Lolcow Melinda Leigh Scott & Marshall Castersen - Sue-happy couple. Flat earth conspiracists. Pretending to be Jewish. Believe Kiwi Farms is protected by the Masonic Order. 0-6 on lawsuits. Marshall is dead.

I think it's wrong if the partner demands it and the spouse hasn't consented to being in that kind of relationship, no matter which person is male and which person is female. At any rate, I think it shows a lot about the partner's character if they don't care about their spouse's pleasure. Are you saying you and Marshall are into BDSM?

Edit: I just realized you already answered that a few pages back. You get turned on by having sex whenever your husband wants it. It's not marital rape if you're never "not in the mood", lol.



So what would you call it? Do you think it would be morally right to shove a soda bottle in your husband's butthole without his consent? 🤔

For some reason, your comment got chopped up when I tried to reply....

For the rest of it...

I think the question that also needs to be asked is WHY do teenagers masturbate so young in some cultures? If you cover teenage bodies, don't show them sexual media, and don't send them off the public school, then how would they develop? Is masturbating at such a young age universally true, or is it the product of environment?
 
We haven't picked a name out yet but it definitely will be a Hebrew name. Definitely not "Paul"!
Good. You shouldn't profane his holy name by naming your feral little tard baby after him.
I don't believe in using ultrasound. It's never been proven safe long term.
Except for the literal millions of children that have been born safe and healthy after having multiple ultrasounds. Of course you're not one to let reality stand in the way of you being a moron.
I think the question that also needs to be asked is WHY do teenagers masturbate so young in some cultures? If you cover teenage bodies, don't show them sexual media, and don't send them off the public school, then how would they develop? Is masturbating at such a young age universally true, or is it the product of environment?
It's biology you dumb brood sow. Puberty means their bodies have reached breeding age, and they experience the hormones and urges that come with that. We evolved this way because until relatively recently (speaking in evolutionary time) people died at like 35, so we had to sexually mature at a young age.
 
For some reason, your comment got chopped up when I tried to reply....

For the rest of it...

I think the question that also needs to be asked is WHY do teenagers masturbate so young in some cultures? If you cover teenage bodies, don't show them sexual media, and don't send them off the public school, then how would they develop? Is masturbating at such a young age universally true, or is it the product of environment?
Kids touch their genitals out of curiosity, think "oh hey that feels nice" and learn to masturbate that way. The sexual thoughts come naturally. I'd wager enforcing modest clothing will only make the them hornier since it emphasizes how naughty and taboo bodies are.

I also disagree that it's insulting to men to say they can have uncontrollable sexual urges and passion. Men have build up of semen that literally has to be released from their bodies. A man's dick will fill with blood and stand up on it's own. (Women have a similar mechanism when they ovulate or are pregnant. I'm not saying a strong sex drive is gender specific). A man's desire is going to have to go somewhere.
That build up of semen is there even in teenagers. When boys try to nofap I'm pretty sure they start getting wet dreams.
 
Last edited:
  • Agree
Reactions: Kosher Salt
Last Question @TamarYaelBatYah
Is your "Torah" made out of toilet paper and filled with chickenshit writing for every 'amendment' to justify your shitty behavior?


You're putting the cart before the horse. I don't use Torah to justify my actions after I make choices, I use it to GUIDE my actions. I was 21 (still impressionable/forming) when I started to consciously follow Torah. I followed parts of it before that based on my conscience.... and by looking at the OT but it was just because I believed "The Bible" not because I believed Torah was eternal

The inability to change your avatar is not censorship.
The uterus is a muscular organ, so you're half right.
The uterus does not get stronger with each pregnancy, there's a good reason why women who have had multiple births show earlier with each pregnancy. Multiple pregnancies can also lead to chromosomal defects if you're an older woman having a child.
If you have a daughter, please don't name her Ariela. That's what me any fiancee are naming our daughter.


Actually the uterus DOES get stronger with each birth. This is why multiparous women experience precipitous birth (not from health issues). The uterus has cell memory to make the process smoother. Baby #5 was only 2.5 hours for me from first contraction to delivery of the body (and not from health issues ejecting the baby quickly)

This knowledge is why historically people groups have looked at women who bear children and survived as highly regarded. It's common knowledge a woman's first birth is the most difficult due to untrained and inexperienced uterus muscles. If a woman in antiquity survived birthing her first child she was highly regarded.

I don't believe in the medical myths about older women and pregnancies.
 
TamarYaelBatYah said:
I don't believe in the medical myths about older women and pregnancies.

Dude its common knowledge that women who have kids over the age of 40 are at an increased risk of giving birth to an autistic kid or a child with Down's Syndrome. How would you handle a kid with Down? Or has Marshall threatened to kill the child if its born with special needs?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
You don't believe anything based in fact or science because you're by far the dumbest person I've ever interacted with.
You have to remember this dumb cow thinks the earth is flat, gravity doesn't exist, and that "landlocked" means there is a giant wall around every continent locking people in.
 
You have to remember this dumb cow thinks the earth is flat, gravity doesn't exist, and that "landlocked" means there is a giant wall around every continent locking people in.
She also thinks her posting here isn't making her look dumber and more morally bankrupt by the post.
 
Actually the uterus DOES get stronger with each birth. This is why multiparous women experience precipitous birth (not from health issues). The uterus has cell memory to make the process smoother. Baby #5 was only 2.5 hours for me from first contraction to delivery of the body (and not from health issues ejecting the baby quickly)

This knowledge is why historically people groups have looked at women who bear children and survived as highly regarded. It's common knowledge a woman's first birth is the most difficult due to untrained and inexperienced uterus muscles. If a woman in antiquity survived birthing her first child she was highly regarded.

I don't believe in the medical myths about older women and pregnancies.
That has nothing to do with the uterus getting "stronger". Every birth is different.

It's not a "myth". There's quite a bit of research to back it up. You just can't pinpoint what sort of problems the child could have.

Thank god you're not a doctor, I can just imagine how many people would die if you were.

Dude its common knowledge that women who have kids over the age of 40 are at an increased risk of giving birth to an autistic kid or a child with Down's Syndrome. How would you handle a kid with Down? Or has Marshall threatened to kill the child if its born with special needs?
Some research puts it 35.
 
Those studies don't factor in variables like birth control remaining in the woman's blood stream, prior history of abortion, other uterine surgeries, invasive gynecological exams that cause uterine problems, history of pharma medicine taken that remains in the blood stream, the mother's sexual habits, other health habits, smoking, alcohol usage, prior history of IUD chips, etc. They just dump everything into one variable (age). The research is lacking.

If you follow The Torah your baby will be born 100% healthy at any age
 
That has nothing to do with the uterus getting "stronger". Every birth is different.

It's not a "myth". There's quite a bit of research to back it up. You just can't pinpoint what sort of problems the child could have.

Thank god you're not a doctor, I can just imagine how many people would die if you were.


Some research puts it 35.
Yes, the research I have seen puts it at 35 -40, however most of the stats I have read point to a decline in fertility starting at 35 and then the real spike happens at 40. Its like a slow treck up to 35, 36, 37, then an exponential spike at 40. Still probably best to at least have a kid by 35 if you want them.

Those studies don't factor in variables like birth control remaining in the woman's blood stream, prior history of abortion, other uterine surgeries, invasive gynecological exams that cause uterine problems, history of pharma medicine taken that remains in the blood stream, the mother's sexual habits, other health habits, smoking, alcohol usage, prior history of IUD chips, etc. They just dump everything into one variable (age). The research is lacking.

If you follow The Torah your baby will be born 100% healthy at any age
That's retarded as fuck. If youre 65 youre gonna give birth to a mutant kid if you can give birth at all.
 
When you divorce your biological family they become your "ex-family". Same as breaking up with a friend. Like people who say "my ex best friend".
Are you sure they just don’t want anything to do with you because you’re a narcissistic whore who uses some backwards interpretation of a religion as justification for being a narcissistic whore and who married someone who gets off on rape and may have had something to do with the death of one of his children?
 
Those studies don't factor in variables like birth control remaining in the woman's blood stream, prior history of abortion, other uterine surgeries, invasive gynecological exams that cause uterine problems, history of pharma medicine taken that remains in the blood stream, the mother's sexual habits, other health habits, smoking, alcohol usage, prior history of IUD chips, etc. They just dump everything into one variable (age). The research is lacking.

If you follow The Torah your baby will be born 100% healthy at any age
You clearly never read any of them.

Yes, the research I have seen puts it at 35 -40, however most of the stats I have read point to a decline in fertility starting at 35 and then the real spike happens at 40. Its like a slow treck up to 35, 36, 37, then an exponential spike at 40. Still probably best to at least have a kid by 35 if you want them.
Men have similar issues once they hit 40, though it's in terms of how the child will look. Though it's not a decline like women have, it's more like ever three or so years it gets worse. By the time you're 55 your children could look much older than they are.
 
  • Disagree
Reactions: TamarYaelBatYah
Back