Okay, I have a variety of people making similar assaults against me using this line of thought. This is by far the most cogent, so I will try my best to address this one.
To begin, let me (very) briefly summarize this exchange so far.
I was called racist due to my association with a particular site.
I claimed this is a fallacy.
You claimed that I am in fallacy, because their argument is correct, but I dismissed it as fallacious.
For your claim to be coherent, I have to be racist. Note that the original claims against me were that I am racist. Absolutely no evidence presented is capable of labeling me as a racist. Mere association alone is fallacious. If they had presented other evidence aside from association, then my claim that their argument is fallacious because of association would be fallacious.
Now, I was also accused of being tolerant of racial views. My response in a more normative manner... is that this is completely speculative. It can be inferred (perhaps incorrectly), but not proven. You have no idea what my activity on this site is. It is unfortunate you believe only offensive beliefs are discussed on that poorly named site.