The autist who threw a child off a London balcony because he wanted his iPad back - Jonty Bravery’s KF thread was inevitable

How son of company director grew up to commit Tate horror


https://mol.im/a/7975865

E4DD923F-55E7-4BE9-90C3-7CC7AEE96DCB.jpeg

Carers in charge of Tate pusher Jonty Bravery were instructed: ‘Never say no to him.’ The volatile teenager had a nasty habit of turning aggressive if he did not get his own way.

Staff assigned to the stocky teen around the clock said they were helpless to confront him if he stole from shops, and were not even allowed to wake him if he overslept.

The details of the way this emotionally disturbed teenager was supervised raise yet more questions about whether the terrible tragedy could have been averted.

At least two carers knew of Bravery’s plan to throw someone off a tall building, which they recorded. The Daily Mail has been handed the chilling recording by one of the carers, whom we are calling Olly.

He said: ‘This was a tragedy waiting to happen. I genuinely thought he was going to do it, because Jonty is the kind of person who, if he says he will do something, he will do it. He doesn’t say something without trying to do it.

‘Jonty was very challenging and complex. He could be nice but was also highly manipulative, and very difficult when not getting his own way. He was constantly trying to get out of the house, get access to females, get on to the internet.

‘If he didn’t get a specific item that he wanted, he had the potential to either steal the item or he would give the staff hell. Basically, we would just go back later and pay for whatever he stole.

‘You can’t say no to Jonty. It was written in his care plan. If you say no, it will trigger him to do the complete opposite of what you told him not to do. It would aggressively work him up, and the situation would get more out of hand.’

Perhaps it is little wonder that 18-year-old Bravery, with his autism and myriad personality disorders, was allegedly described by one care professional as ‘my most complex client’.

He was not always like that. Family photos reflect a happy upbringing, with primary school-aged Jonty smiling happily in costume with a cardboard axe in a school play. Another shows him being hugged by his father.

Bravery was born on October 2, 2001, at Chelsea and Westminster Hospital in West London. But his parents had separated by the time Jonty was three. His father Piers Bravery, 53, a Surrey-based company director who runs a printing firm, and mother, an ex-air hostess, both have new families.

Bravery, who struggled through early life attending various special needs schools, was said to have been jealous of their more ‘normal’ lives.

During his childhood, Bravery’s father campaigned passionately for more help for children with autism. He raised funds for a special needs centre that had been ‘incredibly caring and understanding to my son Jonty’. But as his son grew older, and bigger, he became more of a challenge for his family and teachers.

In 2017, Bravery was sectioned under the Mental Health Act, aged 16, and taken from his home. He spent six weeks in a mental health facility – but after that he was allowed to live semi-independently in a residential flat in Northolt, west London. He was the responsibility of Hammersmith and Fulham social services, and assigned up to six full-time carers. They worked in pairs to ensure – in theory, at least – he was never alone, day or night.

Bravery devoted himself to trying to outwit them. Olly told the Mail: ‘You could tell when Jonty was about to do something, because there were always signs when he was plotting – a lot of eye contact, a lot of aggression. Jonty’s aim was not to make your day tricky, but if you got in his way, he would make it tricky.


‘He was always scheming. We worked in pairs, not so much because Jonty was violent, but because he was highly manipulative and could easily manipulate a lone carer.’

The team of carers, who all worked for a private care firm that was contracted by Hammersmith and Fulham Council to look after Bravery, helped him with his domestic routine and taking his medication. If Bravery wanted to go out, there would be a ‘risk assessment’ and they would usually accompany him.

Bravery was articulate and intelligent, but ‘played dumb’ when it suited him. He had researched his own conditions online and deliberately exhibited the worst symptoms. Olly said: ‘He knew how to use autism, in terms of making it work for him.

‘Jonty had about four key aims. He wanted to get out of the house, access to the internet, access to his parents, access to females. I wouldn’t say it was a fascination, but he really liked women, especially when he was out, and you had to be very vigilant of what he might say or do around women. Everything was geared towards his aims and he would try to remove anything which caused a problem with achieving them.

‘His mindset was: you guys are in my way, so how am I going to get you out of my way? Cause you hell.’

Olly added: ‘He wasn’t unpredictable – he knew exactly what he was doing. He wanted you to quit, and then he would start again with your replacement.’

The carers had to ban Bravery from the internet after he used his iPad to try to stalk the family he no longer lived with. He had made it his ‘number one priority’ to get out of care and back to them.

Bravery’s techniques for manipulating his carers ranged from leaving ‘dirty protests’ around the flat, to wreaking havoc. A neighbour of the property in west London recalled how he would throw things out of his window and was often seen running naked around the estate after he had shaken off his carers.

He said: ‘I know he needs to have them with him at all times because he could hurt someone. He’s often managed to get away from them and I have seen him completely without his clothes running around the garden on many occasions.’

Another neighbour said that in the same week as the Tate incident, Bravery had kicked a hole in the door of his flat. ‘I heard him screaming, fighting with a carer. He was in a real rage,’ she said.

The teenager who threw a six-year-old off the top of the Tate Modern had revealed his murderous plan months earlier.

Yet astonishingly Jonty Bravery, who was in council care, was still allowed to visit the gallery alone.

The Mail has obtained a shocking recording of the autistic teenager vowing to ‘push somebody off’ a tall building – almost a year before Bravery hurled the French boy from the London landmark’s 100ft viewing balcony, nearly killing him.

Care workers – one of whom claims he alerted a senior colleague – were so alarmed by what Bravery was saying that they taped him as he calmly explained: ‘I’ve got it in my head, a way to kill somebody... and I know for a fact they’ll die from falling from the hundred feet.’ A Mail investigation into last summer’s horrific incident at Tate Modern reveals:

  • Bravery said he would kill so he could go to prison and get out of council care;
  • At the time of the attack, he was on bail after a previous arrest on suspicion of multiple assaults;
  • Stockily-built Bravery’s carers were instructed to ‘never say no him’;
  • One of them claims: ‘This was a tragedy waiting to happen.’
On August 4 last year, Bravery horrified tourists on the Tate tower’s viewing platform by suddenly lifting up the French boy, on summer holiday with his parents, and throwing him over a chest-high barrier. The boy’s mother gave a ‘primal scream’ as her son plunged 100ft.

The youngster was airlifted to hospital in a critical condition with fractures to his spine, legs and arms and a bleed on the brain. He remains in hospital, severely disabled.

In December, Bravery, 18, pleaded guilty at the Old Bailey to attempted murder.

Now, ahead of his sentencing hearing, the Mail in conjunction with BBC News has obtained a spine-chilling audio recording of Bravery outlining his plan to throw someone from a tall building.

Recorded by his carers in autumn 2018, Bravery calmly explains the plot taking shape in his disturbed mind, to go on a visit to central London ‘as if we’re having a normal day’ and ‘visit some of the landmarks’. He said: ‘It could be the Shard, it could be anything... as long as it’s a high thing. And we could go up and visit it, and then push one of... push somebody off it.’


He told his carers he was determined to kill someone because ‘I know for a fact, I’m going to go to prison, if I do that’.

Bravery, who was 17 at the time of the attempted murder, claimed being in prison would be better than being in council care.

The teenager, who has autism, an obsessive compulsive disorder, and a personality disorder, was a challenge for his family and had been moved into council care in 2017.


Hammersmith and Fulham council in London had responsibility for him, and it subcontracted the work to an experienced private care provider named Spencer and Arlington. Bravery lived in a flat provided by the council in Northolt, west London, where a team of up to six Spencer and Arlington carers, working in pairs, looked after him day and night.

In autumn 2018, Bravery admitted to one of his carers that he wanted to throw someone from a tall building. Concerned, the carer asked him to repeat it in front of a second carer, and that is when they recorded his confession.

Although neither of them was working with Bravery on August 4, 2019, they claimed he was allowed out that day entirely on his own to visit the Tate Modern, which has a ten-storey-high observation deck with open views over central London.

An independent serious case review has now been set up to find out exactly what went wrong.

Of the carers, who was interviewed by the Mail, says he alerted a more senior colleague to Bravery’s horrendous ‘tall building’ plot. He also claims to have played the shocking recording to someone else involved in Bravery’s care. They both deny this. Spencer and Arlington said in a statement that it had ‘no knowledge and no records’ of the claims being made.

The firm said: ‘We will continue to co-operate openly and with complete transparency with the serious case review and await its conclusions. We are confident the full facts will emerge from this process. We believe we have acted entirely properly in managing and reporting the provision of care for Jonty Bravery. However, with regards to the entirely speculative claim put to us that Jonty may have told carers of his plans, there is absolutely no evidence of this and nor is there any mention of this recorded in any care plan, case report or review from managers or from his carers, psychologists, or health workers reporting to us.’

It added it had nonetheless recognised ‘the gravity’ of the Mail’s claims and had reported them to the care watchdog and the serious case review.

Hammersmith and Fulham council said: ‘Our sympathies go out to the child and his family following what happened at Tate Modern.

‘An independent serious case review is now under way. It will look at what happened and the role played by all the different agencies involved.’

'I've got it in my head… a way to kill somebody': Chilling audio reveals the moment Tate pusher Jonty Bravery told carers he wanted to throw someone to their deaths from a high London landmark

A chilling recording of the autistic teenager who threw a six-year-old boy from the top of the Tate Modern reveals he told carers he wanted to do it almost a year before the tragedy.

Jonty Bravery, 18, shoved the French schoolboy off the museum's viewing gallery as horrified tourists watched on August 4 last year.

The youngster fell 100ft and was airlifted to hospital with a bleed on the brain and breaks to his spine, legs and arms. He is still in hospital, severely disabled.


But a shocking new audio clip reveals he told carers he wanted to push someone off a high landmark in central so he could escape care and go to prison instead.

He tells social workers: 'If I could do it right now, I would. I've got it in my head, a way to, a way to kill somebody.'

Asked why he was prepared to commit murder to get out of council care, he said it was because his iPad had been confiscated.

Recorded by his carers in autumn 2018, Bravery calmly explains the plot taking shape in his mind, to go on a visit to central London 'as if we're having a normal day' and 'visit some of the landmarks'.

He said: 'It could be the Shard, it could be anything... as long as it's a high thing. And we could go up and visit it, and then push one of... push somebody off it.'

Bravery told his carers he was determined to kill someone because 'I know for a fact, I'm going to go to prison, if I do that'.

He added: 'I've got it in my head, I have to, I have to kill somebody to go to prison, to be away from here…I just need to tell you….In the next few months – it has to be, the latest has to be by February, in my head, yeah - but ideally I want to do it before.'

The carer asks him: 'Has there been anything in particular that triggered this off?

The boy replies: 'Moving back here and my iPad going, yeah.'

The carer then asks: 'So if you were to get an iPad, for example, that would basically cancel everything,' to which Bravery replies: 'Yes!'

Bravery pleaded guilty to attempted murder at the Old Bailey in December and is awaiting sentencing.

Hammersmith and Fulham council in London had responsibility for Bravery, and it subcontracted the work to an experienced private care provider named Spencer and Arlington.

Bravery lived in a flat provided by the council in Northolt, west London, where a team of up to six Spencer and Arlington carers, working in pairs, looked after him day and night.

In autumn 2018, Bravery admitted to one of his carers that he wanted to throw someone from a tall building. Concerned, the carer asked him to repeat it in front of a second carer, and that is when they recorded his confession.

Although neither of them was working with Bravery on August 4, 2019, they claimed he was allowed out that day entirely on his own to visit the Tate Modern, which has a ten-storey-high observation deck with open views over central London.

An independent serious case review has now been set up to find out exactly what went wrong.


WARPED PLOT TO GET IPAD BACK

Bravery’s murder plot was partly a warped bid to get his confiscated iPad back.

He shocked carers by warning he would throw someone off a tall building – then suggested he would abandon the plan if they gave him back his gadget.

Bravery is autistic and was in council care. In his mind, the threat to kill someone was seemingly just part of a petty negotiation to get back the iPad, which his carers had been forced to take from him, and to escape the care system.

Carers recorded Bravery talking about the plot. When one of them asked what triggered it, Bravery answered: ‘Moving back here [into his care flat] and my iPad going.’ The carer asks: ‘So if you were to get an iPad, for example, that would basically cancel everything…?’ The teenager shoots back: ‘Yes!’

On December 6, he appeared with a scraggy beard at the Old Bailey via video link to plead guilty to attempted murder.

He is being held at Broadmoor high-security hospital and will be sentenced on February 17 after psychiatric reports.
 
Dude was getting a free apartment in London and free full-time help, all on the taxpayers’ dime. Pretty sure he also got free food and bills paid, though the article doesn’t give an itemized list of his benefits. Homeboy didn’t know how good he had it.
 
God, the fucking head on the lad. Should get extra sentencing for being fucking pug-ugly. Yikes.

This individual should have been put into a secure mental institution for worthless, useless mentals and kept there indefinitely since age 16. He's clearly a spoiled, unpleasant psycho, whatever his bloody diagnosis. I note he had 'personality disorders' on top of autism. Cluster B, doubtless.

I suspect he'll end up back in Broadmoor or moved to Ashworth or Rampton Secure Hospitals (UK secure units for criminally insane types) indefinitely once convicted. Good luck in any of those, Jonti, the staff will be more of a match for you, they can drug you whether you like it or not, and you'll be surrounded by much scarier adult individuals who will thump you right back if you act out. Your big bolshie autie lad act won't cut any ice with serial killers, crazy murderers or the people who keep them locked up. Doubt anyone in there would be impressed with someone whose crime is to pick on a five year-old. Prison better than council care? Haha, oh you dumb autistic cunt, just you wait.

Sounds like daddy should have done less sperging of his own about autism rights etc - which he was known for before his son decided to try to murder a small child out of spite - and maybe spent more time with his own son as he grew. It's clear he was horrific company, a lump of belligerence, selfishness, aggression and nastiness and you get why nobody would want to live with him in any capacity, but I'm of the opinion with these individuals is that if you birth them, you bear the primary responsibility for them. Dumping them off at 18 on teams of people probably getting paid £10 an hour or less and are in trouble if they look at the cunt wrong and will end up arrested if they thump him back is hardly a long term solution.

The cost alone of his team of 24/7 carers and a nice London flat of his own (which he's likely ruined with his shit-smearing 'dirty protests' and destructive tantrums, good luck cleaning that up, landlord) on the taxpayer dime would have run well into six figures a year that could be better spent on someone who wasn't a worthless subhuman with zero redeeming features or contributions to make. Hopefully he necks himself and spares everyone the expense of his upkeep for the next 50 years or so.
 
Last edited:
God, the fucking head on the lad. Should get extra sentencing for being fucking pug-ugly. Yikes.

This individual should have been put into a secure mental institution for worthless, useless mentals and kept there indefinitely since age 16. He's clearly a spoiled, unpleasant psycho, whatever his bloody diagnosis. I note he had 'personality disorders' on top of autism. Cluster B, doubtless.

I suspect he'll end up iback in Broadmoor or moved to Ashworth or Rampton Secure Hospitals (UK secure units for criminally insane types) indefinitely once convicted. Good luck in any of those, Jonti, the staff will be more of a match for you, they can drug you whether you like it or not, and you'll be surrounded by much scarier adult individuals who will thump you right back if you act out. Your big bolshie autie lad act won't cut any ice with serial killers, crazy murderers or the people who keep them locked up. Prison better than council care? Haha, oh you dumb autistic cunt, just you wait.

Sounds like daddy should have done less sperging of his own about autism rights etc - which he was known for before his son decided to try to murder a small child out of spite - and maybe spent more time with his own son as he grew. It's clear he was horrific company, a lump of belligerence, selfishness, aggression and nastiness and you get why nobody would want to live with him in any capacity, but I'm of the opinion with these individuals if that you birth them, you bear the primary resposnisbility for them. Dumping them off at 18 on teams of people probably getting paid £10 an hour or less and are in trouble if they look at the cunt wrong and will end up arrested if they thump him back is hardly a long term solution.

The cost alone of his team of carers and a nice central London flat on the taxpayer dime would have run well into six figures a year that could be better spent on someone who wasn't a worthless subhuman with zero redeeming features or contributions to make. Hopefully he necks himself and spares everyone the expense of his upkeep for the next 50 years or so.
This is what gets me. His parents were apparently doing well financially. But they were allowed to abandon their kid onto the British taxpayer like it was NBD.

This kind of nonchalant freeloading is something I’ve witnessed people shrugging their shoulders over in certain countries. Those who do say “Hang on a minute, run that by me again?” are characterized as heartless, greedy bastards. But fuck me running, how is it that this kid was allowed to cost taxpayers millions of pounds just so he could live “independently” (read: in his own costly London apartment, paid for by the taxpayer, with at least two full-time carers always on the clock, also paid for by taxpayers)? How does this make any kind of sense?
 
Also I'm glad Chris hasn't done anything like this
He's working on on it.
If there has ever been anyone who deserves to purged from the earth (Aside from the more obvious psychos, it's this guy. This article made me irrationally angry and not just because it's poorly written but because I can't believe the system allowed him to get away with crap. Just like OPL, I wish his mother would have swallowed or was struck with a painful, spontaneous abortion.
 
So wait, go back. England will just yank teenagers from their home and stick them in a condo with full-time overseers? The fuck? That sounds immensely wasteful and dumb.

If you're disabled or vulnerable, you're provided with housing pretty easily, I went to school with a girl who was given a very small flat in supported accommodation when she was fourteen because she kept running away from her mother's house. If you have a disability, you can get a council house pretty quick.

If you have mental health problems which are actually recognised by the DWP or you're on a treatment order (I think that's the one after being released from a psych ward, not sure) you get straight into supported accommodation or a council house, as soon as you have a kid, you have a good chance of getting a council house, even if you're too young to actually have benefits deposited into your own account.



Also, fuck the press for blaming this on autism almost entirely. Cluster Bs can be fucking monsters. Not generalising of course, but come on. Anyone who's had their lives 'graced' by a cluster B knows the score here. This tard was a combo of the entirety of the cluster. Care in the community my arse. He should have been in Broadmoor before this was committed, not afterwards. Fucking hell.

Some people are too fucking insane for simple locked wards, and definitely too fucking insane for cheap/wasteful/not cost effective care in the community. I'm a big fan of Thatcher, but fuck her for closing all the asylums. There's going to be some seriously beefy court cases here.

I hope that French family are lawyer-ed up to their teeth and take whichever outside agency/private group responsible for this (because let's be honest here, it's Priory and Huntercombe etc facilities that have the murders, suicides and attacks, not NHS ones no matter how shite they are) for everything they have. I have never seen someone assessed so poorly in my entire life. Someone's going to prison here.
 
So wait, go back. England will just yank teenagers from their home and stick them in a condo with full-time overseers? The fuck? That sounds immensely wasteful and dumb.

Yank? Nope.

This is the result of

a) the kind of clearly very well-to-do and educated family who will both abnegate their responsibiltiy for their awkward, unpleasant brat AND simultaneously advocate for their care by the local authority using their financial resources and general company director-type Type A pushiness to get him out of their hair and housed in a way that salves their consciences .. once abandoned by the family, the local authority has a duty to house this type of person. Clearly he couldn't be placed with other humans so they are forced to assign either sole occupancy social housing or rent a private flat for him

b) the result of 'care in community' philsophies which have been in vogue politically right across the western world since the 80s - asylums, and most secure institutions closed with the ideal that this kind of human wreckage can cope with'help' outside on their own and society is better for it. As we know, there are flaws in this cunning plan. In this case, his care likely cost way more than being in an old-school institution would have, but places in what exists now are like hen's teeth and he probably didn't wualify and again, see a) ... parents probably wanted this 'own flat' outcome so they didn't feel too ashamed of themselves as parents .. they can boast to their mates who ask that 'Jonti has his own flat in London and is doing well' instead of 'Oh, my son's in the nuthouse permanently as he cannot live with us obviously' ..fuck I can hear them now.

and

c) disability rights advocates and legislation giving these spazzes endless rights and authorities duties of care that cannot be trodden on or abandoned until they cross a certain line, which usually involves someone else getting really hurt
 
All this talk of "get access to females" makes me wonder how many sexual assualts were covered up or settle on the UK taxpayer's dime.
Dangerous speds like this are what asylums and straitjackets are made for. None of this "live independently, steal anytime he wants" crap.
 
All this talk of "get access to females" makes me wonder how many sexual assualts were covered up or settle on the UK taxpayer's dime.
Dangerous speds like this are what asylums and straitjackets are made for. None of this "live independently, steal anytime he wants" crap.

Yeah, it pisses me off when speds are allowed to assault anyone, in any way and you're not supposed to complain because spedness. Fuck that. Either tie their hands to their sides and keep them on a tight leash or don't let them out at all. It's not like being hit or sexually assaulted doesn't hurt or traumatize because the hitter or assaulter has the autism or the FAS or whatever half these cunts have these days.

The lad was already on bail for two seperate assaults when he committed the crime against the French boy. He had assaulted a policeman and a care worker. It's clear the system is bolloxed when dealing with people like this. You also know daddy got him the best private representation and otherwise washed his hands of the affair.
 
Also, fuck the press for blaming this on autism almost entirely. Cluster Bs can be fucking monsters. Not generalising of course, but come on. Anyone who's had their lives 'graced' by a cluster B knows the score here. This tard was a combo of the entirety of the cluster. Care in the community my arse. He should have been in Broadmoor before this was committed, not afterwards. Fucking hell
Tell that to the autists who go shooting up schools and being a general, violent nuisance. Personally, I think anti-social personality disorder should be in cluster A because it's not as social adept as the other three disorders.
 
Back