Manosphere Amud - The Balloon Loon, Loveshy Extraordinaire

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
I don't care if he's a troll or not, he shoved a fucking balloon up his nose for us.
image.jpg


You sure showed us.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: MarvinTheParanoidAndroid, PixelKnot, Vitriol and 11 others
@Amud, I just glanced through this thread and you are quite frankly a typical loveshy. You spew pseudo science to justify your sexual frustration and cover up the fact that you are too self absorbed to start and contribute to a relationship. For someone who claims to go to a community college, especially one that focuses on engineering and computer science, you don't have really any biological or anthropological knowledge or the academic process to make a claim on human biology and psychology.

Also, most women and academics find snorting condoms very low brow and wouldn't take you seriously.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
Reactions: MarvinTheParanoidAndroid, Vitriol, Saney and 6 others
Amud said:
Well, what I meant is that the Wolf Robe phenotype can't really be found anymore. Just look at his face, it seems like it's a foot long. We're talking full Neanderthal size dimensions. You'll never see a Native American today with such a long and robust face.
Click to expand...
Can you back that claim up with scientific evidence? And by scientific evidence I mean not your weird, off-brand, phrenology.
My family does in fact have a dog, although I'm not sure why you asked this.
Click to expand...
Can you post pics?
 
  • Agree
  • Like
  • Winner
Reactions: MarvinTheParanoidAndroid, NobleGreyHorse, Wally Balljacker and 1 other person
Dear lord reading through all 31 pages of this thread this Amud guy is really crazy. Jeez, not even Holden gave me this much of the creeps, because at least in his thread I didn't have to see almost 10 pictures of scary-looking people that were either photoshopped or not.
 
  • Winner
Reactions: MarvinTheParanoidAndroid
Osaka Seafood Concern said:
But wait, who the fuck even takes IQ seriously anymore?

http://www.medicaldaily.com/study-confirms-iq-tests-do-not-accurately-predict-intelligence-243971
http://www.jstor.org/discover/10.2307/2112323?sid=21106136597283&uid=2&uid=4&uid=373753

In a modern, civilized society we should be able to generate a place for everybody regardless of whether or not some elitist prick deems them worthy of existing. Some people want everything out of life and they are welcome to go get it, but some people (particularly, the "low IQ psychopathic specimens with ignobilic features") would rather just shelter, food, and little agency over their lives -- why would you be so offended over those people simply existing? If ugly or "low IQ" people are destructive to society, why aren't they the ruling class? The world would literally be Idiocracy and despite all the fear mongering, I think society is still far from that.

My hometown has a major drinking problem and a reasonably sizable percentage have birth related defects like foetal alcohol syndrome, they don't have any agency over my life just like I don't have any over theirs. It's live and let live. Why focus on demographics you hate when you can do something far more constructive with your time? A lot of people in my hometown also play with the idea that they are somehow superior to the general populous because they like Shakespeare and Joss Whedon, and they are obsessed with hating "trashy" people to the point where they waste so much time complaining and shitting on reality TV they end up contributing about an equal amount to society as the people they loathe so much. If you hate ugliness so much, become a scientist! Work in genetics! Tackle the problem from the roots! If you don't like people you feel don't match your intellectual potential, aspire to get away from them and meet the people that do. Investing all this energy into hating people, without really doing anything about it is about as productive as binge watching Keeping up with the Kardashians.

Besides, these people are already treated like shit by an apathetic government for the most part and that's not gonna change anytime soon, so what's your problem?
Click to expand...
Nick Bate has an IQ of 129. Enough said.
 
  • Informative
  • Agree
Reactions: Mr. Awesome Man, MarvinTheParanoidAndroid, Adamska and 9 others
Simplicity111 said:
Every single one I've seen join the forums including this guy is one of the most persistent, unreasonable people on the planet it seems...
Click to expand...
Thankfully that's what makes them so much fun.
Atsimuel said:
Well, he wont be answering me. @mooooo ignored a lot of stuff I asked him, then it turned out he thought I was a girl because of my avatar. I'm kinda suspecting the same might be true of this dingus.
Click to expand...
Did he assume you were also made of marble or are actually a Weeping Angel?
 
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: MarvinTheParanoidAndroid, NobleGreyHorse, Saney and 4 others
WanderingVagabond said:
Going to a community college first then a four year college/university is much more cheaper depending on your major. So stop with the community college jokes. Please, Cat-chan?
Click to expand...
Aw, I think @Amud really deserves the jokes, though. The fact that he is in community college shows he is very early in his academic career, and yet he acts like he knows more than people who have devoted their professional lives to advancing scientific knowledge, calling them "scienmajisticans" and devaluing their expertise by putting his racist messageboard rants on par with their work in the peer-reviewed literature. We could make similar jokes at his expense if he went to an Ivy League university, a state school, or a small, exclusive liberal arts college.

I agree that community college can be a really smart choice for people who actually want to learn and get ahead in life. @Amud, though? He'd be ridiculous wherever he went.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
Reactions: Cryonic Haunted Bullets, CisCat, MarvinTheParanoidAndroid and 16 others
buster_kitten said:
Google informs me that scienmagistics seems to be a popular portmanteau among white nationalists, but is rarely used outside those circles. A handy shibboleth for terrible beliefs, I guess!
Click to expand...

I do not visit White Nationalist sites or identify with the movement. I actually got the term "scienmagistics" from a blogger called Texas Arcane, who I am quite fond of reading. I ended up using the term myself because I thougt it was so funny.

Lalala said:
Hey @Amud I'm running a little test, you'll probably know what's coming but try to be honest;
Please look at the gentleman in the spoiler, identify his skull type and then judge how laid he gets based on it.

tumblr_ni6utplqYr1s98zqoo1_1280.jpg
Click to expand...

I'm seeing some Adenid, some Slayerid, maybe some Borreby or Potatid too. Typical mixed type. Most people don't fit into one of the main archetpyes, but are a blend.

Kablamo said:
Well the photo certainly helps maintain the dialogue we have going. Thanks for that.

I appreciate you acknowledging your limitations, because it does help us to understand what you're trying to claim more broadly. I know that you have tried to insist that you're not a racist, and that you have no interest in neo-nazi ideology, but I regret to inform you that you may have accumulated a lot of neo-nazi sentiments without your explicit knowledge. Much of your belief system is eerily consistent with these value systems.

What I am particularly curious about right now is how you suggest that by killing roughly half the population (due to their identifiers as psychopaths and inbred aristocrats). So as a followup question I would ask this:

1. Do you think there is a moral deficiency in individuals who are prepared to invoke genocide to satisfy their personal value system? How are these individuals distinct from ordinary psychopaths?

2. You have previously stated that race mixing is wrong, and that ethnic populations should reproduce only within their genetic group. This is the mechanism that results in genetic bottlenecking, limiting genetic diversity. How do you reconcile these contrasting views?
Click to expand...

Well, let me preface this by saying that some of my posts may have given you the wrong impression. I'm not perfect, and sometimes I might word things in a way that is incoherent or inconsistent. I absolutely do not advocate killing half of the population. The people who I think should be killed are a tiny minority of the population, probably no more than 5%. In fact, they do not even have to be killed. Depending on the person, there may be other acceptable options such as sterilization, imprisonment, or deportation. Let me list the undesirables:

*psychopathic bankers, politicians and businesspeople
*inbred aristocracy, baking dynasties, etc.
*extreme ignobilid violent criminals
*extreme Chads / Slayerids /boy band heartthrobs

2. I don't anticipate this being a problem, since all of the main racial groups have plenty of genetic diversity as it is. It's only a problem when a new population descends from a very small number of people (for example, I recall reading once that the Jews all descend from four women, which is why they suffer from genetic disorders. This may not be true, it's just something I've heard)


Konstantinos said:
Amud strikes me as being the kind of guy that would have an extensive knowledge of phrenology.

Can you verify that Amud?
Click to expand...
I sure do.

thingshappensometimes said:
Hi! This is my first post so please go easy on me -
It seems like in this utopian situation you have mentioned there would be a lot of killings based on a person's perceived or real contribution to society and the betterment of mankind.​
My question is who would decide this and with what parameters?
It seems like having a person or group of people responsible for deciding who should live and who should die would inevitably lead to subjective decisions based on a current consciousness or thought-process that would never be conducive for the furthering that you seem to be in favor of. I'm going to make a huge leap here and assume that you agree with me that most people believe they are the "best" or "right" type of person and as a rule when someone else is different from them it means that they are "wrong" or "bad". Having any sort of system or person put in place concrete enough to hold authority over an individual's life would always be dated and backwards facing ensuring stagnation and death of a species.
​
Bonus questions if you feel like it (and because you really rusted my jimmies)
What (EDIT: in your opinion) is the difference between humans and animals?
How are your relationships with your parents? (answer each individually please)​
Click to expand...

1. The parameters would be decided by a group of "loremasters" who are well-versed in the theories I have begun to explain in this thread. This would require extensive training from scientific, social, and ethical perspectives.
2. Humans are capable of introspection
3. I have a good relationship with both of my parents. I live with them. We all get along very well and have a stable family.

koyemshii said:
If you leave now, I promise not to keep digging. I've done this to good ol' conner before when he nigged out on his end. And I don't care if you are trolling or not. The reaction your folks will give on you shoving condoms up ypur nose will be fun enough
Click to expand...

My parents know that I shove FINGER COTS up my nose. They are fine with it, although my mother did make a somewhat "confused" face when I first told her about it. I don't see what the big deal is here.

Ca Ira said:
You've ignored my last eight questions, but-- have you ever found that approach to work? Have you ever presented your scientific accomplishments to a woman, explained the type of reaction you felt you were entitled to on the basis of those accomplishments, and then actually gotten that reaction? If not, why do you believe this to be?
Click to expand...

No, I've never tried it. I have a feeling most women would not be very receptive.
 
  • Dumb
  • Mad at the Internet
  • Deviant
Reactions: Mr. Awesome Man, KimCoppolaAficionado, CisCat and 21 others
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back