Manosphere Amud - The Balloon Loon, Loveshy Extraordinaire

[seagull]

@Amud you still have not addressed DNA evidence. I'll quote what I said earlier.

Additionally, as I've mentioned before it is flawed for you to look at structures such as the skull for "likeness" when we have DNA to compare, which is much more accurate way to determine evolutionary relationships.

If humans were descended from Neanderthals, you would expect that their DNA would not differ by much more than the standard differences between humans. This is not the case. Please read this article. http://humanorigins.si.edu/evidence...nd-neanderthals/neanderthal-mitochondrial-dna

muh 50k per year scienmagistical paperz

If you had a degree, I expect that you'd be better able to respond to the wealth of information myself and others have provided that disproves your claims.

 

[JU 199]

Stop. He'll start going on about being friendzoned.

Exactly

 

[KillerBob]

That's absolutely correct. The archaeology profession is fraught with corruption. Female archaeologists frequently sleep with their male professors and supervisors to get a higher position in the field. Everyone involved is incredibly biased. When they find artifacts which do not fit in with their preconceived ideas of evolution, they hide them away in the Indiana Jones warehouse.

When you find an article that doesn't fit in with your preconcieved ideas of racism, misogyny and stupidity, you attempt explain it away as conspiricy. You are not a scientist, because you have decided what your opinion is and will never change it. A scientist, looks at the evidence and decides what to believe. You are an idiot. Go away and try to actually learn something, or stay here where we can laugh at your bullshit. Your choice.

 

[Sigyn]

Eh, I'm just doing it for the experience, mainly. It's easy and unlikely to kill me, so why not give it a shot? If it improves my face, I'll be happy. If it doesn't, then it's not like I lost anything, right?

I hate sluts for a multitude of reasons.

*They accelerate the genetic degeneration of our species by only allowing low IQ psychopathic specimens with Ignobilid features (for example, upper facial flatness) to procreate
*They have created a climate in which many of the most capable of men have greatly reduced motivation to contribute to society
*They have destroyed the stability of the family unit, meaning that most children now grow up in a suboptimal environment. This is unfair to the children.

These three things will lead to the collapse of society as we know it unless we return to traditional ways. I don't know what is with everyone these days who thinks they are somehow above the wisdom of earlier generations. "Old ways are archaic and outdated! We need to change the way we run society with things that are unprecedented because it's PROGRESSIVE!" That attitude is incredibly arrogant. People of earlier generations were not idiots. They did things the way they did for a reason: because they worked throughout history. Changing things up is a recipe for disaster. "Progressives" such as sluts and social justice liberals are showing an immense disrespect for their ancestors.

Just got here, but this is the most autistic thing I have ever read.

 

[Kablamo]

I am also beggining to believe that @Amud may be less than genuine. I think you might be able to alleviate some of this skepticism with some limited personal information. Perhaps a few photos of you and your hobbies IRL could help. Not trying to doxx you, but your claims are becoming increasingly specious.

I don't think any society has existed that matches up with what I have in mind. That's because we've never had a society where the rulers and the commonfolk aren't all a bunch of ignobilid morons.

I appreciate that you have taken the time to answer one part of my questions. Perhaps I can restate the remainer of my unanswered question with a little bit more specificity.

1. Would it be fair to say that you have a "utopian" view of society?

2. What would this political system look like within your prescribed society? How would the state divide powers and deal with economic forces?

3. If you had total authoritarian control of our present society, what sort of laws and policies would you impose to achieve your aforementioned directives?

I have some followup questions, but I will leave it there as to not further inundate you.

For reference of those who are struggling to keep up with this thread, my questions are aimed at seeking clarity on this post by @Amud

3. What we need is an environment that fosters productivity of capable but downtrodden individuals. Where financiers don't fuck us over. Where we can expect to have a solid family. Where we can be educated for free. Where the income scale is meritocratic. Where our culture doesn't involve degenerate sexual videos and dating apps.

 

[Durable Mike Malloy]

muh 50k per year scienmagistical paperz

Come now, don't be so defeatist. Even our very own Reincarnated Einstein Space Jesus, Richard Bradshaw Watson II, managed to present his opus entitled, "Identifying 'True Earth-like Planets' - All New Worlds Are Built On 7_4 (like Earth) Or 6_4" at an actual NASA conference. He told everyone about the planet Nestor where they speak Eqfish instead of English and worship FOD instead of GOD. Lack of formal qualifications and utter lunacy need not stop you, if you really believe in yourself and your ideas.

 

[Dreamatorium]

Because if I'm incel for my whole life, maybe I won't have the motivation to continue the great work I do. I've barely even scratched the surface of it in this thread.


That's absolutely correct. The archaeology profession is fraught with corruption. Female archaeologists frequently sleep with their male professors and supervisors to get a higher position in the field. Everyone involved is incredibly biased. When they find artifacts which do not fit in with their preconceived ideas of evolution, they hide them away in the Indiana Jones warehouse.

What is it with people like you and not understanding that women don't like you because you're pompous, creepy, arrogant to the extreme and just very fucking nutty?

Please tell me you're trolling, for one. You haven't made any contribution to the scientific community. Science is NOT one person trying to pass their untested theories as contributions. Science is a collaboration of certifiably learned individuals working within the bounds of established scientific method to smooth out conjecture and confirmation bias for the good of human enlightenment.

Even if you did have some sort of a working thesis, other than your theories which consist mostly of projections of your various Freudian complexes, you would not be treated as the savant you think you are because humility is a virtue within any sort of respected scientific community.

For all you claim to know about anthropology and genetics, you fail to realize that the fact that you can't get laid IS natural selection in and of itself. Whatever is wrong with your brain is creating your strange behavior, which drives women away because they don't want your fucked up genes. You're a peacock with unimpressive plumage who wonders why he can't find a mate.

 

[Sigyn]

Jesus Christ, you could take a post from Holden, Mooo, and this little dickhole and I wouldn't be able which one was made by who. They all three seem to have absolutely no real personality beyond hating women and they're generally boring people to talk to.

It's actually reassuring, in a weird way. All these guys are single because women recognize their loveshy psychopathy IRL and don't date them. It makes me feel safer. It's sad that Amud hates himself enough to convince himself it's purely cosmetic reasons, though.

 

[JU 199]

Jesus Christ, you could take a post from Holden, Mooo, and this little dickhole and I wouldn't be able which one was made by who. They all three seem to have absolutely no real personality beyond hating women and they're generally boring people to talk to

Holden: Women are degenerate whores!
Moooo: Yeah!
Amud: Preach it!

(5 minutes of silence)

Holden: uhhh I'm going home now
Moooo: I best be getting off too!
Amud: Hey, either of you wanna have balloon sex with me?

(Awkward stares)

Holden: No
Moooo: Nope
Amud: Really? Too bad.

(Everyone walks away in shame)

 

[Daario Naharis]

*They have created a climate in which many of the most capable of men have greatly reduced motivation to contribute to society

This attitude. It`s the one Loveshy attitude that gives me a good giggle. You lot do realize that you've always been at the bottom of the totem pole, yeah? Or do you think that back in the day, women just threw themselves at mopey losers with concave chests? That these guys were, naturally, the object of envy and respect among their peers?

Spoiler: The Loveshy of yesteryear. Minus Charles Atlas makes you a man.

$50 says you could find the same shit in the Bayeux Tapestry. "Vile wench! How dare she bestow her favor upon Sir Thundercock?! Verily, she art responsible for the coming Armageddon!"

TL;DR - Most capable of men?

No. Not by a long shot.

 

[ILoveMylarBalloons]

Holden: Women are degenerate whores!
Moooo: Yeah!
Amud: Preach it!

(5 minutes of silence)

Holden: uhhh I'm going home now
Moooo: I best be getting off too!
Amud: Hey, either of you wanna have balloon sex with me?

(Awkward stares)

Holden: No
Moooo: Nope
Amud: Really? Too bad.

(Everyone walks away in shame)

I think females are superior to males in someways... I am not a Amud clone at all.

 

[Chan the Wizard]

I think @Amud is a troll. Went too far, too fast.

Post a picture of you snorting a balloon while holding a sign that has "kiwi farms" written on it.

 

[ILoveMylarBalloons]

Holden: Women are degenerate whores!
Moooo: Yeah!
Amud: Preach it!

(5 minutes of silence)

Holden: uhhh I'm going home now
Moooo: I best be getting off too!
Amud: Hey, either of you wanna have balloon sex with me?

(Awkward stares)

Holden: No
Moooo: Nope
Amud: Really? Too bad.

(Everyone walks away in shame)

I would say no too I don't want to have balloon sex with a male at all. if girls dressed like the bratz etc then it would be interesting to have a girl like that to kiss some mylar balloons. but I don't want to watch Amud at all...

 

[Daario Naharis]

I think females are superior to males in someways... I am not a Amud clone at all.

Superiority is attained through personal effort, not accidents of birth.

I am going to do to you the same thing I always do to _____ is superior to _____ theologians.

Pick the worst of your superior group and compare them to the best of the inferior.

*Ahem*

Marguerite "The God Warrior" Perrin.

Please explain how she is superior to Albert Einstein in any way.

 

[Meowthkip]

I am also beggining to believe that @Amud may be less than genuine. I think you might be able to alleviate some of this skepticism with some limited personal information. Perhaps a few photos of you and your hobbies IRL could help. Not trying to doxx you, but your claims are becoming increasingly specious.@Amud

Yeah @Amud take a picture with a condom finger cot up your nose.

EDIT: @Chan the Wizard beat me to it!

 

[Amud]

Would you define "wiped out"? Do you mean genetically? Culturally? Are you meaning just in terms of looks? Because guess what, you're still wrong. So I can only assume either you have some sort of visual impairment (due to that deformed skull of yours) or you're just lazy and haven't bothered looking.

Do you have a dog?

Well, what I meant is that the Wolf Robe phenotype can't really be found anymore. Just look at his face, it seems like it's a foot long. We're talking full Neanderthal size dimensions. You'll never see a Native American today with such a long and robust face.

My family does in fact have a dog, although I'm not sure why you asked this.

I had a paper published in a law journal as a student- lack of funds is no excuse.

This is basically an admission that you have not contributed to mankinds knowledge so you have nothing to offer the girls. As if that wasn't obvious.

Further the reason your 'noblids' have never governed society is you loveshy types are stunning dunning krugers. You are stunningly stupid people to the point you can't even recognise it.

The aristocracy was ment to be government by the best, you sir, are the very worst.


Edited to add extra thoughts

I think the established scienmagistikal journalz won't be interested in what I have to say.

Why does contributing to the knowledge of mankind have to be within the confines of "official" scienmajistikal paperz?

$50k more per year than you're making as a NEET amateur anthropologist :^)

I was referring to how much you have to spend at a college to get a scienmagistical paper (a degree) which then enables you to write more scienmagistical paperz ("official" journals)

@Amud you still have not addressed DNA evidence. I'll quote what I said earlier.


If you had a degree, I expect that you'd be better able to respond to the wealth of information myself and others have provided that disproves your claims.

They determine DNA similarity using a PCA plot, or principle component analysis. When examining large amounts of data, the result is a set of vectors with incredibly high dimension. The calculations required to determine the distances between these vectors would be impossible to do because they are so long and complicated. Instead, they use PCA to "project" this data onto a field of smaller dimensions. When the PCA analysis is performed, they break it up into "principle components" which roughly correspond to real-life factors which influence the data. In real life, there's only one factor which has to do with the closeness between modern Euros and Neanderthals. This will be ONE of the principle components, out of a number potentially as large as the number of DNA sequences measured. When they show DNA charts, they are only looking at two principle components, since paper or charts are 2 dimensional. This means the principle component which would tell us how close or far we are to Neanderthals might not even be included in the chart.

I am also beggining to believer that @Amud may be less than genuine. I think you might be able to alleviate some of this skepticism with some limited personal information. Perhaps a few photos of you and your hobbies IRL could help. Not trying to doxx you, but your claims are becoming increasingly specious.



I appreciate that you have take the time to answer one part of my questions. Perhaps I can restate the remained of my unanswered question with a little bit more specificity.

1. Would it be fair to say that you have a "utopian" view of society?

2. What would this political system look like within your prescribed society? How would the state divide powers with economic forces?

3. If you had total authoritarian control of our present society, what sort of laws and policies would you impose to achieve your aforementioned directives?

I have some followup questions, but I will leave it there as to not further inundate you.

For reference of those who are struggling to keep up with this thread, my questions are aimed at seeking clarity on this post by @Amud

I'd prefer not to post photos. I know you guys will try to dox me.

1. Yes, I would like a utopia.
2. I think the best way to do this is to have no economy. Cut out all the middlemen. Banks, federal reserves, employers, etc. all that is just shuffling money around back and forth so that psychopaths can leech off the rest of us at each level. None of that is necessary and we'd be better off to forget all about it. The more shuffling that happens, the more leaching. This is deliberately designed by rich oligarchs to oppress poor people. It's best to cut off the leech's supply by removing all of the blood vessels.
3. I would have all the ignobilids, psychopaths, and inbred aristocracy scum executed.

 

[Lascannon]

What amaze me about Amud is that he is even more ignorant and stupider then Holden.

Like at least Holden doesn't short condoms like this guy does.

 

[Cuck Norris]

I was referring to how much you have to spend at a college to get a scienmagistical paper (a degree) which then enables you to write more scienmagistical paperz ("official" journals)

Perhaps we could differentiate the two if you used actual words, ya know, like an adult.

 

[The Knife]

What amaze me about Amud is that he is even more ignorant and stupider then Holden.

Like at least Holden doesn't short condoms like this guy does.

Although snorting condoms is a close second to fucking your mom.

 

[JU 199]

1. Yes, I would like a utopia.
2. I think the best way to do this is to have no economy. Cut out all the middlemen. Banks, federal reserves, employers, etc. all that is just shuffling money around back and forth so that psychopaths can leech off the rest of us at each level. None of that is necessary and we'd be better off to forget all about it. The more shuffling that happens, the more leaching. This is deliberately designed by rich oligarchs to oppress poor people. It's best to cut off the leech's supply by removing all of the blood vessels.
3. I would have all the ignobilids, psychopaths, and inbred aristocracy scum executed.

Communism? D:

Edit: @Amud Why do you hate the market democracy?