Culture Why I Quit Being a Climate Activist - TL;DR: Because not enough melanin

https://www.vice.com/en_ca/article/...g-a-climate-activist?utm_source=vicetwitterus
https://web.archive.org/web/2020020...g-a-climate-activist?utm_source=vicetwitterus
(Archived)

The climate movement is overwhelmingly white. So I walked away.

In 2013, Typhoon Haiyan battered Southeast Asia, killing 6,300 people in the Philippines alone. The three-storey surge rolled over parts of the city of Tacloban, hitting my family’s neighbourhood the hardest. Schools that were designated storm shelters entombed those taking refuge from the rising waters. My aunt, like many women in the Philippines—a country made up of 7,000 islands—can’t swim. She, my uncle, and cousin were missing or presumed dead.

We only found out they survived after three grief-ridden days, from a family member who had made his way through the ravaged province with the military. Their home and the fish farm they depended on for their livelihood were devastated, and they still haven’t fully recovered.

As a climate activist in Berlin, I felt required to tell my Filipino family’s experience during speeches and rallies because this form of “storytelling” was the only thing that would move a mostly white European audience to an emotional response of climate urgency—even though it was exhausting telling the story, especially since any mention of hurricanes in the news gives me anxiety.

But after a while I realized I would only be called upon when climate organizations needed an inspiring story or a “diverse” voice, contacts for a campaign, or to participate in a workshop for “fun” when everyone else on the (all-white) project was getting paid.

Whenever I would question the whiteness of these spaces and how strategies didn’t take race into account, I would be met with uncomfortable silences. The last time, at a nationwide movement-building workshop last April, I was asked, “Well then, why are you even here?”

So I decided not to be there anymore. After four years of helping organize direct actions, speeches, workshops, and countless video calls, I started hiding and declining requests. I was burned out.

I felt guilty—like I was letting my people down. But I also felt let down by the lack of support when I had gone to the streets. I stopped talking to people who didn’t relate, including friends who were telling me to come join them now that the marches were becoming more popular. I was also in bed sick a lot. I stayed at home from climate marches telling people my knee was injured and kept to myself, needing to regain all the energy I had put into organizing.

Even being present doesn’t always mean being seen or heard. Last week Ugandan activist Vanessa Nakate found herself cropped from a picture and dialogue as the only African on a youth panel in the Davos World Economic Forum. She said the erasure “showed how we are valued.”

Many other climate activists of colour have described similar experiences of tokenism. Māori and disability rights campaigner Kera Sherwood-O’Regan (Kāi Tahu iwi from Te Waipounamu) found that as an Indigenous person at the UN climate conferences, organizers would suggest showing support and “passing the mic,” but the same people would be the ones taking up space in negotiations and speaking to the media.

At the same time, because I am Filipino-German and look ethnically ambiguous, it’s hard for me to emphasize the urgency or danger of climate activism as a Filipina—I am German too after all. Similar to what Colombian American climate activist Jamie Margolin said, my presence “toed a line between inclusion and exclusion.”

When I voiced my exasperation on Twitter, Jefferson Estela, a 21-year-old activist with Youth Strike 4 Climate Philippines, replied, “People are expecting us to do so many things, but when we ask for support no one hears us. White activists can protest whenever they want because they have homes, jobs, a huge amount of freedom of expression. BELIEVE ME, WE WANT TO DO BIG THINGS, but what's stopping us? A future and life that is at risk.”

Climate activism in Germany is mainstream thanks to the longevity and popularity of the German Green Party, which was formed in 1980. But generally the German climate movement is a white space, where there is little awareness of global inequality in the climate crisis.

Sometimes it’s the seemingly little things, like climate action meaning “die-ins,” lynching reenactments, or dancing in the street to disrupt public transport.

Sometimes it’s being asked time and again what whiteness, capitalism, and inequality have to do with climate change.

Other times it’s more major, like how activists here promote veganism as the single biggest way to reduce their carbon footprint, but ignore how people have been killed after protesting against the sourcing of plant-based foods like palm oil on Indigenous lands.

The movement’s failure to address these inequalities is ultimately why I found myself needing to walk away.

In recent years, the Philippines has had the highest number of environmental defenders murdered, where arrests and disappearances have been attributed to combating “communist insurgency.” Targeted groups include the Filipino research NGO I volunteered with during the UN climate conference in Bonn, Germany, and the Filipino women's collective Gabriela, which I also worked with in Berlin before I stepped back.

Anti-racism and anti-capitalism need to be made part of organizing. If “Green” policies fail to consider anti-racism and migrant rights, how is any person of colour supposed to feel voting for them or organizing in the same spaces?

Fortunately, there is now a growing BIPOC Environmental & Climate Justice Collective in Berlin, where we share these experiences of being silenced or tokenized and work together on how to link anti-racism and inequality in climate justice.

As Sherwood-O’Regan said, “As we grow and climate change becomes a harsher reality, privileged activists need to learn to de-centre themselves and meaningfully support Indigenous, disabled, queer, global south, POC, and other marginalized people who are on the frontlines of climate change.”

We need to feel respected and feel valued in our climate activism. Until the rest of the movement understands that our stories may also provide solutions, I am sharing my activism on my own terms.

- End of Article -
 
Even if the climate change movement wasn't just a front to put in socialistic policies and increase government control, why on earth would it matter about how many of the activists have skin darker than a paper bag when climate change supposedly effects everybody?

If you leave a movement that purports to tackle a global problem because the average melanin level is too low, you probably didn't do or weren't planning to do anything meaningful in it anyway.

This bitch could have also wondered why the Pee Oh Cees didn't care as much, or could have tried to get them involved, but alas, it's always the white man's fault.
 
This encapsulates perfectly the root of all failure in leftist activism, the optics are more important than the result.

Change not only has to happen, it has to happen along pre determined ethnic lines, or it didn't happen the "Right" way and might as well have not happened at all.
 
Last edited:
The bitch could have also wondered why the blacks didn't care as much, or have tried to get them involved, but alas, it's always the white man's fault.
Unsurprisingly, people that have actual major issues in their lives to deal with don't want to waste their precious time complaining about climate change. Especially when doing so would involve knee-capping developing countries in Africa/Asia by preventing them from properly industrializing.
 
"Until the rest of the movement understands that our stories may also provide solutions"

So besides blaming white people...what is the solution?
A holistic and organic three stage solution by which the brown and black peoples of the earth can heal the planet of the foul cruelties wrought upon it by the white man

This solution is as simple as it is beautiful.....

Stage 1: gibs
Stage 2: me
Stage 3: dat
 
"Until the rest of the movement understands that our stories may also provide solutions"

So besides blaming white people...what is the solution?
China Smog.jpg

Can't die of climate change if everyone chokes to death on smog first.
 
"Until the rest of the movement understands that our stories may also provide solutions"

So besides blaming white people...what is the solution?
well have the solutions included African witchcraft and other poc magic? No, didn't think so. Whitey doesn't want to try that. White people only want to try "recycling" and "planting trees". Dey barely eben gibs me mo money fo dem programs.
 
This encapsulates perfectly the root of all failure in leftist activism, the optics are more important than the result.

Change not only has to happen, it has to happen along pre determined ethnic lones, or it didn't happen
I agree. That's why I'm not a supporter of Greta or the climate change movement at larger, because it enables nobodies, regardless of who they are, at the same level and undeserving media attention to credible scientist who are actually doing something to help end climate change.
 
I agree. That's why I'm not a supporter of Greta or the climate change movement at larger, because it enables nobodies, regardless of who they are, at the same level and undeserving media attention to credible scientist who are actually doing something to help end climate change.

I'm not a supporter of it because they are full of shit and they use whatever data they get to further their narrative while ignoring previous faulty narratives. Take this wiki entry for an example:

The 2019 Atlantic hurricane season was the fourth consecutive year of above-average and damaging seasons dating back to 2016. It is tied with 1969 as the fourth-most active Atlantic hurricane season on record in terms of named storms,[nb 1] with 18 named storms and 20 tropical cyclones in total, although many were weak and short-lived, especially towards the end of the season.

I distinctly recall being told by climate speds that climate change would cause us to have fewer but bigger storms. So the 2019 season kind bucks that right? I'm sure they explain it though...oh they won't? Oh but guys it was above-average and ties 1969. Good thing we had a network of satellites to track storms in 1968..oh wait...or 1888 oh right not then either.

Another example is the glacier in Greenland that was always pointed to as a harbinger of global demise! It started adding ice. The response from climate speds: It is only temporary.

Yes dipshit the climate is temporary. That's the fucking point. We are still coming out of an ice age and in the future there will be another ice age.

I swear climate change spedery is just a fear of change and desperation to cling to mommy's skirt.
 
This encapsulates perfectly the root of all failure in leftist activism, the optics are more important than the result.

Change not only has to happen, it has to happen along pre determined ethnic lones, or it didn't happen

It's the logical end result of a culture that's simultaneously self-centered and badly-educated. You can't sway their opinion with data, as their pride won't allow it; nor can you prune their ego, as they are miseducated reassured by mainstream media that they're inherently correct. The worst part is this occurs so frequently with so many issues that I can no longer believe it's mere accident or coincidence.
 
I'm not a supporter of it because they are full of shit and they use whatever data they get to further their narrative while ignoring previous faulty narratives. Take this wiki entry for an example:

The 2019 Atlantic hurricane season was the fourth consecutive year of above-average and damaging seasons dating back to 2016. It is tied with 1969 as the fourth-most active Atlantic hurricane season on record in terms of named storms,[nb 1] with 18 named storms and 20 tropical cyclones in total, although many were weak and short-lived, especially towards the end of the season.

I distinctly recall being told by climate speds that climate change would cause us to have fewer but bigger storms. So the 2019 season kind bucks that right? I'm sure they explain it though...oh they won't? Oh but guys it was above-average and ties 1969. Good thing we had a network of satellites to track storms in 1968..oh wait...or 1888 oh right not then either.

Another example is the glacier in Greenland that was always pointed to as a harbinger of global demise! It started adding ice. The response from climate speds: It is only temporary.

Yes dipshit the climate is temporary. That's the fucking point. We are still coming out of an ice age and in the future there will be another ice age.

I swear climate change spedery is just a fear of change and desperation to cling to mommy's skirt.
"It's warmer than it's ever been reeeeeee!" It isn't even the warmest it's been in the time of HOMO sapiens sapiens. It's not even the warmest it's been in the last thousand years.

Yes, we have and continue to dump huge amounts of greenhouse gases out, but the hysterical lies aren't helping anyone, nor is jumping on anyone who points out the lies as racist.

You don't even have to leave the age of mammals to find stretches, millions of years long, where the poles were temperate, and that's not even as warm as the eras where it was so warm we ended up with things like 30cm dragonflies.

Do they think this particular period of extremely stable climate is going to continue forever? It never has.
 
I'm not a supporter of it because they are full of shit and they use whatever data they get to further their narrative while ignoring previous faulty narratives. Take this wiki entry for an example:

The 2019 Atlantic hurricane season was the fourth consecutive year of above-average and damaging seasons dating back to 2016. It is tied with 1969 as the fourth-most active Atlantic hurricane season on record in terms of named storms,[nb 1] with 18 named storms and 20 tropical cyclones in total, although many were weak and short-lived, especially towards the end of the season.

I distinctly recall being told by climate speds that climate change would cause us to have fewer but bigger storms. So the 2019 season kind bucks that right? I'm sure they explain it though...oh they won't? Oh but guys it was above-average and ties 1969. Good thing we had a network of satellites to track storms in 1968..oh wait...or 1888 oh right not then either.

Another example is the glacier in Greenland that was always pointed to as a harbinger of global demise! It started adding ice. The response from climate speds: It is only temporary.

Yes dipshit the climate is temporary. That's the fucking point. We are still coming out of an ice age and in the future there will be another ice age.

I swear climate change spedery is just a fear of change and desperation to cling to mommy's skirt.
Meanwhile, in climate retard land: More hurricanes = death by climate. None at all = death by climate too.

 
For the Climate Change community , this truly is a Major Crisis. White people should be banned forever because advocating for the environment to not die and not having enough Melanin is racist for Non white people. As we all know, Environmentalism and anti-melanism is a White man's tool for halting diverse people from reaching their goals. i.e; robbing, raping, and going to jail. This should be the community's top priority also; Because pollution, having enough melanin to make you black, and just generally destroying the enviroment is adding Culture and Diversity to a once White Devil's World. The entire Earth needs to be blacked. Ban white people and praise Jews.
 
  • Like
Reactions: spiritofamermaid
Back