Social Justice Warriors - Now With Less Feminism Sperging

Do any of these faggots have those complaints about ANY of the other compulsion spells? I want to see them bitching about how summon outsider permits a character to force a native of another plane to show up, and I definitely want to see them reeing and screeching about extraplanar colonialism.

Edit - also lol at the 1:1 possibility that they are projecting they own biases onto all of this, and have completely forgotten that being a cleric of Selune doesn't require a gender, it requires a CHA score, although canonically, the VAST majority of such clerics are priestesses of Selune, not priests.

@Null please allow me to vote both autistic and like on the same post.
 
So the new D&D UA is out. For those who don’t know, every once in a while, the Dungeons and Dragons guys will release a pdf full of what is essentially playtest subclasses and races. The newest one is a cleric subclass focusing on the love domain, a la Aphrodite and Hathor and the like. It’s ruffled the usual feathers.
View attachment 1130694
View attachment 1130703View attachment 1130704View attachment 1130705View attachment 1130706View attachment 1130707
Holy hell, have these people never played Pokèmon? Charm mechanics like this exist in tons of games for the purpose of disabling enemies and getting you free hits. Who cares if you use magic to trick a kobold into having a boner for you that he'll smack his life-long friends in order to show his appreciation for you? He's gonna be dead in a few minutes anyway, might as well die happy, am I right?

I don't play DnD, but I sincerely hope Wizards of the Coast doesn't cave on this. These people need to get a life far, far more than every DnD nerd combined.
 
"I already cover my drinks in real life, I don't want to do it in dnd."

LOL

edit: also browsing their Twitter I found this.

EP5aWjHXsAElJAX
What the fuck is this, and why does the "lady" on the right look like "she" got in a fist fight with a lawn mower?
 
Left-wing violence, like women who rape, aren't called that so as to keep the numbers down. The reporting on shootings in the US where the perpetrator is a minority is noticeably less than when they're a white man, for example, and there are numerous places which show how when women have sex with their students, male or female, it's not called 'rape', and sometimes not even 'sexual assault'.

I believe more men commit sexual assault than women, but I also believe it's not nearly so disparate as they would have you believe, partly because women's assault gets downplayed, and partly because men don't call what they've experienced sexual assault or rape. The number of men who have been sexually assaulted, especially by women, skyrockets when you ask them if they've had certain experiences that equate to sexual assault, rather than if you ask them if they've been sexually assaulted.

Current SJW logic is that women won't lie about rape, so #believewomen. There's also many of them who don't believe women should be punished for making false rape claims, because #believewomen, so then if it can be proved a woman did lie about rape there must have been a good reason; that Rolling Stone false rape story for a couple of years back still had SJWs believing something must have happened to the girl at the centre, because they couldn't let go of the narrative of frat guys all being rape machines. They also are often very dismissive of the consequences of a man being falsely accused of rape, and seem to think that men in general deserve to be punished, so if a few get wrongly accused, well, that's just the price you have to pay.

All of that suggests that they're really not that far off suggesting exactly what you said. And like numerous outlandish positions, while they know they could never say it out loud, noting some of their actions and arguments, it seems clear that there are a few of them - not many, but a few - who do honestly believe that female sexual assault should be dismissed. Because they don't think women can assault men, because they think it's payback, and/or because they just ignore women-on-women violence.
The whole "she must have had something bad happen to her" thing kind of gets my goat on a bunch of levels. So what? Bad shit happened to Charles Manson and Ed Kemper, worse than just a "simple" rape. They are still fucktards who should die in jail. The old Leslie Nielson TV series Police Squad had a moment where the sagely shoe shine said soomething like "It may help us understand where they came from, but it doesn't excuse their behaviour." I've had bad shit happen, and so have a lot of people. It doesn't give one the ability to abdicate responsibility. Yet that's what the entire "victim" and"privilege" narrative does. And as bad as that mindset is for the rest of us in the world, it's actually worse for someone who is a victim or trying to fight their way out of something. It teaches a learned helplessness, resentment of the world, and an unaddressable narcissism.

Anything that teaches someone their conditions are beyondf their control, the world is particularly hostile to them, they are powerless (like AA for instance), and that their failures don't need to be addressed to lead them to a fulfilling life is selling something. It's all cultish manipulation of hurt and damaged people. And it's all very predatory... The entirety of feminism and the SJW shit is that.

And an entirely different aspect: It's all projection, too. The "enemy" keeping them down is something they think themselves about the people they preach to. Nope, poor blacks, or women, or rape victims, or abused kids, or handicapped gimps aren't powerless and incapable of agency, nor are they incapable of taking responsibility for their actions. Being human, they have that capability, and anyone who sells something to convince them oherwise is shucking them for ego or accolades or cash, all to the detriment of the supposed victim. Teaching someone to believe they aren't responsible for their actions is a guaranteed way to ensure they will never stop making the stupid mistakes that keep them coming back with cash or adoration or mental servitude to the prick who told them they were powerless.

The entire paradigm of the Privileged/Victim/ideological-SJW-solution is a triad that exactly mimics both a cult and domestic abuse. It degrades someone vulnerable into believing they have no agency and no power.

And it doesn't matter if it's Anita Snarkeesian, some little black boy in Baltimore, an Iranian who still blames his lot for the ousting of Mossadegh, some fat chick with five kids from five baby daddies, or some rich twat who spergs about manspreading or thinks she is only being paid 70 cents on the dollar. It's just a constant barage tellling them they are too weak, too powerless, incapable of having the wherewithal to claim responsibility, in need of being afraid etc, and somehow, the people selling them that shit also happen to have the solution to it: ideological conformity.

And that seems way more dehumanizing and abusive than anything they accuse others of, IMO.

my personal fantasy is that one day, all exceptional people will decide to unite in one gigantic “movement”, Call it the LGBTQEFAGF+.........
LGBTQIDGAF?
 
So the new D&D UA is out. For those who don’t know, every once in a while, the Dungeons and Dragons guys will release a pdf full of what is essentially playtest subclasses and races. The newest one is a cleric subclass focusing on the love domain, a la Aphrodite and Hathor and the like. It’s ruffled the usual feathers.
Firstly, lol at the idea that this is in any way 'detached from their own market'. It's only upsetting the usual wokescolds and REEEEEEEEEing types.
Secondly, whatever happened to the charm spell that was, if I recall, a 1st level mage spell?
 
Posted on FB by someone I once found to be quite based. Now she's a victim of the highest order.

View attachment 1131049View attachment 1131065
They'd take the kids away from a white mother too. This isn't a race issue, it's a wealth/class issue.

I wish I'd saved the image macro that basically says "When a dad can't pay for his children, he'll be jailed. When a mom can't pay for her children, she'll get section 8, section 19, SNAP, welfare, and every other subsidy under the sun."

Firstly, lol at the idea that this is in any way 'detached from their own market'. It's only upsetting the usual wokescolds and REEEEEEEEEing types.
Secondly, whatever happened to the charm spell that was, if I recall, a 1st level mage spell?

You know what happened - Woko Haram has failed to grasp that none of the compulsion spells have anything to do with gender, and are also exactly the sort of people that don't understand the concept of escapism, because everything MUST be representative of reality, for them. I'm waiting for them to start crying about "racism in fantasy" again, for the 3rd time in 2 decades, because "orcs and other goblinoids are treated as inferior!", despite the fact that EVERY race has stat bonuses and deficits, with humans being the lamest and least unique playable race available.
 
So the new D&D UA is out. For those who don’t know, every once in a while, the Dungeons and Dragons guys will release a pdf full of what is essentially playtest subclasses and races. The newest one is a cleric subclass focusing on the love domain, a la Aphrodite and Hathor and the like. It’s ruffled the usual feathers.
View attachment 1130694
View attachment 1130703View attachment 1130704View attachment 1130705View attachment 1130706View attachment 1130707
Oh nice the double meaning for dominate person is official now
 
Why are sjws even playing a game like D&D that requires imagination and creativity? I could see every character and every single game being the exact same, all feminist trans commie vegan orcs of colour fighting the human patriarchy.

I'm surprised they aren't happy about the charm spell and wishing they could use it in real life to make actual friends.
 
They'd take the kids away from a white mother too. This isn't a race issue, it's a wealth/class issue.
I'm starting to wonder if education really is deliberately making people incapable of seeing the trees for the forest.
Why are sjws even playing a game like D&D that requires imagination and creativity? I could see every character and every single game being the exact same, all feminist trans commie vegan orcs of colour fighting the human patriarchy.

I'm surprised they aren't happy about the charm spell and wishing they could use it in real life to make actual friends.
They've been there for awhile now my guy. Wizards is full of them.
 
So the new D&D UA is out. For those who don’t know, every once in a while, the Dungeons and Dragons guys will release a pdf full of what is essentially playtest subclasses and races. The newest one is a cleric subclass focusing on the love domain, a la Aphrodite and Hathor and the like. It’s ruffled the usual feathers.
View attachment 1130694
View attachment 1130703View attachment 1130704View attachment 1130705View attachment 1130706View attachment 1130707
Homebrew rules exist. Wouldn't be hard to change what the spell does or just write it out of your campaign.

Let me guess, they play Skyrim without mods. Or are just uncreative. Or, even worse, both.
 
Critical Role was a mistake. Allowing the fucking proto-SJW's to run rampant on ENWorld was a mistake. Letting the fucking autists of Something Awful sperg and whine about anything that didn't fit their morals was a mistake. Allowing Wizards to go from lifelong RPG fans to diversity specials was a mistake.

Purge the hobby with fire and steel, brothers.
 
LGBTQIDGAF?
F+ stands for Furry plus. They are furries who have had parts of there bodies surgically altered to appear “animal-like,” fur, claws, elongated noses, etc. Thankfully the technology won’t be available until 2041, thanks to sweeping reforms in surgery experimentation enacted by President Stacey Abrams.
 
Last edited:
Back