Sluthate.com

Status
Not open for further replies.
ne enenen said:
So you guys think you could do just as well with women as a tall, broad-shouldered, Brad Pitt-faced man if only you had a "better personality"
The sheer level of delusion required for this belief makes me think none of you have left the basement in years...

Go outside. Reality does not work that way.
Click to expand...
It depends on what kind of girl you want dude. It's really that simple. If you're just trying to have sex with dumb pretty girls, yeah, that's how it works.

The problem with your understanding of reality is that it's wholly incomplete. Every single thing any of you have said falls under the Accident Fallacy. Just because your little hypothesis works in certain situations does not mean it's an absolute truth.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
Reactions: NobleGreyHorse, Dynamite Ninja, Bernard and 11 others
Valiant said:
I agree with Chimpchan, you guy's are chump change and you're not making a point here by going into these threads thinking you can change our minds without showing actual evidence to back up your claims.

You're lousy arguers, lousier raiders and your so thin skinned you may as well be screaming MUH TRIGGERS and bitching on tumblr.
Click to expand...

We know their weaknesses, they don't know ours. That's not exactly going to work in their favour. Esp when we are the home team.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: NobleGreyHorse, Meowthkip, Scribbler and 3 others
Valiant said:
I agree with Chimpchan, you guy's are chump change and you're not making a point here by going into these threads thinking you can change our minds without showing actual evidence to back up your claims.

You're lousy arguers, lousier raiders and your so thin skinned you may as well be screaming MUH TRIGGERS and bitching on tumblr.
Click to expand...

Holy God...

We should totally hook these betas up with the SJWs. The resulting maelstrom of sperg and salt will destroy both. It will be glorious.
 
  • Winner
  • Optimistic
Reactions: NobleGreyHorse, Dynamite Ninja, Meowthkip and 8 others
Null said:
It depends on what kind of girl you want dude. It's really that simple. If you're just trying to have sex with dumb pretty girls, yeah, that's how it works.

The problem with your understanding of reality is that it's wholly incomplete. Every single thing any of you have said falls under the Accident Fallacy. Just because your little hypothesis works in certain situations does not mean it's an absolute truth.
Click to expand...
No, the "theory" fits every single case.
It's about looks, money, status and sometimes personality (for having good relationships/a social circle)
And only the first of those actually guarantees sexual attraction
 
  • Dumb
  • Autistic
Reactions: NobleGreyHorse, Ti-99/4A, Trombonista and 9 others
ne enenen said:
Yes, they do care about other things... but they are sexually attracted (sexually...) only by looks.
They might be drawn to things like ambition, money, status, but those are not a part of you.
Click to expand...

I disagree. There are lots of things that can make someone a desirable mate.
You could be supportive. You could be someone who can provide, someone who is responsible. You could be someone fun.
You could work for money, work for status.

All of these things build someone into a person who is attractive. People prioritize these things differently, but to throw them off and say that they don't effect emotional and sexual attraction at all seems kind of shortsighted to me.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: NobleGreyHorse, Bernard, The Knife and 1 other person
BOLDYSPICY! said:
@rat & @MysteryMan: the greatest love story ever told
View attachment 20403
Click to expand...

Lol have to be honest this is really well done but a little disrespectful to our king. You have to remember Rat kind of gave us new life so many of us do see him as a demi-God type. On our forum you will see worship threads every now and then to pay respects. So in a way it's a bit like drawing a holy figure in a negative light. Just my opinion, but continue.

chimpchan said:
Did some sort of neurological weakness cause you to overlook the times i've said your members are stupid, idiots or look like they beat women?

Come back when you can troll or at the very least form a vaguely decent argument.
Click to expand...

You said those things about them because you were told they post on a site which just so happens to have the name "SlutHate". Fact: Only one out of every single guy I've posted hates women, and you're saying all this stuff about their personality because you think they want to rape women or w.e. none of them are virgins as far as I know, LeQuack might be I'm not sure. I don't even know why you're angry either nothing insulting was said to you.
 
  • Dumb
  • Autistic
Reactions: NobleGreyHorse, Ti-99/4A, Trombonista and 6 others
DiamondInTheRough said:
Sluthate has good and bad, like any forum. Probably more bad than most forums I've frequented, but a lot of really fucking insightful good. The borderline/not-so borderline pedophiles are bad. The racists are bad(but they're made fun of and called stormfrontcels on the regular). The name of the place is bad. But the discussions of aesthetics are really really good. It's probably the best place on the internet for discussions regarding male aesthetics and sexual attraction, and while it's clear that a lot of people here will dismiss everybody who goes in depth on that topic as gay, it's actually crucial for improving yourself, with or without surgery. If you know what women want, then you'll know how best to improve yourself. And while there's a ton of debate over "what women want" and there always will be, it should be pretty obvious to anyone that isn't completely deluded that men with certain facial and bodily features are favored by women. It is also well documented and pretty obvious if you pay attention that better looking people are treated better in general. Of course, confirmation bias can go overboard here, but the general principle is an almost undeniable truth. Personally, I don't see what's so bad about recognizing these truths and discussing their application in real life. I'm sure a lot of it comes off as aspie, which is what I thought when I was first bombarded with talk of "maxilla" and "gonial angle", but the same would be true if you walked in on a bunch of astrophysics majors talking about the Chandrasekhar limit or some other shit. SHers are not scientists, but a lot of it is backed up by empirical data and some "experiments"(Tinder with very good-looking people). I don't think I'm as bitter as a lot of SHers since I have sex with "prime females"(another phrase which is aspie af), but that doesn't mean I can't see the the truth in a lot of the discussions. It actually makes it easier to see the truth in a lot of SH's theories. This post is probably too far gone with shitposting for anyone to care, but I feel like SH has some very interesting and truthful material under a veneer of shitposting that is hard not to defend.
Click to expand...

"If you know what women want, then you'll know how best to improve yourself."
How does going after women correlate to improving yourself? Correlation does not equal causation. You can work on your mistakes as a human being and work on them. Going after women does not help that in the slightest.

"it should be pretty obvious to anyone that isn't completely deluded that men with certain facial and bodily features are favored by women."
Men with certain facial and bodily features are sometimes the favored trait among women. The keyword being "sometimes". Life isn't fucking fair but that does not give you the right to make sweeping generalizations about women in general.

"SHers are not scientists, but a lot of it is backed up by empirical data and some experiments."
Hoo boy, this one was fucking stupid. What empirical data and thought experiments? CITATION NEEDED.
 
  • Winner
  • Agree
Reactions: NobleGreyHorse, Meowthkip, Scribbler and 2 others
Derbydollar said:
I disagree. There are lots of things that can make someone a desirable mate.
You could be supportive. You could be someone who can provide, someone who is responsible. You could be someone fun.
You could work for money, work for status.

All of these things build someone into a person who is attractive. People prioritize these things differently, but to throw them off and say that they don't effect emotional and sexual attraction at all seems kind of shortsighted to me.
Click to expand...
Yes, you can be a millionaire who gets a hot blonde 20 year old, to give an extreme example.
You'll still never actually arouse her... and she will want other men. Sexual attractiveness is paramount
 
  • Dumb
  • Mad at the Internet
  • Optimistic
Reactions: NobleGreyHorse, Ti-99/4A, Trombonista and 5 others
MysteryMan said:
Lol have to be honest this is really well done but a little disrespectful to our king. You have to remember Rat kind of gave us new life so many of us do see him as a demi-God type. On our forum you will see worship threads every now and then to pay respects. So in a way it's a bit like drawing a holy figure in a negative light. Just my opinion, but continue.
Click to expand...
my fucking sides are in orbit send help
 
  • Agree
Reactions: caffeinated_wench, NobleGreyHorse, Dumb Frogposter and 5 others
MysteryMan said:
Lol have to be honest this is really well done but a little disrespectful to our king. You have to remember Rat kind of gave us new life so many of us do see him as a demi-God type. On our forum you will see worship threads every now and then to pay respects. So in a way it's a bit like drawing a holy figure in a negative light. Just my opinion, but continue.



You said those things about them because you were told they post on a site which just so happens to have the name "SlutHate". Fact: Only one out of every single guy I've posted hates women, and you're saying all this stuff about their personality because you think they want to rape women or w.e. none of them are virgins as far as I know, LeQuack might be I'm not sure. I don't even know why you're angry either nothing insulting was said to you.
Click to expand...


Are you serious? I'm not angry, I have not once implied that I am angry. I actually said more than once that i'm laughing at you, because I am. I think you guys are morons who couldn't win a debate if your lives depended on it.

Time to pack up and go home, you've lost.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: NobleGreyHorse
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back