Culture “Trad Wives”: meet the women radicalised into complete subservience to men - A growing online community of women are rejecting feminism in favour of submission to men


1581392099079.png


When I was seven years old, I wanted to study tornadoes. I had seen the movie Twister and was fascinated by the speed, force and unpredictability of storms. To understand tornadoes fully, and create warning systems, you needed to get to the centre of a storm. Instead of chasing storms I have ended up chasing extremists for a living. In many ways these aren’t too dissimilar. Like storms, extremist movements are fast, have strong destructive potential and can change direction at any time. In my day job at the London-based Institute for Strategic Dialogue (ISD), I monitor extremist movements across the UK, Europe and America. My team works with cutting-edge technology partners and universities such as MIT to track and analyse harmful online content — from extremist propaganda to disinformation. Based on this research, I advise governments, security forces, tech firms and activists on how to respond to extremist activities.


To comprehend what is causing the havoc around us, however, one needs to be inside, to observe and study the engines of the movements. How do the extreme fringes mobilise supporters and lure vulnerable individuals into their networks? What are the social dynamics that keep members inside a group, and how are they evolving? To find answers I have spent two years undercover, adopting different identities and joining tech-savvy extremist groups across the ideological spectrum, including radical misogynists, both male and female.

---

“Where do you think you fall on the SMV scale?” Kim asks me.

“Um.” I google SMV. Sexual market value is “a measure of desirability for sex in the eyes of a person of the opposite sex”, according to the online male supremacist community Men Going Their Own Way (MGTOW).

“Don’t know,” I confess. “How would I?”

“Well, it’s hard to judge yourself, and often we don’t know exactly how we are perceived. But as a woman it is often said our SMV goes up if we control our weight.”

Kim tells me that she went from size 20 to size 14 in one year after joining Red Pill Women, a female anti-feminist community on the discussion platform Reddit. “I am sure it helped, since I am treated differently. But I am not stopping traffic or anything. My face is average or even below average, which probably keeps my SMV low even though I’m skinny now.”

I stare at her brutal self-evaluation. This is a typical discussion in the forum. Kim is one of roughly 30,000 self-described Red Pill Women or Trad Wives (short for Traditional Wives). These women perceive gender roles as the result of “sexual economics”. The heterosexual community, they believe, should be seen as a market place, where women are sellers and men buyers of sex. A woman’s single most important resource is therefore, according to them, her SMV. This is now my third week talking to the Trad Wives and I have started to get used to their endorsement of openly misogynist statements. “Women’s highest value to men is her sexual value, and she’s most valuable when she’s in her sexually pristine state,” I am repeatedly told. To see where you stand in terms of sexual value, Kim recommends trying apps that allow you to get rated anonymously: from the old-school Hot or Not to a more sophisticated attractiveness rating service on Photofeeler.

“OK, but what about other factors such as being funny, educated or having exotic passions?” I ask, half knowing the answer.

“Oh, come on. Health, age and femininity are the single most important qualities that appeal to men,” Kim says. “Education, career or workplace don’t influence a woman’s SMV. Think about it, they don’t enhance the sexual satisfaction of her male partner.”

“Oh, and your SMV also goes down if your N-count goes up,” a woman named Marie adds.

“The what count?” I ask her, starting to feel a little stupid.

“The N-count. You know, her cock count,” Marie explains. “While being sexually experienced may increase the physical pleasure of her male partner, being sexually inexperienced actually increases satisfaction.” Marie is in her early thirties and married. Apart from being a “good wife”, she sees her mission as giving tips on dating, relationships and marriage to fellow Red Pill Women. She appears to be one of the most frequently consulted coaches in the community. She is convinced that feminism has brainwashed men and women into believing that the N-count doesn’t matter. “But,” she says, “human male nature is to have less and less desire for a woman as her N-count rises. Eventually, this lack of desire will turn to outright disgust.”

She gives the example of “a smoking hot, 10/10 bombshell beauty” who has had sex with 1,000 men. “How many men will want to marry her? Very few. Why?” Before anyone can respond, she continues: “Because women are the gatekeepers of sex. Sex is the main thing that men need from women. Therefore it’s the prime value that a woman has. Each time she gives this value to a man, her value is diminished.”

The Trad Wives movement is a small but growing internet phenomenon that developed as the female equivalent of The Red Pill (TRP), a Reddit community that Robert Fisher, then a Republican state house member, founded anonymously in 2012. TRP promised “discussion of sexual strategy in a culture increasingly lacking a positive identity for men” and counted roughly 300,000 subscribers before being banned by Reddit in 2017 for its toxic, dehumanising and threatening content.

However, TRP is only one part of a much bigger misogynist online community, the so-called “Manosphere”, which played a key role in the creation of the alt-right and is made up of a range of subcultures: from the secret seduction community of the pick-up artists (PUAs), who seek to learn how to manipulate women’s minds to get them into bed, to the vengeful involuntary celibacy (incel) movement of men whose main goal is to punish the women they hold responsible for their sexual frustration. While these groups pursue different strategies to “reconquer” male power, pride and privilege, they all share an outright hostility towards feminism, liberalism and modern gender roles. They ridicule movements like #MeToo and denounce women’s rights activists as “feminazis”. I was convinced this was an almost exclusively male phenomenon, but the more time I spend with Red Pill Women, the more I understand that anti-feminist movements aren’t just made up of men. Female men’s rights activists who want a return to traditional power roles and exaggerated notions of masculinity and femininity have adopted the rhetoric of the Manosphere.

The Red Pill Women community is “open to all women wanting to improve themselves and their relationships”, but it does have a few official rules, most notably: Rule Five: No feminism. This is an anti-feminist community, and as such, we are not interested in being “saved” by feminism … Instead, conversations should be based on traditional evolutionary psychology or an anti-feminist premise.

“I’ve been learning to follow my husband and submit instead of making demands and arguing … The biggest thing I’ve done is to just say ‘yes’. Yes to what he asks for or wants …” one woman writes after having been indoctrinated by the Trad Wives for several weeks. I start to understand that this is a forum of unconditional self-deprivation. The single most important goal is to learn how to please men. “If you want to keep a man, you have to put femininity over feminism,” our coaches keep telling us. Books such as The Surrendered Wife by Laura Doyle or The Proper Care and Feeding of Husbands by Laura Schlessinger feature at the top of the reading list.

“Sexual market value” is one of the core concepts underlying the Red Pill Women ideology. Another is the “STFU” (shut the f*** up) method. “Men prefer women who don’t talk too much,” is how Marie summarises the not-so-hard-to-guess concept. As the Trad Wives start sharing stories of how they have successfully applied the STFU method in daily life, I can feel my stomach turn. It feels almost surreal to be watching women get excited about the idea of being literally silenced. “Last night, girls, he gave me the cold shoulder all night and I was getting more and more frustrated,” one of them tells us. “But then I realised that I did it to myself. In fact, if I had STFU we would have had a lovely night like we always do … I’ll make sure to watch my mouth a lot more often from now on.”

STFU is part of a bigger idea about “domestic discipline”. Marie says it applies to wives and girlfriends as much as to children — all of whom are in a man’s power and are supposed to obey him. Her recommendation to men is: “Sit them down, explain what rule they broke, explain why it’s a rule, calmly apply the prescribed punishment, then hug them because it’s over.” Although Trad Wives wouldn’t encourage the use of fists, many believe “men who spank their women are doing it right”.

To my surprise there is no typical profile for Red Pill Women. The majority I’ve come across appear to be between 17 and 30. Some are married, others aren’t even dating. Their financial background varies just as much: while some ask how to save money on kitchenware, others want to know where to get the most glamorous dress to meet Donald and Melania in the White House. Even their educational background is diverse. “I just finished my PhD and figured that it gets you nowhere with men,” one woman confesses.

Whatever their life journey so far, most women arrive here in shock or fear of losing the person they love. A few join because they haven’t found anyone yet and blame themselves. Similar to the men joining the Manosphere, the search for love is what radicalises most Trad Wives.


1581392586452.png

Rejecting modernity: memes on Trad Wives sites reinforce gender stereotypes

I want to see the other side, so I create a male avatar account. I dig into the archives of the banned incels and Red Pill forums. In the 1990s, a Canadian statistics student called Alana created a website to connect anybody — man or woman — who was still a virgin, felt lonely or was unable to find a sexual or romantic partner. She called the platform Alana’s Involuntary Celibacy Project, which was soon abbreviated to incel. It was a well-meaning initiative: the idea was to give individuals suffering from low self-esteem and loneliness the confidence and consolation they needed. But in less than two decades the incel movement evolved into something quite different: a predominantly male community started classifying women into attractive “Stacys” and less attractive “Beckys”, and men into hyper-masculine “alpha males” versus undersexed “zeta males” or “soy boys”.

The use of dehumanising and misogynist language became more common over time. Women were referred to as “femoids” — “female” and “humanoid”. Alana’s positively framed self-help community had effectively turned into a dangerous echo chamber of women-hating, self-loathing loners. When Reddit finally banned incels from its platform in November 2017, the community had attracted 40,000 members. Most incels migrated to other corners of the internet such as Voat, where men continue discussing the injustice of being denied what they see as a basic right — to have sex with attractive women. To escape “inceldom” some would impose strict diets and workout programmes on themselves or undergo plastic surgery, something they call “looksmaxing”. Others reach more radical conclusions: for example, that the only solution is to kill themselves, other people or both. “The Incel Rebellion has already begun!” Alek Minassian, 25, posted on Facebook before driving a van into a crowd of pedestrians in Toronto, killing 10, in April 2018.

It’s true that the average man has a harder time getting laid than the average woman. Research shows it is more difficult for men to achieve matches on Tinder than for women: while male users matched with only about 0.6% of the profiles they liked, their female counterparts had a matching rate of about 10.5%. Another study revealed that women have a response rate of more than 50% on their first messages, while the average man received replies on only 17% of their messages. Over the past few years, anti-feminist thinking has penetrated large proportions of the millennial generation. Mainstream figures such as the psychologist and author Jordan Peterson and the British YouTuber and Ukip member Carl Benjamin (aka Sargon of Akkad) have been fuelling a sense of male victimhood. They often cite the high suicide rates among men, but fail to mention that although more than three-quarters of suicides in the US and the UK are male, women are more likely than men to attempt to take their own lives — a phenomenon known as the “suicide gender paradox”.

The Manosphere has a love-hate relationship with women. Even men’s rights advocates acknowledge that movements that lack female support don’t last very long. “It’s time to get women on our side, and in my opinion one of the best ways to do this is by slowly exposing them to Red Pill women YouTubers,” wrote Jon Anthony, the dating coach and founder of the men’s advice forum Masculine Development.

The Swedish alt-right influencer Marcus Follin, a muscular man with long blond hair and a tanned skin, better known as the Golden One, has argued that white nationalist movements need to get more women involved. He cited statistics from the 2016 Austrian presidential election in which the Green Party candidate won by an extremely narrow margin over the far-right Freedom Party candidate thanks in part to his support from female voters. “You might not like that women have the right to vote … but it’s about winning a long-term political victory,” he concluded.

Female men’s rights activists tend to attract a large male following on Twitter and YouTube. Their vintage swing dresses, matching lipsticks and heels reflect a nostalgia for the hyper-feminine images of the 1950s. DeAnna Lorraine, an attractive brunette with full lips and carefully applied make-up, sits at her desk; in the background you can see a copy of her book Making Love Great Again. Lorraine is currently running as a congressional candidate to unseat Nancy Pelosi. She is also a “redpilled relationship coach” and I am about to join her live-streamed YouTube coaching session for men. Today’s topic: how to redpill your girlfriend. “Remember: she is brainwashed … It is not entirely her fault if she doesn’t ‘get it’ right away.”

Lorraine’s male viewers send her hearts and kisses via the live chat as she starts to encourage them to deal with their girlfriends as they would with someone who has a mental disorder. “Thank you for the hearts, guys,” she responds, beaming at the camera with a seductive smile.

1581392696665.png

Trad all over: “redpilled relationship coach” and YouTube host DeAnna Lorraine

Having seen how Red Pill men are encouraged to manipulate women, I decide to go back on Red Pill Women and type in “abuse” in the search function. Taking the blame for verbal abuse is commonplace among the Trad Wives, but even physical violence is frequently relativised or justified: “There are some bad qualities because of me, such as when I cry, he would slap me,” one woman confesses. Another one offers advice based on Jolynn Raymond’s book Taken in Hand: A Guide to Domestic Discipline, Power Exchange Relationships and Related BDSM Topics. Taken in hand (TiH) is the preferred relationship model of Trad Wives. An anonymous female TiH supporter advocates violent discipline for women who make a “sarcastic remark” and provides the following tips for men: “Learn how to use your authority in public … A raised eyebrow, a gentle squeeze, a pointed finger, even a code word can send the message that although she might feel safe at the moment, she is still under your jurisdiction.”

Several Trad Wives complain that the feminist anger-management industry has defined anything a man does to get or maintain authority in a relationship as abuse. “Raising his voice, refusing to give her money, hitting a wall … using logic in an argument … calling her names even if they are true … ” Marie writes. “It is now illegal abuse for men to exhibit dominance outside of hilariously phony BDSM games.”

Confusion about changing notions of masculinity and femininity has pushed men and women into fundamental identity crises. Millennials are increasingly fed up with the high-speed dating culture of the techno-sexual age, where apps such as Tinder and Bumble mess with users’ brains. Research suggests that Tinder users are less satisfied with their bodies and faces, and male users suffer from lower levels of self-esteem than non-users.

“We are in the middle of a romance apocalypse,” some Trad Wives would say, citing declining marriage and fertility rates in America and Europe. It is true that only one in six Brits in their twenties is married or in a civil partnership, and the average relationship duration for twentysomething British couples is 4.2 years. No wonder the idea of going back to old-fashioned gender roles can be appealing to men as well as to women. Women who are trying to find out why their relationship isn’t working out the way they’d imagined it, the way Hollywood made them imagine it, flock to the Trad Wives community. The Red Pill offers an easy explanation and a way out of an increasingly complex socio-psychological labyrinth. In the Trad Wives community, confusion meets insecurity before turning into guilt and self-doubt. The redpilled start to believe that relationships break down not as a result of mutual failures and mistakes, but when the woman isn’t woman enough. Unlike other online advice and counselling forums, most users who enter the platform to seek help with a specific problem end up sticking around — and are gradually indoctrinated by their coaches and peers.

The Trad Wives are just one example of a recurring group dynamic in extremist gateway communities. Socialisation into jihadist subcultures isn’t dissimilar. Despite its religiously inspired ideology and greater willingness to commit acts of violence, the social dynamics within Isis-bride chat groups resemble those under way in female-only alt-right spaces.

© Julia Ebner 2020. Extracted from Going Dark: The Secret Social Lives of Extremists, to be published on February 20 (Bloomsbury £17)

Meet the UK Trad Wives

In the UK, a less extreme version of “Trad Wives” are gaining popularity on social media

“My dream is to have a husband to look after. I would love to wake up early in the morning, get his clothes ironed and ready, make him lunch to take to work and then look after our kids all day, ready for when he comes home.” Jade, 33, right, has dreamt of being a Traditional Wife since her early twenties. She has a degree in international relations and is currently working full time in London for an energy company. She’s single, but can’t wait to get married and have a brood of children — “five or more would be ideal”.

By her own admission, Jade’s take on gender roles is pretty conservative. “I truly believe that a man is the head of the household, and the woman should stay at home,” she says. But she’s insistent that different set-ups work for different people, and stresses: “You can’t tell people how to live their life.”

Jade’s dream is Alena’s reality. She is a full-time housewife and a mentor in the UK Trad Wife community. “I do the housework because I enjoy it, and it’s where I flourish,” she says. Yet she doesn’t believe homemaking is “specifically a woman’s role”. “It would also work for marriages where the woman is the breadwinner. I just want the role of someone staying at home to be celebrated,” she explains.

Alena takes inspiration from the 1950s, as “that was the last time housewives were treated with respect”, but Jade’s influences go back further. “I take inspiration from the Tudors and the Victorians. I admire Anne Boleyn — I know she got beheaded, but she was powerful.”

Jade’s friends are “modern”, and Alena doesn’t know anyone in real life who lives as she does. “That’s why we go to social media. The only way we can connect with one another is by using the hashtag.”

Though you can find British Trad Wives on Twitter, Instagram and Facebook, neither Alena nor Jade had heard of the Red Pill forum. Terms such as “SMV” (sexual market value) and TiH (“taken in hand”) seem alien to UK Trad Wives, though Jade has seen their influence on the men she has dated after meeting them online.

“One guy treated me very well, but told me he’d used a tracking device to monitor an ex-girlfriend. Another expected to be able to discipline me with spanking. I stopped speaking to them. I would never put myself in that situation.”

---


Ah yes, I forgot that women are brainless beings with no agency who can't think for themselves, good thing feminists can do the thinking for them. Gawd forbid if you are a sane and well-adjusted woman who doesn't want to look like this...

1581392947022.png


To ultimately, end up like this...

1581393463665.png


Then it means that you're being RADICALISED! beware!
 
Last edited:
To be fair, that sounds less like a condemnation of the lifestyle itself, and more of a condemnation of rushing into marriage.

It's 2019 and family planning is a thing. I hate this person but we have multiple children? LMAO. If this user is speaking truth about their situation I have no pity. People don't just 'become' like this and there's a very good chance you know from meeting their friends and family before you're several kids deep that this is what they're like. I see it all the time on facebook especially women who hooked up and married and procreated with a massive asshole who knew he was or was warned off them but didn't listen to others- who then break up and spend all their time shit talking him. You knew and you still slept with him, still had his kids, and still choose to stay.

No pity.
 
Who the fuck buys these MGTOW talking points? Like, this is totally next level bullshit.
I mean the whole "trad wife" thing is total bullshit. Women who want to raise families and do domestic work tend to just sort of do that without requiring the weird power dynamic and other unnecessary stuff. I know plenty of people who are raising 3+ kid families as a team and yeah typically the guy is the primary breadwinner and the woman is the primary caregiver probably for a lot of utilitarian and cultural reasons. They don't become strange cult members who pretend they aren't normal people with desires, interests, and hobbies. Typically they seem pretty happy and engaged with each other if a bit tired until most of their kids are out of the house, but I wouldn't really be friends with them if I thought they weren't pleasant people.

All that said, are we really gonna pretend that being a total whore in the past doesn't decrease how attractive most guys, myself included, view women. I'm not talking the type of person who had a couple boyfriends or whatever; I'm talking the type of person who had a bunch of one-night-stands. As a general rule, people don't really want what everyone else can have.
 
I'm more or less a traditionalist, but the online "trad" community can be so fucking pathetic. Half of them are just greasy BDSM people who got a rockabilly aesthetic. If they're "traditional", then john waters movies and 1980s yard sales are also trad.

Ah yes, sexting a mentally ill 16 year old e girl so she can make jello desserts shaped like swastikas in your gamer cave while you jerk it to tranny hentai, so traditional.
 
On the flip side, there are now so many 30 year old women out there so desperate for love and terrified of dying alone that they will happily lick your asshole and gag on your dick while you play Rimworld. There's literally a smorgasbord of desperate middle aged holes out there hoping and praying for your love, willing to do anything for a chance to fulfill their biological drive.

Someone should setup a pen outside of Whole Foods full of the soon to be egg-less, repentant whores looking to become a wife and mother for dudes to adopt.

Tinder and feminism have made all of my dreams a reality. Thank you, ugly, blue-haired landwhales.
 
(My children are sleeping, so I can post on the half hour break I have generously been told to take before I get back to domestic duties.)

I do not identify with any of this RPW or tradwife bullshit, although I am very familiar with it. I actually live this life

that’s straight up abusive/coercive control. I hope he has a stroke and/or you divorce his ass. No one deserves that shit.
 
that’s straight up abusive/coercive control. I hope he has a stroke and/or you divorce his ass. No one deserves that shit.
No no you don’t get it. The man should be praised for generously and selflessly doing the horrible and demanding task of parenting for a total of 30 minutes. While the kids sleep. It’s a high responsibility task we should all be praising him for.
 
Really this is just one of the evolved forms of millennials pretending to "adult" to gain respect and attention. I really do wonder where exactly attention whore are getting this idea that being a homemaker is all Rose's, I assume it's from second wave feminism trivializing motherhood but I cant be 100% sure.

It's not all roses, certainly not. And I would value a partner who took on the role of managing the domestic side of our relationship without quibbling. But it is easier than it was for some Fifties housewife. You have dishwashers and washing machines and supermarkets and deliveries. I remember clothes being washed in the sink by hand when I was a child (and I'm not super old, thank you very much. We just didn't have a washing machine). A Fifties housewife was still reeling from the help this new fangled vacuum cleaner was. (Pedants - yes, it was invented long before that but they weren't a common household item for the Middle Class). Let alone the advantages most households in the West have today.

None of this is meant to devalue the role of housewife. As I said, a woman who is willing to take on that role is like gold dust in the West these days. But lets also not completely oversell it. If a partner can take care of most of a medium house with a few hours a day, there should still be time for some video games or Facebook or reading in the park or whatever in the afternoon. I wouldn't want a partner who works as hard as I do - we'd both just be exhausted in the evening.

Now all that said, I'm talking about regular life. If you have young children, then yep - it's full on and deserving of total respect. So don't take my post as total disagreement.

EDIT: Wrote all the above before I read @Farael 's post. If all that's true then I am so sorry, and that's not what "traditional" relationships are supposed to be about. The husband is supposed to value all that his wife does for him and for the family. I read your post as implying you're Catholic. I have another Catholic friend who went through a very difficult relationship and stuck it out for the sake of kids for a long time. Your husband is abusive and controlling. I told a friend in an abusive relationship that her children would learn their behaviour from their parents - boys would learn to treat women like they saw their father treating her; and daughters would learn to accept it like they saw her do. It gave her the strength to turn things around. I don't know if that helps but if what you wrote is really what you're going through, seek some support. Here or in your real life. Marriage is not supposed to be like this.
 
Last edited:
Honestly there’s not a whole lot of difference between @Fareal and a shitty job. Millions of people medicate just to get through the day on a go nowhere job with few options other than another shitty job. I sympathize with her but sadly the grass is not necessarily greener in this case.

I'm not exactly a feminist but I'd say unless you're having to share a bed with your boss and unless you have no home to go back to at the end of the day because your place of work is your home so it's a 24/7 prison, that there are key differences.
 
I'm not exactly a feminist but I'd say unless you're having to share a bed with your boss and unless you have no home to go back to at the end of the day because your place of work is your home so it's a 24/7 prison, that there are key differences.

But that's a result of a horrific marriage rather than her role in that marriage. If she was off working all day she'd still have to come home to the same shitbag husband and be miserable.

Anyway on topic I find the current concept cringey for the simple fact that like everything else in our society once it turns from a normal thing between people into a lifestyle brand that those people flaunt all over social media it becomes hollow and degenerate. If a couple accepts that men and women have different roles and responsibilities in a marriage that's not a bad thing at all. It's healthy. Respecting what each other brings to the family unit is different than announcing on social media that you totally are trad and submissive to your man. Even in the 50s that was not the case. In fact people trying to attack traditional gender roles from those periods pretend that it was little more than that to discredit it. Ironic that current hipsters are reverting to the caricature of traditional marriage created by its enemies rather than the real thing.
 
I'm sorry about my autism earlier. It was the sight of the used jizz rag being hurled onto the floor I had spent the afternoon mopping that blew my fuse. It's like... he walks into my place of work and trashes it, then lies there watching as I put it back together. I'm not asking for that much. I want him to use a bin, flush the toilet after he shits in it, and brush his teeth. The children can manage all this, and they are preschoolers and babies. I just want some basic courtesy.

I can't exactly talk to anyone IRL about this, because I don't have any IRL friends any more. My parents know some, but not all, and the more the know the closer my dad is to blowing a fuse.

Yes, I am a Catholic. I take that seriously. Probably too seriously, but it is what it is. Even once I escape, I will not initiate a divorce. I don't want money or assets or anything, I just want to be free. I just want to decide when I go to bed and how I get my hair done for myself without it being a three day war.

I know my children are better off with me than with him half the time: when I was in hospital having the third, I came home to a horrific case of nappy rash on the middle baby and them telling me he didn't feed them for hours at a time. He brought them up to the hospital and the first thing they said was "Mummy, we are so hungry". I can't let him have custody of them half the week when I can't even trust him to do basic care of them. I cannot describe how disappointed I am in him as a father. A bad husband I can forgive. It's probably what I deserve. But the children don't deserve that.

For years I believed we were sub fertile. Fucking years. The grief was terrible and he never would agree to adopt. He told me he went to his doctor and had a low sperm count. Suddenly when he found my running-away fund inside a pair of shoes (I was working then), I had three kids in three years. It turns out natural family planning is really effective for us; sadly I didn't know we were using it. I thought he was just odd and obnoxious about not having sex at particular times. Yes, that makes me stupid. But I should have been able to trust him that for a decade when he told me we were trying for a family and he really wanted one that we were, you know, actually trying as opposed to he was tracking my cycle and actively avoiding it. I trusted him.

I feel so, so fucking stupid. Of course he didn't behave like this before we were married; I could have escaped then. When we met we were teenagers and he lived at home with his mother. There were no jizz rags being lobbed on my mother in law's floor, that much I am certain of. The harder it is logistically for me to leave, the worse he behaves.

I thought he was really committed to this marriage and family business and we would make it work. I took all my career decisions - some acutely painful; it's not easy to walk away from what you are good at and where you are valued by your coworkers - on the basis that we had to maximise his income. Now he won't even go to work five days a week because "he works enough" and he expects me to feed five people on ten quid a day. I can do it, because I can cook and I know how to stretch a quid, but by God in the last month alone he has openly flipped off two jobs that each would have paid him another 40 grand a year for one day a week's work.

I never nag and I never criticise, because I am absolutely committed to not being a shrieking harpy housewife, but by god the job thing has really tested me there. My life would be so much easier with that money, but then again who's to say he would let me use it for housekeeping anyway?

@Unog is right. I got married too young. Maybe he would have displayed these traits left unmarried long enough. Maybe not. For all that I'm intellectually clever, I realise that by God I am not smart. I trusted him, I believed he would be the partner in life he said he would be.

It was bullshit. Now I have to do everything I can to give my children the best opportunities they can have in life so... then it will all be worth it, I guess?

I just struggle terribly with the promotion by this "movement" of a lifestyle where the reality is: you have no leverage. You have no job, no income, and your ability to feed your kids is dependent on keeping some tosser sweet. It's fine if you are the tosser. Actually, for him, it looks great. He brags all the fucking time to other people about how hard I work to keep him happy and what a wonderful wife and mother I am. I just wish he cared about the children. And flushed the toilet.
 
If these wives can't defend your home while you're out pillaging, hold her own in a trial by combat, or get your kids ready to go on your viking raids with you, they ain't not traditional anyways and are just a prissy self-obsessed 1950s housewife wannabees.
If she can't brew beer and help with the harvest, then she is not worth it.
 
When it comes to things like this, I like to go by the Tywin Principle.

Any person who has to call themselves X, is no true X.

All these tradwives are just e-thots who decided to capitalize on a different niche for the same purpose as the harlots they decry. Most SAHMs who live “traditional” lives don’t need to scream about it on Twitter for validation.
 
I'm sorry about my autism earlier. It was the sight of the used jizz rag being hurled onto the floor I had spent the afternoon mopping that blew my fuse. It's like... he walks into my place of work and trashes it, then lies there watching as I put it back together. I'm not asking for that much. I want him to use a bin, flush the toilet after he shits in it, and brush his teeth. The children can manage all this, and they are preschoolers and babies. I just want some basic courtesy.

I can't exactly talk to anyone IRL about this, because I don't have any IRL friends any more. My parents know some, but not all, and the more the know the closer my dad is to blowing a fuse.

Yes, I am a Catholic. I take that seriously. Probably too seriously, but it is what it is. Even once I escape, I will not initiate a divorce. I don't want money or assets or anything, I just want to be free. I just want to decide when I go to bed and how I get my hair done for myself without it being a three day war.

I know my children are better off with me than with him half the time: when I was in hospital having the third, I came home to a horrific case of nappy rash on the middle baby and them telling me he didn't feed them for hours at a time. He brought them up to the hospital and the first thing they said was "Mummy, we are so hungry". I can't let him have custody of them half the week when I can't even trust him to do basic care of them. I cannot describe how disappointed I am in him as a father. A bad husband I can forgive. It's probably what I deserve. But the children don't deserve that.

For years I believed we were sub fertile. Fucking years. The grief was terrible and he never would agree to adopt. He told me he went to his doctor and had a low sperm count. Suddenly when he found my running-away fund inside a pair of shoes (I was working then), I had three kids in three years. It turns out natural family planning is really effective for us; sadly I didn't know we were using it. I thought he was just odd and obnoxious about not having sex at particular times. Yes, that makes me stupid. But I should have been able to trust him that for a decade when he told me we were trying for a family and he really wanted one that we were, you know, actually trying as opposed to he was tracking my cycle and actively avoiding it. I trusted him.

I feel so, so fucking stupid. Of course he didn't behave like this before we were married; I could have escaped then. When we met we were teenagers and he lived at home with his mother. There were no jizz rags being lobbed on my mother in law's floor, that much I am certain of. The harder it is logistically for me to leave, the worse he behaves.

I thought he was really committed to this marriage and family business and we would make it work. I took all my career decisions - some acutely painful; it's not easy to walk away from what you are good at and where you are valued by your coworkers - on the basis that we had to maximise his income. Now he won't even go to work five days a week because "he works enough" and he expects me to feed five people on ten quid a day. I can do it, because I can cook and I know how to stretch a quid, but by God in the last month alone he has openly flipped off two jobs that each would have paid him another 40 grand a year for one day a week's work.

I never nag and I never criticise, because I am absolutely committed to not being a shrieking harpy housewife, but by god the job thing has really tested me there. My life would be so much easier with that money, but then again who's to say he would let me use it for housekeeping anyway?

@Unog is right. I got married too young. Maybe he would have displayed these traits left unmarried long enough. Maybe not. For all that I'm intellectually clever, I realise that by God I am not smart. I trusted him, I believed he would be the partner in life he said he would be.

It was bullshit. Now I have to do everything I can to give my children the best opportunities they can have in life so... then it will all be worth it, I guess?

I just struggle terribly with the promotion by this "movement" of a lifestyle where the reality is: you have no leverage. You have no job, no income, and your ability to feed your kids is dependent on keeping some tosser sweet. It's fine if you are the tosser. Actually, for him, it looks great. He brags all the fucking time to other people about how hard I work to keep him happy and what a wonderful wife and mother I am. I just wish he cared about the children. And flushed the toilet.
If it's really as bad as you say, then I second @GrotesqueBushes, bail. I also concur with @Overly Serious, your kids are currently picking up behavioral habits from both you and your husband; boys will learn from their dad how to treat women, and if you have girls, then they'll learn from you (on a subconscious level) how to treat men. So despite your best efforts, that household will leave a long-lasting impression on them by the time they become adults.
 
Reminds me when I came across a r/redpillwives thread and the OP was miserable because she was doing #wifelyduties AND working full time while her husband schlubs around.

Well after the high of finding RPW I am finding myself at a bit of a decline. The dust is settling and I am still unhappy. There are several things that unfortunately I feel powerless over, even though I know my husband needs me as his right-hand, and I am the best nurturer of the household. As I mentioned before, I am a full time working mother and wife and my career is dependent on our financial security & health insurance for the family. So this comes at a huge cost to being the best wife and mother to our family. Friday for example, I was so sick with the flu & still had to go into work. Meanwhile my daughter got sent home from daycare, my husband will not take off to care for her from his job, and I have done so many times to the point that my boss makes remarks about it. I had no option other than to bring her into my job on Friday so I wouldn’t have to be excused for the day, meanwhile, I’m disgustingly sick from the flu to the point I threw up in my office. This is one extreme example, but the working while sick has happened many many times, but responsibilities still ensue and at the same time none of my own needs are being met. I cannot possibly keep up this lifestyle with no help on my end.
 
Back