- Joined
- Feb 9, 2013
Well, and the longer limbs. It gives you more leverage for the same amount of effort.Most women can open jars, the reason a lot of women fail at opening jars is due to having very small, soft hands.
AI itself isn't really a thing. However neural networks can easily be trained to recognize sex pretty accurately. They're pretty easy enough for amateur programmers to experiment with. Hell, there's a very interesting article about a comp sci experiment, the state of the art in 1995, where their algorithm outperformed humans.That kind of AI sounds testy and unreliable, at least in this stage of AI development. I have a pet theory the photos are run through and approved by humans somewhere along the line.
They're not really AI, just elaborate pattern matchers. But it's interesting because they can hone in on little tells that humans either only notice subconsciously or maybe not at all.
Oh lol, by the way, that comp sci experiment would've gotten defunded in a heartbeat nowadays, from the paper:
The task is referred to by other authors as "gender" recognition, but "gender" is
properly a grammatical term: specifically, words have gender, people don't.
In English, the term "gender" has attained increasing currency as a
euphemistic substitute for (male vs female) "sex". However, "To talk of
persons or creatures of the masculine or feminine g., meaning of the male or
female sex, is either a jocularity (permissible or not according to context) or a
blunder."' Admittedly, the usage is otherwise, but we prefer the anatomically
correct term.