary on The Torah but the things you say are Christian theology. Are you a Hebrew Roots Christian?
Awe, did you miss us Melinda? Considering we're probably the only people who don't abuse you, probably.

I see that after a week you refuse to read the rest of the Tanakh.
 
@Shugo What is your experience in Torah or with Torah observant communities? I have seen you use the name of YHWH when you write but you also pair it with Christian theology. You also make a lot of commentary on The Torah but the things you say are Christian theology. Are you a Hebrew Roots Christian?
we all knew you would be back
 
@Shugo What is your experience in Torah or with Torah observant communities? I have seen you use the name of YHWH when you write but you also pair it with Christian theology. You also make a lot of commentary on The Torah but the things you say are Christian theology. Are you a Hebrew Roots Christian?
No one cares about your theology, tell us what happened to poor Bradley Casterson! #justiceforbradley
 
Awe, did you miss us Melinda? Considering we're probably the only people who don't abuse you, probably.
I believe she's been very adamant that when Marshall rapes her it's not rape because while the Torah doesn't say it's okay for her husband (Marshall) to rape her, it also doesn't say that her husband (Marshall) shouldn't rape her. So, when Marshall rapes her, it's not "abuse" because it's not specifically mentioned as a line item. Thus, Marshall Castersen will continue to rape Melinda Leigh Scott.
 
I believe she's been very adamant that when Marshall rapes her it's not rape because while the Torah doesn't say it's okay for her husband (Marshall) to rape her, it also doesn't say that her husband (Marshall) shouldn't rape her. So, when Marshall rapes her, it's not "abuse" because it's not specifically mentioned as a line item. Thus, Marshall Castersen will continue to rape Melinda Leigh Scott.
I don't think she knows what rape is

She's that stupid
 
Even youtubers want to know what happened to Bradley:

https://www.youtube.com/user/castersen13/discussion

Screen Shot 2020-02-04 at 3.05.50 PM.png


Repost of this classic where marshal castration goes into his backstory of headlocks and the people "slawndering" him.

 
@Shugo What is your experience in Torah or with Torah observant communities? I have seen you use the name of YHWH when you write but you also pair it with Christian theology. You also make a lot of commentary on The Torah but the things you say are Christian theology. Are you a Hebrew Roots Christian?
Glad to see you back! I was hungry for Butt Stew. Have you healed from Marshall Castrations latest volley of fists?
 
Hah, good timing. Something told me Tamar would be back today to share YHVH's love with us all.

So I guess Marshall didn't break her typing fingers, that's good. I assume she only has two black eyes instead because he had to tell her only twice to make him a sammitch and not three times.
 
  • Optimistic
Reactions: cowPoly and Miel67
According to her, it's not rape if you're married. Actually, that raises a question. @TamarYaelBatYah what is your definition of rape, and do you believe there is such a thing as spousal rape?

This is what I believe "rape" is in context of The Torah (link is below). It's a paper I wrote, based on years of debating the issue with others and exegesis of the texts, and one final article I read about rape in The Torah that motivated me to finally put my thoughts on paper.

My points/conclusion is that the Hebraic definition of "rape" involves kidnapping/theft and extorting/robbing something that is not your marital right. So I don't believe a spouse can rape a spouse (in the Hebraic sense of the word) because sex with a spouse's body is a marital right imbued in The Torah. Also, if you put yourself in the bed with a spouse they haven't stolen/kidnapped you. You're in the bed by your own free will.

But if someone causes an injury to their spouse during a forced act of sex they would owe something to the spouse to heal them, according to The Torah. I'm not condoning brutality against spouses

 
This is what I believe "rape" is in context of The Torah (link is below). It's a paper I wrote, based on years of debating the issue with others and exegesis of the texts, and one final article I read about rape in The Torah that motivated me to finally put my thoughts on paper.

My points/conclusion is that the Hebraic definition of "rape" involves kidnapping/theft and extorting/robbing something that is not your marital right. So I don't believe a spouse can rape a spouse (in the Hebraic sense of the word) because sex with a spouse's body is a marital right imbued in The Torah. Also, if you put yourself in the bed with a spouse they haven't stolen/kidnapped you. You're in the bed by your own free will.

But if someone causes an injury to their spouse during a forced act of sex they would owe something to the spouse to heal them, according to The Torah. I'm not condoning brutality against spouses

Your beliefs are stupid, and you're stupid for having them.

What do your stupid beliefs say about keeping secrets about the death of a child like Bradley Castersen? Especially when there are some heavy implications against @Marshall Castersen about being so secretive on the subject. #justiceforbradley.
 
Back