Social Justice Warriors - Now With Less Feminism Sperging

[TerribleIdeas™]

FASCIST REEEEEEEEE
FIRST ITS IONIC AND DORIC COLUMNS, NEXT IT'S ROMAN SALUTES

Now I've got 4.5" of raging greek column, time to beat and fuck my dishwasher, while I Seig Heil.

 

[Elbe]

p1: Rape is about power.

p2: Black people don't have power.

c: Black people can't be rapists.

Am I doing this right?

 

[AngeloTheWizard]

We really just need a significant, near-extinction event, because these kinds of people won't survive, and I'm pretty sure of my odds, in such a case.

With our luck, they would be the only survivors

 

[TerribleIdeas™]

p1: Rape is about power.

p2: Black people don't have power.

c: Black people can't be rapists.

Am I doing this right?

p1: Black men are men.

p2: Men have male privilege, and the patriarchy empowers them.

p3: Black men have male privilege, and the patriarchy empowers them.

p4: Women have no power.

p5: White men have more power than black men.

p6: Troons have the least amount of power.

c: Niggers can rape women, but cannot rape white men. Troons can't ever be rapists.

I think this is the actual equation, now.

With our luck, they would be the only survivors

But I'll be dead, so I won't care.

 

[AnOminous]

Did you know that classical architecture leads directly and immediately to fascism and genocide? -

God what fucking idiocy. Yeah we should tear down everything with columns and replace it with formless concrete blocks like the fucking Soviet Union. Dumbass fucking literal commie.

 

[ThatDumbPhilosopher]

God what fucking idiocy. Yeah we should tear down everything with columns and replace it with formless concrete blocks like the fucking Soviet Union. Dumbass fucking literal commie.

When you can't make anything worthwhile such as architecture and aesthetic, you simply level down everything to your level.
It may be unconscious but I am pretty sure that's something they try to do.
"If I can't become a better person then I'll simply try to put everyone at my level."

 

[AJneedsElocution]

Lol, how do you even reach this conclusion? Greek columns just look nice, what are they gonna do to you?

I wonder if anyone has posed them the question where each of the following fall on the progressive stack,ionic,Corinthian and doric columns ?

 

[Slowboat to China]

The Greek column thing is nuts. If you look at the Nazis and USSR, their architecture was always on the weird modernist side of things. Classical size, but stripped of classical "bourgeois" ornamentation. Bloody hell, even Wikipedia will tell you that. Speer was apparently into stripped classicism, and the rest of their stuff looks downright modern in terms of flat and ugly.

Also, wasn't Obama always giving speeches using Greek columns as a backdrop? I remember him doing a speech at my college way back in the day, and we had to tear down the stage set we'd just finished building so his fancy stuff could be installed.

 

[Otterly]

Feminists have discovered sexual dimorphism

I’ve said this before but I think a lot of people just don’t realise HOW much stronger men are. Most men wouldn’t dream of physically tackling a women and most women haven’t had a fight with a guy since they were fighting their kid brother over toys.
Women have been told that they are the equal of men in every way. Now when I was growing up there was still quite a lot of ‘science? That’s for boys, you silly thing’ so I understand where that message came from. But somewhere the (perfectly oK) message that you can be men’s equal in skills, most jobs, science, etc turned into there being no difference at all, and that’s plain wrong and I think it’s lead to all sorts of problems. Men are stronger. So much stronger. Men and women are not inherently worth more or less but they are different.
I cringe when I see these girls self defence courses that imply you can actually win a fight with a bloke. Believe me, you can’t.

the columns thing is depressing. These people just cannot bear beauty in anything can they? Pave paradise, and put up a parking lot.

 

[Next Task]

p1: Rape is about power.

p2: Black people don't have power.

c: Black people can't be rapists.

Am I doing this right?

c: Niggers can rape women, but cannot rape white men. Troons can't ever be rapists.

I think this is the actual equation, now.

You are correct.

Edit: Yes, this is most likely a parody. Pretty Poe, though.

 

[Hummingbird]

You are correct.
View attachment 1137625

So what if the transwoman rapes another transwoman?

 

[Zbk3VmLfujjzjxBd43tL]

p1: Rape is about power.

p2: Black people don't have power.

c: Black people can't be rapists.

Am I doing this right?

Eldridge Cleaver of the Black Panthers at one point believed it was an "insurrectionary act" to rape a white woman, although even by the early 70s he repudiated this view.

You are correct.
View attachment 1137625

That isn't too different from how black people can't be racist or commit hate crimes against white people

 

[Piga Dgrifm]

You are correct.
View attachment 1137625

I hope no one thinks somebody with the url "transgender-uber-alles" is serious about anything they post.

 

[Hummingbird]

I found this pic and since I can't copy it, I thought I'd repost what it said: "I just came up with a phrase that we could call when SJWs ruin hobbies.. We shall call it... "Hobby Gentrification"

 

[Book Thief]

I will absolutely guarantee you that this thot is 100% okay with rich dudes, and "bad boy types" coercing her -
View attachment 1137192

Naker Navy on Twitter: "Sexual coercion is rape. Sexual coercion is r…

archived 9 Feb 2020 16:29:30 UTC

archive.ph

We really just need a significant, near-extinction event, because these kinds of people won't survive, and I'm pretty sure of my odds, in such a case.

SJWs: "Sexual coercion is rape! If you have to convince, trick, threaten, etc. for sex, you're already wrong!"
Also SJWs: "Trans lesbians are REAL lesbians! If you won't have sex with a trans person because of their identity, you're a transphobe!"

 

[TerribleIdeas™]

I found this pic and since I can't copy it, I thought I'd repost what it said: "I just came up with a phrase that we could call when SJWs ruin hobbies.. We shall call it... "Hobby Gentrification"

 

[madethistocomment]

I’ve said this before but I think a lot of people just don’t realise HOW much stronger men are. Most men wouldn’t dream of physically tackling a women and most women haven’t had a fight with a guy since they were fighting their kid brother over toys.
Women have been told that they are the equal of men in every way. Now when I was growing up there was still quite a lot of ‘science? That’s for boys, you silly thing’ so I understand where that message came from. But somewhere the (perfectly oK) message that you can be men’s equal in skills, most jobs, science, etc turned into there being no difference at all, and that’s plain wrong and I think it’s lead to all sorts of problems. Men are stronger. So much stronger. Men and women are not inherently worth more or less but they are different.
I cringe when I see these girls self defence courses that imply you can actually win a fight with a bloke. Believe me, you can’t.

the columns thing is depressing. These people just cannot bear beauty in anything can they? Pave paradise, and put up a parking lot.

Can confirm, I was one of those girls who underestimated how strong dudes are until about a year and a half ago. I remember how that changed, though- I was goofing around with my best friend, and we ended up play-fighting. I can't remember what happened exactly, but I think I ended up hitting him right in the cheekbone. Quick as a flash, he grabbed me by the wrists and pinned me to the ground and told me to never do that again. He then immediately laughed, let me up and told me he was fucking with me, but it genuinely scared the shit out of me for a hot minute. He's a decently strong guy, but he's usually really gentle and it never occurred to me how easily he could overpower me. It was kind of a wake-up call.

I feel like there's so many people out there who've got it into their minds that a girl could totally take on a bigger man in hand to hand, which concerns me when it comes to personal safety. You must absolutely never underestimate an attacker, but that's exactly what we're teaching girls to do. I'm afraid it's going to create a lot more victims in the future.

 

[Vault Boy]

You are correct.
View attachment 1137625

I can only hope this is a joke account and not some morally bankrupt nutcase trying to excuse actual rape.

If it's the latter, all I can say is that sort of attitude will only further erode tolerance towards the LGBT movement.

 

[LateNightMuffin]

I can only hope this is a joke account and not some morally bankrupt nutcase trying to excuse actual rape.

If it's the latter, all I can say is that sort of attitude will only further erode tolerance towards the LGBT movement.

I believe it is a joke account.

And tolerance toward the T part of the movement needs to be eroded. They destroy everything they touch.

 

[Positron]

Donald Lazere is Professor Emeritus in the Department of English at California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo, USA. (Amazon page)

This is Old Herbert, I mean Donald Lazere.

I'm not touching this trash; let's see what Forbes has to say about it.

From Lazere’s perspective, the dark and greedy forces of corporate America and its right-wing attack machine have prevented President Obama from moving full-throttle to transform the U.S. into the wonderful country we could enjoy. He maintains that the country is so dominated by “conservative” thinking that college professors must try to even things up.

It’s impossible to take that seriously.

In other words, he is another MovieBob who somehow succeeded professionally.

So, how did Lazere put his ideas into practice? He explains that in the composition courses he taught, he had his students write papers on controversial topics after giving them his guidance in analyzing argumentative pieces. At the top of his list of points is that students should think about the author’s “vantage point.” That is, how do such attributes as wealth, class, educational level, gender and so on color the writer’s argument? Does he or she stand to benefit? What other “interests” back the position?

That’s a mistake. If we want students to learn to employ reason, we must teach them to analyze arguments on their own terms.

All of Lazere’s “vantage point” considerations lead students into one of the most common of logical fallacies, the ad hominem circumstantial--the mistake of rejecting an argument merely because of some circumstance about the person making it. Telling students to look for such matters invites them to think that you detect bad arguments by hunting for author bias.

Having students consider the "vantage point" of the author isn't necessarily a bad thing, but of course it can be taken to extremes -- especially if the teacher is intent to introduce bias.