Sluthate.com

Status
Not open for further replies.
Wrong again.
This guy could be a broke deadbeat, have a shit personality, be a convicted rapist, tell her he wants to murder her, and she would still want to have sex with him.

Did you know that women are also people who have their own preferences on what they want in a partner?
 
Wrong again.
This guy could be a broke deadbeat, have a shit personality, be a convicted rapist, tell her he wants to murder her, and she would still want to have sex with him.

936full-david-gandy.jpg

Your sad man.
 
There have been many documented cases of females LEAVING their husbands after they got ill, or diseased. However I gaurantee that there will be more than enough desperate males out there to make a deformed female her wife. No females would do the same. In fact, females won't even accept a perfectly healthy, nice, funny individual if he is ugly.
This is not, in fact, true. Marriages are more likely to end in divorce when wives get sick. http://hsb.sagepub.com/content/56/1/59
 
Height is overrated, and it doesn't improve your chances of getting laid unless you are in the 6'3-6'9 range, with 6'7 being the optimal height. I'm 6'1 as well, and that is nowhere near tall enough to be noticed in the USA. Average height among young American males is roughly 5'11.5". Height has gone up a lot in the last 5-10 years.

Facial attractiveness and race are much more important than height anyway. A good looking 5'9 white guy could easily outslay a 6'3 Indian guy.
Still, you don't have to put yourself down.
 
Okay, I have a variety of people making similar assaults against me using this line of thought. This is by far the most cogent, so I will try my best to address this one.

To begin, let me (very) briefly summarize this exchange so far.

I was called racist due to my association with a particular site.

I claimed this is a fallacy.

You claimed that I am in fallacy, because their argument is correct, but I dismissed it as fallacious.

For your claim to be coherent, I have to be racist. Note that the original claims against me were that I am racist. Absolutely no evidence presented is capable of labeling me as a racist. Mere association alone is fallacious. If they had presented other evidence aside from association, then my claim that their argument is fallacious because of association would be fallacious.

Now, I was also accused of being tolerant of racial views. My response in a more normative manner... is that this is completely speculative. It can be inferred (perhaps incorrectly), but not proven. You have no idea what my activity on this site is. It is unfortunate you believe only offensive beliefs are discussed on that poorly named site.

No you're right if this were a criminal trial the standard of proof would be high and you would not be a racist.
But it isnt. This is an online forum.

The stardard of proof just needs to be convincing to the audience- nothing more. And the fact that you are unable or unwilling to disprove the accusation against you while admitting that you frequent that forum is enough for us to call you a racist and a sexist. This is the kirkwood rule of evidence.

One could argue that defending being a member of a forum called slut hate is in itself sexist.
 
Height is overrated, and it doesn't improve your chances of getting laid unless you are in the 6'3-6'9 range, with 6'7 being the optimal height. I'm 6'1 as well, and that is nowhere near tall enough to be noticed in the USA. Average height among young American males is roughly 5'11.5". Height has gone up a lot in the last 5-10 years.

Facial attractiveness and race are much more important than height anyway. A good looking 5'9 white guy could easily outslay a 6'3 Indian guy.
Aaaaaaand there's that racism.
360x536.fitandcrop.jpg

I bet you get laid way more often than this guy, don't you?
 
Height is overrated, and it doesn't improve your chances of getting laid unless you are in the 6'3-6'9 range, with 6'7 being the optimal height. I'm 6'1 as well, and that is nowhere near tall enough to be noticed in the USA. Average height among young American males is roughly 5'11.5". Height has gone up a lot in the last 5-10 years.

Facial attractiveness and race are much more important than height anyway. A good looking 5'9 white guy could easily outslay a 6'3 Indian guy.

Dude, you're relying on all this superficial shit to attract women. Drop all this garbage and take a more neutral standpoint on life.
 
Actually I am a sociopath and a pathological liar
And a perfect gentleman who deserves sex with women.
Fixed it by combing his hair and exercising.
Now that you mention it too he had a serious attitude adjuustment and went from cutting himself up and crying all the time to being a normal guy who smiles all the time. When we were young I figured his depression had to be mostly innate and felt bad for him. He was on lithium then he's totally unmedicated now.

He wasn't like you guys but he had serious personality flaws then and he doesn't now.
 
"Single women had their brains scanned as they looked at photos of men. The pictures had been subtlely altered to make the men’s faces more or less masculine.

The more masculine faces won out in terms of attraction — but the areas of the brain that were activated indicated these faces were also ones the women found most threatening.

The group found a few interesting results. First, compared with the feminized faces, masculinized faces led to more activity in five specific brain areas: the left superior temporal gyrus, bilateral precentral gyrus, right posterior cingulate cortex, bilateral inferior parietal lobule, and bilateral anterior cingulate cortex. These areas have been implicated in face processing as well as the assessment of risk, suggesting that, consciously or not, masculinized faces are perceived as not only more attractive but also more dangerous. The effect was quite robust considering just how slightly the faces had been morphed."
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back