US "The Squad" Megathread - Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, Ilhan Omar, Rashida Talib Derangement Syndrome

I honestly only know about American politics from what I read on the Internet but since we all love shitting on leftists I figured we'd get a kick out of this. Also it's trending on Twitter so you know it's important.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/poli...irect=on&noredirect=on&utm_term=.960552c9ba53

NEW YORK — Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, a 28-year-old political novice running on a low budget and an unabashedly liberal platform, upset longtime U.S. Rep. Joseph Crowley on Tuesday in the Democratic congressional primary in New York.

The surprise victory by the community organizer in a district that includes parts of the Bronx and Queens came after an energetic, grassroots campaign that mustered more than enough support in a low-turnout race that many had expected to be an easy win for Crowley, a member of the Democratic House leadership.

“The community is ready for a movement of economic and social justice. That is what we tried to deliver,” said Ocasio-Cortez, who has never held elected office and whose candidacy attracted only modest media attention.

She told The Associated Press after her victory that she didn’t have enough money to do polling in the race, but felt in her gut that her message had a chance to connect.

“I live in this community. I organized in this community. I felt the absence of the incumbent. I knew he didn’t have a strong presence,” she said.

Crowley has been in Congress since 1999 and hadn’t faced an opponent in a primary election since 2004, when Ocasio-Cortez was just a teenager. He was considered a candidate to become the next House speaker if Democrats win the majority.

“It’s not about me,” Crowley, 56, told his supporters at a campaign party following his loss. “It’s about America. I want nothing but the best for Ms. Ocasio-Cortez. I want her to be victorious.”

He later played guitar with a band at the election night gathering, and dedicated the first song, Bruce Springsteen’s “Born to Run,” to Ocasio-Cortez.

Crowley represents New York’s 14th Congressional District, where he is also the leader of the Queens Democratic party.

Ocasio-Cortez was outspent by an 18-1 margin during her race but won the endorsement of some influential groups on the party’s far left, including MoveOn, as well as the actress Cynthia Nixon, who is running for governor. She defeated Crowley by 15 percentage points.

Born in the Bronx to a mother from Puerto Rico and a father who died in 2008, Ocasio-Cortez said she decided to challenge Crowley to push a more progressive stance on economic and other issues.

She attended Boston University, where she earned degrees in economics and international relations, and also spent time working in the office of the late U.S. Sen. Edward Kennedy.

After graduating, she returned to the Bronx where she became a community organizer. In the 2016 presidential campaign she worked for U.S. Sen. Bernie Sanders.

Among her issues is expanding the Medicare program to people of all ages and abolishing Immigrations and Customs Enforcement. She recently went to Tornillo, Texas, to protest against policies that have separated parents from their children at the southern U.S. border.

Ocasio-Cortez gained some internet attention for a campaign video called “The Courage to Change,” a two-minute spot for which she wrote the script and featured footage from her own home.

Crowley is chair of the House Democratic Caucus, the fourth-highest ranking position in Democratic leadership in that chamber of Congress.

His loss drew the attention of President Donald Trump.

“Wow! Big Trump Hater Congressman Joe Crowley, who many expected was going to take Nancy Pelosi’s place, just LOST his primary election. In other words, he’s out! That is a big one that nobody saw happening. Perhaps he should have been nicer, and more respectful, to his President!” he tweeted.

The Republican candidate for the office, Anthony Pappas, is running unopposed and had no primary. Pappas teaches economics at St. John’s University.

She was a Bernie campaigner, is supported by BLM, and wants to abolish Immigrations and Customs Enforcement. Also this was in a solid-blue Congressional District so you know she's a shoo-in for next Congress.

But hey, we did get to see Trump laugh at Crowley on Twitter.
 
boot.jpg

I love that she's so insipid that she even fucked up the metaphor. You don't "tug yourself up by your shoelaces" because bootstraps are not fucking shoelaces. It's a metaphor for doing something yourself without requiring someone else's help, which is what a bootstrap was originally designed for. It's the strap on the back or the side of a boot to help you wrench the thing up onto your foot without needing someone else to-- Jesus how do you screw up a metaphor that badly?
 
Why does Kyle kulinski keep defending this dumb cunt? David Pakman and stupidpol realize she is a dumb Harry Potter nerd.
Because as stupid as stupidpol and Pakman can be, Kyle Kulinski still takes the cake when it comes to embodying out-of-touch coastal morons who think their 110 IQ makes them a genius:
This guy makes Cenk Uygur look with it.
 
Why does Kyle kulinski keep defending this dumb cunt? David Pakman and stupidpol realize she is a dumb Harry Potter nerd.
She honestly comes across as so stupid that a part of me still refuses to believe that it isn't an act. She says the dumbest shit almost every time that she opens her mouth, but at the same time she sprints circles around people like Pelosi. She finally pushed Pelosi over the edge for impeachment and then immediately went, "Oh I'm over impeachment. Who cares?" and she egged Pelosi into inviting Trump to that SoTU and then promptly yeeted herself out of attendance.

She comes off like someone who spends most of her spare time eating paint chips, but when it all falls to the table she comes out on top against all of these other career politicians like it's nothing. You'd really expect that someone that stupid would have been slammed with something and shoved out of the door by now, but not only can they not get rid of her, they can't even get her to stop talking and they can't keep falling for whatever insane bait that she throws out there.

I just still cannot shake the feeling that she's some kind of plant, especially after how disasterously insane that the GND was, and how she got every single one of them to climb on board with a plan that was utterly insane. It could easily be that she's just stupid and I'm stupid for thinking too deeply into it, but the way that she seems to pretty much weave her way through these disasters while causing everyone else around her to get hammered with flak is really strange.
 
She went from being a bartender to being a Congresswoman. Yet she believes you can't pull yourself up by your bootstraps. It's quite ironic if you start to think about it.

Somebody has already probably said this, but she was bougie for most of her life (including through college) until her architect dad died and there was some legal fuckery with his estate. Her period of very mild "hardship" lasted, at most, for ~5 years in her early 20s.

Bartending and waitressing are pretty normal for a middle class kid to do for a stretch after college. It's not like she was a working class person who beat the odds, tending bar was never going to be her life. A college educated token hispanic former Ted Kennedy intern has a lot easier time bootstrapping than say, a laid off white male construction worker with a GED.
 
I just still cannot shake the feeling that she's some kind of plant, especially after how disasterously insane that the GND was, and how she got every single one of them to climb on board with a plan that was utterly insane. It could easily be that she's just stupid and I'm stupid for thinking too deeply into it, but the way that she seems to pretty much weave her way through these disasters while causing everyone else around her to get hammered with flak is really strange.
She interned for Ted Kennedy, grew up in Westchester County (not the Bronx as she claims), and went to a private college that her parents paid for. I don't think you're foolish for being suspicious that her being an impoverished bartender in a trendy NYC borough before becoming a politician sounds scripted given to her history.

EDIT: ninja'd
 
Somebody has already probably said this, but she was bougie for most of her life (including through college) until her architect dad died and there was some legal fuckery with his estate. Her period of very mild "hardship" lasted, at most, for ~5 years in her early 20s.

Bartending and waitressing are pretty normal for a middle class kid to do for a stretch after college. It's not like she was a working class person who beat the odds, tending bar was never going to be her life. A college educated token hispanic former Ted Kennedy intern has a lot easier time bootstrapping than say, a laid off white male construction worker with a GED.

For real.

This is one of the most honest statements she's ever made, which is funny because she's ultimately telling on herself.

AOC doesn't know what it's like to actually struggle. I went through something similar to her when my mother was sick, we were almost permanently broke, but it wasn't remotely the same as actually being poor. My mom used massive amounts of credit to keep us afloat, and, had she gotten better, she had the work history to get shit back on track. AOC's mother was almost definitely in the same boat, facing financial setbacks because of AOC's father's death, but ultimately pulling things together like most upper-middle-class Americans.

And slumming it as a bartender for a few years doesn't count as working class either. Bartenders actually make pretty good money considering, and I strongly suspect that AOC working as a bartender was similar to Obama working as a "community organizer", it was always meant to beef up her "working class" bonafides so she could make real money as an "activist" or a politician.
 


At this moment there is a bill pending in Congress called the New Way Forward Act. It’s received almost no publicity, which is unfortunate as well as revealing.

The legislation is sponsored by 44 House Democrats, including Reps. Ilhan Omar of Minnesota and Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez of New York. At roughly 4,400 words, it’s almost exactly as long as the U.S. Constitution.

Like the Constitution, this legislation is designed to create a whole new country. The bill would entirely remake our immigration system, with the explicit purpose of ensuring that criminals are able to move here, and settle here permanently, with impunity.

You may think we’re exaggerating for effect. We’re not – not even a little.

The New Way Forward act is the most radical single piece of legislation we’ve seen proposed in this country. It makes the Green New Deal look like the status quo.

A document produced by Democrats to promote the bill says: “Convictions … should not lead to deportation.”

Keep in mind, we’re not talking about convictions for double parking. The bill targets felony convictions – serious crimes that send you to prison for years. A press release from Rep., Jesus Garcia, D-Ill., is explicit about this.

Garcia brags that the bill will break the “prison to deportation pipeline.” How does the bill do that? Under current U.S. law, legal U.S. immigrants can be deported if they commit an “aggravated felony” or a “crime of moral turpitude” – that is, a vile, depraved act, like molesting a child. Under the New Way Forward Act, “crimes of moral turpitude” are eliminated entirely as a justification for deportation. And the category of “aggravated felony” gets circumscribed too.

What does that mean?

Consider this: Under current law, immigrants who commit serious crimes – such as robbery, fraud, or child sexual abuse – must be deported, regardless of the sentence they receive. Other crimes – less severe ones like racketeering – require deportation as long as the perpetrator receives at least a one-year sentence.

But if this bill passes the House and Senate and is signed into law by the president, there will no longer be any crimes that automatically require deportation. None.

And one crime – falsifying a passport – will be made immune from deportation, no matter what. Because apparently 9/11 never happened, and we no longer care about fake government documents.

If you just renewed your driver’s license to comply with the Real ID Act, you must feel like an idiot. Under the proposed legislation, the minimum prison sentence for crimes that still require deportation would rise from one year to five.

We checked the Bureau of Justice Statistics. According to federal data, crimes like car theft, fraud, and weapons offenses all carry average prison sentences of fewer than five years. And that’s just looking at averages. There are people who commit rape, child abuse and even manslaughter and receive sentences of fewer than five years. Lots of them.

If the New Way Forward Act becomes law, immigrants who commit those crimes and receive those sentences would remain in the country. They’ll all be eligible for citizenship one day, too.

But even that is understating the law’s effect. Even a five-year prison sentence won’t necessarily be enough to secure deportation. The bill would grant sweeping new powers to immigration judges, allowing them to nullify a deportation order.

The only requirement is that “the immigration judge finds such an exercise of discretion appropriate in pursuit of humanitarian purposes, to assure family unity, or when it is otherwise in the public interest.” In other words, anti-American immigration judges – and many of them are exactly that – would have a blank check to open the borders. No vote required.

Sound shocking to you? We’re just getting started. Current U.S. law makes drug addiction grounds for deportation, because why wouldn’t it? This bill would eliminate that statute.

Current law also states that those who have committed drug crimes abroad, or any “crimes involving moral turpitude,” are ineligible to immigrate here. The New Way Forward Act abolishes that statute.

A Mexican drug cartel leader could be released from prison, then freely come to America immediately. And if he wants, he could come here illegally, and it wouldn’t be a crime – because, and you were waiting for this, the bill also decriminalizes illegal entry into America, even by those previously deported.

According to a document promoting the bill, criminalizing illegal entry into America is “white supremacist.”

By this point, you’re beginning to wonder if we’re making this up. We’re not. In fact, we’re barely halfway through the bill.

The legislation doesn’t just make it harder to deport legal immigrants who commit crimes. It doesn’t just make it easier for criminals to legally move here. The bill would also effectively abolish all existing enforcement against illegal immigration.

To detain illegal immigrants, Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) would have to prove in court that the illegal immigrants are dangerous or a flight risk. But of course, ICE wouldn’t be allowed to use a detainee’s prior criminal behavior as proof he or she is dangerous. That's banned.

ICE would have to overcome even more hurdles if the detainee claims to be gay or transgender, under 21, or can’t speak English and an interpreter isn’t immediately available.

In other words, it would be much harder to arrest an illegal alien than it is to arrest you. They’re the protected class here. You’re just some loser who’s paying for it all.

But believe it or not, we saved the nuttiest part for last. What could be more destructive than changing U.S. law, specifically to allow rapists, child molesters, and drug dealers to stay in America? How about this: Using taxpayer money to bring deported criminals back into America.

That’s right. This bill would not only abolish your right to control who lives in your own country, but it invents a new right in return: the “right to come home.”

The bill orders the government to create a “pathway for those previously deported to apply to return to their homes and families in the United States,” as long as they would have been eligible to stay under the new law.

The Department of Homeland Security must spend taxpayer dollars transporting convicted criminal illegal aliens into the United States. Who will be eligible for these free flights? Tens of thousands of people kicked out of this country for all kinds of crimes. Sexual abuse. Robbery. Assault. Drug trafficking, weapons trafficking, human trafficking.

From 2002 to 2018, 480,000 people were deported for illegal entry or reentry into America. And under this bill, you’d have to buy them all a plane ticket to come back. The tickets alone would cost about a billion dollars, and that’s before Democrats make you start paying for these criminals’ free health care, too. Which they plan to.

The New Way Forward Act fundamentally inverts every assumption you have about America. Under this legislation, the criminals are the victims. Law enforcement is illegitimate. It’s racist, just like the country you live in, and the only solution is to get rid of both. America would be better off as a borderless rest area for the world’s worst predators and parasites.

This is a big deal. It’s hard to believe any American would put these ideas on paper, much less pass them into law. Yet, remarkably, the press has ignored it. Scores of Democrats have backed it, but the bill hasn’t been mentioned in The New York Times, or on CNN, or even in self-described conservative outlets like National Review.

If a lone Republican state legislator from Minot, N.D., had proposed a bill this extreme, that would remake America this completely, the president himself would be expected to answer for it.

CNN would demand the president “disavow,” even if he knew nothing about it. But when one-fifth of the Democratic caucus backs a bill demanding that you pay to import illegal alien felons, it’s a non-event in American media. They don’t think you should know about it. That’s dangerous.

Whether the press cares or not, these are the stakes of the 2020 election. A growing wing of the Democratic Party views America as essentially illegitimate – a rogue state, in which everything must be destroyed and remade: our laws, our institutions, our freedoms, our history and our values. That’s the point of all this, of course. An entirely new country, in which resistance is crushed, and they’re in charge forever.

Adapted from Tucker Carlson’s monologue on “Tucker Carlson Tonight” on Feb. 6, 2020.
 
Oh look... another piece of legislation that's going to be laughed out of the senate to say nothing of ever facing the veto pen.
The fact that anyone is even offering this as valid legislation shows that the country is in dire straits. In any sane nation these people would be locked up by the FBI as foreign agents or their own constituents would run them out on a rail.
 
Consider this: Under current law, immigrants who commit serious crimes – such as robbery, fraud, or child sexual abuse – must be deported, regardless of the sentence they receive. Other crimes – less severe ones like racketeering – require deportation as long as the perpetrator receives at least a one-year sentence.

But if this bill passes the House and Senate and is signed into law by the president, there will no longer be any crimes that automatically require deportation. None.

And one crime – falsifying a passport – will be made immune from deportation, no matter what. Because apparently 9/11 never happened, and we no longer care about fake government documents.
Makes me wonder why these things haven't written a bill inviting homeless people to shit in my living room. This is why tar and feathers were invented.
 
She's already dating a tall, extremely white Irish(?) man. She's one of these white-haters who has never and will never date someone mestizo or black.

Riley Roberts.

Payments to Ocasio-Cortez boyfriend spur FEC complaint from Republican group
February 27
2019
The FEC complaint specifically cites the use of "intermediaries" to make the payments, "the vague and amorphous nature of the services Riley ostensibly provided," the relatively small amount of money raised by the campaign at that stage and "the romantic relationship between Ocasio-Cortez and Riley" in asserting the transactions might violate campaign finance law.
 
Back