Inactive Andrew Dobson / Tom Preston / CattyN - STOP DOING SEXIST CRAP

couple of things to unpack
-the fact they're saying it implies they do care.
-two of those three failed without the help of the white man, if they want to blame anyone blame Women.
-plenty of good movies featuring LGBT, woman or minorities have been showered in praise by the white devil, for example Moonlight or Anihilation-maybe the movies are just mediocre or bad on their own terms
-Speaking of Annihilation the fact none of these sort have either seen or it or comment on it buries their credability. I know they havnt has because no ones seen it and Dobson never watches anything for grown ups.
-whose this 'we'? a reviewer has enough to success to carry clout then clearly they have relavence to the dialogue.
-By this logic why would anyone listen to the posters about more succesful movies such as Iron man or Batman.
-Are they seriously saying they enjoyed Charlies angels? because hahahaha holy shit.
-Dobson complaining about a lack a diversity in movie critique is absurd because the movies themselves are either rehashes or repeat performances of other movies. Charlies angels is particulary bad because it's the third remake of a franchise over 30 years old.

EDIT-


It's pretty pathetic that Dobsons quoting teenagers telling tall tales because they like the attention. Although I feel bad for them because they truth is they never left wonderland, they just entered the spookey dramatic bit to distract them from the true horror of reality.

Its far far worse than you can ever imagine in being upset at lack of black people in capeshit. Far far worse.
See, I actually really liked Annihilation. It wasn't nearly as good as the book which goes into detail as to why the team is all women (the government have been testing different combinations of team members to see how Area X reacts) , which makes perfect sense in the context of the book. The problem with the film, as far as Dobson and his ilk are concern, is that the film isn't about Grrl Powah! It's just four women doing stuff like adults instead of mouthpieces for some half-baked ideology. It's not on the required reading list because it doesn't check all the boxes. It's too equal and not empowering enough. The movie is good, but gets ignored for the same reasons. (I'd still recommend it though).

I sort of like the early 2000s Charlie Angels but it may just be nostalgia and Lucy Liu. Would it qualify for diversity today since they replaced a white lady with an Asian lady, but nobody makes a big deal about it?
 
God, his pandering shit is so disgustingly obvious.
View attachment 1143843
Zero. Self. Awareness.
This is the dumbest shit I’ve ever seen. It’s like going into a niche store for a hobby you aren’t interested in, then sperging online that it’s bold of that store to assume you care about what they’re selling. The world doesn’t revolve around these narcissistic twats, and it’s quite bold of them to assume anyone but Dobcuck values their opinion on some shit-tier product.

If you really don’t care about something you don’t seek it out and if you should happen upon it, you’d move on with your life without feeling the need to comment on it.

The opinion of a critic (regardless of their race/gender) is valuable because they’ve seen enough movies to be bored by mediocre consoomertrash and only praise movies that actually merit praise. These tards can feel free to disregard this and/or seek out critics based on their personal tastes, but saying critics are bold to assume that you care, as if they thought out their review hoping that they might be so important as to get your approval, is way cuntier than necessary.
Dobber supports this because he’s a turbosperg who genuinely does believe His Opinion is the Only One That Matters, but if you really care about ‘POC’ voices it is much more valuable to talk about critics whose opinions you value than to narcissistically whine that people who you have no interest in continue to (gasp) have opinions.
 
The diversity bullshit doesn't transfer well into fictional universes.

Because notice they change the rules when going up against orcs, cat girls, elves, and the undead.

Suddenly those don't count as diversity despite all of them being vastly different looking from humans.
 
This is the dumbest shit I’ve ever seen. It’s like going into a niche store for a hobby you aren’t interested in, then sperging online that it’s bold of that store to assume you care about what they’re selling. The world doesn’t revolve around these narcissistic twats, and it’s quite bold of them to assume anyone but Dobcuck values their opinion on some shit-tier product.

If you really don’t care about something you don’t seek it out and if you should happen upon it, you’d move on with your life without feeling the need to comment on it.

The opinion of a critic (regardless of their race/gender) is valuable because they’ve seen enough movies to be bored by mediocre consoomertrash and only praise movies that actually merit praise. These tards can feel free to disregard this and/or seek out critics based on their personal tastes, but saying critics are bold to assume that you care, as if they thought out their review hoping that they might be so important as to get your approval, is way cuntier than necessary.
Dobber supports this because he’s a turbosperg who genuinely does believe His Opinion is the Only One That Matters, but if you really care about ‘POC’ voices it is much more valuable to talk about critics whose opinions you value than to narcissistically whine that people who you have no interest in continue to (gasp) have opinions.

I ain't that shocked, a good part of this generation has this strange mentality how they are super important and everyone must care for what their opinions and what they desire/care about. I dunno if they have this view because of being spoiled shitheads or because college professors lost any initiative to say "You fuckers aren't super special!", maybe 'cause they assume since they are young they are "smarter" and more "experienced".
 
Dobson responds to the person who sent that Ask about him lecturing a teenage lesbian about KorraSami.

E1759A5E-6313-400E-B26B-3FFDEDA7D049.jpeg
 
Valentine's day exceptionalism:
1581710526945.png1581710590231.png1581710660421.png1581710776038.png1581710809591.png1581710874744.png1581711030167.png1581711074976.png1581711128601.png1581711188611.png1581711798748.png

From the Zelda meme thread:
1581711240614.png

Dobson replies to a thread that started out with someone's comic about Marinette, Kagami in her dragon miraculous outfit, and Adrien as Cat Noir all hanging out at Marinette's:
1581711953423.png

Reblogging someone posting a blue checkmark whining about "South Park fans are bad and south park does damage!"
1581712023338.png1581712052684.png

I wonder what the hell that idiot usually says to have those kinds of tweets sent at her, hmmmmmmm?
:thinking:

Oh, wait...
1581712410021.png
She submits a couple DMs or emails or whatever too:
1581712558997.png1581712616200.png
another one called her the k-word for j00s and asked her if she was enjoying menopause.
 
Last edited:
So you know how Dobson’s history on the GT Forums is a bit of a mystery given that he only ever talked about it after they were deleted? Someone who interacted with him there actually contacted me and gave me a brief example of what he was like. The asked me to keep them anonymous, but they did say I was allowed to share the story. And it is peak Dobson, let me tell you.

“I’ve known Dobson ever since he’s been on the GT Forums as TomPreston. He was kind of a d**che then and I see nothing's changed.”

“I made a silly joke during the Other M reveal trailer, "OMG SAMUS SPOKE!" He bit my neck off saying "The hell is your problem, she's been speaking for a long time!" I backed up saying, "Dude, it was a joke. Why so serious?" I kid you not, he said, "Well, that's what happens when you have a deeper philosophical understanding of the world like I do." I was like... in high school then. He was s**ting on a kid for making a harmless joke lol.”

Im willing to vouch for the validity based upon who it was. Here’s the blog post for it:

 
Dobson reblogs this thing:
View attachment 1144239View attachment 1144241View attachment 1144242
This falls under the heading 'Not even wrong'. Especially since while it's true that "pocs" are underrepresented in school shootings, what does end up happening with black kids that might be so inclined to do any shooting at all in inner cities at least is they join a gang and go do their shooting out in the neighborhood instead. (Also, spoiler alert, in the 80s they had to start putting metal detectors in some inner city schools because people were bringing knives AND guns to school. Dunno if they still have them but if they do it explains why inner-city schools aren't shot up all the time).

Not to mention whites are a huge chunk of the population, and the testosterone makes the boys more aggressive than girls, so yeah, most girls don't want to do a shooting. It's got nothing to do with "coping better" than straight white males. Bullying in and of itself doesn't cause school shootings. Bullying antisocial psychopaths or narcissists (or antisocial psychopathic narcissists) DOES.
BTW, the "fully sourced" link goes NOWHERE and cites nothing. The page is blank except for a single word, "gone".
I'd just like to add for the record: Roger Elliot (not a school shooting but still) was only HALF white (half azn), the Virginia Tech shooter was Korean, and while not a school shooting, the Washington DC snipers were both black, so I'd love to know how these people's PoC status "helped them cope better than a white straight male". It's like dude, that is NOT how "coping" works. There's a bajillion factors, including mental health status, and whether a person has a nihilistic mentality, or whether the person has sociopathic antisocial tendencies, which have absolutely nothing to do with race.
Yeah I’m gonna call bull. If I recall a year or two back there was a study on school shootings that found the exact opposite: when you count every gang shootout and drive by that occurs within in a school zone or police fire fight that is taken to a campus, minority school shooters far out number the white one statistically speaking. There’s simply an over representation of white school shooters in the media because news reports have crafted a very specific profile on what a "school shooting" should look like (namely a white dude with a crazy manifesto attacking an area that typically has low crime) and since white people are the majority of the US population they’re more likely to check off all those marks.

And bull-fucking-shit that minorities are somehow magically immune to being batshit violent or acting out violently because they’re oppressed. Tell that to the south side of Chicago. That study just scream confirnation bias. I bet the chick who wrote it has never even spoken to a minority before.
 
"Sorry folks, we tried to secure the border but I guess a bunch of illiterate tribesmen died here as some point so there just has to be an opening where people can enter the country illegally, forever." -What idiots want, apparently.
Don't you know? The unlimited flow of Mestizos into America represents the re-indigenization of the former colony. The wall's attempt to prevent this is anti-indigenous, and blowing up the burial ground just proves it!
 
See, I actually really liked Annihilation. It wasn't nearly as good as the book which goes into detail as to why the team is all women (the government have been testing different combinations of team members to see how Area X reacts) , which makes perfect sense in the context of the book. The problem with the film, as far as Dobson and his ilk are concern, is that the film isn't about Grrl Powah! It's just four women doing stuff like adults instead of mouthpieces for some half-baked ideology. It's not on the required reading list because it doesn't check all the boxes. It's too equal and not empowering enough. The movie is good, but gets ignored for the same reasons. (I'd still recommend it though).

Bizzarly if anything that's optermistic because it works on the presumption that they're an informed consumer making actual decisions, more depressingly it's likely they just prefer to watch stupid childish capeshit over an solid adult sci-fi movie. Because they're just that low brow and the femminism aspects are a red herring for just how thick these people are.

Reblogging someone posting a blue checkmark whining about "South Park fans are bad and south park does damage!"

Apparantly She's going to writting the new she-hulk. I really want to see how that series is going to pan out and if she can one up Gabby Rivera in terms of bad hiring choices from Marvel. She's definatly a bigger arsehole online which is impressive.
"Hey you know what would go down better than those Shrill femminists comics which bombed? another Shrill femminist writter with zero experiance with the medium."
 
So Dobson is getting ripped to fucking shreds
in the comments of that “bold of male reviewers” post, but he confidently only responds to the one that mentions inflation porn.
85BB67AD-E69A-4849-9538-D71E83CE4B86.jpeg

So....do you think Dobson realizes he essentially said “I’m trying to stop and crawl out of the gene pool!”?
 
Not pictured: Dobson kissing anyone

I doubt even that girlfriend from....over a decade ago now(‽) had the displeasure
I think this is the closest we'll get to seeing dobson kissing anyone:
1581755931973.png


OK so this happened: (EDIT: Partially ninja'd by @SteelPlatedHeart but I think we need the commentary soooo)
(previous comments included for context)
1581756189775.png1581756242594.png
Dobbo, that reply don't make no sense. You're TRYING to climb OUT of the GENE POOL (meaning, IF you understood that, you're no longer trying to get laid nor are trying to reproduce), but referring to your inflation porn keeps "dragging you back" ...into the gene pool and therefore........now you're trying to get laid again because someone mentioned something from 13 years ago? You fucking reading-comprehension-impaired AUTIST.
:stress:

Dobson reblogs tryhards who will probably effect the opposite outcome:
1581756439002.png

Dobson pooh-poohs the concept of "colored outlines" to an ask:
1581756487865.png

Previous replies included for context:
(Valentines abomination)
1581756635393.png1581756658344.png1581756692705.png1581756713573.png1581756744858.png

LoZ thread:
1581756779355.png

From the latest blathering splatoon comic:
1581756830692.png


From the stupid splatoon camper comic comments:
1581756872758.png


battle angel alt-right thread:
1581756912994.png
 
Whats making me giggle is that "nobody dragging him back" even in the inflation community hes more seen as a joke that nobody cares for. But, heres the kicker for me, if Dobbo was mature enough he wouldnt be losing his shit over this, he would least approach this as an adult an go "Ye, I was into weird stuff during my younger days. Fun times" and move on. But everytime someone brings up inflation porn, he flips his shit and starts screaming his virgin brains out.
 
I still hope some :epik: will straight up ask Dobbo in what way he believes he has he actually grown as a person.

I see no evidence of emotional growth, and fairly little artistic growth in that time (in fact, his cartoony stuff is vastly better than the traced trash he's doing now). He faked his way into the inflation fandom by pretending to be a teen lesbian girl (side-note: thirteen years ago, it was STILL underage lesbians with this guy).

Instead of learning a lesson thirteen years ago after getting exposed as a fraud and burned, he's only doubled-down, triple-downed and a-hundred-trillion-downed since then. Glomming onto any and all current fandoms or cause of the day, forcing his way into it to make his "art," just to get asspats and empty praise, and then moving on when he is finally pushed out or the popularity of the thing dies out, or the next new popular thing comes along. We've seen the same cycle play out over and over again.

He is still hateful. He is still arrogant. He is still petulant. He is still childish and immature. He is still adverse to any and all advice, criticism, or challenges about his "work," no matter how kind or well-intentioned.

So where's the "growth?" Where's all this "growth" as a person, Dobson, that you keep talking about? And I don't mean around the waistline. How have you actually grown in the past thirteen years, the past ten, or even the past five?
 
On reflection he'd probably have been better off owning it and just doing fet commision art. Good money in smut from what I hear.

Dobson's ego is such that he'd rather not be made fun of than make money.

Dobson's stupidity is such that he doesn't understand people will never stop making fun of him.
 
Back